Video: The Supreme Court and originalism
Throughout US history, judges, scholars, and citizens have argued about how to go about interpreting the US Constitution. The current Supreme Court has embraced a methodology called “originalism” or “original public meaning.” But what exactly is “originalism”? What is its backstory? How does it differ from other approaches to interpretation? Are there good arguments for and against it? How does the Court’s focus on this one methodology shape its decisions and affect our lives? Three distinguished authorities will help us understand originalism and its discontents.
- The Supreme Court is unscientific and medically negligent ›
- Majority of Supreme Court appears opposed to fully embracing ‘independent state legislature theory’ ›
- The original(ist) gender problem ›