Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

President Trump Claims To Care About Interference in US Elections While He Is Doing Everything To Eliminate the Protections

Opinion

President Trump Claims To Care About Interference in US Elections While He Is Doing Everything To Eliminate the Protections
Voted printed papers on white surface

Donald Trump recently gave a prime-time presentation on the vulnerability of US elections. Trump's concern about what he calls election rigging is more than ironic; it is disingenuous in light of his efforts to (1) cleanse the US of Hispanics, (2) destroy the impact of the African American vote, and (3) diminish the impact of the women’s vote. Despite the president complaining about illegal aliens voting, the facts suggest, as published by the Heritage Foundation, that there were only 68 instances of non-citizen voting spanning 40 years, against a backdrop of hundreds of millions of ballots over the period. In fact, it is the president who is primarily responsible for “rigging the elections.”

All of this is in the context of the fact that the one election on which he is fixated, the 2020 presidential election, is one of the two elections to date that his administration oversaw. The circumstances are further contextualized by the fact that he challenged that election in some 60 lawsuits and failed to win a case. In addition, Trump attempted to manipulate the election by demanding that the Secretary of State of Georgia manufacture votes in his favor.


Objectively, regarding the 2020 election, his own Attorney General, William Barr, declared that there was no widespread election fraud.

Regarding international interference, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence published a report on Russian Active Measures in the 2016 US Election on November 10, 2020. It concluded that:

The Russian government directed extensive activity, beginning in at least 2014 and continuing into at least 2017, against U.S. Election infrastructure at the State and local level…[redacted] The Committee has seen no evidence that any votes were changed or that any voting machines were manipulated.

On 10 March 2021, the Office of the National Intelligence Council published an unclassified Intelligence Community Assessment entitled Foreign Threats to the 2020 US Federal Elections; the Key Judgment 1 noted:

We have no indications that any foreign actor attempted to alter any technical aspect of the voting process in the 2020 US elections, including voter registration, casting ballots, vote tabulation, or reporting results. (emphasis in original)

The Assessment went on to outline efforts by Russian Intelligence, Iran, China, Lebanese Hizballah, Cuba, and Venezuela to interfere, but none to the extent that changed the Key Judgment 1. Once again, it is worth noting that the report was predominantly prepared during the time that the current director of the Central Intelligence Agency, John Ratcliffe, served as Director of National Intelligence under Donald Trump.

In fact, Trump’s own Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, which identifies itself as the national coordinator for critical infrastructure security and resilience, released a press release on November 12, 2020, stating that:

The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history.

The joint statement further claimed:

There is. no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes or was in anyway compromised. (bold in the original)

Having determined that there is no material threat of non-citizens voting or fraud anywhere in the election system, the Trump administration has either threatened to:

  1. Jail Secretaries of State who administer elections
  2. Nationalize the Election process
  3. Interfere with the state's administration of elections
  4. Use the DOJ to collect state voter Data
  5. Use the FBI to seize ballots from states relating to the 2020 election
  6. Send ICE and possibly other paramilitary units to polling sites
  7. Fired the members of the Independent Election Assistance Commission
  8. Demanded that states engage in extreme gerrymandering

This is all consistent with his stated goals of:

It is clear that the president’s goal is power and control. Trump's leadership has little to do with a constitutional democracy, ensuring that all Americans are entitled to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, or his responsibility to defend the Constitution, including, but not limited to, the 13th, 14th, 15th, & 19th Amendments.

Several commentators have suggested that President Trump will seek to nullify the midterm elections if the Republicans lose control of the House. Thomas Edsall in the New York Times has suggested that the:

Scenario would likely begin by Trump declaring that the election

results were rigged…and Federal authorities would require

investigation of the results before they were finalized.

This could be followed, according to Congressman Jim Hines, Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee, quoted in the Daily Beast:

Trump would deploy federal officers from the DHS to states to seize ballot boxes, He said if ballot boxes are seized and the chain of custody is broken “American democracy dies.”

It is unclear what the November elections will yield. But we face unprecedented federal interference in November elections from a president who has repeatedly demonstrated that he does not believe he must abide by the results of a free and fair election. The greatest defense that we have as citizens is to make sure that our votes are counted, whatever the circumstances that present themselves.

Walter H. White, Jr. is a member of the Board of Lawyers Defending American Democracy, a founding director and past chair of the ABA Center for Human Rights, and has served as an election observer in the former Soviet Union on behalf of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.


Read More

Voting Is Not a Closed-Book Test
white and black labeled box

Voting Is Not a Closed-Book Test

The Supreme Court closed out its term and issued decisions that could affect millions of Americans. Among them is Watson v. Republican National Committee, in which the court decided in a 5-4 decision to uphold longstanding Mississippi law and allow mail-in ballots received post-Election Day to be counted.

The legal implications of the decision will be analyzed for months, if not years. But beyond the legal questions is a practical one: What role does mail voting actually play in helping Americans participate in elections?

Keep Reading Show less
The New Fight Over Election Observation
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

The New Fight Over Election Observation

As a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the U.S. has signed the foundational agreement committing all participating states to open elections to external scrutiny and inviting fellow members to observe through the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). The 2024 ODIHR observation mission to the U.S. found the fundamentals reassuring—a well-run process, active engagement, free campaigning—but issued 31 recommendations to align U.S. elections with international standards and commitments. Four stand out: federal pre-clearance legislation against discriminatory election-law changes; reassessing the Electoral College; balanced representation in election administration; and guaranteed access for international and nonpartisan observers—notable, since 17 states still legally bar international observation, which is at odds with commitments made by all 57 OSCE states. Yet over a year later, follow-through is thin: no pre-clearance restoration, no Electoral College review, unchanged observer-access laws. Where movement exists—in disinformation tools, in financial disclosure—it remains piecemeal.

An uncomfortable convergence

Keep Reading Show less
10 Organizations Independent Voters Need to Watch

Young woman at voting booth

Canva

10 Organizations Independent Voters Need to Watch

Independent voters are no longer a political afterthought. They are the majority.

And when these voters look at the state of politics in the US, they see the lack of accountability, representation, competition, and meaningful choice that the system produces.

Keep Reading Show less
The Gerrymandering Solution
person holding white and red box

The Gerrymandering Solution

The 250th anniversary of American independence should remind us what’s wrong with gerrymandering. Due to partisanship, however, it now not only persists but rachets tighter in a tit-for-tat cycle that threatens to strangle representative rule. There is a solution to gerrymandering, however, if only politicians will act.

Inspired by revolutionary Enlightenment Era ideals, the Declaration of Independence and the new state constitutions of 1776 call for representative rule. The people would be sovereign, they proclaimed, with governments drawing their just powers from the consent of the governed. Nothing of the sort had ever been tried on a large scale and the founders struggled with how to implement it. Everything turned on establishing a truly representative governing assembly for each newly independent colony or state.

Keep Reading Show less