Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Land of the Free, Home of the Capitalism Didn’t Fail America. America Failed to Moderate Capitalism

Opinion

Land of the Free, Home of the Capitalism Didn’t Fail America. America Failed to Moderate Capitalism
Monopoly's mr. monopoly in a graffiti collage
Photo by Artur Ament on Unsplash

The signs are everywhere. For many Americans, buying power has improved only modestly despite decades of economic growth. Corporate profits are at an all-time high. We have reached a level of wealth inequality last seen almost a hundred years ago. By many measures, our capitalist economy seems to have failed to deliver broadly shared prosperity.

However, the failure isn’t with the free market as an economic approach. Instead, it’s our failure to regulate and moderate the free market, or more accurately, that we have spent 40 years undermining or removing the regulations of the New Deal that made our economy work for more Americans.


Almost a century ago our country rejected both socialism, the complete government control of the economy, and unregulated, survival-of-the-fittest capitalism. Instead, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt navigated a middle path between the two, the New Deal. We stayed with capitalism, with the free market, but Roosevelt’s administration implemented a broad range of financial and corporate regulations to ensure our economy worked for more Americans. Using the power of government to moderate capitalism was a fulfillment of the most basic promise of our Constitution, the promise of equality of opportunity.

Moderated capitalism had broad support throughout society, and even support from the Republican Party. While they certainly saw the mix differently, Republicans and Democrats agreed that the government should both nurture the free market and make sure it served the whole of our country.

And moderated capitalism worked. It allowed us to tap into the immense talent and ambition of every part of our population. Capitalism is more efficient if there is one set of rules; a level playing field allows everyone to compete equally, creating the greatest value for society. Making sure more people shared in that value through reforms like the 40-hour workweek, overtime pay, and unionization put money in people’s pockets and helped create the engine of our massive consumer economy.

Our country has backed away from its commitment to moderated capitalism. In part, this happened because of the ebb and flow of history. Our free-market model had won, producing far greater wealth and personal freedom than socialism. Once the Soviet Union collapsed, we stopped paying as much attention.

However, most of the blame rests with the two major parties. Both began to step back from, and actively undermine, the compromise of moderated capitalism. The true believers in unfettered capitalism still had a home in the right wing of the Republican Party. They claimed the victory over socialism as their own and argued our economy had matured and needed less regulation. At every opportunity they cast government as inherently incompetent and untrustworthy. Part of the Democratic Party also bought into the idea of “triumphant capitalism,” happily going along with deregulating our economy

Page 1 of 2

while collecting ever larger donations from corporate interests. The Republican Party slowly chipped away at the protections of moderated capitalism, and the Democrats either helped with the dismantling, or stood by and did nothing.

As a result, in ways large and small, our country has stepped back from moderated capitalism. We’ve pulled away from using the powers of government to ensure everyone can participate in our economy. We’ve allowed our bridges and roads to slip into disrepair. We’ve retreated from ensuring every student has access to a quality education. We’ve allowed unions to be undermined. We’ve weakened the parts of government that protect us from products that harm us or our environment. We have rolled back financial regulations and consciously chosen not to extend regulation as Wall Street created new financial products, or as new technologies like the Internet were transforming our society. In many different ways, we’ve backed away from our commitment to providing a level playing field.

The return of unregulated—even predatory—capitalism has also led to a renewed interest in socialism, in the government takeover of our economy. But the answer still isn’t to abandon the free market—it’s to go back to moderating it. We need to again make sure that every American has the ability and the opportunity to participate in our economic system. We need to get back to one set of financial, investing, and insurance rules. We need to get back to an updated New Deal, to again make our economy work for all Americans.

Blake Ashby is author of Socialism and the Democratic Party: The Case for a Return to Moderated Capitalism, President of the Ferguson Democratic Township, and a political consultant working with Democratic candidates.


Read More

$100 bills
close up of stacked hundred dollar bills

What's Good for the Blue Collar Worker is Good for America

While our culture of consumerism has benefited corporate America, it has harmed our citizens, hurt our economy, and weakened our nation. It has been particularly harmful to the American blue-collar worker, sacrificed to the holy grail of maximizing profit and globalization by America's multinational corporations. America's welfare depends on a thriving middle class, on prosperous blue-collar workers.

How has our consumer economy hurt America? Let me count the ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
piggy bank
Coins falling into a white piggy bank

Love Him or Hate Him, Open a Trump Account

Last year, Congress established 530A tax-advantaged investment accounts for children under the age of 18. These accounts are now open and eligible children born between January 1, 2025 and December 31, 2028 receive a $1000 contribution from the federal government. This August, philanthropists Michael and Susan Dell gave $6.25 billion to supercharge these so-called Trump accounts, $250 goes into the accounts of the first 25 million children who have an account, are 10 and under and live in qualifying zip codes. Two hundred and fifty dollars was deposited into our children’s 530A Trump accounts.

However, as of July 2026, less than 10% of children eligible to open an account actually had an account. Too many of those who are economically worst off have not opened these 530a accounts. Research shows that families with higher incomes, older people, men and white people are more likely to be aware of this opportunity compared to families with lower incomes who are younger, women and Black and Latino. Given the historical, persistent racial and growing economic wealth gap, opportunities to build wealth should not be overlooked.

Keep ReadingShow less
House key on calculator with wooden table background copy space.

95% of Americans see an affordability crisis, and most distrust government to fix it. An argument for tracking real outcomes, not just GDP growth.

Pla2na/Getty Images

America’s Affordability Crisis Is a Democracy Crisis

Affordability dominates the national conversation because it dominates people’s lives. Ninety-five percent of Americans say the country is facing an affordability crisis, yet two-thirds don’t believe the federal government will successfully address it.

This is more than an economic problem – it’s a crisis for democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large dollar sign surrounded by code, number sequences in green ink.

As Congress weighs AI risk after researcher Jacob Coxon's viral warning, an opinion piece argues fear of 'losing control' can entrench Big Tech's power.

Anton Petrus/Getty Images

The Business Value of Losing Control of AI

A warning that artificial intelligence may escape human control can make its developers look more important, not less. For companies trying to establish AI as the defining technology of the century, even the possibility of catastrophe can increase the perceived significance of what they are building.

That possibility is now moving rapidly from Silicon Valley into Washington. On Sept. 16, senators were scheduled to gather for a private bipartisan briefing organized by Sen. Bernie Sanders on what he called the “extraordinary dangers” of advanced AI. The meeting followed the resignation of Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, whose warning that people building frontier AI genuinely believe the technology could kill humanity drew more than 100 million views. Coxon had spent three years working on pretraining at OpenAI and Anthropic.

Keep ReadingShow less