Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

For the People, By the People

Americans must reclaim democracy from dysfunction and abuse of power

Opinion

Crowd waving flags
Crowd waving flags
(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Democracy was once America’s proudest legacy — the last best hope on earth, a torch that lit the path for nations worldwide. Today, dysfunction grips all three branches of government: Congress abandons its duty to the people, the President exploits power for retribution, and the Supreme Court fails to enforce accountability. This betrayal of trust places our republic at risk. Americans must reclaim democracy from dysfunction and abuse of power.

The United States is both a participatory democracy — by the people, for the people — and a constitutional republic. Power lies with the people, and elected officials are entrusted to serve them. The President enforces the laws, Congress checks executive power, and the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. These checks and balances are designed to prevent abuse of power, yet Congress and the Court have abandoned their duty (U.S. Constitution).


Instead of working for the people, Republicans in Congress pledge allegiance not to the Constitution but to the President. They ignore checks and balances, enabling his abuses. The Supreme Court, plagued by partisan politics and ethical lapses, shields him rather than checks him. The Trump v. United States decision grants immunity, paving the way for continued abuse (Supreme Court opinions). Justices fly upside‑down flags outside their homes, accept lavish gifts from wealthy donors (ProPublica), and allow spouses to support the January 6 insurrection openly. These actions erode public trust and reveal a failure of accountability.

The Court has also ignored the voices of the people on fundamental rights. In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, it overturned Roe v. Wade, ending nearly 50 years of constitutional protections for reproductive freedom (Dobbs ruling PDF). Polls show that a majority of Americans opposed overturning Roe (Pew Research). Yet, the Court disregarded public will, silencing millions of voices and eroding trust in its role as guardian of liberty.

Meanwhile, dysfunction in Congress is on full display. Shutdowns, budget gridlocks, failure to pass bills for the good of the people, attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act (KFF), and passage of the so‑called “Big Beautiful Bill” are glaring examples. Instead of helping citizens with healthcare, housing, and food, Congress ignores their cries. Sessions devolve into censures, profanity, and personal attacks on the House floor — total dysfunction. Together, these failures reveal a government unmoored from its constitutional duty.

At the same time, the President continues to disrespect the Constitution. He refuses to divest his interests, uses his office as a tool for retribution, and openly expresses his desire to be a dictator (Washington Post). Voters elected a man with a documented record of corruption and abuse: his charitable Trump Foundation was dissolved for misuse of funds (NY Attorney General), he was found liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll (BBC), his Trump University defrauded students (FTC), and he manipulated tax laws to enrich himself (NY Times). Congress and the Supreme Court have given him a pass, enabling dysfunction instead of protecting the people.

Accountability has collapsed. Remember the attack on the Capitol, encouraged by the President (House Select Committee Report). Republicans ignored his wrongdoing and refused to check him. Leaders like Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney tried to do the right thing, but they were ostracized. Senator Susan Collins excused his abuse of power after the first impeachment, saying, “He learned his lesson and won’t do it again.” That remark betrayed the people. He abused power again, pardoned criminals from the January 6 insurrection, and victimized the victims yet again.

I was outraged when Representative Paul Gosar formally objected to Arizona’s certification on January 6, 2021, with support from Senator Ted Cruz of Texas. Cruz was not even from my state, yet he tried to silence my vote, my voice, and the voices of millions of Arizonans. Representative Andy Biggs also promoted efforts to overturn Arizona’s results (Arizona Republic). These leaders failed to honor Article II, Section 1, and the 12th, 20th, and 25th Amendments. How can Congress be functional when its Speaker ignores the Constitution?

Millions of voters lost respect for leaders who tried to silence the voices of Americans — our votes.

Yet history shows dysfunction is not destiny. Citizens have reclaimed democracy before. Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address defined democracy as government “of the people, by the people, for the people.” The civil rights movement proved that citizens, through courage and peaceful protest, could bend the arc of history toward justice (King Institute). The women’s suffrage movement showed that persistence at the ballot box could expand freedom (National Archives). These examples prove that dysfunction can be overcome when people act with courage.

Solutions must therefore focus on accountability and courage at every level of government. Members of Congress must enforce ethics rules and refuse to enable abuse. The Supreme Court must adopt binding ethics codes, recuse itself when conflicts arise, and respect the voices of the people rather than silence them. Presidents must be held to the same standards as ordinary citizens, with stronger conflict-of-interest laws, enforced divestment requirements, and a clear principle that no one is above the law. Citizens must reclaim their role as the ultimate guardians of democracy — registering and voting, speaking out, writing letters, signing petitions, attending town halls, and participating in peaceful protests.

Democracy requires vigilance every day, not just at election time.

