Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Israelis and Palestinians: Breaking the cycle of violence and retaliation

Opinion

Israelis and Palestinians: Breaking the cycle of violence and retaliation

An aerial view of the destruction after the ceasefire agreement came into effect in Gaza Strip on January 21, 2025. Months of Israeli bombardment turned the buildings in the city into a pile of rubble and ash.

(Photo by Mahmoud sleem/Anadolu via Getty Images)

While nothing can take away the pain that Israelis and Palestinians have experienced since Oct. 7, 2023, there are some working hard for a mutual society with the hope of a more peaceful future.

Now more than ever, this work needs to be done now, so as not to rob the people coexisting in the region of that future by being stuck in the hate of the present.


The American Jewish Committee describes what happened on Oct. 7 best with this from their website: “On October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists waged the deadliest attack on Jews since the Holocaust — slaughtering babies, committing sexual violence, burning whole families alive, and taking 240 civilians’ hostage. Hamas murdered more than 1,200 Israelis during the attack. Over a year later, Hamas is still holding over 90 men, women, and children— including seven Americans — captive in the terror tunnels in Gaza.”

Of the 240 taken hostage, the youngest is now 2, and the oldest is 86. Most seem to be dead, but even as of this writing, Hamas refuses to divulge just how many.

To be fair, thousands of Palestinians have also lost their lives as Israel responded with the objective to destroy the terrorist organization Hamas. Countless innocent Palestinians are living under Hamas’ control, and blanket statements should not be made for all living in Gaza and the West Bank.

While both groups hold some responsibility for what happened after Oct. 7, there is no false equivalency here. It is imperative to acknowledge Hamas attacked Israel to eliminate the Jewish people and that terrorists who kidnapped and most likely killed an 8-month-old baby maintain a certain level of evil.

So, after 15 months of devastation and grief in Israel and the Gaza Strip, the Israel-Hamas cease-fire deal, which began on Jan. 19, is certainly welcome news. Just how long the fragile peace deal will remain in place remains to be seen.

The agreement brought the release of three Israeli hostages, who are the first of 33 that Hamas is expected to free during the first phase of the deal. Israel released 90 Palestinian prisoners and detainees just a few hours later. As of this writing, the second wave of releases just took place with four more Israeli hostages in exchange for 200 additional Palestinian prisoners.

The complexity of the situation in the region cannot be understated, but then again, both Israelis and Arabs must do something to move past their mutual distrust and break the cycle of violence and retaliation.

Recently, the Jewish Federation of St. Louis hosted a leading expert on Jewish-Arab relations, Mohammad Darawshe. Darawshe is a Shalom Hartman Institute faculty member and the Director of Strategy of Givat Haviva – The Center for Shared Society.

Darawshe has dedicated his life and career to understanding relations between Jews and Arabs in Israel and working on ways to promote peace through dialogue, understanding, and coexistence.

Givat Haviva was founded in 1949 by the Kibbutz Federation as a nonprofit organization to create mutual responsibility, civic equality, and cooperation between divided groups in Israel. Its Center for a Shared Society has a 40-acre campus in the north where education, language instruction, culture, and art are used to empower and bring Arabs and Jews together.

The program brings together 300 Arab and Jewish children nearly every week. Through social contact, participants “see each other as human beings.” Some of the programs offered include language classes, cooking classes, as well as art and ceramic classes.
Those working in this space for future peace understand that work begins now, during this period of crisis. Darawshe shared, “We need to worry about our relations today because they will affect our tomorrow.”

A survey entitled “Shared Society in Times of Emergency” was presented at the 2024 Givat Haviva Conference, which revealed the attitudes of Jewish-Arab coexistence and a shared society in the context of the current crisis (Oct. 7).

They found that, not surprisingly, the level of trust in Arab Israelis among most Jews is significantly lower than the level of trust in Jews among Arab Israelis. And when asked about the coexistence in the wake of the events of Oct. 7, there was a high degree of pessimism regarding coexistence with Arab Israelis among the Jewish community and a slightly higher optimism and significantly less pessimism among Arab Israelis.

The survey ends with “areas of improvement” and a series of recommendations to advance relations moving forward.
While it may seem unthinkable to believe in a better tomorrow, while today is so bleak and grief, there are change agents to guide the way.

Lynn Schmidt is a columnist and editorial board member with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and holds a degree in nursing from the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.


Read More

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less