Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Bill to stop 'prison gerrymandering' advances in New Jersey

New Jersey Gov. Philip Murphy

New Jersey Gov. Philip Murphy already approved a bill restoring voting rights to felons and has indicated he will sign legislation to end prison gerrymandering.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

A nearly decade-long drive to end what's known as "prison gerrymandering" in New Jersey is accelerating toward success, likely in plenty of time for the redrawing of the state's political maps for the coming decade.

Legislation that would count incarcerated people at their home addresses, rather than where they are in imprisoned, is headed to the full state House after it was endorsed 7-4 in committee Monday. The same bill was passed by the state Senate a year ago.

The measure is being pushed hard by Democrats from urban areas, who say their political power is being shortchanged by the current system — which is now the practice in 44 states. If their bill becomes law, New Jersey would join only California, New York, Washington, Maryland, Nevada and Delaware in counting prisoners where they last lived before their convictions.


Opposition to the switch comes primarily from lawmakers, mostly Republicans, representing the rural areas where most prisons are located. They say the status quo is appropriate because prison populations put more of a burden on surrounding areas for infrastructure and services, and the census population counts are also used to apportion funding to local governments.

That was the rationale Republican Gov. Chris. Christie cited when he vetoed a similar bill three years ago.

Both halves of the Legislature were solidly Democratic then and remain so. But the new governor is Philip Murphy, also a Democrat, and he has signaled he's ready to sign whatever criminal justice measures he's sent. He approved a bill in December restoring voting rights to the state's felons on probation and parole.

"We count prisoners for their bodies and deny them the right to vote, giving outsized political power to the rest of the prison district's population," bill supporter Henal Patel, associate counsel for the New Jersey Institute for Social Justice, told the news site northjersey.com . "We really only have this tiny window to pass the legislation, or it's moot for another 10 years after the maps are drawn. New Jersey is one of the first states to start redistricting."

Almost half the state's prison population is housed at three different facilities in rural Cumberland County, but only 3 percent of people incarcerated statewide come from the South Jersey county. And so the current system props up the population of the 2nd congressional district at the expense of those that include Trenton, Newark, Camden, Paterson and Jersey City, where a plurality of prisoners used to live.

The Prison Policy Initiative, a nonprofit organization that researches criminal justice issues, says that in Wisconsin (to cite another example) five counties and cities in rural areas where more than half of their populations incarcerated, leading to more districts for the state's lower house, she said.


Read More

What War Powers?
white concrete dome buildings

What War Powers?

This week the House has cut its session to just Weds-Thurs while the Senate has its standard Monday evening - Thursday schedule.

There's the usual mix in the House of some bills likely to pass with large majorities and and a couple that will probably be party-line or close to.

Keep ReadingShow less
The spectacle of Operation Epic Fury
A general view of Tehran with smoke visible in the distance after explosions were reported in the city, on March 02, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.
(Photo by Contributor/Getty Images)

The spectacle of Operation Epic Fury

The U.S. and Israel’s joint military campaign against Iran, which rolled out under the name Operation Epic Fury, is a phrase that sounds more like a summer action film than a real‑world conflict in which people are dying. The operation involves massive strikes across Iran, with U.S. Central Command reporting that more than 1,700 targets have been hit in the first 72 hours. President Donald Trump described it as a “massive and ongoing operation” aimed at dismantling Iran’s military capabilities.

This framing matters. When leaders adopt language that emphasizes spectacle, they risk shifting public perception away from the gravity of war. The death of Iran’s supreme leader following the bombardment, for example, was a world‑altering event, yet it unfolded under a banner that evokes adrenaline rather than anguish.

Keep ReadingShow less
A plane flying above.

Analysis of Donald Trump’s second-term immigration crackdown, mass deportation plan, and ICE policies, examining human rights concerns, due process, and historical parallels.

Getty Images, SCM Jeans

Are Trump’s Mass Deportations Leading to State‑Sanctioned Persecution?

For the past 14 months, Americans of all political persuasions have witnessed how Trump’s ICE-related actions have involved aggressive detention and demonization of immigrants and minorities. Historians have not observed this large-scale scope of discrimination behavior since 1953-1955, when President Dwight Eisenhower (R) deported ~1.3 million Mexicans from America, including U.S. citizens of Mexican descent and, in some cases, anyone of Mexican appearance, because agents assumed they were undocumented.

Actions by Mr. Trump and personnel within the Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection, ICE, and the FBI have been widely criticized as violating the core American values of equal protection for all families and respect for basic rights. Across the political spectrum, many see these actions as targeting immigrants and minorities in ways that undermine our nation’s shared commitment to fairness, justice, and constitutional equality. Knowing Americans have witnessed two citizens being killed in Minneapolis and one person in Texas by ICE agents, we may be on the verge of systemic persecution and state‑sanctioned violence on a scale not seen in modern American life.

Keep ReadingShow less
American flag

Analysis of concentrated power in the U.S. political economy, examining inequality, institutional trust, executive authority, and the need for equal access and competitive markets.

Chalermpon Poungpeth/EyeEm/Getty Images

America: What We Want, What We Have, What We Need

Equal Access in an Age of Concentrated Power

The American constitutional system was designed to restrain power, not to pursue a single national mission. Authority was divided across branches, diffused among states, and slowed by deliberate friction. As James Madison wrote in Federalist No. 51, ambition was meant to counteract ambition. The design assumed competing interests would prevent domination.

For more than two centuries, that architecture has endured. The United States remains the world’s largest economy by nominal GDP, according to the World Bank’s World Development Indicators, with deep capital markets and a formidable innovation system.

Keep ReadingShow less