Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Accountability Abandoned: A Betrayal of Promises Made

The Big Beautiful Bill: Cuts for the People, Rewards for the Wealthy

Opinion

Accountability Abandoned: A Betrayal of Promises Made
white concrete dome museum

Eleven months ago, Donald Trump promised Americans that he would “immediately bring prices down” on his first day in office. Instead, the Big Beautiful Bill delivered tax cuts for the wealthy, cuts to food benefits, limits on Medicare coverage, restrictions on child care, and reduced student aid — all documented in comprehensive analyses of the law. Congress’s vote was not just partisan — it was a betrayal of promises made to the people.

Not only did Congress’s votes betray nurses, but the harm extended to teachers, caregivers, seniors, working parents, and families struggling to make ends meet. In casting those votes, lawmakers showed a lack of courage to hold themselves accountable to the people. This was not leadership; it was betrayal — the ultimate abandonment of the people they swore to serve.


What makes this betrayal even more damning is that it was foreseen. During the 2024 campaign, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris warned that Trump would do exactly this — strip relief from families and reward the wealthy. And soon after he took his oath, he proved them right. Congress cannot claim ignorance; they were warned, and still they chose silence and complicity.

Democrats listened to the people’s cries for relief. While not perfect, they stood united in opposition because they understood the harm the Big Beautiful Bill would bring to families, seniors, caregivers, and nurses. They tried to keep their promise to protect those most vulnerable from a bill designed to enrich the wealthy at the expense of everyone else.

When the Vice President cast the deciding vote, he showed his lack of moral responsibility, compassion, and empathy for the millions harmed by the bill. Vance is sponsored by billionaires. He does not care about people living in poverty, and his vote showed it. Who can Americans look to for protection when the second‑highest office in the land abandons its duty to the people?

Time and again, Congress has demonstrated that its loyalty lies with the President, not with its oath or the people it swore to serve. Speaker Mike Johnson enforced loyalty. Senators Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, and Tim Scott, along with Representative Jim Jordan, all advanced Trump’s mission. Republicans did not question the President’s broken promise — they supported him without holding him accountable. That loyalty was hypocrisy, because many of them once lived modestly, worried about rent, groceries, and medical bills before they had money and power. Now, insulated by congressional salaries and billionaire donors, they have forgotten what it means to struggle.

Republicans voted yes even as poverty grips their states. These are the very families most dependent on SNAP, Medicare, and child care support — programs gutted by the bill. Republicans chose loyalty to Trump over compassion for constituents, betraying citizens who are already suffering. And these statistics are reflected across the country, with the national poverty rate at 11.1%, representing nearly 37 million Americans living below the federal poverty line.

Though the decision was partisan, the harm hurt Republicans, Democrats, and Independents in red, blue, and purple states all across America. Families in every corner of the nation — rural and urban, coastal and heartland — felt the consequences. The Big Beautiful Bill did not discriminate in its damage; it stripped relief from millions regardless of party affiliation, proving that loyalty to one man came at the expense of the entire country.

While millions of Americans live below the poverty line, members of Congress earn between $174,000 and $223,500 a year. The Speaker of the House earns $223,500, and the Senate Majority Leader earns $193,400. All enjoy health benefits, retirement packages, and travel expenses at taxpayer expense. All this, plus the money they receive from billionaire donors and corporate PACs, guarantees that their immediate families never worry about housing, food, or health care. While ordinary Americans struggle to pay rent, buy groceries, or afford medical care, congressional leaders prosper — and then vote to cut the very programs that keep families afloat.

I once knew a state representative in Virginia who, despite doing well financially, had aunts, uncles, cousins, and friends who were hard‑working people — sometimes struggling to make ends meet. Members of Congress surely have similar stories they could tell if they were human enough to remember them. But instead of honoring those connections, they have insulated themselves with wealth, perks, and billionaire donors. In forgetting their own families’ struggles, they have abandoned the people’s struggles.

The dire consequences of the Big Beautiful Bill are not abstract — they are lived every day. Just this week, while it snowed in Virginia, I spoke on the telephone with my sister. She remarked how cold it was outside, but how blessed she was to be in a warm house with ample food. I told her I was concerned about people without food or shelter. She replied that there are shelters and churches, but I reminded her that shelters fill up, some people are turned away, and food supplies are scarce. People don’t want hand‑outs; they want fair opportunities and equal access — things our President has taken away. This is the essence of diversity, equity, and inclusion: ensuring that every citizen, regardless of background or circumstance, has a fair chance to thrive. Congress abandoned that principle when it passed the Big Beautiful Bill, stripping away equity and denying inclusion to the very people who needed relief most. In doing so, the BBB stamped out a pathway to the American Dream — the promise that hard work and fairness could lead to opportunity.

Accountability was abandoned the moment Congress voted for the Big Beautiful Bill. Americans were asking for relief, but lawmakers ignored the consequences to the people. They have yet to acknowledge that siding with the President was a mistake. They have done nothing to rectify the harm, nor have they justified to the public why they voted for this bill. At times, it seems Congress does not even know the meaning of accountability — because accountability builds trust, guarantees fairness, and sustains integrity. People asked for one thing — relief — and Congress gave them another: complete betrayal.

