Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Ask Joe: Dealing with defamation

Ask Joe: Dealing with defamation

Dear Joe,

I am a retired university president and BadAss Grandma for Democracy ( yes, it's a thing). A very prolific blogger whose columns run in several major and smaller newspapers across the state has been using me as a punching bag to get clicks. When I recently realized that my name has been in eight of his columns in the past 13 months (earlier, too, but less intensely), I took a closer look. His choice of words about me is inflammatory and defamatory. He lies about me. He drags every organization I'm associated with through the mud along with me. Enough is enough, especially in these highly volatile times. And I haven't even been in the public eye for over two years!

In the past, allies have spoken with him and with people at the major paper.

I am preparing to ask the owner of a news syndicate that runs his column to provide me with space for a guest editorial in all the papers that run the offending column. I feel the need to set the facts straight, and I hope to reach a broad range of moderates with information about why I do what I do (i.e., the fragile state of democracy and what we need to do about it).

The blogger typically doubles down and fights back when attacked. Is there any win-win here?

BadAss Grandma


Hello, BadAss.

Wow, I’m sorry to hear you are going through this. No one deserves to be treated this way, whether from a stranger, friend or family member. In your case, it illustrates one of the unfortunate dilemmas of our technologically dominant time: The physical distance created by the Internet, coupled with our ability to “connect” well beyond our immediate and familiar community, makes it easy to be as aggressive, rude and harmful as we like without having to worry about the consequences. Your issue requires more than a few paragraphs of support, but I will certainly offer some ways to look at it.

Let’s first reframe this to help get you back to your power. For someone you don’t know to devote so much time and energy to you, particularly in such a toxic and harmful way, only indicates how powerful you are! Good work! This means that the actions you’re putting forth are having a significant impact. Please keep doing the meaningful work you are doing and be mindful to do that in a way where both what you are doing and how you are communicating it are in alignment with your highest values. In other words, how can you deliver a strong message and call people to their highest, and at the same time minimize ways that your words may attack, judge, criticize, alienate, condescend or threaten?

The Fierce Civility approach offers theory and practices to help us confront a bully without becoming a bully. In essence, that is one of the conscious or unconscious intentions of a bully – to get you in a reactive stance where you are forced to be in either “fight” or “defender” mode. Why is that important? Because this is ultimately the goal of those who don’t want to see progress and any kind of cultural transformation. He wants you to play on his turf, believing that he is far more likely to “win” there.

If you try to retaliate (fight), you are feeding the bully’s mission. If you ignore it (flight) or acquiesce (freeze) you also feed into it. When we are thrown off center, our default strategies for dealing with challenges are either aggression or passivity. This oppositional stance keeps us in the patterns of polarization where we spend a lot of time, energy, and resources trying “to be right” or “to win.” And, in reality, we end up only perpetuating the cycle of animosity and separation without really getting to any new solutions.

With Fierce Civility, you neither attack nor defend; you find alternative strategies that disarm his strategies without disempowering him. So, some things to consider: Yes, take advantage of the opportunity to write an editorial, but don’t address him at all. Create your own turf. Clarify the rules of engagement. Talk to the people and communities that matter to you. Bring up points he has made without needing to defend, and offer readers a deeper teaching on what he has questioned. This person has created the prompt for you to consider honing, delivering and sharing your message and deepening your resolve on issues that matter to you. In this way, it becomes a win for you.

Initiate a platform where you and those organizations he also attacks can get into respectful dialogue in order to create deeper alliances and shared mission. Clarify and celebrate where you all find common ground in order to seek higher ground. By strengthening alliances with those who are truly seeking ways to bridge with others (maybe in surprising places), then the tactics of those who are looking to tear those bridges down have less power.

I admire your desire to find a win-win solution to this. While that should be a key motivating force in alliance building, there is also wisdom in determining that the best strategy is to create safety by setting clear boundaries. That should be your priority at this time. It seems like he has thrown you off balance. I would suggest that you do what is necessary to get you back to your own internal and external balance. Once you have accomplished that (of course knowing that balance is fluid and not static), then you can establish a renewed sense of vitality and stability. From here, you are more empowered to thrive. Big win for you!

