Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) Federalism at Its Best

Opinion

​Women holding a protest sign about voting

Women holding a protest sign for presidential United States elections.

Getty Images

Federalism operates at its peak when states collaborate as a unified network rather than acting as isolated silos. While the American system traditionally views states as competitive "laboratories of democracy," pure isolationism limits policy success. When states pool resources, align regulations, and share data, they solve national problems faster without expanding federal bureaucracy.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) represents federalism at its best by using explicit constitutional state powers to modernize the presidential election system without a constitutional amendment.


Why the NPVIC is True Federalism

Exercises state sovereignty: The Constitution explicitly grants states the absolute authority to choose how they allocate their electors.

Protects local control: It bypasses federal overreach by keeping the election process firmly in the hands of state legislatures.

Reduces federal intervention: It solves a structural democratic issue through state-level cooperation rather than a federal mandate.

Encourages state collaboration: It creates a voluntary pact among equal states to achieve a shared, nationwide goal.

Preserves the Electoral College: It changes how electors are assigned instead of abolishing the constitutional framework entirely.

The 2026 midterm elections are directly relevant to the enactment of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) because they will decide control of the state legislatures that hold the remaining 48 electoral votes needed to activate the agreement. Following Virginia's entry into the compact, the NPVIC sits at 222 of the required 270 electoral votes. Because no Republican governor has ever signed the NPVIC, the compact's survival and activation depend entirely on Democrats gaining or holding legislative trifectas in a specific handful of battleground and purple states during the November 3, 2026, midterms.

The relevance of each specified state to the NPVIC’s mathematical and legislative path to 270 is detailed below.

The Immediate Path to 270 (The Primary Catalysts)

To bridge the 48-vote gap, NPVIC strategists are targeting four key states where legislative margins are razor-thin. Winning trifectas here in the 2026 midterms could allow the compact to cross the finish line in the 2027 legislative session.

Michigan (15 Electoral Votes): The 2026 midterms are critical for defending or expanding narrow legislative margins. Because Michigan has previously passed the NPVIC in one chamber, securing a supportive legislature is the highest-priority step toward capturing nearly a third of the remaining 48 votes.

Pennsylvania (19 Electoral Votes): As the largest remaining prize on the plausible path, the balance of power determined in the 2026 midterms will make or break the compact. Proponents view Pennsylvania as essential; without its 19 votes, the math to reach 270 without deep-red states becomes nearly impossible.

Arizona (11 Electoral Votes): Arizona has historically shown bipartisan openness to the compact, having passed it in the House in 2016. The 2026 legislative elections will determine if a unified majority will finally pass it through both chambers and send it to the governor.

Nevada (6 Electoral Votes): Nevada passed the NPVIC via both chambers in 2023 but failed to pass it a mandatory second time in 2025 to send it to voters as a constitutional amendment. The 2026 legislative races will decide if a new majority will revive the push.

The Alternates (The Secondary Math Insurance)

If any of the primary states fail to flip or hold, these states serve as critical structural backups to reach the 270 threshold.

Wisconsin (10 Electoral Votes): Wisconsin has previously introduced NPVIC legislation (such as HB 156). The 2026 midterms are crucial for breaking entrenched majorities to position the state as a viable 10-vote substitute if Pennsylvania or Michigan stalls.

New Hampshire (4 Electoral Votes): While small, New Hampshire represents vital "insurance" votes. The 2026 midterms will decide if the state's highly volatile legislative chambers swing toward reformers looking to edge the compact over the 270-vote finish line.

The Defensive & Long-Term Targets

Georgia (16 Electoral Votes) & Texas (40 Electoral Votes): Under current political alignments, neither state is a candidate to join the compact in the immediate future due to unified opposition from conservative leadership. However, the 2026 midterms in Georgia and Texas serve as a long-term barometer. If demographic shifts alter legislative margins, it forces the national landscape away from a "winner-take-all" defensive strategy, potentially shifting how both opponents and proponents value the Electoral College over the next decade.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the overall popular vote nationwide.

