Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Violent campus protests are not about freedom

UCLA encampment

Police enter a pro-Palestinian encampment on May 2 after a dispersal order was given at the University of California at Los Angeles.

Qian Weizhong/VCG via Getty Images

Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.

There’s a grand and important tradition of anti-war protest in America. And, when peaceful, these can be a useful and impactful mechanism to advocate for change.

Sadly, what’s happening on our college campuses right now is making a mockery of that grand tradition and civil right.


Over the past few weeks, pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, UCLA, the University of Wisconsin, University of North Carolina and others have disrupted classes and campus life, held administrators hostage to impossible and unserious demands, and resulted in the mass arrests of students and faculty, with some even turning violent.

Worse, they’ve exposed some shocking and disturbing episodes of rabid antisemitism and calls for violence.

A Columbia student and self-proclaimed leader of the pro-Palestinian movement there, Khymani James, was finally suspended for saying that “Zionists don’t deserve to live.”

“I think that taking someone’s life in certain case scenarios is necessary and better for the overall world,” he said matter of factly. “Be glad, be grateful that I’m not just going out and murdering Zionists…. So yes, I feel very comfortable calling for those people to die.” It only took four months to suspend James — “temporarily” — after he posted the disgusting video publicly.

At UCLA, pro-Palestinian students prohibited a Jewish student from entering campus to attend classes. Another Jewish student was asked if he was “a Zionist” before being blocked from entering the library.

At George Washington University protesters held signs advocating for a “FINAL SOLUTION” — a grotesque callback to Hitler’s plan for exterminating Jews.

And on campuses all over the country protesters have been spotted wearing Hamas headbands, calling for “ Intifada,” proudly flying Hezbollah terror flags, and shouting “We are Hamas!” and “Go back to Poland!”

It’s ugly stuff, and hard to wrap your mind around how these supposedly well-educated, enlightened, college students ended up on what is so clearly the wrong side of history.

I don’t blame them, entirely. Even smart kids can be naïve, idealistic, and vulnerable to propaganda disguised as revolution. Rebellion can be fun — more fun than going to class. Yelling petulantly about complex global problems is a lot easier than trying to fix them through policy.

But where are the adults to tell them that what they are doing is stupid, dangerous, and misguided, and in no way helping their cause?

Where are the parents to tell their kids that camping out in tents for Hamas and refusing to go to class isn’t what they intended their $80,000 in annual tuition for?

Where are the administrators to tell protestors that prohibiting other students from going to class, threatening other students’ lives and breaking into buildings will not be tolerated so don’t even try it?

Most importantly, where are the educators to tell students that Hamas and Hezbollah are violent terror groups antithetical to their supposed values — that the regime they align with murders gay people, rapes women, and muzzles free speech? Or, contrary to what a fifth of young Americans shockingly believe, the Holocaust was not “a myth”?

If anything, we’ve seen the opposite guidance from the adults.

We’ve seen university presidents at Harvard and University of Pennsylvania struggle to answer basic questions about whether calling for the genocide of Jews is a violation of campus policy.

We’ve seen some professors describe the Hamas terrorist attacks as “ exhilarating ” and “ awesome,” while one posted proudly, “I’m with Hamas & Hezbollah & Islamic Jihad.”

And we’ve seen some professors blocking students who don’t support the encampments from entering.

We’ve seen politicians come to campus in solidarity with pro-Hamas protesters. Rep. Ilhan Omar embraced Khymani James, who called for Zionists to be killed, and she described Jewish students as “pro-genocide.”

And we know that professional protesters, including “ protest consultants ” have infiltrated campuses to exploit students, heighten tensions, foil negotiations and exacerbate situations for their financial and personal gain.

Protesting war and violence, advocating for peace, and sympathizing with the plight of innocent Palestinians are noble causes worth expressing and commending. And there are campuses where this is happening.

But adults who know better should be telling the misguided faux revolutionaries at Columbia and elsewhere that hate speech isn’t the same thing as free speech, that there’s a difference between being antisemitic and anti-war, that calling for violence isn’t peaceful protest.

They should be warning them that “going viral” for being an ignorant antisemite isn’t going to help them get a job, and that getting thrown out of school for breaking and entering isn’t noble or righteous, but criminal and dumb.

And they should be explaining that sympathizing with barbaric terrorists is hurting their cause and dampening their message.

Clearly, the kids are not alright. But neither are the adults.

©2024 S.E. Cupp. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Read More

“I’m an American Before I am a Republican”: Bacon Reflects on Tenure
Don Bacon | U.S. Congressman Don Bacon speaking with attende… | Flickr

“I’m an American Before I am a Republican”: Bacon Reflects on Tenure

As a self-proclaimed ‘Reagan conservative,’ Rep. Don Bacon proposes a return to normalcy.

Amidst a retirement announcement, voting in favor of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and dealing with criticism both offline and online. Bacon reflects on his tenure as a congressman.

