Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The ACA’s Missing Mandate: Why Costs Keep Rising

Opinion

The ACA’s Missing Mandate: Why Costs Keep Rising

Repealing the ACA’s individual mandate destabilized insurance markets, drove premiums higher, and left families paying the price.

Getty Images

By repealing the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, policymakers allowed healthy Americans to walk away—leaving insurers with risk pools dominated by those most likely to need care. The result was inevitable: premiums soared, markets destabilized, and families were left paying the price.

When Congress passed the ACA, its most controversial feature was the individual mandate—the requirement that all Americans carry health insurance or pay a penalty. Critics called it coercion. In reality, it was the glue holding the system together.


Insurance depends on shared risk. By blending healthy and sick participants, insurers could keep premiums stable and coverage accessible. When the Trump administration eliminated the penalty, that balance collapsed. Healthy Americans had little incentive to stay in, and many walked away. What remained was a pool dominated by older, sicker, and higher‑cost enrollees.

This is the insurance equivalent of running a car company that only covers reckless drivers. Without the steadying presence of low‑risk participants, costs spiral. The Congressional Budget Office projected that repealing the mandate would increase the number of uninsured by 18 million in the first year and drive premiums up by double digits. More recent analyses warn that the expiration of enhanced ACA subsidies in 2026 could trigger premium hikes of over 100%.

Why It Matters

The consequences ripple far beyond the individual marketplace.

• Families: Middle‑class households not eligible for subsidies bear the brunt of higher premiums. For them, insurance becomes a luxury rather than a necessity.

• Markets: Shrinking risk pools push insurers to exit, reducing consumer choice and leaving some regions with only one or two carriers.

• Public health: More uninsured means delayed care, higher uncompensated hospital costs, and taxpayers footing the bill.

The Policy Lesson

The mandate was never about punishment—it was about fairness. Removing it shifted the burden onto those least able to absorb it. Temporary subsidies masked the damage, but as they expire, the imbalance resurfaces. Without a mechanism to keep healthy Americans in the system, premiums will continue to climb, and affordability will erode further.

The Path Forward

If we want health insurance to remain affordable and accessible, we must restore the principle of shared responsibility. Policymakers should either reinstate broad participation or commit to permanent subsidies that stabilize risk pools. Without decisive action, premiums will continue to climb, insurers will retreat, and families will be left stranded.

The ACA’s original design recognized a simple truth: insurance only works when everyone plays. The repeal fractured that principle, and Americans are paying the price.

The time to act is now—before the system collapses under its own weight.

Bruce Lowe is a homeowner advocate and community leader in Lubbock, Texas. He writes about civic integrity, public health, and principled reform. His book, "Honesty and Integrity: The Pillars of a Meaningful Life", explores how ethical leadership can strengthen families, uplift communities, and create a better life for all.


Read More

a doctor showing a patient something on the tablet

Americans die younger than people in most wealthy nations. A new study says the cure is political will, and polarization may be what’s blocking it.

Photo by Nappy on Unsplash

America's Cold Civil War Is Shortening American Lives

Americans die younger than people in nearly every other wealthy democracy.

A study published in September by Steven Woolf of Virginia Commonwealth University traces America's mortality crisis. In 1980, only 13 countries with populations over one million had longer life expectancy than the United States. By 2023, 37 did. People in 60 countries now have a better chance of surviving to age 40.

Keep ReadingShow less
Experienced nutritionist filling out a clients dietary questionnaire during consultations and meal plan presentation

HHS and the American Heart Association gave opposite dietary advice. Here’s a three-step test to separate real skepticism from cynicism.

J_art/Getty Images

Skepticism Isn't Cynicism. The Diet Wars Show the Difference.

This year, Americans got two opposite sets of instructions for the same dinner plate. Many of us responded the way we now respond to almost everything: we picked a team.

In January, the Department of Health and Human Services released new federal dietary guidelines built around red meat and full-fat dairy. Less than three months later, the American Heart Association issued guidance pointing close to the opposite way: build meals around plants and plant protein, choose unsaturated fats over saturated ones, and cut back on red meat and full-fat dairy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Family at dinner table
A family eating chicken nuggets and watermelon at a table in a home
Photo by Tyson on Unsplash

Skepticism Isn't Cynicism. The Diet Wars Show the Difference.

This year, Americans got two opposite sets of instructions for the same dinner plate. Many of us responded the way we now respond to almost everything: we picked a team.

In January, the Department of Health and Human Services released new federal dietary guidelines built around red meat and full-fat dairy. Less than three months later, the American Heart Association issued guidance pointing close to the opposite way: build meals around plants and plant protein, choose unsaturated fats over saturated ones, and cut back on red meat and full-fat dairy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Remote health
Doctor consulting patient via video call on laptop
Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash

AI Agents Could Save Lives—If We Let Them

The warnings about artificial intelligence keep getting louder.

The companies building the world’s most powerful AI systems are reporting troubling behavior from their own creations. And some of the researchers closest to frontier AI development warn that powerful new systems could “cause human extinction.”

Keep ReadingShow less