Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Meet the change leaders: Nick Penniman, founder and CEO of Issue One

Nick Penniman
Courtesy Issue One

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

I had the wonderful opportunity to interview Nick Penniman on March 21 for the CityBiz “Meet the Change Leaders” series.

Penniman is founder and CEO of Issue One, an organization fighting to protect U.S. elections, lessen political polarization, limit the influence of big money over politics, and improve the ability of Congress to solve problems. The organization raises awareness about these issues and advocates for legislation and federal action.


Prior to founding Issue One, Penniman was the founder and executive director of the Huffington Post Investigative Fund, director of the Schuman Center for Media and Democracy, publisher of the Washington Monthly Magazine, director of the Alliance for Democracy, and an editor at various publications, including the American Prospect and the Lincoln Journal.

He is coauthor of “ Nation on the Take: How Big Money Corrupts Our Democracy And What We Can Do About It ” and writes and appears regularly in various media outlets. He serves on multiple nonprofit boards, including OpenSecrets, and is a trustee of St. Lawrence University.

Issue One had many impressive accomplishments in 2023.

  • Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes and Pennsylvania Secretary of State Al Schmidt, members of Issue One’s Faces of Democracy, testified before the Senate Rules and Administration Committee in a hearing focused on the ongoing threats to election administration. Both cited the need for Congress to adequately fund elections to help mitigate the impact of high turnover of election officials.
  • Along with Project Liberty and the 5Rights Foundation, Issue One and the Council for Responsible Social Media helped launch the Safe Tech, Safe Kids campaign to push for a world in which young people and those who care about them have the tools, transparency, and agency they need to stay safe online.
  • Issue One released a deep-dive investigation into the exodus of local election officials since the 2020 presidential election. “ The High Cost of Turnover ” was covered by dozens of national and regional media outlets.
  • The organization hosted a fly-in during which two dozen current and former election officials from the Faces of Democracy program came to Washington, D.C., and met with the officials from the White House, Department of Justice, and Department of Homeland Security, and nearly 60 Republican and Democratic members of Congress to secure our country’s critical election infrastructure and protect election workers in advance of the 2024 election and beyond.
  • It organized more than a dozen groups from across the political spectrum to call on presidential candidates to disclose their campaign bundlers.
  • Issue One’s Council for Responsible Social Media worked closely with the Senate Judiciary Committee to hold a hearing on protecting our children online. The hearing featured three members of the council who highlighted the ways that social media platforms are designed to addict and monetize minors. The hearing signaled bipartisan support for congressional action that would protect the safety, privacy and well-being of youth online. Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) praised the council’s efforts from the dais.
  • It helped lead efforts to create the Subcommittee on the Modernization of Congress within the House Administration Committee to continue the important work of the House Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress, which had over 100 of its bipartisan recommendations either fully or partially implemented.

Watch the interview to learn the full extent of Penniman’s remarkable work and perhaps you’ll become more civically engaged as well.

The Fulcrum Democracy Forum Meets Nick Penniman, Founder and CEO of Issue Onewww.youtube.com


Read More

Two people at separate voting booths, filling out a ballot.

Voters cast their ballots in Colorado's primary election at the Central Library on June 30, 2026 in Denver, Colorado. Voters are deciding on candidates for Colorado Governor, US Senate and other races.

Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images

Closed Primaries Let 7% of Voters Choose 87% of Congress

Consider this wacky football scenario: What if only fans who declared their team loyalty before the game are allowed to watch the Super Bowl? Yep, unless you pick a team, you can’t get into the stadium. This is similar to how closed primary elections work, in which only registered voters of a specific political party can participate in that party's primary. That’s the brilliant analogy the Unite America Institute uses in a new, short explainer video describing the highly undemocratic system that dominates American primary elections.

“In most elections, the real contest is not the general election but the party primary held months before,” said Beth Hladick, Policy Director at Unite America. The new video is part of a year-long fellowship project: the Democracy and Public Service Initiative, a partnership between the National Academy of Public Administration and the Bridge Alliance.

Keep ReadingShow less
People attend a rally with signs that read, "Abolish ICE," and "Money out of politics."

People hold signs as Democratic Congressional candidate Brad Lander speaks during an election eve rally at Silo on June 22, 2026 in the East Williamsburg neighborhood of the Brooklyn borough in New York City.

Michael M. Santiago / Getty Images

Facts Don’t Win Elections. Stories Do.

As a student, I was taught that politics is a contest of ideas. Experience has shown me otherwise.

In a recent New York Times interview with Ezra Klein, conservative activist Chris Rufo captured this reality succinctly: “While we should have the facts on our side, and while we should use logic, by itself, it’s insufficient. Politics operates on a deeper level, an emotional level. Politics occurs on the field of sentiment and public opinion much more than on the field of abstract argumentation.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A crowd of protestors standing on a sidewalk, many holding protest signs.

Suffragists protest President Woodrow Wilson in Chicago in October 1916, four years before ratification of the 19th Amendment. The history of voting rights has never been a clean march forward; even rights later treated as inevitable were won through pressure, backlash and years of state-by-state organizing.

Universal History Archive

What 250 Years of Voting Rights Battles Tell Us About Today

Happy Fourth of July, on this 250th anniversary of the United States. We’re living through extraordinary times in American democracy, as President Trump presses for greater federal control over elections and redistricting slips loose from its once-a-decade rhythm. As always, Votebeat is focused on an essential part of it: who gets to vote, who makes the rules, and what those votes are worth.

That question has loomed over the nation from the beginning. Voting history is often framed as a steady expansion from white male landowners to everyone else. The truth is messier. States have always experimented with expanding the franchise, retracting it, and expanding it again.

Keep ReadingShow less
Texas Is Cross-Referencing Its List of Potential Noncitizen Voters With Driver’s License Records

Texas Department of Public Safety Region II Headquarters on Oct. 1, 2025 in Houston. The state is using DPS records to cross-check a list of registered voters it flagged as potential noncitizens using a federal database.

Antranik Tavitian for The Texas Tribune

Texas Is Cross-Referencing Its List of Potential Noncitizen Voters With Driver’s License Records

The Texas Secretary of State’s Office is now checking whether 2,724 registered voters it flagged as potential noncitizens may have already provided proof of citizenship to the Texas Department of Public Safety, elections division director Christina Adkins said during a meeting with county election administrators earlier this month. That check comes after county elections officials found the federal database used to generate the list flagged some voters who had already given citizenship documentation to DPS when they registered to vote.

Texas officials in October sent counties the list of potential noncitizens generated by checking the state’s voter roll of more than 18 million registered voters against a federal database used to verify citizenship. Soon after the state released the list, counties began to investigate the flagged registrants and mail notices asking them to provide documented proof of citizenship.

Keep ReadingShow less