Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

More Whites Live in Poverty than Either Blacks or Hispanics - Correcting the Perception of Poverty

Opinion

Woman holding out an empty wallet at a table.

Many Americans wrongly associate poverty primarily with Black and Hispanic communities. Explore how this misconception influences public opinion, politics, and anti-poverty policy.

skaman306 / Getty Images

From observing people and politicians over the years—I can find no data on this—I have the impression that liberals as well as conservatives think that the typical person living in poverty is Black or Hispanic. The image most Whites have of people of color is someone who is poor—except for celebrities—with little education; they are not aware of many people of color who are middle class. On the other hand, they are not aware of many Whites who are poor and so they think their number is low.

Why is the perception of poverty important? The perception of who is poor has significant impact on the support for government programs that aid the poor. Given the extent of racism in this country, whether subtle or violent, (see my post, “Whether the Issue is Gun Violence or Inequality, It Always Comes Back to Race/Racism”), it’s not surprising that support for anti-poverty programs is non-existent among MAGA Republicans and for that matter has always been weak among Republicans; 45% of Republicans would even cut food stamp support. Their attitude is "it's your fault;" so government has no responsibility to help. They feel the causes of poverty are personal: bad life choices, drugs, lack of work ethic, and the breakdown of families—all negative perceptions of Black culture.


Liberals of course support such programs as an expression of economic justice, of fighting the systemic causes of poverty—discrimination, an unfair economic system, and the lack of educational opportunities. Although often one feels support is given somewhat begrudgingly; there is a little bit of racism in most of us.

But this perception of poverty is in fact fundamentally wrong. While Blacks and Hispanics do have much higher poverty rates, there were more White people living in poverty (19.6 million) in 2014 than either Blacks (10.2 million) or Hispanics (13.4 million). Even when combined, Blacks and Hispanics, according to Census data from 2024, accounted for just 52% of people living in poverty. Minorities have also historically accounted for no more of the welfare caseload than White families.

Why does this misperception of poverty persist? The main cause is the biases and perceptions we are raised with. But there is also much fault with the media. When it presents images of poverty, they are almost always that of Blacks or Hispanics. The images from the depression—think of the photographs of Walker Evans and Dorothea Lange—showing white Americans living in poverty, have very few equivalents in contemporary media.

Both government and the media must address this misconception. Especially in this polarized age, having an understanding of the oneness of all people is very important.

But it is also important that poor White Americans become more vocal in arguing for government support in bettering their lives and the futures of their children. There is no shame in being poor; it is not, as Republicans often say, "your fault." Asking for support is not asking for charity. Whether you are White or a person of color, most people are poor because of the circumstances of their birth and the resulting milieu the grew up in; getting beyond that barrier is very challenging regardless of race.

But this will be difficult. Although poor Whites benefit from anti-poverty programs, poor Whites seem to have the same perception as most that anti-poverty programs are geared to help people of color because that is how Democrats usually phrase their support; Democrats rarely speak about poor Whites—a big mistake. And this fits in with their racial biases; they do not want to think of themselves as comparable to Blacks. This is in part a result of history: in the antebellum South, planters feared the combined strength of poor Whites and slaves and so they used racism and force to keep poor Whites and poor Blacks separated.

Helping all poor people should be the goal of existing anti-poverty organizations; they should advocate for both people of color and Whites, which would only make their case more compelling. But when I googled to find organizations advocating for poor Whites, I found none.

This is what is fueling part of the Trump base. Poor Whites and poor people of color have been separated by the forces of racism—not just their own but of society's. Poor Whites are supporting Trump because no one else listens to them and no one else says he advocates for them. Even though he really doesn’t.

Poverty should never be seen as primarily a Black issue because it is not in fact. If we seek to end the grip of poverty on people and enable them to lift themselves up, programs and their marketing must be designed with Hispanics and Whites in mind as well. This is not a hand-out. This is about government fulfilling its responsibility under the Declaration of Independence to secure the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all Americans. It is supporting all Americans—including the poor, regardless of color—in the pursuit of their dreams.

