Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: Elon Musk & Twitter

Your Take: Elon Musk & Twitter

Last week, we asked people for their opinions on Elon Musk’s bid to buy Twitter. It’s an issue fraught with questions about social media, federal regulations, algorithmic transparency, content moderation and of course, free speech.

People have … opinions. Some readers believe Twitter needs to be revamped and hope Musk has the creativity to fix things. Others fear consolidating so much control of a major social media platform in one person’s hands. Many people consider this a free speech issue and wonder whether Twitter should be considered more like a public service than a private company (which is not subject to the First Amendment’s free speech protections).


Your responses, edited for clarity and length:

I believe Musk being in charge of Twitter would add to the already toxic divisive environment on the internet and would ultimately undermine what is left of democracy in this country. The only possible way this could be OK is if there were NO retweets. -Tom Daly

My take on the matter is that this is either a) Musk's typical behavior when presented with an arena he doesn't control (i.e., make a bid for control and then leave in a huff if it doesn't go his way) or b) a scheme to pump the Twitter stock he's already got. While I don't like Twitter at all, and I think it lowers the level of public discourse, I don't think an eccentric billionaire seizing the reins will improve matters much. -William Shaffer

It appears some people want to change the rules to prevent Musk from taking over Twitter. Some things I like about Musk, some things I don't, but I think his wealth should NOT disqualify him. He advocates more free speech, rather than less. The fact that he is much more in the public eye than most of the people who control our major news media and communications is a plus for me. -Greg Ripps

Twitter is not currently oriented towards free speech. Their fear of Elon Musk is exposing its leaders’ lack of objectivity. When a platform like Twitter gets big enough it should be considered a public accommodation, which means it should not be kicking so many people off. -Steve Yurash

I do not believe one person should have control of a social media platform. I am especially concerned because Musk has said he wants to make Twitter a free speech platform. It's my observation that other social media platforms that promote themselves as being for free speech always end up as echo chambers for extreme right wing conspiracy theorists who promote violence. Take a look at Parler and Gab, for instance. I hope that the Twitter board stands their ground and resists this takeover. -Marcia Claesson

I do not think he is serious about algorithmic transparency — I can't see why he would want that, other than to find out how Jack Dorsey

tracks his jet. Yes, when you are that rich you can be that self-absorbed. I see it also as another bluff thrown out to keep people holding their Twitter stock to "protect" democracy and free speech from his hostile takeover. By the way, I believe his definition of "free speech" includes the right to lie, deceive and cheat. I am no fan of Elon Musk. I admire him not. -Laura Madden

It all depends on what he does with it. The way it is currently being run is obviously not good from either a freedom of speech perspective or a speech forum perspective. Everyone who is paying attention knows what needs to be done. Open up the algorithm so it is open source. Adequately define out-of-bounds behavior. Make it easier to fact-check information. None of this will be done by the current owners, because it is being run as a cash cow for the investors, and the current algorithm is designed to drive engagement by raising adrenaline levels. They have no incentive to change. He can't make it any worse, and he could make it a lot better. -Ray Curtis

I do not believe free speech can exist in a forum without guard rails. The reason is that people who don’t have extreme views get trolled and then quit using the forum. The result is that only one view ends up being expressed on the forum. As a result I am against Elon Musk buying Twitter and hope it remains a stockholder-owned company. -Lucy Schumer

I am worried about social media platforms' ability to amplify misinformation, rage and anger. I am also worried about extremely wealthy people having an oversized influence on discourse, politics and government. However, I am not sure how we balance freedom of speech and the ability of social platforms to generate distrust in government — that has resulted in the decline in democracy. Perhaps social media companies should not be allowed to have any one person with controlling interest. Perhaps there should be public oversight of major social media platforms. Elon Musk is incredibly creative, intelligent and driven. However, he also appears to be irrational and at times a megalomaniac. I do not think it would be wise for him to have control of Twitter. -Karen Alongi

