Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The Tone of Our Country Has Changed — And Americans Can See and Feel It Everywhere

Opinion

The Tone of Our Country Has Changed — And Americans Can See and Feel It Everywhere

A close-up view of an American flag centerpiece on a patio table, symbolizing patriotism and community spirit.

Getty images

Saturday, after a movie theater visit with my grandsons, we stopped in for a simple meal at a sandwich shop. We were the only customers. The young man at the register looked irritated the moment I approached. When I asked about a turkey sub, he smirked and pointed at the menu board without saying a word. When I asked whether the sandwich could be made without bacon, he stared at me with a look I won’t forget—dismissive, superior, unbothered. What concerned me even more was watching him move a few feet from the register and hover over the two young women preparing sandwiches—no gloves, no apron, no hair net, no handwashing. The sanitary issues, combined with the smirk and stare, made me uncomfortable.

I spent years in human relations and professional development, conducting sessions, training school teams, and supporting administrators as they observed classrooms and provided feedback to teachers. One of the most important concepts I taught was feeling tone—the emotional climate you sense the moment you walk into a classroom or a school building. Was it warm, safe, and welcoming? Was it conducive to learning, motivation, and the retention and transfer of knowledge? Or did it feel tense, cold, or indifferent?


During one walk‑through training with a group of administrators, I remember asking them, “What did you feel when you first walked into that building? Into that classroom?” Their responses included feeling welcomed, safe, supported, motivated to learn, and free to take risks. As Americans, we know this experience. There are places you enter and feel welcomed and comfortable—and places where the tone hits you as cold, indifferent, or unwelcoming. That sub shop took me back to those trainings. The feeling tone was negative the moment I stepped inside.

That discomfort stayed with me as my grandsons placed their orders and I stood nearby watching their sandwiches being made. I thanked the young man for his patience, though he offered none. After a few minutes of watching him hover near the young women preparing the food—standing too close, offering no help, and showing the same smirk and stare I had seen at the register—I stepped closer and asked whether he was the one preparing our sandwiches. When he said no, I asked for a refund. My grandsons listened as I explained why: when something feels wrong, you don’t ignore it. But what stayed with me wasn’t the refund. It was the place's feeling tone. A tone meant to make someone feel small and unsafe.

Later that night, we stopped at two other places for takeout—one grandson wanted a hamburger and fries, the other a chicken sandwich and coleslaw. At both places, the workers smiled. They said thank you. They wished us a good evening. They treated us like human beings. Same night. Same region. Two different feeling tones. Two completely different Americas.

That contrast troubles me. It tells me something deeper is happening in our culture—something we cannot ignore. What I saw in that shop wasn’t an isolated moment—it was a reflection of a tone we are absorbing from the top. When leaders normalize mockery and belittling, that tone spreads quickly. I have watched national leaders smirk, belittle, and dismiss others on live television. I have watched cabinet members sit stiffly around a table, their forced smiles and rigid postures revealing discomfort as they offered praise. As someone trained to read body language and feeling tone, I notice these things. And I notice when they show up in everyday interactions—in classrooms, stores, restaurants, doctors’ offices, supermarkets, shopping malls, and in the messages I receive from family and former colleagues. The tone of our country has changed, and Americans can see and feel it everywhere.

And the data confirms what so many of us feel. Nearly 70% of Americans say they are dissatisfied with the state of the country. About 29% say they are satisfied. Trust in the federal government hovers around 22%. When asked how the government makes them feel, 57% say frustrated, 22% say angry, and only 18% say content. That frustration has been the dominant public emotion for decades.

Americans report feeling less safe, less connected, and less valued. Concerns about crime, violence, and national unity have risen. Only 66% of Americans say they feel close to others in their country—the lowest among advanced democracies surveyed. Loneliness remains, with more than half of Americans feeling left out or lacking companionship. Researchers describe this as a crisis of belonging, not a crisis of personal happiness.

People don’t invent these feelings. They absorb them. They absorb them from the tone of public life, from the behavior of leaders, from the silence of institutions, and from the emotional climate around them. When people feel unseen or unheard, they behave differently. Impatience replaces courtesy. Entitlement replaces responsibility. Hostility replaces empathy. You don’t count. How can I help?

