Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

New N.C. voting machines are secretive and unhealthy, suit alleges

The ExpressVote machines scan a barcode to record the ballot.

UPDATE: The story now includes comment from the machine's manufacturer.

Voting rights groups filed their latest lawsuit on Wednesday, this one alleging new election systems being rolled out in North Carolina are not secure and pose a health threat.

Their suit carries significance beyond that state, the plaintiff said, because the equipment at issue is being deployed all across the country. It is called the ExpressVote touch screen machine, and its use is already facing legal challenges in Pennsylvania.


Those bringing the suit in North Carolina labeled the voting system "insecure, unreliable, unverifiable and unsafe."

The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law joined with Free Speech for People, a democracy reform group started in response to the Citizens United campaign finance deregulation ruling a decade ago, in filing the suit in state court in Wake County on behalf of the North Carolina NAACP and several voters.

It says the machines will pose a threat to the accuracy of the results in the 21 counties (out of 100 statewide) where they are supposed to be used in November because they do not create a readable paper record that voters can use to verify their choices have been properly recorded.

Instead, the printout contains a summary of a voter's choices and a barcode, which is scanned to record a vote. The barcode, which contains the actual ballot information, is not readable.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Using the touch screens also could create a health risk for voters because of the coronavirus pandemic, the lawsuit states. "We can't require voters to use machines that can become disease vectors," said John Bonifaz, president of Free Speech for People.

The machines violate provisions of the North Carolina Constitution that require free and fair elections and equal protection, the lawsuit claims.

It asks that the voting machines, made by Election Systems & Software, be decertified by the federal Election Assistance Commission and state officials and that hand-marked paper ballots be used for voting.

Spokeswoman Katina Granger said Thursday the company "stands by the ExpressVote 100 percent." It has been used successfully in thousands of places nationwide and has performed well in post-election audits, she said, and and she disputed the description of the paper receipt as not offering voters confidence their choices had properly recorded.

Both North Carolina and Pennsylvania, with a combined 35 electoral votes, were carried by President Trump last time but are high on former Vice President Joe Biden's take-back list. North Carolina is also expecting one of the closest Senate races in the nation.

Successfully pressing a broad array of litigation in such battlegrounds is key to boosting turnout that Democrats and their allies in the civil rights community see as pivotal to their chances in the fall. Republicans wield power in most of the states and are resisting the lawsuits vigorously.

Read More

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less