Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Israel's Path to Peace and Security

Opinion

Israel's Path to Peace and Security

A voter casts her ballot at a polling station on October 27, 2026 in Jerusalem, Israel.

Noam Galai/Getty Images

Most people do not think that such a thing—peace and security for Israel—is possible. Yet it is possible—but it requires the wisdom and courage to chart a new path.

The old path has been to think of the Arabs—including Palestinians, even including Palestinian Israeli citizens—as being the enemy. And peace and security could only be achieved through military superiority and dominance over an implacable enemy. Whether the government was Labor (liberal) or Likud (right-wing), that has been the underlying assumption of this country founded in the aftermath of the Holocaust and driven by its memory.


But although Israel has become a strong country in virtually every sense of the word—economically, culturally, militarily—it has not achieved peace, not even true security, in its almost 80 years of existence. Obviously, the old way of thinking has not worked. What is there to lose in trying a new approach?

If you look at the Israeli and Palestinian people, they both want basically the same thing. Both have the same dream: to live in a country that validates and protects their existence and their ability to pursue life after decades or centuries of being subject to the control of others, of being persecuted, of having to live their lives in fear.

And so both have tried to create a space—a state—where they can be free to live their lives as human beings. But to do that, they have not just been willing, but felt it necessary to subjugate another people just as they have been subjugated. It's in many ways the same story as the English Puritans who founded the Massachusetts Bay Colony. They came to America to escape persecution. But once they got here and founded their own state, they persecuted all other Christians, let alone other religions, who did not agree with them.

In understanding the dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, while there is much blame to be placed on both sides, one cannot ignore that the problem began because Jews—Zionists—wanted to create a home for themselves in biblical Israel. But that was thousands of years ago; in modern times, it had become a land ruled by Turkey and inhabited mostly by Arabs—Palestinians, as they came to be called from the post-WWI British protectorate in which they lived. Jews were a clear minority (11% after WWI, which grew to 30% before WWII as a result of the Zionist movement). Jews were modern interlopers; there is no way around that fact.

How does Israel and how do the Palestinians move from where their mindset is now to the mindset that will bring them both the peace and security that they desire? Israel has just had an election in which the two opposing factions both did similarly (actually, the Benjamin Netanyahu faction got somewhat more votes and seats in the Israeli parliament). Neither has enough votes to have a majority and thus form a government.

The key lies in the Arab-Israeli parties. If the centrist coalition has the vision and the nerve to join with the Palestinians to form a government, they would have a clear majority. But the problem is that since October 7, the hearts of most Israelis have hardened toward Palestinians, and the idea of a government that includes the Arab parties is not acceptable to them. Netanyahu stoked the fires of fear in Israelis as a campaign strategy, and it worked.

There is a perhaps once-in-a-lifetime opportunity here. If the centrist parties adopted the viewpoint I am advocating and explained their reasoning to the Israeli public, they could probably move forward with a new government. Their first moves would be towards creating the conditions that would allow the Palestinians to have what they have justifiably wanted. Given the expanded Jewish settlements on the West Bank and the settlers' ability to resort to violence in recent years without repercussions, this would be a real challenge. The Palestinians must, on their part, respond by rejecting Hamas and forming a new government that will lead them in a new spirit of cooperation with Israel. With both sides acting in concert, reciprocally, attitudes will begin to change.

There will be many forces on both sides that will try to sabotage this effort, whether it's the Israeli West Bank settlers, the ultra-orthodox parties with their dreams of Eretz Yisrael, or Hamas. But both Israeli and Palestinian centrists must stand their ground and not allow these forces to derail the new push for peace and security for both sides. The future of both peoples and the lives of their children depend on the successful transition from hatred to peaceful coexistence. The alternative is never-ending conflict, no peace, no security.


Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

Mahatma Gandhi addressing some of his thousands of followers on a lawn.

Mahatma Gandhi addressing some of his thousands of followers on the lawn of the home of Dr. Ansari where Gandhi stopped during his peace meetings with Viceroy Lord Irwin.

Bettmann/Getty Images

Everyone Wants Peace. That’s the Problem.

In 2007, the United Nations gathered to declare an International Day of Non-Violence. It fittingly chose Gandhi’s birthday, October 2nd, for the occasion: a day to affirm “the universal relevance of the principle of non-violence” and strive toward a common culture of tolerance and understanding.

The resolution passed by consensus, co-sponsored by 140 member nations. Each attested to what nearly everyone believes: that they—their culture, their country, their party, their movement—want peace.

Keep ReadingShow less
The U.S. Capitol in autumn.

New surveys of nearly 20,000 battleground voters find bipartisan majorities say Congress ignores the public, and that more public influence would help.

Philip Yabut/Getty Images

Americans Say the People Can Lead Congress to Common Ground; It Appears They Are Right

New surveys in battleground states and districts across the country, as well as nationwide, find that Americans—both Republicans and Democrats—believe Congress does what most Americans would do less than half the time.

They also found that majorities agree that if Congress were to be more influenced by the people, it would be more likely to find common ground. In fact, surveys show that majorities of Republicans and Democrats agree on what to do about many issues that Congress is stuck on.

Keep ReadingShow less
Man holding American flag

Is America still great? An immigrant entrepreneur argues that free speech, opportunity, and the rule of law, not military or economic power, are the real test.

Getty Images

This Is What Makes America Great

After World War II, America stood victorious over Germany and Japan. Instead of permanent retribution, it helped them rebuild and welcomed former enemies as partners and allies. For me, that moment signaled America’s greatness: power guided by humanity. America earned something that power alone could never command — the respect and admiration of people around the world.

Today, a question once almost unthinkable is being asked: Is America still great — and will it remain so?

Keep ReadingShow less
Old Bible with background of American flag

Old Bible with background of American flag

Getty Images

When Politicians Sound Like Preachers

Andy Beshear, Kentucky's democratic governor, has a new book out this week called Go and Do Likewise: How We Heal a Broken Country. The publisher describes it as an effort to “reclaim faith as a force for good” and counter people who use religion to harm and discriminate. Given Beshear’s prominence in Democratic politics and his having been named a presidential frontrunner, it is all but certain to be a New York Times bestseller.

Beshear isn’t alone. A growing number of politicians are writing and running for office in a faith-inflected register:

Keep ReadingShow less