Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump’s State Capitalism Marks a Radical Break in U.S. Policy

Cato says Trump’s taxpayer‑funded equity buys blur the line between markets and government.

Opinion

A miniature residence of the President of the United States, the White House, against the backdrop of 100 US dollar bills.

Has Trump shifted America toward state capitalism? Examine government ownership in 28 companies, taxpayer-funded investments, and concerns over creeping socialism.

Max Zolotukhin / Getty Images

In 17 months of President Trump’s second term, he has overseen the U.S. government using taxpayer money to purchase equity stakes in 14 private and 14 publicly held companies. Over the USA’s 250 years, this is—by far—the most significant change in American economic policymaking.

The Cato Institute, a conservative think tank, characterized Trump’s economic environment as state capitalism and a stepping stone toward what they refer to as “creeping socialism.” Cato’s Aug. 28, 2025 report notes, “Trump’s state capitalism – a hybrid between socialism and capitalism – won’t make America great again.”


The practice of the U.S. government owning stakes in firms has raised concerns about the executive branch trying to “pick winners.” Additionally, it creates a conflict of interest between the government’s role as a regulator and a shareholder and the politicization of corporate decision-making.

Analyzing whether Trump’s economic-related policies signal a shift toward state capitalism or socialism requires comparing his actions to modern-day presidential history and the underlying political dynamics.

1980s-2000 economic assistance

During the 1980s-2000 period, Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton were highly reluctant to engage in direct ownership of companies. The first of two exceptions occurred in 1987 when America faced technology competition from Japan. To address this issue, the Reagan administration helped fund a public-private research consortium (SEMATECH), and the government did not take any stock ownership. Next, in 1989, the George H.W. Bush administration created the Resolution Trust Corporation to manage and liquidate 747 failed and insolvent savings and loan associations.

2001-2016 presidential era

During the 2008 financial crisis, the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations used the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to take equity stakes in major banks, automakers, and insurance companies. This was structured explicitly as a temporary bailout, with liquidation as soon as the respective markets stabilized.

2021-2024 industrial policy

There was bipartisan congressional support for the Joe Biden administration to invoke the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, which gave subsidies to semiconductor and green energy manufacturers. The funds were structured as grants, tax credits, and loans versus direct stock ownership.

2025-present

Upon taking office on Jan. 20, 2025, the Trump 2.0 administration shifted America from temporary emergency industry bailouts to a proactive form of state intervention and “creeping socialism.” Using taxpayer funds, the administration has expanded its portfolio to include stakes in 28 companies.

Privately owned companies with U.S. economic ownership

The following lists privately owned companies, private subsidiaries, or private joint-enterprise structures in which the Trump 2.0 administration has used taxpayer supported funds to acquire a financial stake: 1) USA Rare Earth, 2) Vulcan Elements, 3) ReElement Technologies, 4) Atlantic Alumina Company, LLC, 5) L3Harris Technologies – Missile Solutions Unit, 6) Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 7) Quantinuum, 8) PsiQuantum, 9) Atom Computing, 10) Quantum Technology Solutions, 11) Anderon, 12) xLight Inc., 13) Diraq and 14) Crucible Metals, LLC.

Ownership in publicly held companies

Six semiconductor and advanced tech firms with USA direct equity stake (stock symbol is noted) include: 1) Intel Corporation (INTC), 2) IBM (IBM), 3) GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS), 4) Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI), 5) Coherent Corporation (COHR) and 6) MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings (MTSI).

America now has a share in these quantum computing firms: 1) Rigetti Computing, Inc. (RGTI), 2) D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS), and 3) Infleqtion (INFQ).

In the minerals and automotive supply chain area, U.S. stockholding exists as follows: 1) 5% ownership in Lithium Americas Corporation (LAC), 2) 10% capital stock in Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ), and 3) 15% stake in MP Materials Corporation (MP).

There are two other uniquely structured companies with U.S. ownership: 1) a direct equity stake of up to 20% to help Westinghouse Electric Company build a multi-billion-dollar network of domestic nuclear reactors, and 2) a “Golden Share” of U.S. Steel Corporation (X), giving the executive branch direct corporate governance rights and a seat on the corporate board.

