Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Automatic voter registration gets early boost in Ohio Legislature

Ohio statehouse

Several Republicans, who control the statehouse in Ohio, seem willing to change their position on automatic voter registration.

fotoguy22/Getty Images

A bipartisan consensus is forming behind the idea of bringing automatic voter registration to Ohio.

Legislation to that effect will be introduced by Democrats in the General Assembly as soon as it convenes for its annual session next week. The Legislature is controlled by Republicans, who have resisted the idea in the past. But several on the majority side are now willing to go along since Ohio's top elections official, GOP Secretary of State Frank LaRose, has given his enthusiastic support.

If the measure becomes law, Ohio would become the second most populous place, after California, on a roster that would grow to 17 states plus Washington, D.C., with AVR.


But the change would take effect next year, not in time to boost turnout this fall, when the perennial battleground's 18 electoral votes appear likely to be claimed a second time by President Trump.

Under the system, eligible people are added to the voter rolls (unless they ask to opt out) whenever they get a driver's license or do other business with the motor vehicle department or another state agency that maintains a database of residents' personal information.

The legislative drive in Columbus could become complicated if Democrats push through an additional provision that would automatically register all high school students in the state who will have turned 18 before the next general election.

That idea has no apparent GOP sponsors yet. But the proponent of an expansive AVR system, Democratic state Rep. Bride Rose Sweeney of Cleveland, says she's confident of winning over Republicans with the argument that the additional potential turnout will not favor one party over another.

Her other argument is that AVR will allow for much speedier and more accurate upkeep of the voter registration rolls, avoiding the need for the sort of cleanups that became so contentious two years ago, when the Supreme Court decided that the way the state purged its rolls was constitutional.


Read More

U.S. Capitol.

A rundown of the House bills most likely to become law this week — from seafood fraud enforcement to a sanctions bill critics call a tariff bill.

Photo by Andy Feliciotti on Unsplash

Both Chambers in Session this Week

Last Minute Rush

We’re not going to describe every bill the House aims to take action on this week because there’s lots. Instead, we’re going to focus on the ones that will become law if passed by the House and pull a few notable bills at the beginning of the legislative process. We’ll use the same level of discretion at the end of this week when we review what actually happened between today, Monday Sept. 14 and Friday, Sept. 18.

Probable New Laws

In addition to the bills listed below are also a couple of park renamings. All of these will, if passed, then go to the President for signing and once that’s done, become law.

Keep ReadingShow less

Alaska Is Voting on More Than Ranked Choice Voting. It’s Voting on Who Gets to Vote

Alaska voters will once again vote on a measure to repeal its nonpartisan election system. Those fighting to preserve the system have gone to the courts to make a simple case: It’s only fair that voters know exactly what is on their ballot.

Specifically the consequences of Ballot Measure 2, which would give parties the ability to shut out 60% of Alaska voters registered as independents. This is what attorney Scott Kendall argued before the Alaska Supreme Court last week.

Keep ReadingShow less
Group of young adult students sit at desks in classroom listening to teacher

Why do Americans respond so differently to hard history lessons? A look at the three psychological mindsets driving the patriotism debate — and a path past it.

Lighthouse Films/Getty Images

“They Hate America”: Patriotism in the Face of Historical Updates

I happened upon a civil discussion blog and read a post by a man who said he was happy to report that when he attended a panel discussion about teaching patriotism in the schools, all went well. He said that’s because most of the people in the bridging organization that hosted the event are “pretty patriotic.” He clarified that by writing, “None of the type of bad actors (and there are many) who want to teach kids to hate America and Western Civilization were represented.”

Someone made a comment about why we can’t incorporate historical change into curriculum and objected to the notion that a segment of the population wants to teach kids to hate America. The man who posted cited what he believes is proof. A last commenter simply input the emoji for a sleeping person, as though the argument was boring or unimportant.

Keep ReadingShow less