Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Accountability Abandoned: A Betrayal of Promises Made

The Big Beautiful Bill: Cuts for the People, Rewards for the Wealthy

Opinion

Accountability Abandoned: A Betrayal of Promises Made
white concrete dome museum

Eleven months ago, Donald Trump promised Americans that he would “immediately bring prices down” on his first day in office. Instead, the Big Beautiful Bill delivered tax cuts for the wealthy, cuts to food benefits, limits on Medicare coverage, restrictions on child care, and reduced student aid — all documented in comprehensive analyses of the law. Congress’s vote was not just partisan — it was a betrayal of promises made to the people.

Not only did Congress’s votes betray nurses, but the harm extended to teachers, caregivers, seniors, working parents, and families struggling to make ends meet. In casting those votes, lawmakers showed a lack of courage to hold themselves accountable to the people. This was not leadership; it was betrayal — the ultimate abandonment of the people they swore to serve.


What makes this betrayal even more damning is that it was foreseen. During the 2024 campaign, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris warned that Trump would do exactly this — strip relief from families and reward the wealthy. And soon after he took his oath, he proved them right. Congress cannot claim ignorance; they were warned, and still they chose silence and complicity.

Democrats listened to the people’s cries for relief. While not perfect, they stood united in opposition because they understood the harm the Big Beautiful Bill would bring to families, seniors, caregivers, and nurses. They tried to keep their promise to protect those most vulnerable from a bill designed to enrich the wealthy at the expense of everyone else.

When the Vice President cast the deciding vote, he showed his lack of moral responsibility, compassion, and empathy for the millions harmed by the bill. Vance is sponsored by billionaires. He does not care about people living in poverty, and his vote showed it. Who can Americans look to for protection when the second‑highest office in the land abandons its duty to the people?

Time and again, Congress has demonstrated that its loyalty lies with the President, not with its oath or the people it swore to serve. Speaker Mike Johnson enforced loyalty. Senators Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, and Tim Scott, along with Representative Jim Jordan, all advanced Trump’s mission. Republicans did not question the President’s broken promise — they supported him without holding him accountable. That loyalty was hypocrisy, because many of them once lived modestly, worried about rent, groceries, and medical bills before they had money and power. Now, insulated by congressional salaries and billionaire donors, they have forgotten what it means to struggle.

Republicans voted yes even as poverty grips their states. These are the very families most dependent on SNAP, Medicare, and child care support — programs gutted by the bill. Republicans chose loyalty to Trump over compassion for constituents, betraying citizens who are already suffering. And these statistics are reflected across the country, with the national poverty rate at 11.1%, representing nearly 37 million Americans living below the federal poverty line.

Though the decision was partisan, the harm hurt Republicans, Democrats, and Independents in red, blue, and purple states all across America. Families in every corner of the nation — rural and urban, coastal and heartland — felt the consequences. The Big Beautiful Bill did not discriminate in its damage; it stripped relief from millions regardless of party affiliation, proving that loyalty to one man came at the expense of the entire country.

While millions of Americans live below the poverty line, members of Congress earn between $174,000 and $223,500 a year. The Speaker of the House earns $223,500, and the Senate Majority Leader earns $193,400. All enjoy health benefits, retirement packages, and travel expenses at taxpayer expense. All this, plus the money they receive from billionaire donors and corporate PACs, guarantees that their immediate families never worry about housing, food, or health care. While ordinary Americans struggle to pay rent, buy groceries, or afford medical care, congressional leaders prosper — and then vote to cut the very programs that keep families afloat.

I once knew a state representative in Virginia who, despite doing well financially, had aunts, uncles, cousins, and friends who were hard‑working people — sometimes struggling to make ends meet. Members of Congress surely have similar stories they could tell if they were human enough to remember them. But instead of honoring those connections, they have insulated themselves with wealth, perks, and billionaire donors. In forgetting their own families’ struggles, they have abandoned the people’s struggles.

