Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Just the Facts: Trump’s Mass Pardons Grab Headlines

While Trump’s pardons spark controversy, past presidents quietly granted thousands more.

News

Close up of President Trump signing an excutive order.

U.S. President Donald Trump signs a series of executive orders on Feb. 10, 2025.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

Presidential pardons have been used by Presidents from George Washington to Donald Trump. They have been used as instruments of reconciliation and, at times, have led to controversy.


From Andrew Johnson’s sweeping amnesty for former Confederates after the Civil War to Jimmy Carter’s blanket pardon of more than 200,000 Vietnam draft dodgers, American history is replete with dramatic individual and mass pardons.

Against that backdrop, Donald Trump’s use of clemency stands out less for how they depart from historical patterns or volume than for its visibility.

His mass pardons of Jan. 6 defendants and “fake electors” have fueled headlines and sharpened partisan divides, creating the impression of an unusually high number of pardons.

Yet compared to past presidents who quietly granted thousands, Trump’s tally remains relatively modest.

What are the Facts?

How many pardons has President Trump given?

First Term (2017–2021):

  • Trump granted 143 pardons and 94 commutations during his first term. These included high-profile cases like Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, and Charles Kushner.

Second Term (2025–present):

  • As of Nov. 9, 2025, Trump had issued 142 pardons and 28 commutations.
  • On Jan. 20, 2025 (Inauguration Day), he announced a mass pardon for nearly everyone charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot — estimated at 1,500+ individuals.
  • On Nov. 7, 2025, he issued another mass pardon tied to the “fake electors” scheme from the 2020 election, naming 77 individuals (including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, Kenneth Chesebro, and John Eastman) while also extending clemency to others not individually listed.

How does this compare to the number of pardons by previous presidents?

Donald Trump’s pardons (about 238 named individuals across both terms, plus mass pardons for thousands) are far fewer than most past presidents, especially compared to Franklin D. Roosevelt (3,687), Barack Obama (1,927), and Joe Biden (4,245).

Is President Trump's use of mass pardons on two occasions unusual?

There is a long history of the use of mass pardons by previous Presidents so the two that Trump has issued are not unprecedented, although critics have pointed out that traditionally mass pardons were often about healing national divisions (Civil War, Vietnam, WWII) and Donald Trump’s mass pardons (Jan. 6 defendants, “fake electors”), some argue, are unusual because they focus on political allies and supporters, rather than broad categories of citizens.

The list:

George Washington (1795) Pardoned participants in the Whiskey Rebellion, granting clemency to large groups of insurgents to calm tensions.

Andrew Johnson (1865–1868) Issued sweeping pardons to tens of thousands of former Confederates after the Civil War, restoring their rights and property (with some exceptions for high-ranking officials).

Jimmy Carter (1977) On his first day in office, Carter granted a blanket pardon to all Vietnam War draft dodgers — estimated at 200,000+ individuals. This is one of the largest mass pardons in U.S. history.

Woodrow Wilson (1919) Pardoned many individuals convicted under the Espionage Act during World War I, including those jailed for anti-war activism.

Harry Truman (1947) Issued clemency to thousands of WWII deserters, restoring civil rights to many.

Joe Biden (2022–2025) Has used mass pardons for federal marijuana possession offenses, covering thousands of people at once. He also extended pardons to certain categories of nonviolent offenders.

Conclusion:

Presidential pardons, whether granted quietly or with great publicity, have always carried symbolic weight beyond the individuals they affect. Trump’s use of mass pardons may be distinctive in its political focus, but in sheer numbers, it falls well within the historical continuum of executive clemency. For readers and citizens alike, the challenge is not only to measure the facts but to consider what these acts reveal about the evolving role of presidential power in shaping justice, reconciliation, and public trust.

David Nevins is the publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

White House
A third party candidate has never won the White House, but there are two ways to examine the current political situation, writes Anderson.
DEA/M. BORCHI/Getty Images

250 Years of Presidential Scandals: From Harding’s Oil Bribes to Trump’s Criminal Conviction

During the 250 years of America’s existence, whenever a scandal involving the U.S. President occurred, the public was shocked and dismayed. When presidential scandals erupt, faith and trust in America – by its citizens as well as allies throughout the world – is lost and takes decades to redeem.

Below are several of the more prominent presidential scandals, followed by a suggestion as to how "We the People" can make America truly America again like our founding fathers so eloquently established in the constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Gavin Newsom’s Prop 50 is Reshaping California - For Better or For Worse
Getty Images, Mario Tama

How Gavin Newsom’s Prop 50 is Reshaping California - For Better or For Worse

Prop 50 is redrawing California’s political battlefield, sparking new fears of gerrymandering, backroom mapmaking, and voters losing their voice. We cut through the spin to explain what’s really changing, who benefits, and what it could mean for competitive elections, election reform, and independent voters. Plus, Independent CA-40 candidate Nina Linh joins us to spell out how Prop 50’s map shifts are already reshaping her district - and her race.

Keep ReadingShow less
Texas redistricting map
A map of new Texas Senate districts can be seen on a desk in the Legislature.
Tamir Kalifa/Getty Images

SCOTUS Upholds Texas Map, Escalates Gerrymandering Crisis

In the closing weeks of 2025, a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court moved our democracy in the wrong direction by clearing the way for a gerrymandered congressional map in Texas to be in place for the 2026 midterm elections in its Abbott v. LULAC decision. Aside from the fact that the new Texas map illegally discriminates to weaken the voting power of the state’s Black and Latino voters, the Supreme Court’s ruling is deeply problematic on a number of other levels.

Most disturbingly, the majority in this opinion takes an appalling new turn on the issue of partisan gerrymandering. To illustrate the Court’s backward slide, consider that in 2004 then-Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote as a concurrence to an opinion in a key redistricting case that, if a state declared it would redistrict with the goal of denying a certain group of voters “fair and effective representation” for partisan reasons, then the Court “would surely conclude the Constitution had been violated.”

Keep ReadingShow less