My take is that Congress needs to dramatically revise Section 230, not merely unshielding platforms for content carried, but specifically holding them accountable for their algorithms that prioritize incendiary content to increase interaction. While they may not be able to police everything on their platform, they are absolutely capable of modifying the algorithms and making transparent how they push content. And when they don't, criminal prosecutions and hefty fines should follow. -Alan LaPolice

I don’t like wealthy individuals or companies gobbling up smaller guys- too much concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few. I’d rather see the money spent on buyouts creating jobs or something else productive. -Kevin Cushing

Musk claims he wants to ensure free speech but I think he really wants to ensure irresponsible speech. I hope Twitter holds on. I resent that Musk thinks he can buy what he wants and then morph it into a platform for those that cling to the Big Lie. -Sonja Barclift

Read More

Where’s Athlete Activism During Trump’s Second Term?

Antoine Bethea #41 and Rashard Robinson #33 of the San Francisco 49ers raise their first during the anthem as Eli Harold #58 while teammates Colin Kaepernick #7 and Eric Reid #35 take a knee, prior to the game against the Dallas Cowboys at Levi Stadium on October 2, 2016 in Santa Clara, California.

(Photo by Michael Zagaris/San Francisco 49ers/Getty Images)

Where’s Athlete Activism During Trump’s Second Term?

Despite the 2016-17 NFL season featuring Tom Brady and the New England Patriots’ iconic 28-3 comeback over the Atlanta Falcons in the Super Bowl, the retirement of legendary quarterback Peyton Manning, and the emergence of Joey Bosa as one of the top defensive players in the league, one monumental event stands above the rest: Colin Kaepernick kneeling during the national anthem in the heart of Donald Trump’s first term to protest racial injustice and police brutality in the United States.

Kaepernick spawned one of the most talked-about protests in the history of American sports, leading to national conversations about police brutality while earning himself severe backlash in the process.

Keep ReadingShow less
Political Spectacle: Sydney Sweeney’s “Great Jeans”

A digital advertising display featuring US actress Sydney Sweeney is seen outside an American Eagle store in Times Square in New York City on August 4, 2025.

Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images

Political Spectacle: Sydney Sweeney’s “Great Jeans”

What began as a denim campaign has morphed into a political spectacle, with far-right groups, conservative commentators, and progressive critics all weighing in on Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad. The slogan—“Sydney Sweeney has great jeans”—was interpreted by many as a pun on “genes,” sparking accusations of racial messaging and white supremacist undertones.

- YouTube youtu.be

Keep ReadingShow less
A Place for Women of Color: Woman Made Gallery

Building a Home Out of Dirt (2018)

A Place for Women of Color: Woman Made Gallery

While the Trump administration seeks to erase places for those with historically marginalized identities, Woman Made Gallery offers more than representation—it offers response. Through exhibitions like the most recent Acts of Care, the gallery creates an intentional space where women, women of color, and nonbinary artists don't have to ask for permission to belong—they build that belonging themselves. As a nonprofit rooted in justice and community dialogue, Woman Made Gallery continues to model what inclusive, women-of-color-led spaces can look like: ones that honor lineage, complexity, and care as forms of resistance.

For Program Coordinator Corinne Pompéy, the mission of Woman Made Gallery is more than just representation—it’s about creating an entry point for connection and care. “Our goal is to ensure women and nonbinary artists are seen in the art world,” she said. “But more than that, we want people to feel something when they walk in—whether that’s reflection, joy, or even release.”

Keep ReadingShow less
House Committee on Homeland Security Discusses Public Safety During the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympics

Witnesses are sworn in at the House Committee on Homeland Security hearing, Tuesday, July 22, 2025.

(Medill News Service/Erin Drumm)

House Committee on Homeland Security Discusses Public Safety During the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympics

WASHINGTON— Police leaders from cities across the United States that have experienced deadly attacks at major gatherings urged Congress Tuesday to provide adequate federal funding to cities hosting the 2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Olympic Games.

Security concerns were top of mind for law enforcement officials at a House Committee on Homeland Security hearing as the United States prepares to host mass events with millions of international travelers for its 250th anniversary and the FIFA World Cup, which will hold games in 11 cities across the country in 2026. The United States will also host the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles.

Keep ReadingShow less