Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Answering the CallLawyers Must Lead the Defense of Democracy

Democracy’s 250th finds core institutions strained, demanding action from citizens and lawyers

Opinion

Answering the CallLawyers Must Lead the Defense of Democracy

Three law books beside opened notebook

This year marks the 250th anniversary of our founders’ Declaration of Independence from Great Britain. But the constitutional democracy it enabled - designed to promote life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness - is now threatened, not by a foreign adversary, but from within.

Persistent constitutional and statutory transgressions, coupled with the continued erosion of democratic norms that once safeguarded our institutions, have undermined the foundations of our democratic order. They have also shaken Americans’ confidence in its durability.


The 250th anniversary, meant to be a moment of reflection and celebration, now stands as a call to action in the spirit of the document it commemorates. If we act with the resolve this moment demands, our response to these threats, like the Declaration itself, will be genuine cause for celebration.

To be clear, these threats are not abstract, and our responsibilities are not hypothetical. We must ask ourselves plainly:

Can we remain silent when constitutional provisions and laws are repeatedly tested, and in some cases, clearly violated; when institutions designed to serve all Americans are hobbled or commandeered for personal or political ends; when false claims are systematically deployed to undermine the legitimacy of elections; when voting rights are burdened or votes diluted through redistricting for partisan political gain; when the press is bullied and attacked to undermine its credibility and stifle criticism?

Can we stand by while opposing views and candidates are delegitimized through baseless personal attacks; while judges are threatened or harassed in their personal lives because of a ruling; while actors, including elected officials, generate falsehoods on matters big and small with such regularity and audacity that they cripple the exchange of ideas, and normalize lying and misinformation in public life?

Like the grievances against the Crown in the Declaration, these conditions call us to action.

No one should answer this call more urgently than lawyers. They occupy a unique position in our constitutional democracy — one not shared by other citizens. The legal profession holds a near-exclusive, state‑sanctioned authority to represent parties and shape the issues presented to courts. As such, they play a singular role in enabling access to the judiciary, where individual rights can be adjudicated and constitutional questions resolved. The courts cannot act without a case or controversy, and it is lawyers who must bring those cases forward for judicial review. And, they have done so.

Hundreds of lawsuits have been filed challenging the current administration's actions across a wide range of topics, including immigration, civil liberties, citizenship, federal employment, taxes, and spending. Courts have issued many preliminary and final rulings, often halting or staying illegal policies and actions. We can be proud of the indispensable role that lawyers have played in enforcing democratic rights through the courts and challenging laws and actions that undermine democratic principles or threaten our democratic system.

But while court orders addressing unconstitutional or illegal conduct can reinforce the rule of law and create space for civil society to operate, they are not sufficient on their own to meet the threats facing our democracy. It is citizens, including lawyers in their role as citizens (citizen‑lawyers), who must fill that space with their voices, their actions, and, most importantly, their vote - especially in the face of undemocratic actions that fall within the bounds of the law and therefore outside the reach of the courts.

Conduct that violates democratic norms and principles cannot go unanswered. It is important to identify and condemn undemocratic actions in traditional and social media. But full-throated opposition often requires us to leave our comfort zone. A protest gains power when it is in person, in public, and in concert with fellow citizens. This is the collective voice represented by the Declaration.

As important as it is, we must do more than vote: we must defend the right of all citizens to vote and encourage participation. We need to work together to remove barriers and disincentives to voting and, where barriers remain, organize paths around them. Volunteering at the polls and educating voters about their rights and responsibilities strengthens the voting process and increases participation. High participation fortifies elections.

Unconstitutional, illegal, or undemocratic conduct is often bolstered by denials or misrepresentations that twist facts, misstate the law, or invoke a contrived emergency. Citizen-lawyers can be a force‑multiplier in cutting through the fog of disinformation, especially on matters of law; this may be their most important role outside the courtroom. A lawyer’s lifeblood is separating the proven from the unproven, the relevant from the irrelevant, and fact from opinion. Uncovering the truth and exposing disinformation will clarify what’s at stake and strengthen public opposition to undemocratic and illegal policies.

The Declaration’s 250th anniversary calls all of us to exhibit the same courage that animated its signing. Lawyers and citizens working together must confront constitutional illegality, expose disinformation, and defend the vote. Given their role as bridges between citizens and the courts and their training in the pursuit of truth, lawyers, in their dual capacities, must lead when our democracy is under attack. Moving forward with resolve, we will realize the promise of the Declaration of Independence.

