Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Just the Facts: Trump’s Mass Pardons Grab Headlines

While Trump’s pardons spark controversy, past presidents quietly granted thousands more.

News

Close up of President Trump signing an excutive order.

U.S. President Donald Trump signs a series of executive orders on Feb. 10, 2025.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

Presidential pardons have been used by Presidents from George Washington to Donald Trump. They have been used as instruments of reconciliation and, at times, have led to controversy.


From Andrew Johnson’s sweeping amnesty for former Confederates after the Civil War to Jimmy Carter’s blanket pardon of more than 200,000 Vietnam draft dodgers, American history is replete with dramatic individual and mass pardons.

Against that backdrop, Donald Trump’s use of clemency stands out less for how they depart from historical patterns or volume than for its visibility.

His mass pardons of Jan. 6 defendants and “fake electors” have fueled headlines and sharpened partisan divides, creating the impression of an unusually high number of pardons.

Yet compared to past presidents who quietly granted thousands, Trump’s tally remains relatively modest.

What are the Facts?

How many pardons has President Trump given?

First Term (2017–2021):

  • Trump granted 143 pardons and 94 commutations during his first term. These included high-profile cases like Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, and Charles Kushner.

Second Term (2025–present):

  • As of Nov. 9, 2025, Trump had issued 142 pardons and 28 commutations.
  • On Jan. 20, 2025 (Inauguration Day), he announced a mass pardon for nearly everyone charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot — estimated at 1,500+ individuals.
  • On Nov. 7, 2025, he issued another mass pardon tied to the “fake electors” scheme from the 2020 election, naming 77 individuals (including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, Kenneth Chesebro, and John Eastman) while also extending clemency to others not individually listed.

How does this compare to the number of pardons by previous presidents?

Donald Trump’s pardons (about 238 named individuals across both terms, plus mass pardons for thousands) are far fewer than most past presidents, especially compared to Franklin D. Roosevelt (3,687), Barack Obama (1,927), and Joe Biden (4,245).

Is President Trump's use of mass pardons on two occasions unusual?

There is a long history of the use of mass pardons by previous Presidents so the two that Trump has issued are not unprecedented, although critics have pointed out that traditionally mass pardons were often about healing national divisions (Civil War, Vietnam, WWII) and Donald Trump’s mass pardons (Jan. 6 defendants, “fake electors”), some argue, are unusual because they focus on political allies and supporters, rather than broad categories of citizens.

The list:

George Washington (1795) Pardoned participants in the Whiskey Rebellion, granting clemency to large groups of insurgents to calm tensions.

Andrew Johnson (1865–1868) Issued sweeping pardons to tens of thousands of former Confederates after the Civil War, restoring their rights and property (with some exceptions for high-ranking officials).

Jimmy Carter (1977) On his first day in office, Carter granted a blanket pardon to all Vietnam War draft dodgers — estimated at 200,000+ individuals. This is one of the largest mass pardons in U.S. history.

Woodrow Wilson (1919) Pardoned many individuals convicted under the Espionage Act during World War I, including those jailed for anti-war activism.

Harry Truman (1947) Issued clemency to thousands of WWII deserters, restoring civil rights to many.

Joe Biden (2022–2025) Has used mass pardons for federal marijuana possession offenses, covering thousands of people at once. He also extended pardons to certain categories of nonviolent offenders.

Conclusion:

Presidential pardons, whether granted quietly or with great publicity, have always carried symbolic weight beyond the individuals they affect. Trump’s use of mass pardons may be distinctive in its political focus, but in sheer numbers, it falls well within the historical continuum of executive clemency. For readers and citizens alike, the challenge is not only to measure the facts but to consider what these acts reveal about the evolving role of presidential power in shaping justice, reconciliation, and public trust.

David Nevins is the publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”

Keep ReadingShow less
People waving US flags

People waving US flags

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Democracy Fellowship Spotlight: Joel Gurin on Trustworthy Data

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems: spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Recently, I interviewed Joel Gurin, who founded and now leads the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and wrote Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he chaired the White House Task Force on Smart Disclosure, which studied how open government data can improve consumer markets. He also led as Chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission and spent over a decade at Consumer Reports.

Keep ReadingShow less
A balance.

A retired New York judge criticizes President Trump’s actions on tariffs, judicial defiance, alleged corruption, and executive overreach, warning of threats to constitutional order and the rule of law in the United States.

Getty Images

A Pay‑to‑Play Presidency Testing the Limits of Our Institutions

Another day, another outrage, and another attack on the Constitution that this President has twice taken a vow to uphold. Instead of accepting the Supreme Court decision striking down his imposition of tariffs, the President is now imposing them by executive order and excoriating the Justices who ruled against him. His disrespect for the Constitution and the judiciary is boundless.

To this retired New York State judge, all hell seems to have broken loose in our federal government. Congress lies dormant when it is not enabling the chief executive’s misuse and personal acquisition of federal funds, and, notwithstanding its recent tariffs ruling, a majority of the Supreme Court generally rubber-stamps the administration’s actions through opaque “shadow docket” rulings. In doing so, SCOTUS abdicates its role as an independent check.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less