Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Congress Poised to Advance Bill Providing ALS Patients Their ‘”Best Chance’” at a Cure

News

Congress Poised to Advance Bill Providing ALS Patients Their ‘”Best Chance’” at a Cure

Sandra Abrevaya and Brian Wallach give testimony at an Apr. 15 House Subcommittee hearing

(Photo by Stephen Voss, courtesy of I AM ALS)

WASHINGTON — Brian Wallach spoke with his eyes.

The Illinois native and co-founder of I AM ALS has been living with ALS for eight years and can no longer use his voice. Instead, Wallach, 45, types with his eyes, then generates speech by applying artificial intelligence to old recordings of his voice.


He used that software on Wednesday during a hearing held by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce's Health Subcommittee to testify for a bill that would expand investigational therapies treating the disease.

“It is the single biggest investment in ALS research,” Wallach said, as his wife, caregiver, and co-founder, Sandra Abrevaya, gripped his hand.

“Rereauthorizing it is our best chance of finding a cure,” said Wallach, as his wife, caregiver, and co-founder Sandra Abrevaya gripped his hand.

The proposal, introduced in the House earlier this month by Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., would reauthorize a 2021 law bill that authorizedallocated $100 million annually from 2022 to 2026 to study ALS and facilitate more investigational therapies for patients, who typically have a life expectancy of two to five years following diagnosis, said Sheri Strahl, President and CEO of ALS Network.

The measure has drawn broad, bipartisan support with 13 co-sponsors on either side of the aisle. Health Subcommittee Chair Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., predicted a “strong vote” in its favor, he said Wednesday at a press briefing. That would move the bill out of committee and put it to the Senate.

“This is not Republican or Democrat. This is Congress doing its job together, which we can do on occasion,” Griffith told Medill News Service.

Health Subcommittee Chair Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., speaks at an Apr. 15 hearing (Photo by Stephen Voss, courtesy of I AM ALS)

That would be welcome news for ALS patients, who are often restricted from traditional clinical trials, said Strahl. To participate, patients usually need to have a certain vital capacity and to have been diagnosed within the last two years.

“It takes a very long time for people to get diagnosed, the range is 11 months to 20 months,” Strahl said. “You only have four months to get your arms around the research landscape, find a clinical trial, get screened for a clinical trial, and participate.”

The bill would give those shut out of clinical trials access to investigational therapies, Strahl said. Sandra Abrevaya credits one such therapy with helping her husband live eight years past diagnosis.

“We've tried to take advantage of every opportunity we can, both with clinical trials and expanded access programs,” Abrevaya told Medill News Service. “We really do believe that Brian is alive today, in part, because we've leaned in to promising new treatments.”

The proposal would also fund and invest in a study researching the biomarkers of ALS that could allow quicker diagnosis across multiple degenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and Huntington’s diseases.

The legislation’s broad applicability and many Congress members’ personal connections to these diseases propelled the legislation forward at what, for Congress, has been breakneck speed, Quigley said.

“It's so important to think of this as the way to get to all the neurodegenerative diseases,” Quigley told Medill News Service. “Some of the best bills get caught up for reasons that defy reason. Somehow, this caught lightning in a bottle.”

Zara Norman is a graduate student reporter covering health for Medill News Service.


Read More

​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less
California’s New Law Aims To Close a Housing Gap for Domestic Violence Survivors
Emily Scherer for The 19th; Getty Images

California’s New Law Aims To Close a Housing Gap for Domestic Violence Survivors

Domestic violence survivors often struggle to find housing, and California’s “Unseen and Unheard Housing Act” will help make more housing available to meet their specific needs.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the bill Sunday requiring cities and counties to factor in domestic violence survivors when planning for future housing.

Keep ReadingShow less