Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Economic Models that Made America Great Are Broken

Opinion

The Economic Models that Made America Great Are Broken

American flag and money

Javier Ghersi/Getty Images

We all want an America where hard work pays, families thrive, and the American Dream is real again. Greatness starts with dignity for workers, safety for communities, and a fair shot for every kid. The promise is simple: if you put in the work, you should be able to raise a family and get ahead—period.

So why do we cling to what is obviously not working for everyday people?


Reflect on the good ole’ days of 2019, and the status of basic societal pillars.

I would consider these economic indicators to be alarming. They are big red flashing signs that the economy isn’t working for everyone. Stop and consider your own life for a moment. What is working well for you? What isn’t? And what actions are you taking to change what isn’t working in your life?

For most of us, making change is really, really hard. We think about it for a fleeting moment and then it passes—we keep doing what we have to do to survive inside the current societal and economic systems.

The economic models that once turbo-charged a (mostly white) mid-century middle class are now producing a reality where many working people can’t get ahead.

Stay with me for a quick detour into Buddhism—then we’ll come right back to the U.S. economy.

In Buddhism, there’s an ideal called right livelihood.” Five livelihoods to avoid are often named as:

  1. The business of butchery, killing animals
  2. The trade in weapons, explosives and instruments of death
  3. Trading in humans, slavery, or the flesh of beings for slaughter
  4. Trading in poisons and toxic substances
  5. Trading in intoxicants and drugs

Back to the U.S. economy. Look at where outsized profits often flow in our system. In modern terms, these map to:

  • Meat packing / big-game tourism
  • Defense industry
  • Prison industry
  • Chemical & energy industries
  • Big Pharma

And of course, there are illegal versions, too:

  • Poaching and wildlife smuggling
  • Mercenaries, illicit arms
  • Human trafficking
  • Toxic dumping
  • Drug cartels

When I first discovered the “right livelihood” list, I wanted to adopt it immediately. I wasn’t working in those trades. I wasn’t invested in the stock market. But I ate meat. I took prescription pills. I drank alcohol. Hmm.

The more I studied these high-profit sectors, the more it occurred to me: our economy is breaking because it fails to reward life-giving outcomes. That’s part of why we’re in a transformative (disruptive) time. (For example, in 2019 the U.S. still emitted over 6.5 billion metric tons CO₂-equivalent, and global health research linked millions of premature deaths each year to pollution—costs the market often doesn’t price in.)

So why are we clinging to a system that was set up to fail us? Why not grieve the loss and begin building what comes next—something more wholesome?

That’s what a future economy could incentivize: wholesome outcomes. What would we have to change about ourselves to do it?

Here’s where our resistance to change matters most and why we cling to what is obviously not working for all.

The system may be broken and even irreparable. But we know it. We work around it. We cling to it because it’s familiar. We resist change not because we don’t want it, but because it is uncertain. And certainty feels like safety, even when that safety is bad for us.

To overcome our human default, we need three things:

  1. A future worth the risk. Picture it vividly. Most of all, FEEL it deeply in your bones.
  2. A community of support. Compare visions, swap tools, back each other up.
  3. Contagious joy. Communicate with clarity and delight—enough to short-circuit algorithms that prey on outrage and keep us stuck.

In short: a worthy vision, a supportive community, and joy. Then more joy.

Practice makes progress. If we dedicate ourselves to becoming this—a little more each day—we’re far more likely to succeed.

Or… we can keep clinging to what is.

It’s our choice.

The Economic Models that Made America Great Are Broken was first published on Debilyn Molineaux's Substack platform and republished with permission.

Debilyn Molineaux is a storyteller, collaborator & connector. For 20 years, she led cross-partisan organizations. She currently holds several roles, including catalyst for JEDIFutures.org and podcast host of Terrified Nation. She also works with the Center for Collaborative Democracy, which is home to the Grand Bargain Project as a way to unify Americans by getting unstuck on six big issues, all at the same time. She previously co-founded BridgeAlliance, Living Room Conversations, and the National Week of Conversation. You can learn more about her work on LinkedIn.