So, BadAss, use this situation as a creative opportunity to step more fully into your power in a way that inspires others and allows you to increase your scope of influence. Who knows? Some day you may look back and feel gratitude for the opportunity he created for you to up your game! I know this is easier said than done. However, I hope what I suggest can help you find your path forward on this.

The world needs more of the wisdom and compassion you have to offer,

Joe

Ask Joe is dedicated to exploring the best ways to transform tensions and bridge divides. Our resident advice columnist and conflict resolution specialist, Joe Weston, is here to answer your questions in order to resolve tension, polarization, or conflict.

Learn more about Joe Weston and his work here. Make sure to c heck out Joe’s bestselling book Fierce Civility: Transforming our Global Culture from Polarization to Lasting Peace, published March 2023.

To Ask Joe, please submit questions to: AskJoe@Fulcrum.us.

Read More

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, and Paul Thomas Anderson pose during the fan event for the movie 'One Battle After Another' at Plaza Toreo Parque Central on September 18, 2025 in Naucalpan de Juarez, Mexico.

(Photo by Eloisa Sanchez/Getty Images)

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

After decades of work, Angeleno director P.T. Anderson has scored his highest-grossing film with his recent One Battle After Another. Having opened on the weekend of September 26, the film follows the fanatical, even surrealistic, journey of washed-up revolutionary Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio), who lives in hiding with his teenage daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), some fifteen years after his militant group, French 75, went underground. When their nemesis Colonel Lockjaw (Sean Penn) resurfaces, Bob and Wila again find themselves running from the law. When Wila goes AWOL, her karate teacher, Sensei Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), is enlisted to help Bob find his daughter. Although ambitious, edgy, and fun, the political message of the hit film is generally muddled. The immensely talented director did not make a film matching the Leftist rigor of, say, Battleship Potemkin. Nor can the film be grouped among a veritable cavalcade of fictional and non-fictional films produced during the last twenty years that deal with immigrant issues along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Sleep Dealer, El Norte, and Who is Dayani Cristal? are but a few of the stronger offerings of a genre of filmmaking that, for both good and bad, may constitute a true cinematic cottage industry.

Nevertheless, the film leans heavily into Latino culture in terms of themes, setting, and characters. Filmed largely in the U.S.’s Bordertown par excellence—El Paso, Texas—we meet the martial arts teacher Sergio, who describes his work helping migrants cross the border as a “Latino Harriet Tubman situation.” We learn that the fugitive revolutionary, Bob, is known by several aliases, including “The Gringo Coyote.” His savior, Sensei Sergio, explains to him outrightly that he’s “a bad hombre”—cheekily invoking the hurtful bon mots used by then-candidate Donald Trump in a 2016 debate with Hilary Clinton. The epithet is repeated later on in the film when Bob, under police surveillance in the hospital, is tipped off to an exit route by a member of the French 75 disguised as a nurse: “Are you diabetic? You’re a bad hombre, Bob. You know, if you’re a bad hombre, you make sure you take your insulin on a daily basis, right?” All this, plus the fact that the film’s denouement begins with a raid on a Mexican Restaurant in Northern California.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Pop Culture Can Save Democracy: Lessons From Just Do It to Designated Drive

Shoppers stand in line at a Nike outlet store on May 3, 2025 in San Diego, California.

Getty Images, Kevin Carter

How Pop Culture Can Save Democracy: Lessons From Just Do It to Designated Drive

In the late 1980s, the Harvard Alcohol Project did just that. By embedding the term designated driver into prime-time television—from Cheers to L.A. Law—they didn’t just coin a phrase. They changed people’s behavior. The campaign was credited with helping reduce alcohol-related traffic fatalities by nearly 30% over the following decade. President George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, along with organizations like Mothers Against Drunk Driving, endorsed the movement, amplifying its reach.

They made sober driving socially admirable, not awkward. And they proved that when language meets culture, norms shift.

Keep ReadingShow less