Keep ReadingShow less

Angelica Salas’s Journey From Undocumented Immigrant to Community Leader at CHIRLA

Angelica Salas has long been a leading advocate for immigrant rights in Los Angeles. Since becoming Executive Director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA) in 1999, she has transformed the organization into one of the most powerful immigrant-led advocacy groups in the country. Her leadership has redefined what grassroots organizing can look like, mobilizing communities around issues ranging from Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) to voter outreach and legal services.

Salas’s journey into activism is deeply personal. Born in Durango, Mexico, she arrived in the United States at the age of five, undocumented, to reunite with her parents who had migrated for work. Growing up in Pasadena, California, her family lived in the shadows of deportation until they were able to legalize their status. In 2008, Salas became a U.S. citizen, adding a powerful chapter to a story she shares with many of the people CHIRLA serves. Her own experience navigating the U.S. immigration system informs her commitment to building dignity, not dependency, in the immigrant rights movement. After graduating from Occidental College with a degree in history and sociology, Salas joined CHIRLA in 1995 and became its executive director just four years later.

Keep ReadingShow less
This Isn’t My Story. But It’s One I’ll Never Forget.

Children with American flags

This Isn’t My Story. But It’s One I’ll Never Forget.

My colleague, Meghan Monroe, a former teacher and trainer in the Dignity Index, went out to lunch with a friend on the 4th of July. Her friend was late and Meghan found herself waiting outside the restaurant where, to her surprise, a protest march approached. It wasn’t big and it wasn’t immediately clear what the protest was about. There were families and children marching—some flags, and some signs about America being free.

One group of children caught Meghan’s eye as they tugged at their mother while marching down the street. The mom paused and crouched down to speak to the children. Somehow, Meghan could read the situation and realized that the mom was explaining to the children about America—about what it is, about all the different people who make up America, about freedom, about dignity.

“I could just tell that the Mom wanted her children to understand something important, something big. I couldn’t tell anything about her politics. I could just tell that she wanted her children to understand what America can be. I could tell she wanted dignity for her children and for people in this country. It was beautiful.”

As Meghan told me this story, I realized something: that Mom at the protest is a role model for me. The 4th may be over now, but the need to explain to each other what we want for ourselves and our country isn’t.

My wife, Linda, and I celebrated America at the wedding of my godson, Alexander, and his new wife, Hannah. They want America to be a place of love. Dozens of my cousins, siblings, and children celebrated America on Cape Cod.

For them and our extended family, America is a place where families create an enduring link from one generation to the next despite loss and pain.

Thousands of Americans in central Texas confronted the most unimaginable horrors on July 4th. For them, I hope and pray America is a place where we hold on to each other in the face of unbearable pain and inexplicable loss.

Yes. It’s complicated. There were celebrations of all kinds on July 4th—celebrations of gratitude to our military, celebrations of gratitude for nature and her blessings, and sadly, celebrations of hatred too. There are a million more examples of our hopes and fears and visions, and they’re not all happy.

I bet that’s one of the lessons that mom was explaining to her children. I imagine her saying, “America is a place where everyone matters equally. No one’s dignity matters more than anyone else’s. Sometimes we get it wrong. But in our country, we always keep trying and we never give up.”

For the next 12 months as we lead up to the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, we’re going to be hearing a lot about what we want America to be. But maybe the more important question is what we the people are willing to do to fulfill our vision of what we can be. The answer to that question is hiding in plain sight and is as old as the country itself: join with others and do your part, and no part is too small to matter.

At our best, our country is a country of people who serve one another. Some may say that’s out of fashion, but not me. Someone is waiting for each of us—to talk, to share, to join, to care, to lead, to love. And in our time, the superpower we need is the capacity to treat each other with dignity, even when we disagree. Differences of opinion aren’t the problem; in fact, they’re the solution. As we love to say, “There’s no America without democracy and there’s no democracy without healthy debate and there’s no healthy debate without dignity.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Beyond Party Lines
An illustration to symbolize two divided groups.
Getty Images / Andrii Yalanskyi

Beyond Party Lines

The American Experiment tested whether groups with diverse interests could unite under a declaration of common principles. In this moment, we face a critical juncture that tests whether distrust and political fervor could drive Americans to abandon or deny everything that unites us.

Henry Bolingbroke contends that party spirit inspires “Animosity and breeds Rancor.” Talking of his countrymen, he wrote, “We likewise derive, not our Privileges (for they were always ours) but a more full and explicit Declaration”; Whigs and Tories can unite on this alone. That Declaration of Ours was penned by Thomas Jefferson when his colonists repelled the redcoats at the Siege of Charleston and when Washington’s troops were awaiting battle in Manhattan. The American Declaration set out those principles, which united the diverse colonies. And the party system, as Bolingbroke said, brought animosity and weakened the Union. Critics disputed these claims. William Warburton attacked Bolingbroke as an evil-speaker with “dog-eloquence”—claimed his calls for party reform were an aristocratic conspiracy to cement the power of elites. An anonymous critic argued that the government is a union of unrelated people where laws supplant the natural bonds between families. Then, the government of the United States would not exist, or would not exist long.

Keep ReadingShow less