Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Make governing great again

Opinion

New members of Congress

Newly elected members of Congress take a break from orientation to gather for their class photo at the Capitol on Nov. 15.

Alex Wong/Getty Images

Murphy is the director of FixUS, the democracy reform advocacy arm of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a fiscal policy think tank of which he is also chief of staff. Tomchik is vice president nd deputy chief of staff at FixUS and CRFB

To the new members of Congress,

Congratulations on your election. In just two short months, you’ll take your seat in an institution that has guided and embodied the world’s oldest representative democracy and its people since its founding more than two centuries ago. Sadly, the excitement you may feel at this moment isn’t matched by your fellow citizens.

According to Gallup, only 7 percent of Americans possess a great deal of confidence in Congress. That’s lower than their confidence in the presidency, organized labor, large tech companies and the media. And while none of this is surprising, it should be cause for concern.

The problem stems from the fact that, for many Americans, the first branch of our democracy seems to have little to do with governing. Instead of working together and passing laws, Congress has become a zero-sum game, defined by gridlock and hyper-partisanship. Add to that the endless campaign cycles, self-imposed crises, and back-and-forth bickering in the media, and it’s easy to see why Americans feel as they do.

So, how did it get to this point? And more importantly, as an incoming member of Congress, what can you do about it?


Fortunately, you can find answers in the collective wisdom of the public servants who came before you – dozens of living former elected and appointed officials spanning every presidential administration from John F. Kennedy to Donald J. Trump (whom we surveyed during the current Congress).

If you ask these former mayors, governors, members of Congress, U.S. ambassadors, Cabinet secretaries, and White House chiefs of staff why it seems that good governing is no longer good politics and what can we do about it, they’ll reaffirm your worst fears about the political dysfunction taking place. However, they’ll also offer hope that change is possible and, more importantly, it can begin with you.

For that to happen, you’ll have to recognize, acknowledge and work to overcome two uncomfortable truths – ones you’re likely already familiar with.

First, like most people, elected officials respond to incentives, and our electoral system has built-in incentives that effectively make good governing bad politics. Gerrymandered districts and the outsized role and influence of partisan primaries increasingly yield power to the extreme flanks of both parties and contribute to a system that leads many to choose party over country. Members of Congress spend an inordinate amount of time “dialing for dollars,” raising money for their next election at the expense of devoting time to the task of legislating.

Second, you’ll be increasingly immersed in a media landscape that constantly shifts the focus in Washington from policy to politics and, more specifically, to the politics of outrage. This gradual change has not only stoked our divisions and reinforced information echo chambers, but it also makes agreeing on a common set of facts nearly impossible. It’s hard to govern when you cannot even agree upon reality itself.

The result is governing is too often defined by short-term political gain at the expense of long-term problem-solving. It’s why issues like affordable health care, improving education, fixing our broken immigration system, and addressing our national debt have become perennial topics on the campaign trail rather than the subject of legislative action.

However, all hope is not lost. And the change begins with you as members of Congress.

If you ask your predecessors what is urgently needed given the challenges of today, they’ll tell you – regardless of office held, when they served, or which party they belonged to – that it is not political warriors but leaders who choose to govern with character. It’s those public officials – many you will get to know but who don’t garner as much media attention as the firebrands – who take the time to get to know their fellow members, learn the issues and the facts, know the importance and role of compromise, and who, above all else, practice civility toward others.

The nation you’re about to serve is at a crossroads. In addition to the domestic and international challenges it faces, many are losing faith in our democracy and the very tenet of self-government. Reversing this trend will require reaffirming the constitutional belief that we “affirm that the government of the United States exists to serve its citizens.”

But while your task may be monumental, it is not impossible. It starts by doing the very thing you were elected to do: govern, and in doing so, show good governing can be good politics once again.

Good luck!


Read More

Illustration of someone holding a strainer, and the words "fakes," "facts," "news," etc. going through it.

Trump-era misinformation has pushed American politics to a breaking point. A Truth in Politics law may be needed to save democracy.

Getty Images, SvetaZi

The Need for a Truth in Politics Law: De-Frauding American Politics

“Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?” With those words in 1954, Army lawyer Joseph Welch took Senator Joe McCarthy to task and helped end McCarthy’s destructive un-American witch hunt. The time has come to say the same to Donald Trump and his MAGA allies and stop their vile perversion of our right to free speech.

American politics has always been rife with misleading statements and, at times, outright falsehoods. Mendacity just seems to be an ever-present aspect of politics. But with the ascendency of Trump, and especially this past year, things have taken an especially nasty turn, becoming so aggressive and incendiary as to pose a real threat to the health and well-being of our nation’s democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less