This series from Lawyers Defending American Democracy connects the words of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to current events that threaten democracy and the justice system. Each piece highlights the unique responsibility lawyers carry—through their oath, professional obligations, and roles in their communities—to help the public understand what’s at risk and to speak out when democratic principles are under threat. LDAD’s call to action is straightforward: as the Founders once did, we must recognize threats to constitutional values, demand accountability, and act to defend them.

Michael Curry is a University of Texas Law School graduate who served for over a decade as an adjunct professor. Retired, he is a volunteer with Lawyers Defending American Democracy, serving as the Meeting the Moment co-lead for Texas.


Read More

 Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection. Back lit

From FIFA to federal agencies, politics is reshaping institutions once guided by expertise. How Trump v. Slaughter could redefine presidential power.

Aitor Diago/Getty Images

The Politicization of Everything

A red card is supposed to be one of the few things in public life a president cannot fix.

Not anymore, apparently. During the World Cup, U.S. striker Folarin Balogun received a red card and an automatic one-game suspension. President Trump called FIFA President Gianni Infantino, who lifted the suspension. Whether the decision was right or wrong is beside the point. Another line separating politics from ordinary life had been crossed.

Keep Reading Show less
A U.S.-Mexico Impasse Will Test How Far the Trump Administration Will Go to Fight Drug Trade

Rubén Rocha Moya, governor of Mexico’s Sinaloa state, left, with then-President-elect Claudia Sheinbaum, center, and then-President Andrés Manuel López Obrador in 2024. The U.S. has charged Rocha with drug corruption, but Sheinbaum has refused to arrest him.

Rashide Frias/AFP via Getty Images

A U.S.-Mexico Impasse Will Test How Far the Trump Administration Will Go to Fight Drug Trade

After months of U.S.-Mexico tensions sparked by the Trump administration’s threats to strike unilaterally at Mexican drug traffickers, the two governments are heading for a potentially more serious confrontation over President Claudia Sheinbaum’s refusal to arrest Mexican officials charged in the United States with drug corruption.

U.S. Justice Department officials have yet to present a full picture of their evidence against 10 current and former Mexican officials, whose indictments were announced on April 29. They include the governor of Sinaloa state, Rubén Rocha Moya, an ally of the president and a prominent figure in her leftist political party.

Keep Reading Show less
Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection

The Rule of Law depends on action, not blind optimism. Explore how critical hope, civic engagement, and accountability can strengthen democracy.

Aitor Diago / Getty Images

Only Collective Action Can Turn Outrage Into Accountability and Protect the Rule of Law

The past year has shaken our faith in institutions and, perhaps, in each other. If not already eviscerated, the Rule of Law is under attack. In this atmosphere of constant chaos, we have become numbed by the events of each day and the scope of unprecedented executive action. Yet, even in the face of growing autocracy and oligarchy, the Rule of Law can prevail.

“There is a crack, a crack in everything. That’s how the light gets in.” In the current moment, it is tempting to reach for hope as comfort, or to repeat familiar lines about resilience, unity, or the promise of American ideals—such as this one from Leonard Cohen. But as educator Jeffrey Duncan-Andrade warns, not all hope is created equal. The kind of hope that ignores suffering, that insists the Rule of Law will revive itself without action, is not hope at all. It is what he calls “hokey or “mythical hope,” a passive optimism that ultimately deepens despair. What this moment demands instead is “critical hope”: a form of hope grounded in struggle and action.

Keep Reading Show less

Are State Courts More Protective of Transgender People than Federal Courts?

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that state laws prohibiting trans women and girls from participating on female sports teams do not violate the Equal Protection Clause — the seventh Supreme Court ruling curbing the rights of trans people in just the past 14 months. Since May 2025, the Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to ban trans people from serving in the military, upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming care for trans minors, given anti-LGBTQ+ parents a veto over LGBTQ+-inclusive content in their children’s classrooms, endorsed Trump’s policy requiring trans people to list their sex assigned at birth on their passports, reinstated an injunction against policies barring schools from outing trans students to their parents against students’ wishes, and determined that Colorado’s ban on anti-LGBTQ+ conversion therapy must be subjected to strict scrutiny, a form of judicial review that almost no law survives.

However, there may be some cause for optimism. In an article published in The Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, I conducted a comprehensive survey of state court cases that impacted the rights and lives of trans people between 2022 and 2024. The survey showed state courts have an essential role to play in protecting trans people in an increasingly hostile political environment. Amongst some ominous signs for trans rights, there were important signals of hope in the survey.

Keep Reading Show less