Skip to content

Latest Stories

Top Stories

New N.C. voting machines are secretive and unhealthy, suit alleges

New N.C. voting machines are secretive and unhealthy, suit alleges

The ExpressVote machines scan a barcode to record the ballot.

UPDATE: The story now includes comment from the machine's manufacturer.

Voting rights groups filed their latest lawsuit on Wednesday, this one alleging new election systems being rolled out in North Carolina are not secure and pose a health threat.

Their suit carries significance beyond that state, the plaintiff said, because the equipment at issue is being deployed all across the country. It is called the ExpressVote touch screen machine, and its use is already facing legal challenges in Pennsylvania.

Those bringing the suit in North Carolina labeled the voting system "insecure, unreliable, unverifiable and unsafe."

The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law joined with Free Speech for People, a democracy reform group started in response to the Citizens United campaign finance deregulation ruling a decade ago, in filing the suit in state court in Wake County on behalf of the North Carolina NAACP and several voters.

It says the machines will pose a threat to the accuracy of the results in the 21 counties (out of 100 statewide) where they are supposed to be used in November because they do not create a readable paper record that voters can use to verify their choices have been properly recorded.

Instead, the printout contains a summary of a voter's choices and a barcode, which is scanned to record a vote. The barcode, which contains the actual ballot information, is not readable.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Using the touch screens also could create a health risk for voters because of the coronavirus pandemic, the lawsuit states. "We can't require voters to use machines that can become disease vectors," said John Bonifaz, president of Free Speech for People.

The machines violate provisions of the North Carolina Constitution that require free and fair elections and equal protection, the lawsuit claims.

It asks that the voting machines, made by Election Systems & Software, be decertified by the federal Election Assistance Commission and state officials and that hand-marked paper ballots be used for voting.

Spokeswoman Katina Granger said Thursday the company "stands by the ExpressVote 100 percent." It has been used successfully in thousands of places nationwide and has performed well in post-election audits, she said, and and she disputed the description of the paper receipt as not offering voters confidence their choices had properly recorded.

Both North Carolina and Pennsylvania, with a combined 35 electoral votes, were carried by President Trump last time but are high on former Vice President Joe Biden's take-back list. North Carolina is also expecting one of the closest Senate races in the nation.

Successfully pressing a broad array of litigation in such battlegrounds is key to boosting turnout that Democrats and their allies in the civil rights community see as pivotal to their chances in the fall. Republicans wield power in most of the states and are resisting the lawsuits vigorously.

Read More

Trump and Biden at the debate

Our political dysfunction was on display during the debate in the simple fact of the binary choice on stage: Trump vs Biden.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The debate, the political duopoly and the future of American democracy

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization.

The talk is all about President Joe Biden’s recent debate performance, whether he’ll be replaced at the top of the ticket and what it all means for the very concerning likelihood of another Trump presidency. These are critical questions.

But Donald Trump is also a symptom of broader dysfunction in our political system. That dysfunction has two key sources: a toxic polarization that elevates cultural warfare over policymaking, and a set of rules that protects the major parties from competition and allows them too much control over elections. These rules entrench the major-party duopoly and preclude the emergence of any alternative political leadership, giving polarization in this country its increasingly existential character.

Keep ReadingShow less
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Voters should be able to take the measure of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., since he is poised to win millions of votes in November.

Andrew Lichtenstein/Getty Images

Kennedy should have been in the debate – and states need ranked voting

Richie is co-founder and senior advisor of FairVote.

CNN’s presidential debate coincided with a fresh batch of swing-state snapshots that make one thing perfectly clear: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. may be a longshot to be our 47th president and faces his own controversies, yet the 10 percent he’s often achieving in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada and other battlegrounds could easily tilt the presidency.

Why did CNN keep him out with impossible-to-meet requirements? The performances, mistruths and misstatements by Joe Biden and Donald Trump would have shocked Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas, who managed to debate seven times without any discussion of golf handicaps — a subject better fit for a “Grumpy Old Men” outtake than one of the year’s two scheduled debates.

Keep ReadingShow less
I Voted stickers

Veterans for All Voters advocates for election reforms that enable more people to participate in primaries.

BackyardProduction/Getty Images

Veterans are working to make democracy more representative

Proctor, a Navy veteran, is a volunteer with Veterans for All Voters.

Imagine this: A general election with no negative campaigning and four or five viable candidates (regardless of party affiliation) competing based on their own personal ideas and actions — not simply their level of obstruction or how well they demonize their opponents. In this reformed election process, the candidate with the best ideas and the broadest appeal will win. The result: The exhausted majority will finally be well-represented again.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting at a dropbox in Washington, D.C.

A bill moving through Congress would only allow U.S. citizens to vote in D.C. municipal eletions.

Chen Mengtong/China News Service via Getty Images

The battle over noncitizen voting in America's capital

Rogers is the “data wrangler” at BillTrack50. He previously worked on policy in several government departments.

Should you be allowed to vote if you aren’t an American citizen? Or according to the adage ‘No taxation without representation’, if you pay taxes should you get to choose the representatives who help spend those tax dollars? Those questions are at the heart of the debate over a bill to restrict voting to U.S. citizens.

Keep ReadingShow less
people walking through a polling place

Election workers monitor a little-used polling place in Sandy Springs, Ga., during the state's 2022 primary.

Nathan Posner/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

What November election? Half of the U.S. House is already decided.

Troiano is the executive director ofUnite America, a philanthropic venture fund that invests in nonpartisan election reform to foster a more representative and functional government. He’s also the author of “The Primary Solution.”

Last month, Americans were treated to an embarrassing spectacle: Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) tradingpersonal insults related to “fake eyelashes” and a “bleach blonde bad built butch body” during a late-night committee hearing. Some likened it to Bravo’s “Real Housewives” reality TV series, and wondered how it was possible that elected officials could act that way and still be elected to Congress by the voters.

The truth is, the vast majority of us don’t actually elect our House members — not even close. Less than 10 percent of voters in Crockett’s district participated in her 2024 Democratic primary, which all but guaranteed her re-election in the safe blue district. Greene ran unopposed in her GOP primary — meaning she was re-elected without needing to win a single vote. The nearly 600,000 voters in her overwhelmingly red district were denied any meaningful choice. Both contests were decided well before most voters participate in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less