Taxpayer alert and Congressional oversight

No one can deny that the Trump 2.0 administration has made a direct pivot toward a state-directed economic environment. There are two things Americans and Congress need to reflect upon. First, a Dec., 2025 YouGov/Economist poll of Americans found capitalism remains the overwhelmingly preferred economic system, and only 21% prefer socialism.

Secondly, many countries have struggled and been harmed by state capitalism because it often leads to corruption, inefficiency, and poorly managed resources. Well-known examples include Algeria, Brazil, China, India, the Soviet Union, and Venezuela—nations the U.S. should avoid emulating.

The conservative Cato Institute’s observation that Trump has created state capitalism and a stepping stone toward socialism is alarming. America’s economic stance from 1776 until 2025 was quite rewarding; we’re now in dangerous territory.

Congress’s passive stance during Trump’s economic upheaval brings to mind Plato’s famous adage: “silence gives consent.” A return to rigorous, bipartisan congressional oversight is long overdue.


Steve Corbin is a professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa and a non-paid freelance guest columnist contributor to 158 newspapers and 47 social media platforms in 44 states.


Read More

piggy bank
Coins falling into a white piggy bank

Love Him or Hate Him, Open a Trump Account

Last year, Congress established 530A tax-advantaged investment accounts for children under the age of 18. These accounts are now open and eligible children born between January 1, 2025 and December 31, 2028 receive a $1000 contribution from the federal government. This August, philanthropists Michael and Susan Dell gave $6.25 billion to supercharge these so-called Trump accounts, $250 goes into the accounts of the first 25 million children who have an account, are 10 and under and live in qualifying zip codes. Two hundred and fifty dollars was deposited into our children’s 530A Trump accounts.

However, as of July 2026, less than 10% of children eligible to open an account actually had an account. Too many of those who are economically worst off have not opened these 530a accounts. Research shows that families with higher incomes, older people, men and white people are more likely to be aware of this opportunity compared to families with lower incomes who are younger, women and Black and Latino. Given the historical, persistent racial and growing economic wealth gap, opportunities to build wealth should not be overlooked.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large dollar sign surrounded by code, number sequences in green ink.

As Congress weighs AI risk after researcher Jacob Coxon's viral warning, an opinion piece argues fear of 'losing control' can entrench Big Tech's power.

Anton Petrus/Getty Images

The Business Value of Losing Control of AI

A warning that artificial intelligence may escape human control can make its developers look more important, not less. For companies trying to establish AI as the defining technology of the century, even the possibility of catastrophe can increase the perceived significance of what they are building.

That possibility is now moving rapidly from Silicon Valley into Washington. On Sept. 16, senators were scheduled to gather for a private bipartisan briefing organized by Sen. Bernie Sanders on what he called the “extraordinary dangers” of advanced AI. The meeting followed the resignation of Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, whose warning that people building frontier AI genuinely believe the technology could kill humanity drew more than 100 million views. Coxon had spent three years working on pretraining at OpenAI and Anthropic.

Keep ReadingShow less
house with red door
Cozy house with red door under a blue sky

Massive Racial Wealth Gap for Massachusetts Latino Families

BOSTON — A comprehensive statewide report released by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston has exposed a staggering racial wealth gap in Massachusetts, revealing that Latino families hold a median net wealth of just $1,200.

The landmark study, titled “Family Wealth in Massachusetts,” indicates that despite the Commonwealth ranking near the top of national measures for median income, economic security remains profoundly stratified along racial lines. The findings show that the median net wealth of White families in the state stands at $549,200—an amount 458 times greater than that of typical Latino households.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Tax Word on Wooden Block With Calculator and Tax Form

Tax Word on Wooden Block With Calculator and Tax Form

Getty Images

$40 Trillion U.S. National Debt & Role of ATR Taxpayer Protection Pledge Shell Game

The Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) Taxpayer Protection Pledge amounts to a "Shell Game" centered on a conflict between revenue restriction and total federal spending. Signers who vote for massive spending packages—such as high defense spending, Great Recession bailouts, pandemic relief expenditures, and national debt Interest —while simultaneously pledging never to raise taxes are engaging in a contradictory fiscal strategy that simply shifts the true cost of government to the deficit, ultimately resulting in our $40 trillion national debt.

This critique is articulated across the specified pillars:

Keep ReadingShow less