Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

More Whites Live in Poverty than Either Blacks or Hispanics - Correcting the Perception of Poverty

Opinion

Woman holding out an empty wallet at a table.

Many Americans wrongly associate poverty primarily with Black and Hispanic communities. Explore how this misconception influences public opinion, politics, and anti-poverty policy.

skaman306 / Getty Images

From observing people and politicians over the years—I can find no data on this—I have the impression that liberals as well as conservatives think that the typical person living in poverty is Black or Hispanic. The image most Whites have of people of color is someone who is poor—except for celebrities—with little education; they are not aware of many people of color who are middle class. On the other hand, they are not aware of many Whites who are poor and so they think their number is low.

Why is the perception of poverty important? The perception of who is poor has significant impact on the support for government programs that aid the poor. Given the extent of racism in this country, whether subtle or violent, (see my post, “Whether the Issue is Gun Violence or Inequality, It Always Comes Back to Race/Racism”), it’s not surprising that support for anti-poverty programs is non-existent among MAGA Republicans and for that matter has always been weak among Republicans; 45% of Republicans would even cut food stamp support. Their attitude is "it's your fault;" so government has no responsibility to help. They feel the causes of poverty are personal: bad life choices, drugs, lack of work ethic, and the breakdown of families—all negative perceptions of Black culture.


Liberals of course support such programs as an expression of economic justice, of fighting the systemic causes of poverty—discrimination, an unfair economic system, and the lack of educational opportunities. Although often one feels support is given somewhat begrudgingly; there is a little bit of racism in most of us.

But this perception of poverty is in fact fundamentally wrong. While Blacks and Hispanics do have much higher poverty rates, there were more White people living in poverty (19.6 million) in 2014 than either Blacks (10.2 million) or Hispanics (13.4 million). Even when combined, Blacks and Hispanics, according to Census data from 2024, accounted for just 52% of people living in poverty. Minorities have also historically accounted for no more of the welfare caseload than White families.

Why does this misperception of poverty persist? The main cause is the biases and perceptions we are raised with. But there is also much fault with the media. When it presents images of poverty, they are almost always that of Blacks or Hispanics. The images from the depression—think of the photographs of Walker Evans and Dorothea Lange—showing white Americans living in poverty, have very few equivalents in contemporary media.

Both government and the media must address this misconception. Especially in this polarized age, having an understanding of the oneness of all people is very important.

But it is also important that poor White Americans become more vocal in arguing for government support in bettering their lives and the futures of their children. There is no shame in being poor; it is not, as Republicans often say, "your fault." Asking for support is not asking for charity. Whether you are White or a person of color, most people are poor because of the circumstances of their birth and the resulting milieu the grew up in; getting beyond that barrier is very challenging regardless of race.

But this will be difficult. Although poor Whites benefit from anti-poverty programs, poor Whites seem to have the same perception as most that anti-poverty programs are geared to help people of color because that is how Democrats usually phrase their support; Democrats rarely speak about poor Whites—a big mistake. And this fits in with their racial biases; they do not want to think of themselves as comparable to Blacks. This is in part a result of history: in the antebellum South, planters feared the combined strength of poor Whites and slaves and so they used racism and force to keep poor Whites and poor Blacks separated.

Helping all poor people should be the goal of existing anti-poverty organizations; they should advocate for both people of color and Whites, which would only make their case more compelling. But when I googled to find organizations advocating for poor Whites, I found none.

This is what is fueling part of the Trump base. Poor Whites and poor people of color have been separated by the forces of racism—not just their own but of society's. Poor Whites are supporting Trump because no one else listens to them and no one else says he advocates for them. Even though he really doesn’t.

Poverty should never be seen as primarily a Black issue because it is not in fact. If we seek to end the grip of poverty on people and enable them to lift themselves up, programs and their marketing must be designed with Hispanics and Whites in mind as well. This is not a hand-out. This is about government fulfilling its responsibility under the Declaration of Independence to secure the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all Americans. It is supporting all Americans—including the poor, regardless of color—in the pursuit of their dreams.

The poverty of Whites must be brought visibly and audibly into the public consciousness in a positive way so as to increase public support for programs to fight poverty. If poor Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics aligned themselves in this common cause, they would present a very potent political force.


Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

Business owner hanging an open sign at a cafe

Black wealth is rising but the racial wealth gap is widening. From Douglass to Mays to today, the freedom struggle's unfinished business is ownership.

Luis Alvarez/Getty Images

Salute A True America 250: Black History Lessons on Power Everyone Needs Today

From Emmaus, Pennsylvania and Staten Island to Veterans of Foreign Wars posts in Kansas, Tennessee, N. Carolina and more, as well as the Ohio State Fair's butter cow theme (and deviled egg recipes), the celebration of America 250 continues throughout the rest of the sesquicentennial year.

Added to the recent Sail250 tall ship event culminating in Boston’s harbor attended by millions was part of the country’s s 1776 official birthdate of independence, but the persistent calls for Black freedom of the last two centuries are still ignored.

Keep ReadingShow less
United States' Constitution and Declaration of Independence on a flag background

The Constitution didn't create American prosperity — geography, immigration, and historical luck did. Here's why that matters for reform debates.

miflippo/Getty Images

The Constitution Did Not Make America Rich

Americans are taught a reassuring story about their country’s success. The United States became prosperous, powerful, and free because the framers wrote an exceptional Constitution. The miracle of Philadelphia produced the miracle of America.

The story appears in classrooms, campaign speeches, judicial opinions, and serious scholarly works. Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson have argued that institutions securing property and constraining expropriation help separate rich nations from poor ones. But the popular American version takes that insight and turns it into something much stronger – and misguided: that our prosperity flowed from our particular constitutional design, and that altering it would put the wealth at risk.

Keep ReadingShow less
  Creative Images & Video Creative Images & Video Images Creative Editorial Video Creative Editorial  Search by image or video Electrician working at a construction site during home or apartment renovation, repair or reconstruction.

America’s housing affordability crisis is rooted in a severe shortage of homes, restrictive zoning and rising costs. Can Congress’s new housing law fix the foundation?

ArtMarie/Getty Images

America’s Housing Crisis Needs More Than Simple Repairs

My wife and I recently moved into a charming Victorian house built in 1879, when Rutherford B. Hayes was president. Despite nearly a century and a half of wear, it remains a beautiful home. But living in it has taught me an important lesson: there’s a world of difference between a house that looks sound and one that is structurally sound.

The floors slope noticeably from room to room. Windows stick on humid days. Doors don’t always close quite right. None of these problems is catastrophic. They are reminders that beneath the attractive exterior, a house this old carries structural issues that no amount of fresh paint can conceal.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman putting savings in a white piggy bank.

How tax cuts, deregulation and weakened unions helped shift the U.S. from the postwar Great Compression to today’s Great Divide—and examine the Gomory-Baumol corporate tax proposal as an alternative.

Guido Mieth/Getty Images

Affordability Crisis: From The Great Compression to the Great Divide

Trickle-down policies facilitated the transition from the mid-20th century "Great Compression “characterized by low-wage inequality and strong labor unions—to the "Great Divide" by shifting the economic focus from mass purchasing power to capital accumulation through massive tax cuts and deregulation.

The Great Compression

Following World War II, the United States experienced an unprecedented period of economic egalitarianism. Propelled by the G.I. Bill, the rise of powerful labor unions, and a heavily progressive tax code, the income gap between the wealthiest Americans and the working class shrank dramatically.

Keep ReadingShow less