Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Just the Facts: Trump’s Mass Pardons Grab Headlines

While Trump’s pardons spark controversy, past presidents quietly granted thousands more.

News

Close up of President Trump signing an excutive order.

U.S. President Donald Trump signs a series of executive orders on Feb. 10, 2025.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

Presidential pardons have been used by Presidents from George Washington to Donald Trump. They have been used as instruments of reconciliation and, at times, have led to controversy.


From Andrew Johnson’s sweeping amnesty for former Confederates after the Civil War to Jimmy Carter’s blanket pardon of more than 200,000 Vietnam draft dodgers, American history is replete with dramatic individual and mass pardons.

Against that backdrop, Donald Trump’s use of clemency stands out less for how they depart from historical patterns or volume than for its visibility.

His mass pardons of Jan. 6 defendants and “fake electors” have fueled headlines and sharpened partisan divides, creating the impression of an unusually high number of pardons.

Yet compared to past presidents who quietly granted thousands, Trump’s tally remains relatively modest.

What are the Facts?

How many pardons has President Trump given?

First Term (2017–2021):

  • Trump granted 143 pardons and 94 commutations during his first term. These included high-profile cases like Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, and Charles Kushner.

Second Term (2025–present):

  • As of Nov. 9, 2025, Trump had issued 142 pardons and 28 commutations.
  • On Jan. 20, 2025 (Inauguration Day), he announced a mass pardon for nearly everyone charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot — estimated at 1,500+ individuals.
  • On Nov. 7, 2025, he issued another mass pardon tied to the “fake electors” scheme from the 2020 election, naming 77 individuals (including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, Kenneth Chesebro, and John Eastman) while also extending clemency to others not individually listed.

How does this compare to the number of pardons by previous presidents?

Donald Trump’s pardons (about 238 named individuals across both terms, plus mass pardons for thousands) are far fewer than most past presidents, especially compared to Franklin D. Roosevelt (3,687), Barack Obama (1,927), and Joe Biden (4,245).

Is President Trump's use of mass pardons on two occasions unusual?

There is a long history of the use of mass pardons by previous Presidents so the two that Trump has issued are not unprecedented, although critics have pointed out that traditionally mass pardons were often about healing national divisions (Civil War, Vietnam, WWII) and Donald Trump’s mass pardons (Jan. 6 defendants, “fake electors”), some argue, are unusual because they focus on political allies and supporters, rather than broad categories of citizens.

The list:

George Washington (1795) Pardoned participants in the Whiskey Rebellion, granting clemency to large groups of insurgents to calm tensions.

Andrew Johnson (1865–1868) Issued sweeping pardons to tens of thousands of former Confederates after the Civil War, restoring their rights and property (with some exceptions for high-ranking officials).

Jimmy Carter (1977) On his first day in office, Carter granted a blanket pardon to all Vietnam War draft dodgers — estimated at 200,000+ individuals. This is one of the largest mass pardons in U.S. history.

Woodrow Wilson (1919) Pardoned many individuals convicted under the Espionage Act during World War I, including those jailed for anti-war activism.

Harry Truman (1947) Issued clemency to thousands of WWII deserters, restoring civil rights to many.

Joe Biden (2022–2025) Has used mass pardons for federal marijuana possession offenses, covering thousands of people at once. He also extended pardons to certain categories of nonviolent offenders.

Conclusion:

Presidential pardons, whether granted quietly or with great publicity, have always carried symbolic weight beyond the individuals they affect. Trump’s use of mass pardons may be distinctive in its political focus, but in sheer numbers, it falls well within the historical continuum of executive clemency. For readers and citizens alike, the challenge is not only to measure the facts but to consider what these acts reveal about the evolving role of presidential power in shaping justice, reconciliation, and public trust.

David Nevins is the publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

A Democrat's Plan for Ending the War in Gaza
An Israeli airstrike hit Deir al-Balah in central Gaza on Jan. 1, 2024.
Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto via Getty Images

A Democrat's Plan for Ending the War in Gaza

Trump's 21-point peace plan for Gaza has not and will not go anywhere, despite its adoption by the UN Security Council. There are two reasons. One is that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his ultra-orthodox nationalist allies will not agree to an eventual Palestinian state in the occupied territories. The other is that Hamas will not stand down and give up its arms; its main interest is the destruction of Israel, not the creation of a home for the Palestinian people.

Democrats should operate as the "loyal opposition" and propose a different path to end the "war" and establish peace. So far, they have merely followed the failed policies of the Biden administration.

Keep Reading Show less
How the Unprecedented Redistricting War Is Harming Election Officials, Politicians, and Voters

The Indiana State House is the site of the latest political fight over new congressional maps for the 2026 election.

Lee Klafczynski for Chalkbeat

How the Unprecedented Redistricting War Is Harming Election Officials, Politicians, and Voters

The redrawing of states’ congressional districts typically happens only once per decade, following the release of new U.S. Census data. But we’re now up to six states that have enacted new congressional maps for the 2026 midterms; that’s more than in any election cycle not immediately following a census since 1983-84. Even more are expected to join the fray before voters head to the polls next year. Ultimately, more than a third of districts nationwide could be redrawn, threatening to confuse and disenfranchise voters.

The truly unusual thing, though, is that four of those states passed new maps totally voluntarily. Texas, Missouri, and North Carolina all redrew their districts after President Donald Trump urged them to create more safe seats for Republicans to help the GOP maintain control of the House of Representatives next year, and California did so in order to push back against Trump and create more safe seats for Democrats. (The other two states redrew for more anodyne reasons: Utah’s old map was thrown out in court, and Ohio’s was always set to expire after the 2024 election.) To put that in perspective, only two states voluntarily redistricted in total in the 52 years from 1973 to 2024, according to the Pew Research Center.

Keep Reading Show less
Crowd waving flags
Crowd waving flags
(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

For the People, By the People

Democracy was once America’s proudest legacy — the last best hope on earth, a torch that lit the path for nations worldwide. Today, dysfunction grips all three branches of government: Congress abandons its duty to the people, the President exploits power for retribution, and the Supreme Court fails to enforce accountability. This betrayal of trust places our republic at risk. Americans must reclaim democracy from dysfunction and abuse of power.

The United States is both a participatory democracy — by the people, for the people — and a constitutional republic. Power lies with the people, and elected officials are entrusted to serve them. The President enforces the laws, Congress checks executive power, and the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. These checks and balances are designed to prevent abuse of power, yet Congress and the Court have abandoned their duty (U.S. Constitution).

Keep Reading Show less
Framing "Freedom"

hands holding a sign that reads "FREEDOM"

Photo Credit: gpointstudio

Framing "Freedom"

The idea of “freedom” is important to Americans. It’s a value that resonates with a lot of people, and consistently ranks among the most important. It’s a uniquely powerful motivator, with broad appeal across the political spectrum. No wonder, then, that we as communicators often appeal to the value of freedom when making a case for change.

But too often, I see people understand values as magic words that can be dropped into our communications and work exactly the way we want them to. Don’t get me wrong: “freedom” is a powerful word. But simply mentioning freedom doesn’t automatically lead everyone to support the policies we want or behave the way we’d like.

Keep Reading Show less