Congress’s duty is not only to legislate but to safeguard the public good. By prioritizing partisan loyalty over the needs of families, nurses, caregivers, and seniors, lawmakers abandoned that duty — betraying the trust of citizens who depend on them. Stripping nurses’ professional status devalues clinical judgment, weakens patient safety, and chills the pipeline of future providers. Cutting food benefits and child care undermines families. Reducing student aid blocks opportunity. Limiting Medicare leaves seniors vulnerable.

When elected leaders diminish the people who care for us, they diminish the country itself. If Congress can erase nurses’ professional recognition while slashing food benefits, narrowing Medicare coverage, and constraining child care, they can erase trust in public service altogether. Accountability isn’t a slogan; it is the guardrail of a functioning democracy.

Citizens must vote — register, show up, and replace leaders who betray the people; write letters, op‑eds, and petitions that call out hypocrisy and demand repeal of the Big Beautiful Bill; speak up at town hall meetings, in community forums, and directly to representatives; hold leaders accountable by asking them to justify their votes, reminding them of their oath, and insisting they repeal this bill; peacefully protest to show that betrayal will not be tolerated; and demand repeal to reverse the harm and restore fairness, equity, and opportunity.

Congress failed to hold itself accountable for the people — a great betrayal of trust. They lacked the courage to remind the President of his promise and chose silence over standing up for families, nurses, caregivers, and seniors. That silence betrayed democracy itself. What America needs now are leaders with compassion, empathy, and moral understanding. We demand that the Big Beautiful Bill be repealed. Only courage, compassion, and accountability can restore democracy — and reopen the pathway to the American Dream that Congress stamped out in ultimate abandonment.

______________________________________________________________________________

Carolyn Goode is a retired educational leader and national advocate for ethical leadership whose writing examines the three branches of government and their impact on democracy, citizens, and public trust.


Read More

Gavel on top of binders

A full rundown of this week's congressional action: 7 bills headed to the President, a stalled data center bill, and the votes lawmakers wanted on record.

May Lim / 500px/Getty Images

House Crams in Votes Before Extended Break

The House wasn’t expected to stay in session past this week and, in fact, they left a day early after Rep. Massie (R-KY4) introduced an impeachment resolution against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Nonetheless, they powered through many more votes than usual. We’ll cover the seven soon-to-be new laws and the bills of interest we highlighted in this week’s preview. As is its usual function, the Senate mostly acted as a break on legislation that had passed the House.

New Laws

These bills have all passed both chambers in identical form, so they next go to the President for signing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cardboard ballot box with a voter slip being placed into it by a hand, with a blue and red coloured background.

Cardboard ballot box with a voter slip being placed into it by a hand, with a blue and red coloured background.

Getty Images

The Leverage Ethic and the Spirit of Tripartisanship

I made the immodest proposal in my edited interdisciplinary volume Leveraging: A Political, Economic, and Societal Framework that the contemporary analogue to what Max Weber called the "Protestant Work Ethic" in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism was what I called "the Leverage Ethic."

Moreover, I suggested that the Leverage Ethic has more or less replaced what the late Harvard sociologist Daniel Bell called the "Consumer Ethic" in his classic book The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, which he argued more or less replaced the Protestant Work Ethic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lorraine Marquez Eiler

Lorraine Marquez Eiler, a Hia-C’ed O’odham elder, listens as Tohono O'odham Chairman Verlon Jose speaks during a news conference at the Quitobaquito Springs site on Monday, Aug. 24, 2026.

Stephanie Casanova

“We Will Not Let This Destroy Our Sacred Sites”: Indigenous Leaders Fight Trump Administration’s Border Wall

Standing near the pond at Quitobaquito Springs, Lorraine Marquez Eiler, a Hia-Ced O’odham elder, shared how her ancestors held ceremonies at the sacred site — a desert oasis in a national park that the federal government is set to bulldoze for a new border wall.

She pulled out a photo of her great-great grandparents and her great-grandparents, who would walk about 50 miles through the Sonoran Desert to the springs. The O’odham call the water flow A’al Vaipia. She showed the image of her ancestors to a group that included Indigenous leaders and a U.S. congressional representative — all there on Monday to condemn the border wall construction.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Ukrainian rescuers at night

Ukrainian rescuers work at the site of a Russian strike in Zaporizhzhia on Aug.11, 2026, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

(Darya Nazarova/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

The war in Ukraine is becoming very inconvenient for Trump

One of the challenges with writing about the war in — and on — Ukraine is that so little changes.

I don’t mean the fighting on the ground, though even there, when viewed from a distance, it doesn’t look as though much has shifted in a long while. Russia has gained very little territory in the last year (even as it has suffered an estimated half-million Russian casualties over the last 12 months). All of that to gain 0.3% of Ukrainian territory (and net zero gains in the last six months). Though distance can be deceiving, the fighting on the ground has actually been far more dynamic, with evolving tactics, strategies, technologies and geopolitics.

Keep ReadingShow less