Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Must Enforce the Power of the Purse as Debt Soars

President Trump’s policies accelerate a debt crisis Congress failed to check.

Opinion

U.S. economic crisis as markets crash. Concept showing a slowing market behind a black and white United States Capitol

America's national debt is projected to reach $45 trillion by 2029. Explore Congress's constitutional "Power of the Purse," federal spending, appropriations, and the policies contributing to rising deficits.

Greggory DiSalvo / Getty Images

“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law” (Appropriations Clause, Article I, Section 9, Clause 7, U.S. Constitution). Congress’s “Power of the Purse” means the President cannot spend money or authorize expenditures unless Congress has passed a specific law funding it (Congress.gov).

According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the non-partisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, the total federal debt held by Americans is on track to hit $40 trillion by the end of 2026. Currently, every resident in America carries a $122,642 share of this debt.


When the USA’s 48th president takes office on Jan. 20, 2029, the federal debt is projected to reach approximately $44-$45 trillion. Should this hold true, the publicly held debt will be 107% of gross domestic product (GDP). This will surpass the highest debt-to-GDP ratio in American history, which was set in 1946 immediately following the massive mobilization of World War II.

Drivers of accelerated debt

A significant portion of America’s debt is driven by long-term and mandatory spending, such as Social Security, Medicare, and historically high net interest payments. However, the CBO and budget trackers note specific policy choices from the Trump 1.0 and 2.0 administrations have actively accelerated the USA’s debt.

Here’s the percentage increase in national debt for each of the last seven presidents: 188% for Reagan, 42% for G.H.W. Bush, 40% for Clinton, 101% for G.W. Bush, 88% for Obama, 40.3% for Trump, and 30.5% for Biden (us-debt-clock.com). When Donald Trump leaves office in Jan. of 2029, the federal debt will at least be $44 trillion, an increase of 21.8% since Joe Biden’s presidency ended.

The drivers of Donald Trump’s spending increases include:

1 - The 2025 Reconciliation Act (One Big, Beautiful Bill Act) will add a net $4.2 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years (CBO).

2 – Recent CBO projections note that the administration’s immigration and enforcement actions added roughly $500 billion to projected long-term deficits (Feb. 11).

3 – Arms Control Association reports Trump’s Iran War -- not authorized by Congress – has already incurred more than $100 billion in direct military costs. President Trump has put forward an $88 billion supplemental war spending request to Congress in addition to his record $1 trillion military budget request.

4 – President Trump’s 2.0 administration spent $10 billion of taxpayer money to buy equity stakes in 14 private and 14 publicly-held companies, in what the conservative Cato Institute identified as “creeping socialism” (Center for Strategic and International Studies, Feb. 12, and Cato Institute).

5 - The White House East Wing ballroom is projected to cost $500 million, plus an additional $1 billion in security funding. Clark Construction has revealed that $293 million of the cost is being drawn from public funds (USA Today).

6 – The Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool’s renovation initial work cost – awarded in a no-bid contract to vendors with personal ties to Mr. Trump -- was in the $14.7-$16.3 million range. Now that Trump’s beautification project has failed, an additional $1.7 million will be spent to fix the structural issues, all at taxpayer expense.

7 – The Trump administration maintains that DOGE saved upwards of $200 billion. Despite the Trump administration bragging about it being “the most transparent in U.S. history,” the White House announced it has no plans to issue a DOGE financial disclosure report. However, the Partnership for Public Service, a nonpartisan watchdog, estimated DOGE resulted in a staggering $135 billion cost to taxpayers (CBS News), while University of Michigan experts and independent economists note that when it is all said and done, an estimated $500 billion of lost tax revenue occurred from DOGE (Chatham House).

8 – The Government Accountability Office determined the Trump administration illegally impounded $825 million of funds approved for America’s Head Start Program, which is dedicated to early childhood education for low-income families.

9, 10, 11 & 12 – Congress has not authorized or appropriated: A) $15 million for President Trump’s 250-foot Independence Arch, nicknamed “Arc de Trump” (CBS News), B) $40 million for Trump’s construction of the National Garden of American Heroes (ABC News), C) $400 million to overhaul Qatari-gifted Air Force One (Wall Street Journal) or D) $600 million to renovate the 106-year old East Potomac Golf Links course in Washington, D.C. (Golf Digest).