Ultimately, there is power in the people, and we must not allow leaders to suppress it. Democracy cannot survive on silence or complacency; it demands vigilance, courage, and accountability. Congress must enforce its oath, the Supreme Court must respect the people’s voices, and the President must be held to the same laws as every citizen. History shows that when citizens act with courage — from Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address to the civil rights and suffrage movements — democracy can be reclaimed. The republic will endure only if the people insist that government once again serve for the people, by the people. That is our responsibility. That is our power. That is our promise.

C. Goode is a retired educational leader and advocate for ethical leadership and health care justice.

Read More

Framing "Freedom"

hands holding a sign that reads "FREEDOM"

Photo Credit: gpointstudio

Framing "Freedom"

The idea of “freedom” is important to Americans. It’s a value that resonates with a lot of people, and consistently ranks among the most important. It’s a uniquely powerful motivator, with broad appeal across the political spectrum. No wonder, then, that we as communicators often appeal to the value of freedom when making a case for change.

But too often, I see people understand values as magic words that can be dropped into our communications and work exactly the way we want them to. Don’t get me wrong: “freedom” is a powerful word. But simply mentioning freedom doesn’t automatically lead everyone to support the policies we want or behave the way we’d like.

Keep Reading Show less
Hands resting on another.

Amid headlines about Epstein, survivors’ voices remain overlooked. This piece explores how restorative justice offers CSA survivors healing and choice.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

What Do Epstein’s Victims Need?

Jeffrey Epstein is all over the news, along with anyone who may have known about, enabled, or participated in his systematic child sexual abuse. Yet there is significantly less information and coverage on the perspectives, stories and named needs of these survivors themselves. This is almost always the case for any type of coverage on incidences of sexual violence – we first ask “how should we punish the offender?”, before ever asking “what does the survivor want?” For way too long, survivors of sexual violence, particularly of childhood sexual abuse (CSA), have been cast to the wayside, treated like witnesses to crimes committed against the state, rather than the victims of individuals that have caused them enormous harm. This de-emphasis on direct survivors of CSA is often presented as a form of “protection” or “respect for their privacy” and while keeping survivors safe is of the utmost importance, so is the centering and meeting of their needs, even when doing so means going against the grain of what the general public or criminal legal system think are conventional or acceptable responses to violence. Restorative justice (RJ) is one of those “unconventional” responses to CSA and yet there is a growing number of survivors who are naming it as a form of meeting their needs for justice and accountability. But what is restorative justice and why would a CSA survivor ever want it?

“You’re the most powerful person I’ve ever known and you did not deserve what I did to you.” These words were spoken toward the end of a “victim offender dialogue”, a restorative justice process in which an adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse had elected to meet face-to-face for a facilitated conversation with the person that had harmed her. This phrase was said by the man who had violently sexually abused her in her youth, as he sat directly across from her, now an adult woman. As these two people looked at each other at that moment, the shift in power became tangible, as did a dissolvement of shame in both parties. Despite having gone through a formal court process, this survivor needed more…more space to ask questions, to name the impacts this violence had and continues to have in her life, to speak her truth directly to the person that had harmed her more than anyone else, and to reclaim her power. We often talk about the effects of restorative justice in the abstract, generally ineffable and far too personal to be classifiable; but in that instant, it was a felt sense, it was a moment of undeniable healing for all those involved and a form of justice and accountability that this survivor had sought for a long time, yet had not received until that instance.

Keep Reading Show less
Labeling Dissent As Terrorism: New US Domestic Terrorism Priorities Raise Constitutional Alarms

A new Trump administration policy threatens to undermine foundational American commitments to free speech and association.

Labeling Dissent As Terrorism: New US Domestic Terrorism Priorities Raise Constitutional Alarms

A largely overlooked directive issued by the Trump administration marks a major shift in U.S. counterterrorism policy, one that threatens bedrock free speech rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights.

National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-7, issued on Sept. 25, 2025, is a presidential directive that for the first time appears to authorize preemptive law enforcement measures against Americans based not on whether they are planning to commit violence but for their political or ideological beliefs.

Keep Reading Show less
Someone holding a microphone.

Personal stories from constituents can profoundly shape lawmakers’ decisions. This excerpt shows how citizen advocacy influences Congress and drives real policy change.

Getty Images, EyeEm Mobile GmbH

Want to Influence Government? Start With Your Story

[The following article is excerpted from "Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."]


Rep. Nanette Barragán (D-California) wanted to make a firm statement in support of continued funding of the federal government’s Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) during the recent government shutdown debate. But instead of making a speech on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, she traveled to the Wilmington neighborhood of her Los Angeles district to a YMCA that was distributing fresh food and vegetables to people in need. She posted stories on X and described, in very practical terms, the people she met, their family stories, and the importance of food assistance programs.

Keep Reading Show less