Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Accountability Abandoned: A Betrayal of Promises Made

The Big Beautiful Bill: Cuts for the People, Rewards for the Wealthy

Opinion

Accountability Abandoned: A Betrayal of Promises Made
white concrete dome museum

Eleven months ago, Donald Trump promised Americans that he would “immediately bring prices down” on his first day in office. Instead, the Big Beautiful Bill delivered tax cuts for the wealthy, cuts to food benefits, limits on Medicare coverage, restrictions on child care, and reduced student aid — all documented in comprehensive analyses of the law. Congress’s vote was not just partisan — it was a betrayal of promises made to the people.

Not only did Congress’s votes betray nurses, but the harm extended to teachers, caregivers, seniors, working parents, and families struggling to make ends meet. In casting those votes, lawmakers showed a lack of courage to hold themselves accountable to the people. This was not leadership; it was betrayal — the ultimate abandonment of the people they swore to serve.


What makes this betrayal even more damning is that it was foreseen. During the 2024 campaign, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris warned that Trump would do exactly this — strip relief from families and reward the wealthy. And soon after he took his oath, he proved them right. Congress cannot claim ignorance; they were warned, and still they chose silence and complicity.

Democrats listened to the people’s cries for relief. While not perfect, they stood united in opposition because they understood the harm the Big Beautiful Bill would bring to families, seniors, caregivers, and nurses. They tried to keep their promise to protect those most vulnerable from a bill designed to enrich the wealthy at the expense of everyone else.

When the Vice President cast the deciding vote, he showed his lack of moral responsibility, compassion, and empathy for the millions harmed by the bill. Vance is sponsored by billionaires. He does not care about people living in poverty, and his vote showed it. Who can Americans look to for protection when the second‑highest office in the land abandons its duty to the people?

Time and again, Congress has demonstrated that its loyalty lies with the President, not with its oath or the people it swore to serve. Speaker Mike Johnson enforced loyalty. Senators Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, and Tim Scott, along with Representative Jim Jordan, all advanced Trump’s mission. Republicans did not question the President’s broken promise — they supported him without holding him accountable. That loyalty was hypocrisy, because many of them once lived modestly, worried about rent, groceries, and medical bills before they had money and power. Now, insulated by congressional salaries and billionaire donors, they have forgotten what it means to struggle.

Republicans voted yes even as poverty grips their states. These are the very families most dependent on SNAP, Medicare, and child care support — programs gutted by the bill. Republicans chose loyalty to Trump over compassion for constituents, betraying citizens who are already suffering. And these statistics are reflected across the country, with the national poverty rate at 11.1%, representing nearly 37 million Americans living below the federal poverty line.

Though the decision was partisan, the harm hurt Republicans, Democrats, and Independents in red, blue, and purple states all across America. Families in every corner of the nation — rural and urban, coastal and heartland — felt the consequences. The Big Beautiful Bill did not discriminate in its damage; it stripped relief from millions regardless of party affiliation, proving that loyalty to one man came at the expense of the entire country.

While millions of Americans live below the poverty line, members of Congress earn between $174,000 and $223,500 a year. The Speaker of the House earns $223,500, and the Senate Majority Leader earns $193,400. All enjoy health benefits, retirement packages, and travel expenses at taxpayer expense. All this, plus the money they receive from billionaire donors and corporate PACs, guarantees that their immediate families never worry about housing, food, or health care. While ordinary Americans struggle to pay rent, buy groceries, or afford medical care, congressional leaders prosper — and then vote to cut the very programs that keep families afloat.

I once knew a state representative in Virginia who, despite doing well financially, had aunts, uncles, cousins, and friends who were hard‑working people — sometimes struggling to make ends meet. Members of Congress surely have similar stories they could tell if they were human enough to remember them. But instead of honoring those connections, they have insulated themselves with wealth, perks, and billionaire donors. In forgetting their own families’ struggles, they have abandoned the people’s struggles.

The dire consequences of the Big Beautiful Bill are not abstract — they are lived every day. Just this week, while it snowed in Virginia, I spoke on the telephone with my sister. She remarked how cold it was outside, but how blessed she was to be in a warm house with ample food. I told her I was concerned about people without food or shelter. She replied that there are shelters and churches, but I reminded her that shelters fill up, some people are turned away, and food supplies are scarce. People don’t want hand‑outs; they want fair opportunities and equal access — things our President has taken away. This is the essence of diversity, equity, and inclusion: ensuring that every citizen, regardless of background or circumstance, has a fair chance to thrive. Congress abandoned that principle when it passed the Big Beautiful Bill, stripping away equity and denying inclusion to the very people who needed relief most. In doing so, the BBB stamped out a pathway to the American Dream — the promise that hard work and fairness could lead to opportunity.

Accountability was abandoned the moment Congress voted for the Big Beautiful Bill. Americans were asking for relief, but lawmakers ignored the consequences to the people. They have yet to acknowledge that siding with the President was a mistake. They have done nothing to rectify the harm, nor have they justified to the public why they voted for this bill. At times, it seems Congress does not even know the meaning of accountability — because accountability builds trust, guarantees fairness, and sustains integrity. People asked for one thing — relief — and Congress gave them another: complete betrayal.

Congress’s duty is not only to legislate but to safeguard the public good. By prioritizing partisan loyalty over the needs of families, nurses, caregivers, and seniors, lawmakers abandoned that duty — betraying the trust of citizens who depend on them. Stripping nurses’ professional status devalues clinical judgment, weakens patient safety, and chills the pipeline of future providers. Cutting food benefits and child care undermines families. Reducing student aid blocks opportunity. Limiting Medicare leaves seniors vulnerable.

