Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Community Partnerships Build Systems for Early Childhood Success

Opinion

 Little kids playing with colorful wooden building blocks on the table

Colorado, Maui County, and Washington State are connecting early childhood services and putting families at the center. Here’s what worked and why.

Lourdes Balduque/Getty Images

In Colorado’s San Luis Valley, a family looking for developmental support for their toddler may drive over an hour to reach a specialist, if one is even taking new patients. In too many communities across the country, like the San Luis Valley, the problem isn’t that services don’t exist. It’s that pediatricians, childcare providers, and mental health professionals are all working toward the same goal, but may not be working together.

When families have to navigate a maze of disconnected programs and providers, children start to miss opportunities for timely developmental support. Not because communities don’t care, but because the systems around them were never built to function as one.


A few communities have set out to change that, not by reinventing the wheel, but by connecting existing systems. When communities find ways to integrate and expand vital support systems, rather than replicating another model, a more cohesive and responsive solution emerges that better serves local families and their needs. In doing so, stronger partnerships can form between providers and community groups, between state agencies and local leaders, and most importantly, between families and the systems serving them.

Three places show what that looks like in practice.

San Luis Valley, Colorado

Rural communities like the San Luis Valley face a harder version of the same problem. There are fewer specialists, longer drives, and a smaller workforce to go around. Often, when a family can’t access services easily, it feels like they have no services at all.

State agencies supported local leaders in implementing a robust, closed-loop electronic referral system, increasing successful referrals and the number of families completing early intervention evaluations. State and local partners also strengthened the mental health workforce through training and fellowship opportunities, created a framework for partnering with families to develop more responsive pathways to care, and expanded the HealthySteps program, which embeds a specialist in early childhood development directly in pediatric offices – including San Luis Valley’s most rural clinics.

None of this worked just because of a single tool, process, or resource. It worked because activities were driven and shaped by the people who stand to benefit from the coordination.

Maui County, Hawai'i

Rather than launching something new, leaders in Maui County, Hawai’i, strengthened an existing collaborative already trusted by local families: Kākou for Keiki. It had a community network of strong relationships, local knowledge, infrastructure, and credibility that was ripe for additional investment.

By refining their collective impact strategies, Kākou for Keiki demonstrates what’s possible when centering lived experience in decision-making and developing family leaders in Maui County. Among their successes is the launch of a screening kiosk within a community health center, facilitating stronger connections between families, medical providers, and available community resources for quality developmental support.

Meeting families where they are, both literally and figuratively, builds the trust necessary to make services truly more accessible.

Washington State

State leaders in Washington recognized that local communities know their families best, but they don’t have to build every system alone. The state assessed existing data to create a full picture of family needs and shared it with partners for decision-making, helping 70 organizations across five counties and eight sectors work together to identify solutions that can be expanded across the state.

Washington also used collaborative contracting to position county-level partners as the drivers of change, while advancing shared goals. In Grant and Grays Harbor counties, local leaders used resource mapping, public awareness campaigns, and community events to connect families with services.

Washington shows us that state support and local ownership aren’t in tension with one another. In fact, when done well, they can reinforce each other and the community they serve.

While Colorado, Maui County, and Washington look nothing alike on the surface, each of these communities succeeded for the same underlying reason: inviting families in as partners when designing solutions, not just the recipients of the efforts. One built new infrastructure, one strengthened an existing collaborative, and one coordinated local and statewide resources for the greater good.

A referral system, a screening initiative, or a data-sharing agreement will rarely make headlines. Yet they determine whether families experience early childhood services as a seamless network of support or a confusing collection of disconnected organizations they navigate on their own.

These lessons arrive at an important moment. Policymakers, healthcare providers, and community leaders across the country are looking for practical ways to strengthen early childhood systems. The answer isn’t fifty communities trying to become San Luis, Maui, or Washington. It’s thousands of communities empowered to become the best version of themselves, supported by strong partnerships, family leadership, and sustainable infrastructure that’s built to last.

Communities looking for a place to start don't have to build a system from the ground up. There are field-tested, practical strategies and real-world examples to help you find field-tested tools for strengthening early childhood systems in your own community.

When we stop searching for a perfect model and instead invest in the strategies that allow communities to solve problems together, we don’t just improve individual programs. We build and strengthen systems that meet families where they are and support them on their journey to where they want to be.

Hannah Johnson is the Director of Early Childhood Developmental Health Systems (ECDHS): Evidence to Impact Center at ZERO TO THREE. She has spent the last 20 years uniting early childhood, healthcare, and legislative partners around systems transformation. Hannah is a dedicated advocate for families and serves on the Farmington Area Public Schools Board of Education in Minnesota while holding two Bachelor of Science degrees from Iowa State University.


Read More

US Capitol building
The United States Capitol building with its white dome against a blue sky

Would Congressional Term Limits Make Congress Better—or Worse?

Starting in the 1990’s, the idea of putting term limits on members of Congress became a recurring idea to reform the institution and improve democracy. The idea was born out of the theory that replacing the current crop of legislators with a new batch would produce a better Congress. More than 30 years later we now have quantitative and qualitative data showing the impact of term limits.

Twenty-one state legislatures have enacted some kind of term limit on legislators since 1990. Since then, dozens of academic studies have examined the impact on such factors as: complexity of legislation, influence of lobbyists and staff on legislative outcomes, and interactions with constituent. Here are some key findings.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand points to the word tax on a screen

Data calculations

Getty Images

Inconvenient Numbers Are a Sign the System Works

Earlier in October, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that consumer prices rose 3.7 percent over the past year, a little higher than the month before, with gasoline accounting for more than half of September's increase. Rising prices are the kind of news no incumbent politician wants weeks before an election. The report was published anyway, on schedule. That is the quiet discipline of a trustworthy statistical system. It tells us what is true even when the number is unwelcome to whoever holds power.

So, do Americans trust government data? We do. But that trust is incomplete, and it has room to grow.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

jimfeng/Getty Images

Pennsylvania’s Bipartisan Exchange Is Rebuilding Trust in Governance

The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics has nearly 40 years of experience working with legislators from different political parties, and it is building on this history by drawing on lessons from the successful American Congressional Exchange model, begun in 2018 at the Bipartisan Policy Center, and from state exchanges now underway in Minnesota and Michigan. The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics, in collaboration with the Bridge Alliance, has launched the Pennsylvania Legislative Exchange.

This state-based, systematic approach is designed to foster better relationships and build trust across the political aisle with the following guiding principles:

Keep ReadingShow less
An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less