Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Is this the election reform that can make it through Congress?

Jan. 6 insurrection - Presidential Election Reform Act

The sponsors of an election reform bill believe it would prevent another riot like that one that occurred on Jan. 6, 2021.

Jennifer Mercieca/Getty Images

The House of Representatives is scheduled to begin consideration of a new bill on Wednesday that is designed to update Congress’ role in finalizing presidential elections and head off another Jan. 6. While not an exact match, it’s very similar to a bipartisan bill that has been introduced in the Senate.

Together, they would be the first meaningful update to federal election laws since rioters entered the Capitol in an effort to block Congress from confirming Joe Biden’s 2020 victory over Donald Trump.

Unlike the Senate bill, which has meaningful Republican support, the House legislation may have trouble picking up GOP voters beyond one of its initial sponsors, Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming. While that may impact the optics of the bill, it likely wouldn’t keep it from passing.


House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer’s daily schedule of chamber activities shows the members will begin work on the Presidential Election Reform Act on Wednesday, with the possibility of voting on passage before the session ends. Democrats are expected to overwhelmingly support the bill.

However, Rep. Steve Scalise, the second-ranking Republican in the House, will encourage GOP members to vote against the bill.

"In their continued fixation to inject the Federal government into elections, this legislation runs counter to reforms necessary to strengthen the integrity of our elections," Scalise's office wrote to Republicans, according to ABC News.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

But unlike prior bills that would have set national standards for voter registrations, methods of voting and redistricting, the Presidential Election Reform Act would not affect how states manage their elections. Rather, it focuses on four key aspects of election certification – steps that take place after voters have done their part.

As described in a Wall Street Journal op-ed written by Cheney and the bill’s co-sponsor, Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren, the bill:

  1. Makes clear that the vice president’s role in presiding over the congressional counting of electoral votes is ceremonial.
  2. Establishes the requirement for objecting to a state’s slate of electors as one-third of each chamber of Congress, up from one member of each.
  3. Requires states to submit the electoral vote counts, so state officials can not prevent Congress from counting all the votes.
  4. Bars states from changing the rules after elections are complete.

“Our proposal is intended to preserve the rule of law for all future presidential elections by ensuring that self-interested politicians cannot steal from the people the guarantee that our government derives its power from the consent of the governed,” wrote Cheney and Lofgren, who have served together on the select committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection.

The most significant difference between the House and the Senate bills is the threshold for objecting to a state’s electoral votes. While the Cheney-Lofgren bill sets the minimum objectors as one-third of each chamber, the Senate bill would only require one-fifth of lawmakers.

Assuming both bills pass their respective chambers intact, that and any other differences would need to be worked out.

And passage of both is likely. If all Democrats vote for the House bill, it will pass regardless of Republican opposition. And the Senate bill, formally known as the Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act, has 10 Republican co-sponsors (in addition to the lead sponsor, Republican Susan Collins, who has led the effort with Democrat Joe Manchin). That means it has enough support to break through a filibuster.

The Senate Rules and Administration hearing has scheduled a Sept. 27 hearing on that chamber’s bill.

These bills would amend the Electoral Count Act, an 1887 law governing the process by which Congress reviews the Electoral College votes and affirms the election of a president and vice president. Following his loss in 2020, Trump and some of his allies pressured Vice President Mike Pence, in his capacity as the presiding officer, to refuse to allow votes for Biden to be counted.

Following a rally in front of the White House, thousands of Trump supporters marched on the Capitol. Approximately 2,000 people illegally entered the Capitol by breaking through barriers and overpowering Capitol Police officers. At least five deaths have been associated with the insurrection, more than 140 law enforcement officers were injured and more than 700 people have been arrested.

Read More

majority vs minority
Sanga Park/Getty Images

Make a choice: majoritarian democracy or minority tyranny?

Nelson is a retired attorney and served as an associate justice of the Montana Supreme Court from 1993 through 2012.

What is more American than majority rule — the principle that 50.1 percent carries the day when decisions affecting all of us are made? The majority wins, and the minority has to accept, even if not graciously, the decision of the greater number. That’s how decisions are made in this country. Right?

Not necessarily!

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump

Jabin Botsford/Getty Images

Scholars unmask Trump election lawyers’ use of falsified evidence

Rosenfeld is the editor and chief correspondent of Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

After 2022’s midterm election, I had an email exchange with Robert Beadles, a combative northern Nevada businessman and Donald Trump devotee. His post-2020 hounding of Reno’s top election official had pushed her to resign. Beadles didn’t trust the midterm results either and offered a $50,000 reward to anyone who’d prove that it was not stolen.

Easy money, right? Beadles’ distrust was tribal. But his reward hinged on refuting a statistical analysis that he waved like the flag. His statistician, Edward Solomon, who lived halfway across the country, found mathematical aberrations in the results that he didn’t like. The men claimed that was proof enough that the announced election results were dishonest.

I, and several experienced analysts — a math PhD, a computer scientist, and an election auditor who had spent years studying election systems, voting data, and procedures — tried to explain why the statistics, alone, did not prove anything. We politely told him what records to obtain, why they mattered, what methodologies to use. Beadles didn’t care and soon lashed out.

Keep ReadingShow less
D.C. Police Officer Daniel Hodges shakes hands with Rep. Liz Cheney at a hearing

Officer Daniel Hodges of the D.C. police force shakes hands with then-Rep. Liz Cheney at a July 21, 2022, House committee hearing investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Remembering Jan. 6 with an officer injured in the line of duty

To mark the third anniversary of the attacks on the Capitol, the hosts of the “Politics Is Everything” podcast talked with D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges, who was beaten by rioters that day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Election challengers in Detroit in 2020

Election challengers demand to observe the counting of absentee ballots in Detroirt in 2020. The room had reached capacity.

Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

It's 2024 and the battle for democracy in the U.S. continues

Merloe provides strategic advice on democracy and elections to U.S. and international organizations. He is a former director of election integrity programs at the nonpartisan National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.

The U.S. political environment is suffering from toxic polarization, with election deniers constantly spewing noxious vapors to negate belief in the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election, the integrity of election administration, and the honorableness of their political opponents. The constant pollution has blinded many from seeing the real state of things and is causing others to close their eyes to avoid the irritation. The resulting diminished public confidence and perhaps participation in elections creates more precarious conditions in 2024 than it faced in 2020 and 2022.

I’ve learned an important lesson from observing elections in more than 50 countries: Even when elections are credible, if a large segment of the population is made to believe otherwise their outcome and the fate of democracy can easily be placed in jeopardy. Unfortunately, that is a central feature of the present electoral circumstance, and concerted action is needed to mitigate that damage and prevent it from worsening.

Keep ReadingShow less