Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Why America Needs Its Nonprofits to Manage Disasters

Opinion

Why America Needs Its Nonprofits to Manage Disasters

Search and rescue operations are performed in the Guadalupe River on July 14, 2025 in Kerrville, Texas.

(Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

When the Guadalupe River broke its banks across Kerr County, the water carried off not only homes but many fragmented memories: a stuffed bear, a baby shoe, and family photos blurred beyond recognition. Within days, volunteers began piecing those fragments back together through a ‘Texas Flood Lost & Found’ network, reuniting survivors with what little could be recovered.

Within two weeks, more than 14,000 volunteers from different nonprofits showed up to help the survivors of the Hill Country floods. The same spirit defined Texas’s response to Harvey in 2017, when the state, along with its nonprofits, led one of the largest rescue operations in U.S. history.


From local food pantries to national relief networks, nonprofits have become the connective tissue of America’s disaster response. In those first hours, it feels like the whole country moves together. But when the cameras go dark, the rhythm breaks. The second act of the disaster- the long, uneven work of recovery, and the even harder task of preparing for the next storm- is the one we struggle to sustain.

The housing recovery after Harvey lasted 8 years. The same pattern appears in mental recovery. Nearly 3 in 10 disaster survivors face stress or anxiety across the U.S., yet only one receives counseling after a year, even when the need persists. And while communities rebuild, preparedness often slips back into the background. Many Americans still lack a household emergency plan, know little about evacuation routes, or have never participated in a community preparedness drill.

These gaps don't reflect a lack of will; they reveal the limits of a system that is built to respond, but not always to sustain. As emergency operations wind down and public attention shifts elsewhere, nonprofits continue showing up through recovery and preparedness. They "add value by acting fast, filling gaps, and advocating for vulnerable groups who are often forgotten when needs are overwhelming," in the words of Stephan Kline, who is CEO of NECHAMA - Jewish Response to Disaster.

After the Kerr County floods, one such nonprofit, Hill Country MHDD Centers, became a lifeline for survivors by opening a free emotional support hub. Counselors from the same town sat with families in grief, offering comfort that continues today for anyone still finding their way back to normalcy.

Another nonprofit, West Street Recovery, helped communities rebuild physically. After Winter Storm Uri, it began converting ordinary houses into ‘hub homes,’ equipped with solar panels and battery systems to keep power running.

Extending that spirit of preparedness, Sewa USA has taken readiness into the heart of communities. Through its unique AmeriCorps partnership, it has trained more than 12,000 people through community preparedness in disaster safety, mental health, and environmental awareness.

Yet across most communities, such efforts remain exceptions rather than infrastructure. The systems that scale nonprofits during response weaken once emergencies fade. To close that gap, nonprofits need structure and scale to keep the collaboration alive and strengthen two essentials between disasters: sustained rebuilding and community readiness.

A first step is building on what already works. ‘Voluntary Organizations Active in Disasters’ (VOAD) and Long-Term Recovery Groups (LTRGs) already unite hundreds of nonprofits for disaster response and recovery. But public attention, volunteers, and donations often decline rapidly after the response phase.

These LTRGs could evolve into a permanent ‘Resilience Division’, keeping the same coordination tables while also sustaining funding streams and volunteer engagement for continuity by maintaining a verified public portal where donors and volunteers can directly support trusted nonprofits.

These portals could keep recovery visible long after the response phase, sharing progress updates, photos, and stories that show how rebuilding actually unfolds on the ground.

Beyond recovery, these Divisions would also expand their mandate to preparedness. They would keep the network active through quarterly preparedness training hosted by member nonprofits in their own communities and annual reviews of lessons learned from past disasters.

Together, these systems would give nonprofits the structure to lead and sustain America’s disaster management. One where nonprofits preserve trust and relationships, and systems provide scale and authority.

Gitesh Desai is the former president of Sewa International USA’s Houston chapter and led large-scale volunteer rescue, relief, and recovery efforts during Hurricane Harvey.


Read More

US America and China flags on chess king on a chessboard.

USA and China trade relations, cooperation strategy. US America and China flags on chess king on a chessboard.

Getty Images

America’s Gridlock Is Beijing’s Best Argument

Americans tend to treat democracy’s superiority as settled, and the long-run evidence backs them up. A major study by MIT economist Daron Acemoglu and colleagues found that countries that democratize end up about 20 percent richer per person within a generation. But most of the world does not grade governments on long-run studies. For billions of people outside the wealthy West, the test is simpler: does the power stay on, are food prices steady, is there work, and do the roads get built? When the stomach is empty, a ballot can feel like a luxury.

China understands this and sells its model on exactly those terms. Its GDP per capita has climbed from about $300 in 1980 to nearly $15,000 today, by IMF figures, and the World Bank credits it with lifting some 800 million people out of extreme poverty. India, the world’s largest democracy, started from a similar place and sits near $2,800. Beijing’s centralized system, paired with Deng Xiaoping’s market reforms, built power plants, factories and rail lines at a pace India’s more deliberative politics has not matched. Anyone who values liberty will find little to admire in that model. It does explain why the model sells.

Keep ReadingShow less
American soldier in headquarter control center

American soldier in headquarter control center

Getty Images

Why America Must Rethink Its Counterterrorism Strategy in Nigeria

When American forces conducted airstrikes against suspected Islamic State militants in northwest Nigeria on Christmas Day 2025, the operation signaled a renewal of security cooperation between Washington and Abuja. Yet for Nigerians living in communities plagued by terrorism, kidnapping, and armed attacks, a critical question remained: Will these strikes make their daily lives any safer?

That question demands serious consideration in Washington. The United States has spent decades helping Nigeria combat terrorism through military equipment, intelligence sharing, and tactical training. Yet, armed violence continues to disrupt daily life across northern Nigeria, raising doubts about how the effectiveness of American counterterrorism assistance should be measured.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pete Hegseth

US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on October 28, 2026.

(Photo by Ezra Acayan/Getty Images)

Pete Hegseth and the High Price of Compromised Governance

Just days after a historic midterm election in which everyday Americans sent a clear, undeniable demand for political accountability and transparency, the halls of Congress have devolved into a new theater of crisis. Republican Representative Thomas Massie’s introduction of eight articles of impeachment against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has thrown the Department—and the nation’s fragile democratic norms—into uncharted territory.

Massie, a longtime Trump critic who plans to retire from Congress at the end of the year, accuses Hegseth of bypassing Congress and violating constitutional limits on war powers.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close up of pharmacist hand taking meds from drawer

New federal law already targets PBM pricing and rebate practices. An opinion on why state pharmacy ownership bans go too far, and the freight-rail lesson.

Cris Cantón/Getty Images

State Healthcare Reforms Have Gone Off the Rails

Government generally has two ways to address problems in a marketplace. It can establish clear rules, target harmful conduct and let competition produce better outcomes. Or it can design the market itself by controlling business decisions and dictating how companies must operate. That is the decision facing lawmakers in healthcare today.

America's freight-rail experience shows what is at stake. For decades, the Interstate Commerce Commission controlled railroad rates, restricted routes and made it hard for carriers to shed unprofitable lines. Intended to stabilize an essential industry, the rules instead contributed to bankruptcies and lagging investment.

Keep ReadingShow less