When elected leaders diminish the people who care for us, they diminish the country itself. If Congress can erase nurses’ professional recognition while slashing food benefits, narrowing Medicare coverage, and constraining child care, they can erase trust in public service altogether. Accountability isn’t a slogan; it is the guardrail of a functioning democracy.

Citizens must vote — register, show up, and replace leaders who betray the people; write letters, op‑eds, and petitions that call out hypocrisy and demand repeal of the Big Beautiful Bill; speak up at town hall meetings, in community forums, and directly to representatives; hold leaders accountable by asking them to justify their votes, reminding them of their oath, and insisting they repeal this bill; peacefully protest to show that betrayal will not be tolerated; and demand repeal to reverse the harm and restore fairness, equity, and opportunity.

Congress failed to hold itself accountable for the people — a great betrayal of trust. They lacked the courage to remind the President of his promise and chose silence over standing up for families, nurses, caregivers, and seniors. That silence betrayed democracy itself. What America needs now are leaders with compassion, empathy, and moral understanding. We demand that the Big Beautiful Bill be repealed. Only courage, compassion, and accountability can restore democracy — and reopen the pathway to the American Dream that Congress stamped out in ultimate abandonment.

______________________________________________________________________________

Carolyn Goode is a retired educational leader and national advocate for ethical leadership whose writing examines the three branches of government and their impact on democracy, citizens, and public trust.


Read More

Two groups of glass figures. One red, one blue.

Congressional paralysis is no longer accidental. Polarization has reshaped incentives, hollowed out Congress, and shifted power to the executive.

Getty Images, Andrii Yalanskyi

How Congress Lost Its Capacity to Act and How to Get It Back

In late 2025, Congress fumbled the Affordable Care Act, failing to move a modest stabilization bill through its own procedures and leaving insurers and families facing renewed uncertainty. As the Congressional Budget Office has warned in multiple analyses over the past decade, policy uncertainty increases premiums and reduces insurer participation (see, for example: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61734). I examined this episode in an earlier Fulcrum article, “Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis,” as a case study in congressional paralysis and leadership failure. The deeper problem, however, runs beyond any single deadline or decision and into the incentives and procedures that now structure congressional authority. Polarization has become so embedded in America’s governing institutions themselves that it shapes how power is exercised and why even routine governance now breaks down.

From Episode to System

The ACA episode wasn’t an anomaly but a symptom. Recent scholarship suggests it reflects a broader structural shift in how Congress operates. In a 2025 academic article available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), political scientist Dmitrii Lebedev reaches a stark conclusion about the current Congress, noting that the 118th Congress enacted fewer major laws than any in the modern era despite facing multiple time-sensitive policy deadlines (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5346916). Drawing on legislative data, he finds that dysfunction is no longer best understood as partisan gridlock alone. Instead, Congress increasingly exhibits a breakdown of institutional capacity within the governing majority itself. Leadership avoidance, procedural delay, and the erosion of governing norms have become routine features of legislative life rather than temporary responses to crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s ‘America First’ is now just imperialism

Donald Trump Jr.' s plane landed in Nuuk, Greenland, where he made a short private visit, weeks after his father, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, suggested Washington annex the autonomous Danish territory.

(Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty Images)

Trump’s ‘America First’ is now just imperialism

In early 2025, before Donald Trump was even sworn into office, he sent a plane with his name in giant letters on it to Nuuk, Greenland, where his son, Don Jr., and other MAGA allies preened for cameras and stomped around the mineral-rich Danish territory that Trump had been casually threatening to invade or somehow acquire like stereotypical American tourists — like they owned it already.

“Don Jr. and my Reps landing in Greenland,” Trump wrote. “The reception has been great. They and the Free World need safety, security, strength, and PEACE! This is a deal that must happen. MAGA. MAKE GREENLAND GREAT AGAIN!”

Keep ReadingShow less
The Common Cause North Carolina, Not Trump, Triggered the Mid-Decade Redistricting Battle

Political Midterm Election Redistricting

Getty images

The Common Cause North Carolina, Not Trump, Triggered the Mid-Decade Redistricting Battle

“Gerrymander” was one of seven runners-up for Merriam-Webster’s 2025 word of the year, which was “slop,” although “gerrymandering” is often used. Both words are closely related and frequently used interchangeably, with the main difference being their function as nouns versus verbs or processes. Throughout 2025, as Republicans and Democrats used redistricting to boost their electoral advantages, “gerrymander” and “gerrymandering” surged in popularity as search terms, highlighting their ongoing relevance in current politics and public awareness. However, as an old Capitol Hill dog, I realized that 2025 made me less inclined to explain the definitions of these words to anyone who asked for more detail.

“Did the Democrats or Republicans Start the Gerrymandering Fight?” is the obvious question many people are asking: Who started it?

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. and Puerto Rico flags
Puerto Rico: America's oldest democratic crisis
TexPhoto/Getty Image

Puerto Rico’s New Transparency Law Attacks a Right Forged in Struggle

At a time when public debate in the United States is consumed by questions of secrecy, accountability and the selective release of government records, Puerto Rico has quietly taken a dangerous step in the opposite direction.

In December 2025, Gov. Jenniffer González signed Senate Bill 63 into law, introducing sweeping amendments to Puerto Rico’s transparency statute, known as the Transparency and Expedited Procedure for Access to Public Information Act. Framed as administrative reform, the new law (Act 156 of 2025) instead restricts access to public information and weakens one of the archipelago’s most important accountability and democratic tools.

Keep ReadingShow less