The National Popular Vote interstate Compact (NPVIC) What It Is - Why It's Needed, YouTube video is summarized as, follows:

What It Is

The Mechanism: Participating states pass laws pledging their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote (the total number of individual votes cast across all 50 states and D.C.).

The Trigger: The compact does not change the U.S. Constitution. It stays inactive until enough states join to reach 270 electoral votes, the magic number required to win the presidency.

The Result: Once activated, it guarantees that the candidate who receives the most votes across the entire country wins the White House, without needing a constitutional amendment.

Current Status: As of August 31,2026, 18 states and Washington, D.C., representing 222 electoral votes, have enacted the compact, needing 48 more electoral votes to take effect.

Why It's Needed

Prevents Popular Vote Mismatches: Under the current Electoral College system, a candidate can win the national popular vote yet still lose the election (which happened in 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016). Proponents argue this undermines the democratic principle that the candidate with the most votes should win.

Eliminates Swing State Focus: Currently, presidential campaigns focus almost entirely on a handful of tightly contested "battleground" states. Voters in safely "red" or "blue" states are largely ignored. The NPVIC ensures every vote in every state matters equally.

Encourages Higher Voter Turnout: When people feel their individual votes do not matter in a lopsided state, they may stay home. The compact gives every citizen a direct stake in the national total, boosting civic participation.

Hugh J. Campbell, Jr., CPA, is a Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) professional and a student of W. Edwards Deming, the American statistician often credited as the catalyst for the Japanese economic miracle after WWII.


Read More

Be a voter stickers

Be a voter stickers

Photo by Dan Dennis on Unsplash

Blue Wave, Red Undertow, Independent Surge

The midterms seem to be adhering to a familiar script: the sitting president will be rebuked and the party in power will lose seats in Congress. There’s a blue wave coming. Or there’s a red undertow that will sink the GOP.

But look closer. Not everything is red and blue. Independent voters, independent candidates, and independent reform is surging. Even independent celebrities like Matthew McConaughey are stirring the pot!

Keep ReadingShow less
woman enters a building to vote
a group of people outside a building

Political Accountability Begins Before Election Day

In a response video circulating on September 22, Brandon Herrera, the Republican nominee in Texas’s 23rd Congressional District, described his remarks about mothers and children as “a bit crass” but said “the sentiment stands”. His response renewed a question that extends beyond one candidate: what responsibility do parties bear before voters make their choice?

Elections are supposed to make politicians accountable. Candidates ask voters to judge their records, their positions, and their conduct, and voters ultimately decide who will represent them. But that familiar picture of democracy leaves out an important part of the process: much of the work shaping the general-election choice happens earlier. Parties recruit candidates, political organizations support them, donors help finance them, and influential political figures give them credibility. Herrera’s candidacy offers a revealing example of how that process works.

Keep ReadingShow less
Nigeria flag, elections, ballot box, casting vote.

Nigeria flag, elections, ballot box, casting vote.

Getty Images

As Nigeria Prepares to Vote, Years of U.S. Democracy Support Face a New Test

For years, American institutions helped Nigerian civic groups train election observers, track political violence and challenge false information. As Nigeria approaches its 2027 elections, the organizations that developed that expertise face a different question: how much of the work can they sustain with less financial and technical support?

Dauda Garuba, director of the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD West Africa), sees the change as part of a broader shift in American foreign policy. But he also believes it invites an uncomfortable assessment of Nigeria’s elections.

Keep ReadingShow less

Taxpayer-Funded, Closed to Millions: The Growing Push to Reform Kentucky’s Primaries

More than half of America’s military veterans identify as independents, not Democrats or Republicans. Yet in many states with closed primary systems, those voters are barred from participating in taxpayer-funded primary elections. Because veterans swear an oath to defend the Constitution, not a political party, a growing coalition of veteran-led organizations is advocating for open primaries and other electoral reforms designed to expand voter participation and strengthen representative democracy.

In Kentucky, veterans have emerged as leading voices in a nonpartisan campaign to open the Commonwealth’s closed primary system. Their efforts come as the state's electorate shifts: independent voters are the fastest-growing segment of registered voters.

Keep ReadingShow less