Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Public support for HR 1 not reflected in Congress' one-sided fight for reform

Chuck Schumer

Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has made democracy reform a top legislative priority for the Senate.

Melina Mara/Getty Images

On the heels of a contentious election and attempted insurrection, congressional Democrats and Americans across the political spectrum are on the same page when it comes to making democracy reform a top legislative priority.

But renewed efforts to pass legislation known as HR 1 — which would expand access to the ballot box, curb the influence of big money in politics and end partisan gerrymandering — still face the same old roadblocks.

House Democrats passed the first iteration of the so-called For the People Act two years ago, and they will likely do so again early in this Congress. And although the Democrats' newly minted majority in the Senate will give them more control over the legislative agenda this time around, getting the bill through that chamber without Republican cooperation — or eliminating the filibuster — will prove to be a herculean task.


Still, Democrats say the repeated attempts to subvert the 2020 election, including the violent attack on the Capitol earlier this month, demonstrate why this legislation is needed now more than ever. The bill includes provisions to strengthen election security, make voting more accessible and safe, and bolster campaign finance transparency, among other reforms.

The Senate's new majority leader, Democrat Chuck Schumer, said his chamber's version of the bill, dubbed S. 1, "will ensure that government is finally able to respond to the pressing needs of the American people."

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

And while the efforts in Congress to pass this legislation are largely one-sided, two-thirds of Americans across party lines back the bill, according to a poll released Friday by Equal Citizens and conducted by Data For Progress.

The survey found that Democratic voters, unsurprisingly, were the most supportive of HR 1 at 77 percent — but a majority of independents (68 percent) and Republicans (56 percent) were also in favor. The poll surveyed just under 1,200 likely voters Jan. 15-19 — more than a week after the riot at the Capitol — and had a margin of error of 2.9 percentage points.

"Americans across the political spectrum are ready for fundamental democracy reform that will end gerrymandering, protect the right to vote, and reduce the influence of big money in politics. This poll clearly shows that the public stands behind Democratic congressional leaders in their decision to prioritize the For the People Act," said Adam Eichen, executive director of Equal Citizens.

Of course, Americans broadly supported these efforts in this past, to no avail.

Another big push for reform this week was focused on limiting the influence of money in politics. On Thursday — to mark the 11th anniversary of the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. FEC, which allowed for unlimited corporate spending in elections — lawmakers re-introduced a constitutional amendment to allow federal and state governments to regulate such political money.

Democratic Reps. Ted Deutch of Florida, Jim McGovern of Massachusetts and Jamie Raskin of Maryland and GOP Rep. John Katko of New York are leading the effort to pass the amendment, which has been introduced in every Congress since the 2010 Supreme Court ruling.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less