Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The ACA’s Missing Mandate: Why Costs Keep Rising

Opinion

The ACA’s Missing Mandate: Why Costs Keep Rising

Repealing the ACA’s individual mandate destabilized insurance markets, drove premiums higher, and left families paying the price.

Getty Images

By repealing the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, policymakers allowed healthy Americans to walk away—leaving insurers with risk pools dominated by those most likely to need care. The result was inevitable: premiums soared, markets destabilized, and families were left paying the price.

When Congress passed the ACA, its most controversial feature was the individual mandate—the requirement that all Americans carry health insurance or pay a penalty. Critics called it coercion. In reality, it was the glue holding the system together.


Insurance depends on shared risk. By blending healthy and sick participants, insurers could keep premiums stable and coverage accessible. When the Trump administration eliminated the penalty, that balance collapsed. Healthy Americans had little incentive to stay in, and many walked away. What remained was a pool dominated by older, sicker, and higher‑cost enrollees.

This is the insurance equivalent of running a car company that only covers reckless drivers. Without the steadying presence of low‑risk participants, costs spiral. The Congressional Budget Office projected that repealing the mandate would increase the number of uninsured by 18 million in the first year and drive premiums up by double digits. More recent analyses warn that the expiration of enhanced ACA subsidies in 2026 could trigger premium hikes of over 100%.

Why It Matters

The consequences ripple far beyond the individual marketplace.

• Families: Middle‑class households not eligible for subsidies bear the brunt of higher premiums. For them, insurance becomes a luxury rather than a necessity.

• Markets: Shrinking risk pools push insurers to exit, reducing consumer choice and leaving some regions with only one or two carriers.

• Public health: More uninsured means delayed care, higher uncompensated hospital costs, and taxpayers footing the bill.

The Policy Lesson

The mandate was never about punishment—it was about fairness. Removing it shifted the burden onto those least able to absorb it. Temporary subsidies masked the damage, but as they expire, the imbalance resurfaces. Without a mechanism to keep healthy Americans in the system, premiums will continue to climb, and affordability will erode further.

The Path Forward

If we want health insurance to remain affordable and accessible, we must restore the principle of shared responsibility. Policymakers should either reinstate broad participation or commit to permanent subsidies that stabilize risk pools. Without decisive action, premiums will continue to climb, insurers will retreat, and families will be left stranded.

The ACA’s original design recognized a simple truth: insurance only works when everyone plays. The repeal fractured that principle, and Americans are paying the price.

The time to act is now—before the system collapses under its own weight.

Bruce Lowe is a homeowner advocate and community leader in Lubbock, Texas. He writes about civic integrity, public health, and principled reform. His book, "Honesty and Integrity: The Pillars of a Meaningful Life", explores how ethical leadership can strengthen families, uplift communities, and create a better life for all.


Read More

Pregnant woman holding her belly during a prenatal exam.

Americans are questioning whether they have enough resources and support to raise a family in the nation's current political landscape. Julie Roland examines the contradictions of "pro-family" politics in America today and the kind of care mothers are owed to safely and successfully raise children.

Getty Images, Drs Producoes

The Trump Administration Has a Mommy Problem

My mother, who died of breast cancer when I was 18, had me when she was 32. This past Sunday, I turned 33, childless. As I officially fall behind her timeline, with no plans to have kids anytime soon, I look at the landscape of 2026 America and have to ask: Who can blame me?

The decision to start a family is a difficult one. J.D. Vance said on his first day as Vice President that he wants “more babies in America,” but many Americans simply can’t afford to have kids anymore. Perhaps that’s one reason why this administration is offering $5,000 “baby bonuses” just to incentivize birth, while also banning abortion in every way they can. But becoming a mother should be a choice. I was the result of an unplanned pregnancy–and I’m lucky my mom decided to have me and that she turned out to be the best mom ever–but as Miriam Rabkin, MD, MPH, put it: “if you want mom to be happy and healthy, she needs access to contraception so she can choose if and when to get pregnant!” Instead, this administration seems to think that if women won’t elect to have children, they should try paying them, and if that doesn’t work, then they should just force them.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Women Will Die’: How the Mifepristone Ban Will Affect Women across the Country

In this photo illustration, packages of Mifepristone tablets are displayed at a family planning clinic.

(Photo illustration by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

‘Women Will Die’: How the Mifepristone Ban Will Affect Women across the Country

WASHINGTON–Maternal health advocates and a Virginia state legislator warned that women’s health would suffer even in states that allow abortions if the Supreme Court fails to block a ban on mail deliveries of mifepristone, a drug used in abortions.

Jennifer McClellan, a representative for the state of Virginia and long-time advocate for reproductive rights, experienced a high-risk pregnancy and an emergency C-section 9 weeks before her due date. She said that she worried about the risks to individuals if they lose easy access to Mifepristone for abortions, miscarriages, or other reasons.

Keep ReadingShow less
stethoscope and us dollar bills on blue-colored background.

As debate over universal health care intensifies in the United States, rising medical costs, insurance complexity, and international comparisons are fueling renewed calls for a transparent, accountable system that guarantees basic care for all Americans.

Getty Images, aaaaimages

The United States May Be the Best Place to Build Universal Health Care

The debate over health insurance in the United States has returned to the forefront as the Affordable Care Act faces political pressure, insurance premiums continue to climb, and physicians experience increasing restrictions from insurance companies. A recent poll shows that roughly 62 to 68 percent of Americans believe the government has a responsibility to ensure health care coverage for all. Yet after more than a century of debate, the federal government has taken only small steps toward universal coverage. Today, the United States spends a relatively high amount per person on health care, but Americans die younger and are less healthy than residents in other high-income countries.

Having experienced different health care systems firsthand, I am deeply aware of how universal health care can impact life. Surprisingly, I have also realized that the United States may actually have one of the systems best suited to making it work.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reduce Barriers That Delay Care
a doctor holding a stethoscope
Photo by Nappy on Unsplash

Reduce Barriers That Delay Care

Today, administrative complexity continues to shape access to care, affecting both patients and providers. For individuals seeking timely treatment, delays and uncertainty remain common. For providers — especially community and rural hospitals — the burden of navigating these processes continues to strain already limited resources.

Prior authorization requirements are one of the most visible examples of this dynamic, and a 11% reduction in such reviews over the last year following an insurance industry pledge offers a welcome sign of progress. At a minimum, this shift suggests that some of the administrative burden embedded in the system can be reduced without compromising its core functions. But it also underscores a more persistent issue.

Keep ReadingShow less