The dire consequences of the Big Beautiful Bill are not abstract — they are lived every day. Just this week, while it snowed in Virginia, I spoke on the telephone with my sister. She remarked how cold it was outside, but how blessed she was to be in a warm house with ample food. I told her I was concerned about people without food or shelter. She replied that there are shelters and churches, but I reminded her that shelters fill up, some people are turned away, and food supplies are scarce. People don’t want hand‑outs; they want fair opportunities and equal access — things our President has taken away. This is the essence of diversity, equity, and inclusion: ensuring that every citizen, regardless of background or circumstance, has a fair chance to thrive. Congress abandoned that principle when it passed the Big Beautiful Bill, stripping away equity and denying inclusion to the very people who needed relief most. In doing so, the BBB stamped out a pathway to the American Dream — the promise that hard work and fairness could lead to opportunity.

Accountability was abandoned the moment Congress voted for the Big Beautiful Bill. Americans were asking for relief, but lawmakers ignored the consequences to the people. They have yet to acknowledge that siding with the President was a mistake. They have done nothing to rectify the harm, nor have they justified to the public why they voted for this bill. At times, it seems Congress does not even know the meaning of accountability — because accountability builds trust, guarantees fairness, and sustains integrity. People asked for one thing — relief — and Congress gave them another: complete betrayal.

Congress’s duty is not only to legislate but to safeguard the public good. By prioritizing partisan loyalty over the needs of families, nurses, caregivers, and seniors, lawmakers abandoned that duty — betraying the trust of citizens who depend on them. Stripping nurses’ professional status devalues clinical judgment, weakens patient safety, and chills the pipeline of future providers. Cutting food benefits and child care undermines families. Reducing student aid blocks opportunity. Limiting Medicare leaves seniors vulnerable.

When elected leaders diminish the people who care for us, they diminish the country itself. If Congress can erase nurses’ professional recognition while slashing food benefits, narrowing Medicare coverage, and constraining child care, they can erase trust in public service altogether. Accountability isn’t a slogan; it is the guardrail of a functioning democracy.

Citizens must vote — register, show up, and replace leaders who betray the people; write letters, op‑eds, and petitions that call out hypocrisy and demand repeal of the Big Beautiful Bill; speak up at town hall meetings, in community forums, and directly to representatives; hold leaders accountable by asking them to justify their votes, reminding them of their oath, and insisting they repeal this bill; peacefully protest to show that betrayal will not be tolerated; and demand repeal to reverse the harm and restore fairness, equity, and opportunity.

Congress failed to hold itself accountable for the people — a great betrayal of trust. They lacked the courage to remind the President of his promise and chose silence over standing up for families, nurses, caregivers, and seniors. That silence betrayed democracy itself. What America needs now are leaders with compassion, empathy, and moral understanding. We demand that the Big Beautiful Bill be repealed. Only courage, compassion, and accountability can restore democracy — and reopen the pathway to the American Dream that Congress stamped out in ultimate abandonment.

______________________________________________________________________________

Carolyn Goode is a retired educational leader and national advocate for ethical leadership whose writing examines the three branches of government and their impact on democracy, citizens, and public trust.

Read More

Project 2025 Drives Trump’s State Dept Overhaul

U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House on December 15, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Project 2025 Drives Trump’s State Dept Overhaul

In May 2025, I wrote about the Trump administration’s early State Department reforms aligned with Project 2025, including calls for budget cuts, mission closures, and policy realignments. At the time, the most controversial move was an executive order targeting the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), shutting it down and freezing all federal foreign aid. This decision reflected Project 2025’s recommendation to scale back and "deradicalize" USAID by eliminating programs deemed overly politicized or inconsistent with conservative values. The report specifically criticized USAID for funding progressive initiatives, such as policies addressing systemic racism and central economic planning, arguing that U.S. foreign aid had become a "massive and open-ended global entitlement program" benefiting left-leaning organizations. The process connecting the report’s ideological critiques to this executive action involved a strategic alignment between key administration officials and Project 2025 architects, who lobbied for immediate policy adjustments. This coalition effectively linked the critique to policy by framing it as a necessary step toward realigning foreign aid with national interests and conservative principles.

