Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Why America Needs Its Nonprofits to Manage Disasters

Opinion

Why America Needs Its Nonprofits to Manage Disasters

Search and rescue operations are performed in the Guadalupe River on July 14, 2025 in Kerrville, Texas.

(Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

When the Guadalupe River broke its banks across Kerr County, the water carried off not only homes but many fragmented memories: a stuffed bear, a baby shoe, and family photos blurred beyond recognition. Within days, volunteers began piecing those fragments back together through a ‘Texas Flood Lost & Found’ network, reuniting survivors with what little could be recovered.

Within two weeks, more than 14,000 volunteers from different nonprofits showed up to help the survivors of the Hill Country floods. The same spirit defined Texas’s response to Harvey in 2017, when the state, along with its nonprofits, led one of the largest rescue operations in U.S. history.


From local food pantries to national relief networks, nonprofits have become the connective tissue of America’s disaster response. In those first hours, it feels like the whole country moves together. But when the cameras go dark, the rhythm breaks. The second act of the disaster- the long, uneven work of recovery, and the even harder task of preparing for the next storm- is the one we struggle to sustain.

The housing recovery after Harvey lasted 8 years. The same pattern appears in mental recovery. Nearly 3 in 10 disaster survivors face stress or anxiety across the U.S., yet only one receives counseling after a year, even when the need persists. And while communities rebuild, preparedness often slips back into the background. Many Americans still lack a household emergency plan, know little about evacuation routes, or have never participated in a community preparedness drill.

These gaps don't reflect a lack of will; they reveal the limits of a system that is built to respond, but not always to sustain. As emergency operations wind down and public attention shifts elsewhere, nonprofits continue showing up through recovery and preparedness. They "add value by acting fast, filling gaps, and advocating for vulnerable groups who are often forgotten when needs are overwhelming," in the words of Stephan Kline, who is CEO of NECHAMA - Jewish Response to Disaster.

After the Kerr County floods, one such nonprofit, Hill Country MHDD Centers, became a lifeline for survivors by opening a free emotional support hub. Counselors from the same town sat with families in grief, offering comfort that continues today for anyone still finding their way back to normalcy.

Another nonprofit, West Street Recovery, helped communities rebuild physically. After Winter Storm Uri, it began converting ordinary houses into ‘hub homes,’ equipped with solar panels and battery systems to keep power running.

Extending that spirit of preparedness, Sewa USA has taken readiness into the heart of communities. Through its unique AmeriCorps partnership, it has trained more than 12,000 people through community preparedness in disaster safety, mental health, and environmental awareness.

Yet across most communities, such efforts remain exceptions rather than infrastructure. The systems that scale nonprofits during response weaken once emergencies fade. To close that gap, nonprofits need structure and scale to keep the collaboration alive and strengthen two essentials between disasters: sustained rebuilding and community readiness.

A first step is building on what already works. ‘Voluntary Organizations Active in Disasters’ (VOAD) and Long-Term Recovery Groups (LTRGs) already unite hundreds of nonprofits for disaster response and recovery. But public attention, volunteers, and donations often decline rapidly after the response phase.

These LTRGs could evolve into a permanent ‘Resilience Division’, keeping the same coordination tables while also sustaining funding streams and volunteer engagement for continuity by maintaining a verified public portal where donors and volunteers can directly support trusted nonprofits.

These portals could keep recovery visible long after the response phase, sharing progress updates, photos, and stories that show how rebuilding actually unfolds on the ground.

Beyond recovery, these Divisions would also expand their mandate to preparedness. They would keep the network active through quarterly preparedness training hosted by member nonprofits in their own communities and annual reviews of lessons learned from past disasters.

Together, these systems would give nonprofits the structure to lead and sustain America’s disaster management. One where nonprofits preserve trust and relationships, and systems provide scale and authority.

Gitesh Desai is the former president of Sewa International USA’s Houston chapter and led large-scale volunteer rescue, relief, and recovery efforts during Hurricane Harvey.


Read More

An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less