Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Former members of Congress say threats of violence are on the rise

News

Former Rep. Fred Upton, model Kate Upton and baseball pitcher Justin Verlander pose outside the Capitol

Former Rep. Fred Upton (left) received threatening messages during his time in office. Some involved his niece, model Kate Upton, and her husband, baseball star Justin Verlander.

Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via Getty Images

Meyers is executive editor of The Fulcrum and president of DBM Content Solutions.

Baseball star Justin Verlander and model Kate Upton likely know that stalkers and threats come with their chosen professions. But the couple are far more famous than most other relatives of politicians, who have witnessed an increase in personal threats in recent years.

That’s one of the takeaways from a new survey conducted by the U.S. Association of Former Members of Congress and the University of Massachusetts Amherst that found retired lawmakers and their families have received threats at an increasing frequency.

Nearly half (47 percent) of retired members of Congress said they or their family members were threatened at least “sometimes,” with numbers significantly higher among women and Black or Latino members (69 percent).


“There is nothing new about people criticizing or disliking certain Members of Congress, but the uptick in violent threats towards our politicians is incredibly disturbing,” said FMC President L.F. Payne, a former Democratic lawmaker from Virginia. “Partisan disagreements should not lead to violence or threats. The results of this survey showcase a need for drastic action.”

survey questionFMC and UMass Poll survey


Former Rep. Fred Upton, a Michigan Republican, said he received his first threat after voting for the 1994 gun control legislation known as the Brady Bill, and then was targeted again after supporting the assault weapons ban during the Clinton administration. He experienced another surge in threats after voting to impeach former President Donald Trump.

“At the end we were very careful about telegraphing events ahead of time, whether it was a service club or a school,” Upton said. “We just had to be more careful so no one could get a jump on us.”

Upton recounted a particular case in which a man managed to find the lawmaker’s home phone number and would call at 1 or 2 a.m.

“He was convinced that I had broken into his hotel room and stolen his AT&T phone charger, which then prevented him from dating my niece,” Upton said, explaining that Kate Upton and Verlander, now her husband, needed to get police protection.

“They were very fearful,” he said.

And in 2021, after voting in favor of a bipartisan infrastructure bill, Upton received threatening voicemail messages. He played one of the messages on CNN, allowing viewers to hear someone tell Upton: “I hope you die. I hope everybody in your f**king family dies.”

But these anecdotes are just a drop in the bucket. The U.S. Capitol Police conducted 7,501 threat investigations in 2022. While that total is a decrease from a high of 9,626 in 2021, it still represents a 90 percent increase since 2017.

The USCP says members of both parties receive threats at a similar rate, and the FMC-UMass survey bears that out. The poll found that 49 percent of Republicans and 46 percent of Democrats reported receiving threats at least sometimes.

The survey also found that lawmakers elected more recently received threats at a higher frequency.

survey question and resultsFMC and UMass Poll survey

And it’s not just members of Congress and their families. The survey found that 30 percent of former members reported their staffers had received threats sometimes or frequently, but 45 percent among staffers employed by women and minority lawmakers.

Respondents were also fearful of potential violence more broadly related to the 2024 election: 44 percent said they were very concerned, along with 40 percent who were somewhat concerned, about election-related violence occurring during next year’s presidential election. The fear is stronger among Democrats (94 percent concerned or somewhat concerned) than among GOP, but a significant share of Republicans (74 percent) share that fear.

“While these results are extremely upsetting, it’s exactly why we felt conducting this survey was so important,” said FMC CEO Pete Weichlein. “Political tension in our country is clearly coming to a boiling point, and awareness of these findings may be the first step to combating it.”

Actual violence against lawmakers and their families is rare, but certainly a concern. Most recently:

The FMC and UMass-Amherst survey included responses from 293 former House members and senators; 55 percent were Democrats and 45 percent were Republicans.


Read More

The dome of the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., stands tall against a blue sky with the American flag waving proudly

A look at this week's congressional agenda, including House votes on Iran, Ukraine, FISA, appropriations, and key legislative priorities.

Getty Images, aire images

Legislative Preview for June 1, 2026

There will be plenty of coverage around the likely drama involved in picking up where House and Senate Republicans left off before this most recent week off. (For a recap, see our last post.) So we’re not going to go into any detail about what might happen with the reconciliation bill (originally only for two departments in the Department of Homeland Security; now enlarged with funding for the President’s ballroom project and overshadowed by the announcement of the President’s plan to pay off political allies with funds from the Department of Justice) or the FISA extension or the housing bill that’s been pingponging between chambers because you can read in sources like Politico about these marquee issue.

We will note that the Iran War resolution postponed in the House before the recess may be up for a vote this week, along with a resolution to remove US troops from Lebanon and a discharge petition (number 8) to put forward a bill authorizing support for Ukraine. Three privileged resolutions, of which one is a discharge petition (meaning it has 218 co-sponsors meaning at least a few House Republican co-sponsors), is a lot for one week. Especially when all three are expressing opposition to various administration stances and might get some House Republican votes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Can Governing Survive Without Continuity?
white and black quote board
Photo by Brendan Beale on Unsplash

Can Governing Survive Without Continuity?

Modern societies depend on continuity.

Electric grids are built over decades. Infrastructure systems require long investment cycles. Defense planning depends on sustained procurement and strategic consistency. Climate adaptation, energy systems, artificial intelligence governance, public health preparedness, and fiscal stability all require institutions capable of maintaining long-term priorities across multiple administrations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Can Coalitions Built on Opposition Still Govern?

Supporters of President Donald Trump, February 09, 2024 in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Can Coalitions Built on Opposition Still Govern?

Political parties are supposed to do two things at once: win elections and govern. Those are not the same skill.

Winning elections requires assembling coalitions large enough to secure power. Governing requires maintaining enough internal agreement to make decisions, negotiate trade-offs, allocate resources, and sustain policy direction once power is achieved.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Fragile Promise of the Ballot
black and white love print crew neck shirt
Photo by Cyrus Crossan on Unsplash

The Fragile Promise of the Ballot

Recent Supreme Court decisions such as Shelby County v. Holder and Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee were not just redefinitions of election law; they marked a critical shift away from the federal government’s duty to ensure equal ballot access—a duty fundamental to democracy.

The consequences were swift and broad. Within hours, Shelby County, Texas, imposed strict voter ID rules that federal officials had previously blocked under the Voting Rights Act’s pre-clearance provisions. Soon after, North Carolina reduced early voting and eliminated same-day registration. Across parts of Alabama, Georgia, and other Southern states, polling places closed or moved, often in communities with large Black populations. What once required federal review could now proceed quickly.

Keep ReadingShow less