Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Accountability Abandoned: A Betrayal of Promises Made

The Big Beautiful Bill: Cuts for the People, Rewards for the Wealthy

Opinion

Accountability Abandoned: A Betrayal of Promises Made
white concrete dome museum

Eleven months ago, Donald Trump promised Americans that he would “immediately bring prices down” on his first day in office. Instead, the Big Beautiful Bill delivered tax cuts for the wealthy, cuts to food benefits, limits on Medicare coverage, restrictions on child care, and reduced student aid — all documented in comprehensive analyses of the law. Congress’s vote was not just partisan — it was a betrayal of promises made to the people.

Not only did Congress’s votes betray nurses, but the harm extended to teachers, caregivers, seniors, working parents, and families struggling to make ends meet. In casting those votes, lawmakers showed a lack of courage to hold themselves accountable to the people. This was not leadership; it was betrayal — the ultimate abandonment of the people they swore to serve.


What makes this betrayal even more damning is that it was foreseen. During the 2024 campaign, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris warned that Trump would do exactly this — strip relief from families and reward the wealthy. And soon after he took his oath, he proved them right. Congress cannot claim ignorance; they were warned, and still they chose silence and complicity.

Democrats listened to the people’s cries for relief. While not perfect, they stood united in opposition because they understood the harm the Big Beautiful Bill would bring to families, seniors, caregivers, and nurses. They tried to keep their promise to protect those most vulnerable from a bill designed to enrich the wealthy at the expense of everyone else.

When the Vice President cast the deciding vote, he showed his lack of moral responsibility, compassion, and empathy for the millions harmed by the bill. Vance is sponsored by billionaires. He does not care about people living in poverty, and his vote showed it. Who can Americans look to for protection when the second‑highest office in the land abandons its duty to the people?

Time and again, Congress has demonstrated that its loyalty lies with the President, not with its oath or the people it swore to serve. Speaker Mike Johnson enforced loyalty. Senators Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, and Tim Scott, along with Representative Jim Jordan, all advanced Trump’s mission. Republicans did not question the President’s broken promise — they supported him without holding him accountable. That loyalty was hypocrisy, because many of them once lived modestly, worried about rent, groceries, and medical bills before they had money and power. Now, insulated by congressional salaries and billionaire donors, they have forgotten what it means to struggle.

Republicans voted yes even as poverty grips their states. These are the very families most dependent on SNAP, Medicare, and child care support — programs gutted by the bill. Republicans chose loyalty to Trump over compassion for constituents, betraying citizens who are already suffering. And these statistics are reflected across the country, with the national poverty rate at 11.1%, representing nearly 37 million Americans living below the federal poverty line.

Though the decision was partisan, the harm hurt Republicans, Democrats, and Independents in red, blue, and purple states all across America. Families in every corner of the nation — rural and urban, coastal and heartland — felt the consequences. The Big Beautiful Bill did not discriminate in its damage; it stripped relief from millions regardless of party affiliation, proving that loyalty to one man came at the expense of the entire country.

While millions of Americans live below the poverty line, members of Congress earn between $174,000 and $223,500 a year. The Speaker of the House earns $223,500, and the Senate Majority Leader earns $193,400. All enjoy health benefits, retirement packages, and travel expenses at taxpayer expense. All this, plus the money they receive from billionaire donors and corporate PACs, guarantees that their immediate families never worry about housing, food, or health care. While ordinary Americans struggle to pay rent, buy groceries, or afford medical care, congressional leaders prosper — and then vote to cut the very programs that keep families afloat.

I once knew a state representative in Virginia who, despite doing well financially, had aunts, uncles, cousins, and friends who were hard‑working people — sometimes struggling to make ends meet. Members of Congress surely have similar stories they could tell if they were human enough to remember them. But instead of honoring those connections, they have insulated themselves with wealth, perks, and billionaire donors. In forgetting their own families’ struggles, they have abandoned the people’s struggles.

The dire consequences of the Big Beautiful Bill are not abstract — they are lived every day. Just this week, while it snowed in Virginia, I spoke on the telephone with my sister. She remarked how cold it was outside, but how blessed she was to be in a warm house with ample food. I told her I was concerned about people without food or shelter. She replied that there are shelters and churches, but I reminded her that shelters fill up, some people are turned away, and food supplies are scarce. People don’t want hand‑outs; they want fair opportunities and equal access — things our President has taken away. This is the essence of diversity, equity, and inclusion: ensuring that every citizen, regardless of background or circumstance, has a fair chance to thrive. Congress abandoned that principle when it passed the Big Beautiful Bill, stripping away equity and denying inclusion to the very people who needed relief most. In doing so, the BBB stamped out a pathway to the American Dream — the promise that hard work and fairness could lead to opportunity.

Accountability was abandoned the moment Congress voted for the Big Beautiful Bill. Americans were asking for relief, but lawmakers ignored the consequences to the people. They have yet to acknowledge that siding with the President was a mistake. They have done nothing to rectify the harm, nor have they justified to the public why they voted for this bill. At times, it seems Congress does not even know the meaning of accountability — because accountability builds trust, guarantees fairness, and sustains integrity. People asked for one thing — relief — and Congress gave them another: complete betrayal.

