Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Former members of Congress say threats of violence are on the rise

News

Former Rep. Fred Upton, model Kate Upton and baseball pitcher Justin Verlander pose outside the Capitol

Former Rep. Fred Upton (left) received threatening messages during his time in office. Some involved his niece, model Kate Upton, and her husband, baseball star Justin Verlander.

Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via Getty Images

Meyers is executive editor of The Fulcrum and president of DBM Content Solutions.

Baseball star Justin Verlander and model Kate Upton likely know that stalkers and threats come with their chosen professions. But the couple are far more famous than most other relatives of politicians, who have witnessed an increase in personal threats in recent years.

That’s one of the takeaways from a new survey conducted by the U.S. Association of Former Members of Congress and the University of Massachusetts Amherst that found retired lawmakers and their families have received threats at an increasing frequency.

Nearly half (47 percent) of retired members of Congress said they or their family members were threatened at least “sometimes,” with numbers significantly higher among women and Black or Latino members (69 percent).


“There is nothing new about people criticizing or disliking certain Members of Congress, but the uptick in violent threats towards our politicians is incredibly disturbing,” said FMC President L.F. Payne, a former Democratic lawmaker from Virginia. “Partisan disagreements should not lead to violence or threats. The results of this survey showcase a need for drastic action.”

survey questionFMC and UMass Poll survey


Former Rep. Fred Upton, a Michigan Republican, said he received his first threat after voting for the 1994 gun control legislation known as the Brady Bill, and then was targeted again after supporting the assault weapons ban during the Clinton administration. He experienced another surge in threats after voting to impeach former President Donald Trump.

“At the end we were very careful about telegraphing events ahead of time, whether it was a service club or a school,” Upton said. “We just had to be more careful so no one could get a jump on us.”

Upton recounted a particular case in which a man managed to find the lawmaker’s home phone number and would call at 1 or 2 a.m.

“He was convinced that I had broken into his hotel room and stolen his AT&T phone charger, which then prevented him from dating my niece,” Upton said, explaining that Kate Upton and Verlander, now her husband, needed to get police protection.

“They were very fearful,” he said.

And in 2021, after voting in favor of a bipartisan infrastructure bill, Upton received threatening voicemail messages. He played one of the messages on CNN, allowing viewers to hear someone tell Upton: “I hope you die. I hope everybody in your f**king family dies.”

But these anecdotes are just a drop in the bucket. The U.S. Capitol Police conducted 7,501 threat investigations in 2022. While that total is a decrease from a high of 9,626 in 2021, it still represents a 90 percent increase since 2017.

The USCP says members of both parties receive threats at a similar rate, and the FMC-UMass survey bears that out. The poll found that 49 percent of Republicans and 46 percent of Democrats reported receiving threats at least sometimes.

The survey also found that lawmakers elected more recently received threats at a higher frequency.

survey question and resultsFMC and UMass Poll survey

And it’s not just members of Congress and their families. The survey found that 30 percent of former members reported their staffers had received threats sometimes or frequently, but 45 percent among staffers employed by women and minority lawmakers.

Respondents were also fearful of potential violence more broadly related to the 2024 election: 44 percent said they were very concerned, along with 40 percent who were somewhat concerned, about election-related violence occurring during next year’s presidential election. The fear is stronger among Democrats (94 percent concerned or somewhat concerned) than among GOP, but a significant share of Republicans (74 percent) share that fear.

“While these results are extremely upsetting, it’s exactly why we felt conducting this survey was so important,” said FMC CEO Pete Weichlein. “Political tension in our country is clearly coming to a boiling point, and awareness of these findings may be the first step to combating it.”

Actual violence against lawmakers and their families is rare, but certainly a concern. Most recently:

The FMC and UMass-Amherst survey included responses from 293 former House members and senators; 55 percent were Democrats and 45 percent were Republicans.


Read More

A TSA employee standing in the airport, with two travelers in the foreground.

A Transportation Security Administration (TSA) worker screens passengers and airport employees at O'Hare International Airport on January 07, 2019 in Chicago, Illinois. TSA employees are currently working under the threat of not receiving their next paychecks, scheduled for January 11, because of the partial government shutdown now in its third week.

Getty Images, Scott Olson

Nope. Nevermind. Some DHS agencies still shut down.

House Republicans reject clean bill to open shut-down DHS agencies (March 28 update)

House Republicans (and three Democrats) rejected the Senate's clean bill to end the shutdown late Friday night. Instead, the House passed a different bill that fully funds every agency in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) but for only 60 days with the knowledge that this short-term continuing resolution will not pass in the Senate.

Both chambers are out until April 13 so the shutdown is expected to last until then at least. Hope that no major weather disasters occur before then because FEMA is one of the DHS agencies out of commission (though some of its employees may be working without pay). It's possible that air travel security lines won't get worse since the President signed an Executive Order authorizing DHS to pay TSA workers. New DHS Secretary Mullin says paychecks will start to go out as early as Monday. How long can this approach continue? Unknown. Leaving aside the questionable legality of repurposing funds in this way, DHS may not be willing to keep paying TSA from these other funds long-term.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs, including one that says "let the people vote."
Attendees hold signs advocating for voting rights and against the SAVE America Act at a rally to outside the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2026 in Washington, DC.
Getty Images, Heather Diehl

The Senate Was Meant to Slow Us Down—Not Stop Us Cold

The Senate is once again locked in a familiar pattern: a bill with clear support on one side, firm opposition on the other—and no obvious path forward.

This time it’s the SAVE Act, framed by its supporters as a safeguard for election integrity and by its opponents as a barrier to voting access. The arguments are well-rehearsed. The positions are firm. And yet, beneath the policy debate sits a more revealing truth: in today’s Senate, the outcome of legislation is often shaped long before a final vote is ever cast.

Keep ReadingShow less
Clarity Is Power: The Three Pillars That Keep the People in Charge
man in white robe holding a book statue
Photo by Caleb Fisher on Unsplash

Clarity Is Power: The Three Pillars That Keep the People in Charge

American democracy does not weaken all at once. It falters when citizens lose clarity about how power is being used in their name. Abraham Lincoln warned that “public sentiment is everything… without it, nothing can succeed.” When people understand what their leaders are doing, they can hold them accountable.

But when confusion takes hold, power shifts quietly, and the public’s ability to act begins to erode. Clarity enables citizens to participate fully in democratic life and shape a government that responds to them. Confusion is not harmless; it erodes the safeguards, public awareness, and civic action that make self‑government possible. Clarity strengthens all three pillars at once — it protects our constitutional safeguards, sharpens public awareness, and fuels civic action.

Keep ReadingShow less
CONNECT for Health Act of 2025
person wearing lavatory gown with green stethoscope on neck using phone while standing

CONNECT for Health Act of 2025

How does a bill with no enemies fail to move? That question should trouble anyone who cares about Medicare, about rural health care, and about whether Congress can still do straightforward things.

In plain terms, the CONNECT Act would permanently end the outdated rule that limits Medicare telehealth to patients in rural areas who travel to an approved facility. It would make the patient's home a covered site of care. It would protect audio-only services, critical for seniors without broadband or smartphones, especially for behavioral health. It would ensure that Federally Qualified Health Centers can be reimbursed for telehealth, and it would lock in the pandemic-era flexibilities that Congress has been extending on a temporary basis since 2020. In short, it would turn five years of emergency workarounds into permanent, accountable policy.

Keep ReadingShow less