Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Pandemic alters the democracy reform world's rhythm and priorities

Jennifer Lawrence

The annual Unrig conference, which Jennifer Lawrence has headlined the past two years, is going to be postponed due to the coronavirus outbreak.

RepresentUs

While the novel coronavirus has upended life across the country, the democracy reform community is sounding determined to stay on course through an election year that could prove pivotal for its goals.

The rapid spread of Covid-19 has brought unprecedented challenge to lobbyists and advocates for all causes, including those working to fix the broken political system. Not only have logistics been jumbled and planned campaigns threatened, but the public and the nation's policymakers are now singularly focused on the pandemic and the economic collapse it's threatening — leaving almost no room for discussing any other national ills.

Highlighting how fix-the-system efforts are in limbo, one of the most prominent and best-financed advocacy groups, RepresentUs, planned to announce that its Unrig convention, scheduled to take place in eight weeks, would be postponed for at least several months.

At the same time, the infectious and potentially deadly virus is also scrambling the democracy reform agenda, with an optimistic coalition rapidly assembling behind what had been a second-tier cause: expanding access to the polls by making voting at home the American standard.


The progressive advocacy group Stand Up America launched a six-figure campaign to pressure Congress to make voting by mail an option nationwide in November — with digital ads, social media posts and a text messaging blast to supporters urging them to phone their senators and House members. With many of its allies working from home, the group said, the campaign generated more than 17,400 calls in a few hours.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

A similar strategic switch was signaled by other prominent groups including Common Cause and RepresentUs, while the smaller National Vote at Home Institute was newly besieged with attention.

The burst of activity came after two prominent Democratic senators, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Ron Wyden of Oregon, said they would work to get language in the coming $1 trillion economic stimulus bill mandating that states send postage-paid mail ballots to every voter and also providing federal funds to offset the cost.

Republican leaders have not signaled willingness to accept the proposal, but pressure for a quick bipartisan deal is building and the GOP is under pressure to be supportive of minimizing infection risks at the polls. Five states have already postponed March and April primaries in response to a health emergency, as officials are discouraging Americans from being in groups of 10 or more.

A coalition of more than 200 organizations, led by the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, is urging state officials to make the upcoming primary and general elections more medically safe for an anxious electorate. This week the coalition united behind 14 proposals for the states to not only ease vote-by-mail rules but also make registering easier online, extend early in-person balloting to shorten Election Day queues at the polls, modify polling locations to ease crowding and combat misinformation about the health risks of casting a vote.

Debilyn Molineaux, executive director of the Bridge Alliance, a coalition of 101 democracy reform groups, said she sees the pandemic as a "moment of opportunity to build community and strengthen our democratic values, especially as we are voluntarily giving up liberty and freedom to protect ourselves."

The coalition is hosting two video calls this week for its members, one on how to manage working remotely and the other on finding opportunity in times of crisis.

The Campaign Legal Center emailed its allies to say it would continue its campaigns for voting rights and campaign finance regulation without impediment. But the logistical restraints will be significant now that the association of 52 employees has abandoned its downtown Washington office and started working entirely online.

Fortunately for one of CLC's attorneys, the restrictions were being matched by his adversaries. He was not required to go to Cincinnati on Tuesday for oral arguments in a federal appeals court on the constitutionality of Michigan's new independent redistricting commission, for example, because the proceedings were turned into a giant conference call.

At virtually all the bigger democracy reform groups, employees are working from home and nearly all their conferences, advocacy strategy sessions or other convenings have been canceled, postponed or made virtual.

The biggest cancelation, by far, would be of what would be this year's premier convention for people across the political spectrum who are plotting to reverse democracy's dysfunction: Now called the Unrig Spotlight (after two years as the Unrig Summit), the conference was on course to attract almost 1,000 people from dozens of groups to a Miami Beach concert hall the weekend of May 15. RepresentUs leaders said they were planning to try to reschedule the event in January.

However, getting the general public to pay attention to much beside the public health crisis has proved difficult.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, says the virus is posing an "extra challenge" to its efforts to get the public interested in and angered by the bad behaviors of Trump administration officials and other elected officials, spokesman Jordan Libowitz said.

"With everyone totally tuned in to the coronavirus, there isn't much space for other things," Libowitz said.

Overall, the coronavirus has made an already hectic election year that much more chaotic. Groups have to plan months ahead, while also being wary of day-to-day changes.

"Everything is in flux," said Common Cause spokesman Dave Vance. "We're just waiting to see how long it takes the curve to get flattened."

(Disclosure: The Bridge Alliance Education Fund is a funder of The Fulcrum.)

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less
Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Peter Wood is an anthropologist and president of the National Association of Scholars. He believes—like many Americans on the right—that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and the January 6th riots were incited by the left in collusion with the FBI. He’s also the author of a new book called Wrath: America Enraged, which wrestles with our politics of anger and counsels conservatives on how to respond to perceived aggression.

Where does America go from here? In this episode, Peter joins Ciaran O’Connor for a frank conversation about the role of anger in our politics as well as the nature of truth, trust, and conspiracy theories.

Keep ReadingShow less