Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Second Chance Month: What’s Possible When Formerly Incarcerated People Lead

Opinion

A group of people joining their hands in solidarity.

Formerly incarcerated leaders are driving criminal justice reform, from Clean Slate laws to community healing—proving that lived experience is key to safer, stronger communities.

Getty Images, Adene Sanchez

As a formerly incarcerated person, Second Chance Month is personal. For generations, folks directly impacted by our criminal justice system have driven movements for reform in America. Our determination has pushed this country closer to its ideals of a free and fair democracy, even when its systems have failed us. From a ballot measure campaign in Florida that restored voting rights to nearly 1.4 million people with felony convictions to a national “Ban the Box” movement that encouraged employers to remove arrest history questions from job applications for fair employment practices, formerly incarcerated people have proven that we can make history. But far too often, people like me are excluded from conversations on public safety policies. All of us want to live in safe, just, and prosperous communities—but that’s only possible if we center the leadership of those most impacted by our criminal justice system, and advance policies that prioritize redemption over retribution.

My incarceration became a turning point in my life, forcing me to reimagine my purpose and the kind of man I wanted to become. Today, I lead a Community Healing Resource Center in Morgan Park, where I convene a men’s group for people affected by gun violence and trauma. My work is rooted in a truth I’ve lived, and it’s why leaders like me matter: when we are given the chance to lead, we don’t just rebuild our own lives—we strengthen entire neighborhoods.


Recent legislation passed in my home state of Illinois provides a roadmap for what is possible when formerly incarcerated people are given the opportunity to lead. Last year, after years of lobbying, the state legislature passed the passage of the Clean Slate Act, which automatically clears old criminal records and removes barriers to jobs, housing, and education. At the heart of the campaign for Clean Slate were leaders whose lives had been touched by the injustices of our criminal justice system.

Organizations like my own, Live Free Illinois, brought both formerly incarcerated people and organizers whose family members had faced incarceration together for near-daily strategy sessions, organized listening sessions, expanded coalitions, and engaged directly with those whose lives would be changed by this policy. We hosted teach-ins, organized canvasses, led peace pop-ups, and mobilized hundreds to take action through witness slips and outreach efforts. We featured stories like mine every step of the way, ensuring lawmakers understood the real human cost of outdated record‑keeping laws. It was the perspectives of formerly incarcerated people that shaped and protected the storytelling of this movement, ensuring that system-impacted leaders spoke from an authentic place of truth, dignity, and power—not surface-level, feel-good narratives.

What we achieved in Illinois is part of a much longer tradition. Directly impacted leaders have always been at the forefront of efforts to transform public safety and advance justice. Their expertise comes not from theory, but from navigating and surviving the very systems we seek to change. And it shows that when people like me are given a real opportunity to lead, we can implement meaningful public safety reforms like Clean Slate that benefit our economy, disrupt cycles of crime and violence, and ensure every Illinoisian can contribute to our state.

This is the deeper lesson of Second Chance Month. It’s not simply about celebrating individual transformation. It’s about recognizing that our communities are safer and more stable when people with lived experience shape the policies that govern reentry, public safety, and justice.

Yet our leadership is still routinely undervalued or underfunded. Too many decision‑making spaces exclude the very people who understand the consequences of our laws most intimately. That must change. That means funding community-rooted organizing, supporting coalitions that center the voices of those most impacted by harm, including gun violence and mass incarceration, and recognizing that directly impacted leaders are not just storytellers—they are decision makers who should shape what comes next.

If we want a justice system that actually delivers justice, we need to invest in the leaders who have been doing the work for decades. Illinois showed what’s possible when we do. The question for Second Chance Month is whether the rest of the country is ready to follow the same path.


Marvin Treadwell is a Decarceration Fellow with Live Free Illinois. He credits his love of chess for his aptitude in community organizing strategy.


Read More

Group of workers

Group of workers

Picture provided

Washington’s Domestic Workers Win Protections After Years of Organizing

Years of rallying on the steps of the Capitol building, marching through streets and testifying before legislators have paid off for Washington’s house cleaners, childcare providers, gardeners and their supporters.

On March 9, Gov. Bob Ferguson signed the Domestic Workers Bill of Rights into law, making Washington the 13th state to ensure basic labor protections for domestic workers, according to the domestic employers network Hand in Hand. These rights include fair pay, written contracts and protection from discrimination for workers doing domestic services in a private residence.

Keep ReadingShow less
ladder inside head silhouette illustration
ladder inside head silhouette illustration

Father-Daughter Bonding: The Art of Disagreeing Well

From the moment my youngest daughter was born, she carved out her own space in my world. I remember the pediatrician remarking on her long eyelashes, my brief panic when she didn't cry right away, and then the overwhelming relief and joy of holding her as she looked up and seemed to smile.

Growing up in the United States, most children called their fathers “Dad.” She chose something different. She called me Nanna—the Telugu word for father. It was a small, sweet choice that signaled the unique intellectual and emotional bond we would share. I have three daughters, and while my relationships with her older sisters are deep and powerful in their own ways, this is the daughter who shares this particular story with me.

Keep ReadingShow less
ball under basketball ring
ball under basketball ring
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

Fairness and Inclusion in Women’s Sports

Two former NBA players have said they want to play in the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA). Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White announced their intent to enter the WNBA draft, claiming—falsely—that they identify as women to force the WNBA to clarify its policy, which restricts participation to women without defining what it means to be a woman. The players’ announcement followed closely on the heels of WNBA player Sophie Cunningham’s public comments that it was “common sense” that only “biological women” be permitted to compete in the WNBA. Cunningham’s comments drew competing rallies to her games, either supporting or denouncing her stance. Her statement was preceded by the first Supreme Court ruling on eligibility for female sports competitions at the school and college level, a ruling that does not apply to professional sports. In West Virginia v. B. P. J., the Supreme Court affirmed that U.S. states may legally bar transgender girls and women from female school or collegiate sports teams, leaving states to decide.

Public discussion of this issue has been deeply polarized. Some on the political left have asserted that “trans women are women” and that anyone who opposes their participation in elite women’s sports is a bigot. Meanwhile, some on the political right have presented trans women athletes as male athletes stealing women’s trophies. This is a classic case of affective polarization—a phenomenon in which people feel their identities, values, or rights are at stake. They become less willing to consider alternative perspectives and demonize those with opposing views.

Keep ReadingShow less
Aerial view of a large Google Data Center

Aerial view of a large Google Data Center

Getty images

West Virginia NAACP wants statewide data center moratorium

Local chapters of the NAACP in West Virginia have joined together in unanimously opposing new construction of data centers, signing on to a resolution demanding a statewide moratorium.

Data center growth in the Mountain State is on the rise. It is estimated fewer than a dozen smaller centers are currently in operation and around 10 large-scale projects have been proposed.

Keep ReadingShow less