Congress’s duty is not only to legislate but to safeguard the public good. By prioritizing partisan loyalty over the needs of families, nurses, caregivers, and seniors, lawmakers abandoned that duty — betraying the trust of citizens who depend on them. Stripping nurses’ professional status devalues clinical judgment, weakens patient safety, and chills the pipeline of future providers. Cutting food benefits and child care undermines families. Reducing student aid blocks opportunity. Limiting Medicare leaves seniors vulnerable.

When elected leaders diminish the people who care for us, they diminish the country itself. If Congress can erase nurses’ professional recognition while slashing food benefits, narrowing Medicare coverage, and constraining child care, they can erase trust in public service altogether. Accountability isn’t a slogan; it is the guardrail of a functioning democracy.

Citizens must vote — register, show up, and replace leaders who betray the people; write letters, op‑eds, and petitions that call out hypocrisy and demand repeal of the Big Beautiful Bill; speak up at town hall meetings, in community forums, and directly to representatives; hold leaders accountable by asking them to justify their votes, reminding them of their oath, and insisting they repeal this bill; peacefully protest to show that betrayal will not be tolerated; and demand repeal to reverse the harm and restore fairness, equity, and opportunity.

Congress failed to hold itself accountable for the people — a great betrayal of trust. They lacked the courage to remind the President of his promise and chose silence over standing up for families, nurses, caregivers, and seniors. That silence betrayed democracy itself. What America needs now are leaders with compassion, empathy, and moral understanding. We demand that the Big Beautiful Bill be repealed. Only courage, compassion, and accountability can restore democracy — and reopen the pathway to the American Dream that Congress stamped out in ultimate abandonment.

______________________________________________________________________________

Carolyn Goode is a retired educational leader and national advocate for ethical leadership whose writing examines the three branches of government and their impact on democracy, citizens, and public trust.


Read More

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court, in holding that partisan gerrymandering is permissible—unless it "goes too far"—stated that the argument made against this practice based on the Court's "one person, one vote" doctrine didn't work because the cases that developed that doctrine were about ensuring that each vote had an equal weight. The Court reasoned that after redistricting, each vote still has equal weight.

I would respectfully disagree. After admittedly partisan redistricting, each vote does not have an equal weight. The purpose of partisan gerrymandering is typically to create a "safe" seat—to group citizens so that the dominant political party has a clear majority of the voters. It's the transformation of a contested seat or even a seat safe for the other party into a safe seat for the party doing the redistricting.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Puncher’s Illusion: Winning the First Round and Losing the War
Toy soldiers in a battle formation
Photo by Saifee Art on Unsplash

The Puncher’s Illusion: Winning the First Round and Losing the War

In the Rumble in the Jungle, George Foreman came in expecting to end the fight early.

At first, it looked that way. He was stronger, faster, and landing clean punches. I watched the 1974 championship on simulcast fifty-two years ago and remember how dominant he was in the opening rounds.

Keep ReadingShow less
Calling Wealthy Benefactors!
A rusty house figure stands over a city.
Photo by Katja Ano on Unsplash

Calling Wealthy Benefactors!

My housing has been conditional on circumstances beyond my control, and the time is up; the owner is selling.

Securing affordable housing is a stressor for much of the working class. According to recent data, nearly 50% of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they spend over 30% of their take-home income on housing costs. Rental prices in California are especially high, 35% higher than the national average. Renting is routinely insecure. The lords of land need to renovate, their kids need to move in. They need to sell.

Keep ReadingShow less
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed upon entering the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on June 6, 2023 in New York City. New York City has provided sanctuary to over 46,000 asylum seekers since 2013, when the city passed a law prohibiting city agencies from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant for the person's arrest.(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed.
(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The Power of the Purse and Executive Discretion: ICE Expansion Under the Trump Administration

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Constitutional Debate: Expanded ICE enforcement under the Trump Administration raises a core constitutional question: Does Article II executive power override Article I’s congressional power of the purse?
  • Executive Justification: The primary constitutional justification for expanded ICE enforcement is The Unitary Executive Theory.
  • Separation of Powers: Critics argue that the Unitary Executive Theory undermines Congress’s power of the purse.
  • Moral Conflict: Expanded ICE enforcement has sparked a moral debate, as concerns over due process and civil liberties clash with claims of increased public safety and national security.

Where is ICE Funding Coming From?

Since the beginning of the current Trump Administration, immigration enforcement has undergone transformative change and become one of the most contested issues in the federal government. On his first day in office, President Trump issued Executive Order 14159, which directs executive agencies to implement stricter immigration enforcement practices. In order to implement these practices, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a budget reconciliation package that paired state and local tax cuts with immigration funding. This allocated $170.7 billion in immigration-related funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to spend by 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less