Read More

America’s Tariff Mirage and the Coming Debt Reckoning

Record tariff revenues mask a deepening U.S. fiscal crisis as deficits, debt, and interest costs soar, raising alarms about economic stability and governance.

Getty Images, Andriy Onufriyenko

America’s Tariff Mirage and the Coming Debt Reckoning

The latest fiscal disclosures from the US Treasury offer a stark reality check for a country that continues to see itself as the global lodestar of economic stability. Tariffs, once an auxiliary tool of industrial policy or bargaining chip in trade negotiations, have quietly morphed into the financial backbone of the Trump administration’s economic experiment. October’s revenue haul - an unprecedented thirty-four point two billion dollars, up more than threefold from a year earlier - has been heralded by the White House as vindication. It is, according to President Trump, not merely proof that tariffs are “working,” but a testament to a new era of American prosperity robust enough to fund direct cash transfers to households. A two-thousand-dollar bonus, he insists, is just the beginning.

The president has taken to social media to cast opponents of this approach as out-of-touch elites, blind to a transformed landscape in which the United States is, in his words, “the richest and most respected country in the world.” Record stock prices, swollen retirement accounts, and subdued inflation are deployed to sustain an alluring political narrative: that tariffs are no longer punitive, but emancipatory - a fiscal engine capable of generating national renewal.

Keep ReadingShow less
American flag and money
American flag and money
Javier Ghersi/Getty Images

Why Is the American Economy Designed to Punish the People Who Build It?

Walk onto any construction site in America.

Step into any busy emergency room.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cryptocurrency: Debunking Myths, Understanding Realities, and Exploring Economic and Social Impacts
a pile of gold and silver bitcoins
Photo by Traxer on Unsplash

Cryptocurrency: Debunking Myths, Understanding Realities, and Exploring Economic and Social Impacts

“In 2020 and 2021, there was a big crypto bubble. You couldn’t turn a corner without seeing another celebrity crypto endorsement," said Mark Hays, the Associate Director for Cryptocurrency and Financial Technology with AFR/AFREF and with Demand Progress during the NFRPP’s October 25th, 2025, panel discussion. Hilary J. Allen, a Professor of Law at the American University Washington College of Law, joined Hays. The discussion was moderated by Peter Coy, a freelance journalist covering economics, business, and finance.

Celebrities like Kevin Hart, Gwyneth Paltrow, Madonna, Justin Bieber, Serena Williams, Paris Hilton, and Snoop Dogg jumped to endorse crypto-related companies. The record of these endorsements has been poor (Bloomberg), and some are calling for people who endorse these products without doing due diligence to face legal repercussions (Boston College Law Review). The message from the NFRPP’s panel discussion was one of intense skepticism towards cryptocurrencies in general, with Professor Allen going so far as to call them a “failure as a technology.”

Keep ReadingShow less
The Welfare Queen Myth: How Racist Stereotypes Still Shape America’s War on Poverty

A powerful look at how the “welfare queen” myth—from Linda Taylor to modern AI deepfakes—racializes poverty, masks systemic corruption, and fuels political scapegoating.

Getty Images, jetcityimage

The Welfare Queen Myth: How Racist Stereotypes Still Shape America’s War on Poverty

In 1974, Linda Taylor, a 47-year-old woman in Chicago, was indicted on 31 counts of fraud involving welfare, medical assistance, food stamps, and Social Security benefits. Though few knew her name, many came to know her as the “welfare queen”—a label first coined in a Rochester, New York newspaper and later amplified by Ronald Reagan on the campaign trail in 1976. Without naming her, Reagan described a woman who used 80 aliases to collect government benefits, claiming she earned $150,000 tax-free annually. The crowd gasped. Taylor became the symbol of a racialized myth: that Black women were exploiting government handouts.

Reagan never mentioned Taylor’s race, but he didn’t need to. As Bryce Covert of The New Republic explains, the image of a fur-wearing woman in a Cadillac was unmistakably Black to many White Americans. Though 60% of AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children) recipients were non-Black, media portrayals had racialized poverty. Taylor became a proxy for resentment toward Black Americans and public assistance. The stereotype mirrored that of affirmative action: the idea that Black people were gaming the system, prompting policies that harmed all poor families.

Keep ReadingShow less