The poverty of Whites must be brought visibly and audibly into the public consciousness in a positive way so as to increase public support for programs to fight poverty. If poor Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics aligned themselves in this common cause, they would present a very potent political force.


Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

​A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes.

A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes in the Houch neighborhood, after being displaced for weeks by war between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah militia that has displaced 1.2 million Lebanese, on April 28, 2026, in Tyre, Lebanon.

Scott Peterson / Getty Images

Please Don't Feed the Warmongers

I was recently catching up with an old friend from my Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps days who told me about some young sailors he knew in Bahrain tasked with intercepting hostile drones. Critically, as highly disciplined professionals, they have become extraordinarily good at it. My friend and I, with over twenty years of active duty service as military officers between us, discussed the extent to which their competence and vigilance are keeping them, and other Americans deployed in the area, alive, all while their leadership in Washington treats war with an increasingly terrifying callousness.

As brave servicemembers risk their lives on the front lines, Trump brags about how much money he’s making as president. It is true that for those invested in the types of industries that thrive during armed conflict, this war in Iran is a windfall. Trump himself invested between $9.7 million and $24.3 million in arms manufacturers and Pentagon contractors in 2025. Why would he end the war?

Keep Reading Show less
A father voting, with his young son standing by him, watching him.

Citizens cast their vote during the 2026 presidential runoff in Colombia on June 21, 2026 in Barranquilla, Colombia. Ivan Cepeda, candidate for the Pacto Historico party and Abelardo de la Espriella, candidate for the Salvación Nacional, face in a tight runoff to rule Colombia from 2026 to 2030.

Leonardo Castañeda/Getty Images

Colombia’s Election Matters—Especially to Ecuador and the U.S.

In a closely fought election on June 21, conservative outsider Abelardo De La Espriella prevailed over Iván Cepeda, an ally of current leftist president, Gustavo Petro. Central to the electorate’s choice were distinct policy proposals to fight criminality and the drug cartels, who control large swaths of Colombian territory. The policies president-elect De La Espriella will bring to the fight against these issues matter greatly, not only to Colombia, but to neighboring Ecuador and the United States.

Earlier in March, Ecuadorian President Noboa, desperate to gain traction in his own drug war, announced a partnership with the U.S. to conduct joint operations against drug cartels. The partnership quickly went awry. A New York Times investigation of the first strike indicates that what the joint militaries considered a drug camp was in fact a dairy farm, with no drug connection. Then, on March 17, Colombia accused Ecuador of bombing within its territory with U.S. involvement. These incidents resulted in U.S. lawmakers calling for a suspension of joint operations on May 13. Very quickly, the U.S. partnership has reopened the scars of the Plan Colombia era of the early 2000s, where an overly militaristic approach to the drug war funded by the U.S. resulted in human rights abuses and false positives.

Keep Reading Show less
Adult grandson teaching his grandfather to use laptop, close-up.

Social Security faces a funding crisis by 2032 that could cut retirement benefits by 22%. Learn what's driving the shortfall and how it could be fixed.

Westend61 / Getty Images

Social Security Faces a 2032 Crisis with Deep Benefit Cuts Ahead

A financial tsunami of giant proportions is heading our way. And it is due to arrive in about six years. Policymakers have known about this tsunami for some time, but in June, we found out the Big Wave is taller than anyone knew.

That’s when the Social Security Trustees released their latest report on the financial health of the popular Social Security retirement program. According to the trustees’ report, the outlook is not good – Social Security’s solvency is in danger. By 2032, the Social Security fund will fall short by about $2.5 trillion of the money needed to pay the 52 million American retirees their full retirement benefits. Previously, it was thought that the tsunami would make landfall in 2034, but the finances are deteriorating faster than expected. If no presidential and congressional intervention is mounted, retirees will take about a 22 percent haircut, meaning any senior beneficiary who was receiving $3000 per month will see that chopped to about $2300 per month, a loss of about $8000 per year.

Keep Reading Show less
 Lego Bricks in child hands

How imagination shapes our future and the American spirit.

Ekaterina79 / Getty Images

The Dreams That Built America—and Will Carry Us Forward

Ah love, let us be true

To one another! For the world, which seems

Keep Reading Show less