Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The ACA’s Missing Mandate: Why Costs Keep Rising

Opinion

The ACA’s Missing Mandate: Why Costs Keep Rising

Repealing the ACA’s individual mandate destabilized insurance markets, drove premiums higher, and left families paying the price.

Getty Images

By repealing the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, policymakers allowed healthy Americans to walk away—leaving insurers with risk pools dominated by those most likely to need care. The result was inevitable: premiums soared, markets destabilized, and families were left paying the price.

When Congress passed the ACA, its most controversial feature was the individual mandate—the requirement that all Americans carry health insurance or pay a penalty. Critics called it coercion. In reality, it was the glue holding the system together.


Insurance depends on shared risk. By blending healthy and sick participants, insurers could keep premiums stable and coverage accessible. When the Trump administration eliminated the penalty, that balance collapsed. Healthy Americans had little incentive to stay in, and many walked away. What remained was a pool dominated by older, sicker, and higher‑cost enrollees.

This is the insurance equivalent of running a car company that only covers reckless drivers. Without the steadying presence of low‑risk participants, costs spiral. The Congressional Budget Office projected that repealing the mandate would increase the number of uninsured by 18 million in the first year and drive premiums up by double digits. More recent analyses warn that the expiration of enhanced ACA subsidies in 2026 could trigger premium hikes of over 100%.

Why It Matters

The consequences ripple far beyond the individual marketplace.

• Families: Middle‑class households not eligible for subsidies bear the brunt of higher premiums. For them, insurance becomes a luxury rather than a necessity.

• Markets: Shrinking risk pools push insurers to exit, reducing consumer choice and leaving some regions with only one or two carriers.

• Public health: More uninsured means delayed care, higher uncompensated hospital costs, and taxpayers footing the bill.

The Policy Lesson

The mandate was never about punishment—it was about fairness. Removing it shifted the burden onto those least able to absorb it. Temporary subsidies masked the damage, but as they expire, the imbalance resurfaces. Without a mechanism to keep healthy Americans in the system, premiums will continue to climb, and affordability will erode further.

The Path Forward

If we want health insurance to remain affordable and accessible, we must restore the principle of shared responsibility. Policymakers should either reinstate broad participation or commit to permanent subsidies that stabilize risk pools. Without decisive action, premiums will continue to climb, insurers will retreat, and families will be left stranded.

The ACA’s original design recognized a simple truth: insurance only works when everyone plays. The repeal fractured that principle, and Americans are paying the price.

The time to act is now—before the system collapses under its own weight.

Bruce Lowe is a homeowner advocate and community leader in Lubbock, Texas. He writes about civic integrity, public health, and principled reform. His book, "Honesty and Integrity: The Pillars of a Meaningful Life", explores how ethical leadership can strengthen families, uplift communities, and create a better life for all.

Read More

A stethoscope, calculator, pills, and cash.

As ACA subsidies expire and Medicaid rolls shrink, millions could face higher premiums or lose coverage, reigniting a national healthcare debate.

Getty Images, athima tongloom

How Expiring Subsidies and Medicaid Cuts Could Reshape U.S. Access to Care

Current Issue

In the coming year, millions of Americans could see their health insurance premiums rise, or lose coverage entirely, as key federal supports for affordable care are set to expire. The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace, which were later extended by the Inflation Reduction Act, are scheduled to expire at the end of 2025. According to one analysis, if these enhanced subsidies expire, premiums on average could increase by 25-100 percent. At the same time, several states are reducing Medicaid rolls following the end of the pandemic-era continuous coverage requirement. Over 25 million people had been disenrolled from Medicaid and CHIP during this process in 2024. Together, these changes could redefine U.S. healthcare access, reigniting debates about public health and fiscal restraint.

Background

The ACA, passed in 2010, aimed to make health insurance more accessible for millions of uninsured Americans by expanding Medicaid eligibility and creating subsidized plans under the premium tax credit. The ARPA of 2021 significantly increased those marketplace subsidies, eliminating the 400% of poverty threshold for eligibility and reducing the percentage of income that enrollees must pay in premiums. As a result, the number of people eligible for marketplace subsidies increased from 18.1 million to 21.8 million from 2020-2021. Meanwhile, pandemic policies prevented states from disenrolling almost all Medicaid and CHIP enrollees for over three years. When this continuous coverage requirement ended in April of 2023, states began to reevaluate the eligibility of tens of millions of people. The expiration of ARPA temporary subsidies combined with the end of continuous Medicaid coverage set the stage for a contentious healthcare market next year.

Keep Reading Show less
U.S. Healthcare in 2025: Chaos, Costs, and Controversy Without Real Progress
a person wearing a blue shirt with a white circle on it
Photo by Nappy on Unsplash

U.S. Healthcare in 2025: Chaos, Costs, and Controversy Without Real Progress

The year 2025 has been one of the most turbulent years in modern U.S. healthcare. The headlines were explosive, the rhetoric dramatic, and the controversies nonstop. Yet for all the hoopla and upheaval, the medical care Americans receive now, month in and month out, looks no better than what they experienced on January 1 — but far more expensive.

Here are five areas of healthcare that generated chaos, confusion, and conflict in 2025 without meaningful improvement.

Keep Reading Show less
University Roundtable Puts Latino Mental Health Front and Center

woman holds "Hablo Espanol" button

Picture Provided

University Roundtable Puts Latino Mental Health Front and Center

“Keep it to yourself. Push it down. Don’t say anything.” That is how Isis Lara Fernandez was taught to live with her status as an undocumented immigrant in the United States.

At 6-years-old, Lara Fernandez fled to the U.S. with her mother and siblings to escape domestic violence in Honduras. From that point forward, Lara Fernandez navigated life with a persistent fear that her secret could be discovered at any point in time.

Keep Reading Show less
The Health Care Debate & Feldstein’s Fix
black and gray stethoscope

The Health Care Debate & Feldstein’s Fix

Serving in Congress during the implementation of President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, Republicans embraced the position of “repeal and replace.” Repeal the ACA, but replace it with what? The debate is front-and-center again, though the ground has shifted some. There is more support for the ACA. Even some Republicans are looking to temporarily extend COVID-era subsidies for ACA health plans. Other Republicans want Health Savings Accounts, so more money goes to individuals instead of insurance companies. Democratic leadership seeks an approach temporarily extending the expanded premium subsidies, during which the entire approach to health care can be rethought.

The late economist Martin Feldstein had the fix: Martin Feldstein proposed a voucher system in which everyone could purchase a health insurance plan covering health care expenses exceeding 15% of their income. This could be combined with HSAs if they prove popular with the public.

Keep Reading Show less