Back then, I predicted even more sweeping changes to the State Department. Since May, several major developments have indeed reshaped the department:

Keep Reading Show less
SNAP Isn’t a Negotiating Tool. It’s a Lifeline.
apples and bananas in brown cardboard box
Photo by Maria Lin Kim on Unsplash

SNAP Isn’t a Negotiating Tool. It’s a Lifeline.

Millions of families just survived the longest shutdown in U.S. history. Now they’re bracing again as politicians turn food assistance into a bargaining chip.

Food assistance should not be subject to politics, yet the Trump administration is now requiring over 20 Democratic-led states to share sensitive SNAP recipient data—including Social Security and immigration details—or risk losing funding. Officials call it "program integrity," but the effect is clear: millions of low-income families may once again have their access to food threatened by political disputes.

Keep Reading Show less
Democrats’ Redistricting Gains Face New Court Battles Ahead of 2026 Elections
us a flag on white concrete building

Democrats’ Redistricting Gains Face New Court Battles Ahead of 2026 Elections

Earlier this year, I reported on Democrats’ redistricting wins in 2025, highlighting gains in states like California and North Carolina. As of December 18, the landscape has shifted again, with new maps finalized, ongoing court battles, and looming implications for the 2026 midterms.

Here are some key developments since mid‑2025:

  • California: Voters approved Proposition 50 in November, allowing legislature‑drawn maps that eliminated three safe Republican seats and made two more competitive. Democrats in vulnerable districts were redrawn into friendlier territory.
  • Virginia: On December 15, Democrats in the House of Delegates pushed a constitutional amendment on redistricting during a special session. Republicans denounced the move as unconstitutional, setting up a legal and political fight ahead of the 2026 elections.
  • Other states in play:
    • Ohio, Texas, Utah, Missouri, North Carolina: New maps are already in effect, reshaping battlegrounds.
    • Florida and Maryland: Legislatures have begun steps toward redistricting, though maps are not yet finalized.
    • New York: Court challenges may force changes to existing maps before 2026.
    • National picture: According to VoteHub’s tracker, the current district breakdown stands at 189 Democratic‑leaning, 205 Republican‑leaning, and 41 highly competitive seats.

Implications for 2026

  • Democrats’ wins in California and North Carolina strengthen their position, but legal challenges in Virginia and New York could blunt momentum.
  • Republicans remain favored in Texas and Ohio, where maps were redrawn to secure GOP advantages.
  • The unusually high number of mid‑decade redistricting efforts — not seen at this scale since the 1800s — underscores how both parties are aggressively shaping the battlefield for 2026.
So, here's the BIG PICTURE: The December snapshot shows Democrats still benefiting from redistricting in key states, but the fight is far from settled. With courts weighing in and legislatures maneuvering, the balance of power heading into the 2026 House elections remains fluid. What began as clear Democratic wins earlier in 2025 has evolved into a multi‑front contest over maps, legality, and political control.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network

Kelly Sponsors Bipartisan Bill Addressing Social Media

Sen. Mark Kelly poses for a selfie before a Harris-Walz rally featuring former President Barack Obama on Oct. 18, 2024.

Photo by Michael McKisson.

Kelly Sponsors Bipartisan Bill Addressing Social Media

WASHINGTON – Lawmakers have struggled for years to regulate social media platforms in ways that tamp down misinformation and extremism.

Much of the criticism has been aimed at algorithms that feed users more and more of whatever they click on – the “rabbit hole” effect blamed for fueling conspiracy theories, depression, eating disorders, suicide and violence.

Keep Reading Show less