Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Showing Up and Staying: Disaster Relief in an Age of Distrust

Opinion

Showing Up and Staying: Disaster Relief in an Age of Distrust

NECHAMA volunteers in Western North Carolina after Hurricane Helene.

As the Atlantic hurricane season officially began on June 1, disaster response organizations across the country are preparing for the next storm. That preparation includes coordinating logistics, purchasing supplies, training volunteers, and strengthening partnerships. It now also requires planning for an environment shaped by misinformation, distrust, and competing narratives.

A recent 60 Minutes segment examining extremist groups in disaster zones highlighted how quickly public perceptions can form after a disaster. Recovery efforts are now followed by outside groups and online networks attempting to influence how events are understood while communities are still in crisis.


The segment highlighted a reality many disaster response organizations have increasingly encountered: disaster zones are no longer only spaces for physical recovery. They are also environments where information moves quickly, emotions run high, and public perception can form before recovery is completed. In the 60 Minutes segment, Henderson County, North Carolina, Sheriff Lowell Griffin warned that this may become “the new normal” for disaster response.

Fear, uncertainty, and isolation create fertile ground for misinformation after disasters. In moments when communities are struggling to make sense of loss and disruption, narratives can spread quickly, often filling the vacuum before facts and recovery efforts have had time to take shape.

We saw this during NECHAMA’s deployment after Hurricane Helene in Western North Carolina. Volunteers from Jewish communities across the country worked alongside local churches, civic groups, and community organizations to clear debris, muck homes, and support families recovering from the storm. At the same time, online misinformation about both the disaster and recovery efforts circulated widely, often disconnected from conditions on the ground.

Disaster response now happens both on the ground and online, where recovery efforts and public narratives develop at the same time. In highly visible moments of crisis, volunteers become ambassadors of trust. Their presence shapes how communities understand who is showing up and whom they come to trust during uncertain times.

NECHAMA volunteers work alongside local residents during recovery efforts in Western North Carolina.

In many of the communities NECHAMA serves, our volunteers may be among the first Jewish people local residents have ever worked beside. In others, NECHAMA may be the only Jewish organization that people encounter during a time of crisis. Those interactions matter. Trust is often built not through statements or slogans but through direct experiences and shared work during difficult moments.

This does not mean disaster response should be reframed primarily through the lens of public relations. The core mission remains helping communities recover after disaster strikes. NECHAMA means “comfort” in Hebrew, and that commitment is reflected through direct service and long-term recovery work in partnership with local communities.

As storms grow more destructive and recovery becomes more complex for vulnerable communities, organizations are operating in environments where misinformation can spread rapidly and public trust can become fragile. That reality makes partnership, consistency, and long-term presence even more important.

For volunteers, showing up is only the beginning. Communities remember the people who work beside them, listen to their stories, and remain engaged after headlines fade. In an age of distrust, service itself becomes an act of relationship-building.

NECHAMA’s work has always been grounded in service: showing up, working alongside local communities, and remaining committed long after media attention fades. In moments of crisis, communities remember who showed up and who stayed.


Stephan Kline is Chief Executive Officer of NECHAMA – Jewish Response to Disaster.

Tzlil McDonald serves as Project Director, Combating Antisemitism, leading interfaith outreach efforts in Western North Carolina and beyond.

For more information, contact: stephan.kline@nechama.org or tzlil@nechama.org


Read More

The Reward — Angela and James: An American Dynasty

Ring–Fitzgerald Homestead, Will County (1987). A house still true to its original form, carrying forward the Rings’ steadiness, aspiration, and good citizenship across five generations.

Photo courtesy by Patrick Fitzgerald.

The Reward — Angela and James: An American Dynasty

They got an early start; the morning light came on fast. The Ring siblings were headed to the Joliet depot with young Angela in tow — the same depot where Lincoln’s funeral train had passed in silence thirty years earlier. Now they were bound for the White City, forty miles northeast. The Columbian Exposition was a turning point for both Angela and America. Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Show, pitched just outside the fairgrounds, rivaled the Exhibition itself.

One photograph captured it all. Taken in a fairground photo booth, the Ring siblings stood in their summer clothes, huddled around eleven-year-old Angela. Their faces were bright and open — a single moment preserved in time. Determined to outshine the 1889 Paris Exhibition and its Eiffel Tower, Chicago answered with George Ferris’s great wheel. At night, the city glowed, outlined in electric white light.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less