Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Just the Facts: Trump’s Mass Pardons Grab Headlines

While Trump’s pardons spark controversy, past presidents quietly granted thousands more.

News

Close up of President Trump signing an excutive order.

U.S. President Donald Trump signs a series of executive orders on Feb. 10, 2025.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

Presidential pardons have been used by Presidents from George Washington to Donald Trump. They have been used as instruments of reconciliation and, at times, have led to controversy.


From Andrew Johnson’s sweeping amnesty for former Confederates after the Civil War to Jimmy Carter’s blanket pardon of more than 200,000 Vietnam draft dodgers, American history is replete with dramatic individual and mass pardons.

Against that backdrop, Donald Trump’s use of clemency stands out less for how they depart from historical patterns or volume than for its visibility.

His mass pardons of Jan. 6 defendants and “fake electors” have fueled headlines and sharpened partisan divides, creating the impression of an unusually high number of pardons.

Yet compared to past presidents who quietly granted thousands, Trump’s tally remains relatively modest.

What are the Facts?

How many pardons has President Trump given?

First Term (2017–2021):

  • Trump granted 143 pardons and 94 commutations during his first term. These included high-profile cases like Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, and Charles Kushner.

Second Term (2025–present):

  • As of Nov. 9, 2025, Trump had issued 142 pardons and 28 commutations.
  • On Jan. 20, 2025 (Inauguration Day), he announced a mass pardon for nearly everyone charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot — estimated at 1,500+ individuals.
  • On Nov. 7, 2025, he issued another mass pardon tied to the “fake electors” scheme from the 2020 election, naming 77 individuals (including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, Kenneth Chesebro, and John Eastman) while also extending clemency to others not individually listed.

How does this compare to the number of pardons by previous presidents?

Donald Trump’s pardons (about 238 named individuals across both terms, plus mass pardons for thousands) are far fewer than most past presidents, especially compared to Franklin D. Roosevelt (3,687), Barack Obama (1,927), and Joe Biden (4,245).

Is President Trump's use of mass pardons on two occasions unusual?

There is a long history of the use of mass pardons by previous Presidents so the two that Trump has issued are not unprecedented, although critics have pointed out that traditionally mass pardons were often about healing national divisions (Civil War, Vietnam, WWII) and Donald Trump’s mass pardons (Jan. 6 defendants, “fake electors”), some argue, are unusual because they focus on political allies and supporters, rather than broad categories of citizens.

The list:

George Washington (1795) Pardoned participants in the Whiskey Rebellion, granting clemency to large groups of insurgents to calm tensions.

Andrew Johnson (1865–1868) Issued sweeping pardons to tens of thousands of former Confederates after the Civil War, restoring their rights and property (with some exceptions for high-ranking officials).

Jimmy Carter (1977) On his first day in office, Carter granted a blanket pardon to all Vietnam War draft dodgers — estimated at 200,000+ individuals. This is one of the largest mass pardons in U.S. history.

Woodrow Wilson (1919) Pardoned many individuals convicted under the Espionage Act during World War I, including those jailed for anti-war activism.

Harry Truman (1947) Issued clemency to thousands of WWII deserters, restoring civil rights to many.

Joe Biden (2022–2025) Has used mass pardons for federal marijuana possession offenses, covering thousands of people at once. He also extended pardons to certain categories of nonviolent offenders.

Conclusion:

Presidential pardons, whether granted quietly or with great publicity, have always carried symbolic weight beyond the individuals they affect. Trump’s use of mass pardons may be distinctive in its political focus, but in sheer numbers, it falls well within the historical continuum of executive clemency. For readers and citizens alike, the challenge is not only to measure the facts but to consider what these acts reveal about the evolving role of presidential power in shaping justice, reconciliation, and public trust.

David Nevins is the publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

Fight For Today For A Better Tomorrow sign

Canva

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

En español

Operation Midway Blitz outraged much of the Chicagoland community last September when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents raided neighborhoods, arrested thousands of individuals, and fatally shot Mexican immigrant Silverio Villegas González.

Witnessing these injustices across the country and in Chicago, two local coalitions came together last year to form Allies United, a Chicago-based coalition initially focused on responding to immigration raids, and now prioritizing protecting civil rights and building long-term cross‑community solidarity.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose
white red and blue textile

A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose

As the United States approaches both a consequential election cycle and the 250th anniversary of its founding, Americans stand at a crossroads the framers anticipated but hoped we would never reach: a moment when citizens must decide whether to allow the Republic to erode or restore it through vigilance. This is not about left or right. It is about whether we still share a common vision of the country we want to be — and whether we still believe in the same Republic.

The Founders never imagined “the land of the free” as a place dependent on benevolent leaders. They built a system in which the people — not the government — were the safeguards against overreach. James Madison warned that “the accumulation of all powers…in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny,” a reminder that freedom depends on restraint, not trust in any single individual. George Washington pledged that the Constitution would remain “the guide which I will never abandon,” signaling that loyalty to the Republic must always outweigh loyalty to any leader. These were not ceremonial lines. They were instructions — a blueprint for preventing institutional strain, polarization, and distrust we see today.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person holding a sign in front of the U.S. capitol that reads, "We The People."

The nation has reached a divide in the road—a moment when Americans must decide whether to accept a slow weakening of the Republic or insist on the principles that have held it together for more than two centuries

Getty Images

A Republic Under Strain—And a Choice Ahead

Americans feel something shifting beneath their feet — quieter than crisis but unmistakably a strain. Many live with a steady sense of uncertainty, conflict, and the emotional weight of issues that seem impossible to escape. They feel unheard, unsafe, or unsure whether the Republic they trust is fading. Friends, relatives, and former colleagues say they’ve tried to look away just to cope, hoping the turmoil will pass. And they ask the same thing: if the framers made the people the primary control on government, how will they help set the Republic back on a steadier path?

Understanding the strain Americans are experiencing is essential, but so is recognizing the choice we still have. Madison’s warning offers the answer the framers left us: when trust erodes and power concentrates, the Constitution turns back to the people—not as a slogan, but as a structural reality.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

President Donald Trump speaks at the White House on April 25, 2026, after the cancellation of the annual White House Correspondents Association Dinner.

Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

For the third time in three years, Donald Trump has come under threat by an attacker. Many facts remain unclear after a gunman stormed the Washington Hilton on April 25, 2026, during the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner.

As the investigation into the shooting continues, Alfonso Serrano, The Conversation’s politics and society editor, spoke with James Piazza, a political violence scholar at Penn State, about what is driving the rise of political violence in the U.S. and what can be done about it.

Keep ReadingShow less