Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup

Opinion

Your Take: 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup

Earlier this week we asked the following questions of our Bridge Alliance, Coffee Party and Fulcrum communities to get your take on the value of sports in building social and political bridges:

  • What is your favorite, unifying sports moment?
  • Are sports a genuine tool for bridging our divides or a temporary distraction from the real issues?

A multistage tournament spanning across a month’s worth of sweltering summer days, the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup has entered the knockout round; cutting the remaining field of countries in half to begin a barrage of single-elimination clashes. Thankfully, the U.S.’s title hopes are still alive. And although criticism of the team’s potentially lukewarm temperament has poured in, hope remains that the team will regain its back-to-back reigning-world-title form.


This same hope exists in the hopes that these games can be used to further a sense of positive change. In a recent article published on The Fulcrum, Marc Wong illuminated how this year’s World Cup has been used to break down barriers of gender equality in various forms, even television ads. In a similar vein, we see fans pouring into bars and lounges across the country, united, just to get a view of a potentially historic third straight title by the U.S. Women’s team. No, some good soccer will not be the tool alone to fix the smorgasbord of issues facing our country. But, if we can share a set of sticky barstools, we can engage in responsible political discourse. If countries across the world can do it for a simple soccer match, why can’t we do it with and for each other? The beauty of sport is that even when a winner is decided, the most cherished aspect is the ability to participate earnestly.

Just like the Boston Red Sox after the Boston Marathon bombing, the New York Yankees after the tragedies of 9/11, and Jesse Owens at the 1936 Olympics just to name a few- never rule out the value of sports in its ability to unite and create change.

Here is a sampling of your thoughts. Responses have been edited for length and clarity:

Sports are a good reminder of how we can unite around the achievements of our own players and even those of the players of other nations. - Audrey Gaquin

There are many special uniting moments I recall. In soccer there is always one that touches me. The song and honor given to each team while their respective national anthem is sung is special. Regardless of who wins - watch the embraces of the teams. Sadly this doesn't make the "roll" of the media many times but to see it live is impressive. That is unity. - Marc Garcia

Sports can be both a tool and a distraction. Participants find friends among competitors. But some viewers only care about the result but not what it means otherwise. For them, the contest is a distraction. - Glen Davis

I lived through the Miracle on Ice in Lake Placid in 1980, and I can tell you without question, sports has the ability to raise humanity up into its purest form of love and understanding. Not only did the hockey team bring together a country that was reeling from the Iran hostage crisis, feeling that America was no longer a place for dreams, it showed Russians in an entirely different kind of light. They watched not with jealousy, but with awe and admiration for the kind pure joy and emotion the U.S. amateurs expressed at upsetting what had been the greatest hockey team in the world for decades. Even the Russians, who were viewed as our 'enemy' were brought to a perspective of humanity, just from a different cultural lens. Sure, it was a distraction, but it was also a moment where I believe the world was uplifted to seek the ideals that dreams matter, that nothing is impossible if you try, and that we are better together than apart. - Jonathan Phillips

A cool unifying moment from women's soccer was when Japan won in 2011. It was at a time when their nation was reeling from the most devastating earthquake and tsunami, it gave such joy to the folks back home. Yes, I do think we can use sports to come together to root for a team, even if we disagree on most everything else. And if our team does win, that joy is something we can celebrate together - and those moments are often rare given our differences. - Vicky van den Berg

Read More

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​
Photo illustration by Yunuen Bonaparte for palabra

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​

Iguanas may seem like an unconventional subject for verse. Yet their ubiquitous presence caught the attention of Puerto Rican poet Martín Espada when he visited a historic cemetery in Old San Juan, the burial place of pro-independence voices from political leader Pedro Albizu Campos to poet and political activist José de Diego.

“It was quite a sight to witness these iguanas sunning themselves on a wall of that cemetery, or slithering from one tomb to the next, or squatting on the tomb of Albizu Campos, or staring up at the bust of José de Diego, with a total lack of comprehension, being iguanas,” Espada told palabra from his home in the western Massachusetts town of Shelburne Falls.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, and Paul Thomas Anderson pose during the fan event for the movie 'One Battle After Another' at Plaza Toreo Parque Central on September 18, 2025 in Naucalpan de Juarez, Mexico.

(Photo by Eloisa Sanchez/Getty Images)

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

After decades of work, Angeleno director P.T. Anderson has scored his highest-grossing film with his recent One Battle After Another. Having opened on the weekend of September 26, the film follows the fanatical, even surrealistic, journey of washed-up revolutionary Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio), who lives in hiding with his teenage daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), some fifteen years after his militant group, French 75, went underground. When their nemesis Colonel Lockjaw (Sean Penn) resurfaces, Bob and Wila again find themselves running from the law. When Wila goes AWOL, her karate teacher, Sensei Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), is enlisted to help Bob find his daughter. Although ambitious, edgy, and fun, the political message of the hit film is generally muddled. The immensely talented director did not make a film matching the Leftist rigor of, say, Battleship Potemkin. Nor can the film be grouped among a veritable cavalcade of fictional and non-fictional films produced during the last twenty years that deal with immigrant issues along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Sleep Dealer, El Norte, and Who is Dayani Cristal? are but a few of the stronger offerings of a genre of filmmaking that, for both good and bad, may constitute a true cinematic cottage industry.

Nevertheless, the film leans heavily into Latino culture in terms of themes, setting, and characters. Filmed largely in the U.S.’s Bordertown par excellence—El Paso, Texas—we meet the martial arts teacher Sergio, who describes his work helping migrants cross the border as a “Latino Harriet Tubman situation.” We learn that the fugitive revolutionary, Bob, is known by several aliases, including “The Gringo Coyote.” His savior, Sensei Sergio, explains to him outrightly that he’s “a bad hombre”—cheekily invoking the hurtful bon mots used by then-candidate Donald Trump in a 2016 debate with Hilary Clinton. The epithet is repeated later on in the film when Bob, under police surveillance in the hospital, is tipped off to an exit route by a member of the French 75 disguised as a nurse: “Are you diabetic? You’re a bad hombre, Bob. You know, if you’re a bad hombre, you make sure you take your insulin on a daily basis, right?” All this, plus the fact that the film’s denouement begins with a raid on a Mexican Restaurant in Northern California.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less