Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Economic Models that Made America Great Are Broken

Opinion

The Economic Models that Made America Great Are Broken

American flag and money

Javier Ghersi/Getty Images

We all want an America where hard work pays, families thrive, and the American Dream is real again. Greatness starts with dignity for workers, safety for communities, and a fair shot for every kid. The promise is simple: if you put in the work, you should be able to raise a family and get ahead—period.

So why do we cling to what is obviously not working for everyday people?


Reflect on the good ole’ days of 2019, and the status of basic societal pillars.

I would consider these economic indicators to be alarming. They are big red flashing signs that the economy isn’t working for everyone. Stop and consider your own life for a moment. What is working well for you? What isn’t? And what actions are you taking to change what isn’t working in your life?

For most of us, making change is really, really hard. We think about it for a fleeting moment and then it passes—we keep doing what we have to do to survive inside the current societal and economic systems.

The economic models that once turbo-charged a (mostly white) mid-century middle class are now producing a reality where many working people can’t get ahead.

Stay with me for a quick detour into Buddhism—then we’ll come right back to the U.S. economy.

In Buddhism, there’s an ideal called right livelihood.” Five livelihoods to avoid are often named as:

  1. The business of butchery, killing animals
  2. The trade in weapons, explosives and instruments of death
  3. Trading in humans, slavery, or the flesh of beings for slaughter
  4. Trading in poisons and toxic substances
  5. Trading in intoxicants and drugs

Back to the U.S. economy. Look at where outsized profits often flow in our system. In modern terms, these map to:

  • Meat packing / big-game tourism
  • Defense industry
  • Prison industry
  • Chemical & energy industries
  • Big Pharma

And of course, there are illegal versions, too:

  • Poaching and wildlife smuggling
  • Mercenaries, illicit arms
  • Human trafficking
  • Toxic dumping
  • Drug cartels

When I first discovered the “right livelihood” list, I wanted to adopt it immediately. I wasn’t working in those trades. I wasn’t invested in the stock market. But I ate meat. I took prescription pills. I drank alcohol. Hmm.

The more I studied these high-profit sectors, the more it occurred to me: our economy is breaking because it fails to reward life-giving outcomes. That’s part of why we’re in a transformative (disruptive) time. (For example, in 2019 the U.S. still emitted over 6.5 billion metric tons CO₂-equivalent, and global health research linked millions of premature deaths each year to pollution—costs the market often doesn’t price in.)

So why are we clinging to a system that was set up to fail us? Why not grieve the loss and begin building what comes next—something more wholesome?

That’s what a future economy could incentivize: wholesome outcomes. What would we have to change about ourselves to do it?

Here’s where our resistance to change matters most and why we cling to what is obviously not working for all.

The system may be broken and even irreparable. But we know it. We work around it. We cling to it because it’s familiar. We resist change not because we don’t want it, but because it is uncertain. And certainty feels like safety, even when that safety is bad for us.

To overcome our human default, we need three things:

  1. A future worth the risk. Picture it vividly. Most of all, FEEL it deeply in your bones.
  2. A community of support. Compare visions, swap tools, back each other up.
  3. Contagious joy. Communicate with clarity and delight—enough to short-circuit algorithms that prey on outrage and keep us stuck.

In short: a worthy vision, a supportive community, and joy. Then more joy.

Practice makes progress. If we dedicate ourselves to becoming this—a little more each day—we’re far more likely to succeed.

Or… we can keep clinging to what is.

It’s our choice.

The Economic Models that Made America Great Are Broken was first published on Debilyn Molineaux's Substack platform and republished with permission.

Debilyn Molineaux is a storyteller, collaborator & connector. For 20 years, she led cross-partisan organizations. She currently holds several roles, including catalyst for JEDIFutures.org and podcast host of Terrified Nation. She also works with the Center for Collaborative Democracy, which is home to the Grand Bargain Project as a way to unify Americans by getting unstuck on six big issues, all at the same time. She previously co-founded BridgeAlliance, Living Room Conversations, and the National Week of Conversation. You can learn more about her work on LinkedIn.


Read More

Trump Frames Economy As ‘Stronger than Ever Before’ in State of the Union, but Lawmakers Question the Claim

President Donald Trump delivered his State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night.

(Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)

Trump Frames Economy As ‘Stronger than Ever Before’ in State of the Union, but Lawmakers Question the Claim

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump used the longest State of the Union address in U.S. history on Tuesday night to argue that Americans are already experiencing “a turnaround for the ages” thanks to his agenda. But moments of disruption inside the House chamber and reactions from lawmakers afterward suggested Democrats and even some Republicans dispute his claims.

Trump’s address offered a snapshot of how the White House is trying to frame the economy heading into an election year. The administration sought to present easing inflation, falling prices, and rising wages as settled facts.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Capitol

A shrinking deficit doesn’t mean fiscal health. CBO projections show rising debt, Social Security insolvency, and trillions added under the 2025 tax law.

Getty Images, Dmitry Vinogradov

The Deficit Mirage

The False Comfort of a Good Headline

A mirage can look real from a distance. The closer you get, the less substance you find. That is increasingly how Washington talks about the federal deficit.

Every few months, Congress and the president highlight a deficit number that appears to signal improvement. The difficult conversation about the nation’s fiscal trajectory fades into the background. But a shrinking deficit is not necessarily a sign of fiscal health. It measures one year’s gap between revenue and spending. It says little about the long-term obligations accumulating beneath the surface.

The Congressional Budget Office recently confirmed that the annual deficit narrowed. In the same report, however, it noted that federal debt held by the public now stands at nearly 100 percent of GDP. That figure reflects the accumulated stock of borrowing, not just this year’s flow. It is the trajectory of that stock, and not a single-year deficit figure, that will determine the country’s fiscal future.

What the Deficit Doesn’t Show

The deficit is politically attractive because it is simple and headline-friendly. It appears manageable on paper. Both parties have invoked it selectively for decades, celebrating short-term improvements while downplaying long-term drift. But the deeper fiscal story lies elsewhere.

Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the debt now account for roughly half of federal outlays, and their share rises automatically each year. These commitments do not pause for election cycles. They grow with demographics, health costs, and compounding interest.

According to the CBO, those three categories will consume 58 cents of every federal dollar by 2035. Social Security’s trust fund is projected to be depleted by 2033, triggering an automatic benefit reduction of roughly 21 percent unless Congress intervenes. Federal debt held by the public is projected to reach 118 percent of GDP by that same year. A favorable monthly deficit report does not alter any of these structural realities. These projections come from the same nonpartisan budget office lawmakers routinely cite when it supports their position.

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

A take on permitting reform, deregulation, and DHS accountability—arguing for economic growth with guardrails that protect communities, health, and the environment.

Getty Images, Javier Ghersi

A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

For far too long, our national conversation has been framed around a false choice. On one side, Republicans frequently argue that the best way to strengthen the economy and improve the lives of everyday Americans is to give businesses maximum freedom by having fewer rules, fewer constraints and more incentives to grow. On the other side, Democrats have stressed the need for guardrails to protect our environment, our health, and our communities from the unintended effects of unchecked growth.

But this debate has always been too narrow. It assumes that we must choose between action and accountability, between getting things done and doing them responsibly.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Many Victims of Trump’s Immigration Policy–Including the U.S. Economy

Messages of support are posted on the entrance of the Don Julio Mexican restaurant and bar on January 18, 2026 in Forest Lake, Minnesota. The restaurant was reportedly closed because of ICE operations in the area. Residents in some places have organized amid a reported deployment of 3,000 federal agents in the area who have been tasked with rounding up and deporting suspected undocumented immigrants

Getty Images, Scott Olson

The Many Victims of Trump’s Immigration Policy–Including the U.S. Economy

The first year of President Donald Trump’s second term resulted in some of the most profound immigration policy changes in modern history. With illegal border crossings having dropped to their lowest levels in over 50 years, Trump can claim a measure of victory. But it’s a hollow victory, because it’s becoming increasingly clear that his immigration policy is not only damaging families, communities, workplaces, and schools - it is also hurting the economy and adding to still-soaring prices.

Besides the terrifying police state tactics, the most dramatic shift in Trump's immigration policy, compared to his presidential predecessors (including himself in his first term), is who he is targeting. Previously, a large number of the removals came from immigrants who showed up at the border but were turned away and never allowed to enter the country. But with so much success at reducing activity at the border, Trump has switched to prioritizing “internal deportations” – removing illegal immigrants who are already living in the country, many of them for years, with families, careers, jobs, and businesses.

Keep ReadingShow less