Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

First debate: Democracy reform by the numbers

First Democratic debate

Democracy reform issues were barely mentioned during the first two-hour Democratic presidential debate.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images News

Did we miss the question about voting rights? How about gerrymandering? Anyone care about election security?

Hellloooo?

In the first Democratic presidential primary debate, those and other democracy reform issues took a back seat to "kitchen table" topics such as the economy, health care and immigration.

Despite the moderators' lack of interest in the candidates' democracy reform proposals, some of the presidential hopefuls snuck in tidbits anyway.

Here's a by-the-numbers takeaway from the first debate (from The Fulcrum angle):


7 and 29: Minutes and seconds, until the first mention of anything related to democracy reform.Former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke spoke about reducing the influence of money in politics and removing barriers to voting:

"A new democracy that is revived because we've returned power to the people, no PACs, no gerrymandering, automatic and same-day voter registration to bring in more voters, and a new Voting Rights Act to get rid of the barriers that are in place now."

10: Mentions of "reform." The word was uttered by five candidates, but none of the mentions were related to democracy reform. Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan, Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar and New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker instead used it when discussing guns, immigration and criminal justice.

7: References to money in politics. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke, Klobuchar, Booker and de Blasio all mentioned a need to lessen the influence of corporations and special interests in politics. Booker repeated during the debate his previous declaration that he would not take contributions from pharmaceutical companies. However, in his Senate career, Booker has accepted roughly $427,000 from the pharmaceutical industry.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

1: References to Citizens United. Booker was the only one to name drop the Supreme Court case that gave rise to unlimited spending in elections.

3: Shots against lobbying. Warren knocked lobbying twice while Booker also touched on the influence of gun rights lobbying.

3:Nods at Russia's election interference. O'Rourke called out Vladimir Putin, "who attacked and invaded our democracy," and Klobuchar also expressed concern. But de Blasio got the viral zinger when asked about the country's greatest geopolitical threat:

"Russia, because they're trying to undermine our democracy and they've been doing a pretty damn good job of it, and we need to stop them."

4: Candidates who said nothing about democracy reform. Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, Ryan, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and former Maryland Rep. John Delaney all kept mum on those issues.

Reform quotes of the night

Warren: "It has been far too long that the monopolies have been making the campaign contributions, have been funding the super PACs, have been out there making sure that their influence is heard and felt in every single decision that gets made in Washington."

Booker: "At the end of the day, we have too much of a problem with corporate power growing. We see that with everything from Citizens United and the way they're trying to influence Washington. It's about time that we have a president that fights for the people in this country."

Klobuchar: "If we let the Republicans run our elections and if do not do something about Russian interference in the election and we let Mitch McConnell stop all the backup paper ballots, then we're not going to get what we want to do."

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less
Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Peter Wood is an anthropologist and president of the National Association of Scholars. He believes—like many Americans on the right—that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and the January 6th riots were incited by the left in collusion with the FBI. He’s also the author of a new book called Wrath: America Enraged, which wrestles with our politics of anger and counsels conservatives on how to respond to perceived aggression.

Where does America go from here? In this episode, Peter joins Ciaran O’Connor for a frank conversation about the role of anger in our politics as well as the nature of truth, trust, and conspiracy theories.

Keep ReadingShow less