MIA: Congressional oversight and authority

Suffice it to say, Congress has been `Missing in Action’ in its fiscal oversight role during the presidencies of Reagan, G.H.W. Bush, Clinton, G.W. Bush, Obama, Biden, and Trump.

Tuesday, Nov. 3, can’t come soon enough for the truly conservative, conscientious, and fiscally responsible registered voters to kick the incumbents out who are not watching America’s pocketbook. It’s high time to clean house and vote for legislators who will honor the “Power of the Purse,” the constitutional authority to control government spending and taxation.


Steve Corbin is a professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa and a non-paid freelance guest columnist contributor to 158 newspapers and 47 social media platforms in 44 states.


Read More

A father voting, with his young son standing by him, watching him.

Citizens cast their vote during the 2026 presidential runoff in Colombia on June 21, 2026 in Barranquilla, Colombia. Ivan Cepeda, candidate for the Pacto Historico party and Abelardo de la Espriella, candidate for the Salvación Nacional, face in a tight runoff to rule Colombia from 2026 to 2030.

Leonardo Castañeda/Getty Images

Colombia’s Election Matters—Especially to Ecuador and the U.S.

In a closely fought election on June 21, conservative outsider Abelardo De La Espriella prevailed over Iván Cepeda, an ally of current leftist president, Gustavo Petro. Central to the electorate’s choice were distinct policy proposals to fight criminality and the drug cartels, who control large swaths of Colombian territory. The policies president-elect De La Espriella will bring to the fight against these issues matter greatly, not only to Colombia, but to neighboring Ecuador and the United States.

Earlier in March, Ecuadorian President Noboa, desperate to gain traction in his own drug war, announced a partnership with the U.S. to conduct joint operations against drug cartels. The partnership quickly went awry. A New York Times investigation of the first strike indicates that what the joint militaries considered a drug camp was in fact a dairy farm, with no drug connection. Then, on March 17, Colombia accused Ecuador of bombing within its territory with U.S. involvement. These incidents resulted in U.S. lawmakers calling for a suspension of joint operations on May 13. Very quickly, the U.S. partnership has reopened the scars of the Plan Colombia era of the early 2000s, where an overly militaristic approach to the drug war funded by the U.S. resulted in human rights abuses and false positives.

Keep Reading Show less
 Lego Bricks in child hands

How imagination shapes our future and the American spirit.

Ekaterina79 / Getty Images

The Dreams That Built America—and Will Carry Us Forward

Ah love, let us be true

To one another! For the world, which seems

Keep Reading Show less
America at 250: The Next Expansion of the American Promise
white and black striped textile
Photo by Tim Mossholder on Unsplash

America at 250: The Next Expansion of the American Promise

As the United States approaches its 250th year, we are returning to a ritual as old as the republic itself: the work of taking stock — of measuring the country we have inherited against the country we were promised.

Some look at America today and see a nation in decline, divided by politics, frayed by distrust, unsettled by economic anxiety. Others see its enduring strengths — its genius for invention, its long habit of self-correction, its singular capacity to begin again. Both are describing the same country. For America has never been a finished thing. It has been, from the start, an argument we are still having with ourselves about who belongs.

Keep Reading Show less
Toy tank on the background of dollar bills

The true cost of war with Iran goes far beyond the battlefield. Learn how military spending affects gas prices, national debt, infrastructure, healthcare, and American taxpayers.

Sinenkiy / Getty Images

The Cost of the Iran War Isn't Just Measured in Bombs

A farmer in Ames, Iowa, pulls up to a gas station and stares in shock at the numbers on the pump. The price of fuel has jumped sharply since the outbreak of war with Iran. His next thought is simple: every extra dollar spent on diesel is a dollar he cannot spend elsewhere. Before long, those higher costs will show up in the price of food, shipping, and countless other goods Americans buy every day.

Most Americans experience the costs of war not on a battlefield thousands of miles away, but at the gas pump. But higher fuel prices are only the most visible expense. The true cost of war extends far beyond oil markets. It includes billions spent on military operations, the interest on borrowed money, and the opportunities lost when scarce public resources are diverted from schools, housing, infrastructure, and other urgent social needs.

Keep Reading Show less