So, how do we restore positive tone? Not with slogans. Not with speeches. With behavior. Tone is communicated long before words are spoken—through posture, facial expression, eye contact, and the way we move through a space. In schools, I taught teachers and administrators that tone is created by warm greetings, encouraging and supportive language, and a calm, respectful, inclusive atmosphere. It is strengthened when people feel safe to speak without fear of embarrassment, when questions are welcomed, and when feedback builds confidence rather than undermines it.

Those same principles apply to adult life. We restore positive tone when we use a steady voice instead of a sharp one, when we soften our shoulders instead of bracing them, when we acknowledge others with a nod or a smile, and when we choose patience over irritation. Tone is restored when we create environments where people feel seen, valued, and respected. It is restored when we refuse to mirror cruelty and instead model the steadiness we want reflected back to us. Tone is not accidental. It is created, moment by moment, by the way we treat one another.

Americans now face a choice—what kind of country do we want to live in? A healthy, warm, safe America where people value moral character, integrity, responsibility, and respect? A country where the tone of public life lifts us up rather than drags us down? Or an America where cruelty is entertainment, where public behavior is defined by spectacle, and where national leadership models the very conduct the framers warned against? As we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, it is hard to imagine the founders envisioning a nation where a UFC fight would be staged on the White House lawn. They debated fiercely, but they believed in dignity, restraint, and the moral weight of office. The question now is whether we still do.

I left that sandwich shop disappointed—not in a teenager, but in the culture that shaped him. A culture that rewards smirks over service, dominance over decency, and cruelty over character. But I also left with clarity. My grandsons saw what I saw: tone is taught, tone is absorbed, and tone becomes behavior.

Feeling tone doesn’t just belong in classrooms. It belongs in our homes, our workplaces, our communities, and our country. If our institutions will not defend the values that hold a democracy together, then we must defend them ourselves. America cannot survive on spectacle, cruelty, or entitlement. It can survive on the quiet, steady work of people who believe in dignity, decency, and the simple idea that every person counts. The Government may feel far away. But the country is still in our hands. And we are running out of time to restore the feeling tone that once held us together.

___________________________________________________________________________

Carolyn Goode is a retired educational leader and former human relations and professional development coordinator who writes about civic responsibility, democratic values, and the everyday experiences that reveal who we are as a nation.


Read More

Meeting, handshake and business people with deal in office for funding approval and success.

Four Reds and four Blues reached unanimous Points of Agreement on immigration, then presented them to Reps. Fitzpatrick and Suozzi. Here’s how it worked.

Jacob Wackerhausen/Getty Images

On Immigration, Common Ground May Be Closer Than We Think

Immigration has become one of the issues pulling Americans apart. Earlier this month, at a constituent conversation in Bristol, Pennsylvania, I watched eight Americans with very different political views offer a glimpse of how it does not have to stay that way.

Four “Reds” and four “Blues” — terms used for participants on the political right and left — sat across from Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) and Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.), the Republican and Democratic co-chairs of the House Problem Solvers Caucus, to present something increasingly unusual in our politics: unanimous Points of Agreement on immigration developed through an earlier Common Ground Workshop.

Keep ReadingShow less
Visitor at the reflecting pools to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center

A visitor pauses at the reflecting pools to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center at the National 9/11 Memorial & Museum on September 11, 2026, in New York City.

(Photo by Jeenah Moon - Pool/Getty Images)

The Moral Distance Between Our Dead and Theirs

Last month, I watched the ceremonies marking the 25th anniversary of September 11.

I listened as family members read the names of the dead. Children and grandchildren talked about people whose absence still shapes their lives. Nearly 3,000 people were killed that morning. At the 9/11 Memorial, they are remembered as individuals.

Keep ReadingShow less
​A sign directs pedestrians towards the United States in Tijuana, Mexico. A person walks in the foreground.

A sign directs pedestrians towards the United States on January 16, 2019 in Tijuana, Mexico.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Immigration, Borders, and Belonging: Toward a More Honest Conversation

This week, Germany’s far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) won nearly 44 percent of the vote in Saxony-Anhalt, more than twice the Christian Democrats’ share and the AfD’s strongest state-election result. Anti-immigration sentiment and nationalism helped drive the campaign.

I first visited Germany in 1986 and have returned many times. Career-related assignments have repeatedly taken me to the Netherlands and Austria as well. Through four decades of travel and conversations with ordinary Europeans, I have noticed a marked change since 2016. Over the past decade, concerns about immigration have surfaced more frequently, not only in Germany but across Europe.

Keep ReadingShow less