Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

How Anti-Black Racism is Fueling the Widespread Cruelty Against Kevin González and Other Latinos

Opinion

Kevin González

Kevin González

Telemundo Chicago

When something is cruelly racist, the average American wants to pin it on the prejudiced feelings of individual actors. Here, a few “bad apples” are responsible for the gut-wrenching fate of Kevin González – an American teen who recently died from cancer after briefly reuniting with his deported parents in México. But the real force behind this cruelty against Mr. González and other Latinos is driven by something more sinister and less recognizable than a bad batch of fruit. The literal violence raining down on Latinos is being caused by an unstable racial hierarchy – a long-standing system rooted in using Black people as a yardstick for how Americans judge the worth of other people of color, including Latinos.

graphic of subordination


This hierarchy has no feelings. It simply follows an internal logic aimed at preserving White Americans’ political clout, economic power, and distinctiveness from people of color. This system considers Whites the most superior and American group, reflected in their collective advantages in politics and society (figure 1). Moreover, although this system casts Asian people as foreigners, it also treats them as superior to Latinos and Blacks, justified by stereotyping all Asians as well-to-do and less impertinent than other racial “minorities.” And Latinos? Well, they are not confused for being White, but many of them are deemed too much like Black people –which matters for how the hierarchy handles Latinos like Kevin González. The average Latino in the U.S. is Mexican, native-born with immigrant parents, bilingual, votes Democratic, and wants economic mobility without forfeiting their culture. This combo of cultural difference and left-of-center politics is what the racial order finds most threatening now.

The racial hierarchy’s cruelty against Kevin González and other Latinos is steeped in anti-Blackness. Indeed, it is a testament to this mainstay that all previous immigrant groups—Irish, Italians, Jews, Irish, and others—gradually assimilated and climbed in socio-economic status, to the point that the system now deems them fully White. But Black people, who have been here longer than all these groups and have worked just as hard if not harder, have yet to be fully integrated into the American family. In racial terms, they remain the hierarchy’s personae non gratae.

Like previous immigrant waves, Latinos are now confronting this decision: to assimilate and become White or remain culturally and politically distinct, like Black Americans. The hierarchy offers this choice to Latinos as alleged foreigners, even though two-thirds of them are born here in the U.S. Indeed, it is no coincidence that President Trump’s anti-Latino politics took shape immediately after the presidency of a Black president who drew extensively on Latino support. Remember, the logic of America’s racial hierarchy is that proximity to Blackness is Blackness, so the system clamps down. It is time for Latinos to recognize this dynamic, to value it as a positive development, and to use this instability in the system to begin dismantling it.

Hold on! But didn’t non-trivial shares of Latinos vote for President Trump and many are now actively helping him deport their co-ethnics? Please resist this lazy logic. All systems of racial oppression, including our own, thrive on the consensus of some of the oppressed. Latinos for Trump. Latino ICE agents. Latino apologists for the cruelty against their co-ethnics. These are all individuals who acutely sense their proximity to Blackness and who find it too close for comfort. They recognize the high price of being Black in America, do not want to be confused with them, and so publicly and fervently signal their differentiation from Black people by lumping “bad” Latinos with them – including those like Kevin González and his undocumented parents.

Despite these dastardly moves, it is essential to recognize that the center of gravity among the larger Latino population is still left-of-center, especially on racial matters. Getting this diagnosis right is imperative if we want effective, durable solutions to this cruelty. One solution: stop focusing on changing negative feelings toward Latinos. Racial prejudice is deep-seated and resistant to change. Focus instead on converting people’s indifference into active opposition to this racial system. Indifference is what lets the hierarchy operate unfettered. Second, speak up about the system’s cruelty against Latinos, Blacks, and other people of color. Focusing your peers’ attention on this structural dynamic nudges them to see that even without personal prejudices, a system organized around race is still racist if it privileges – intentionally or not—one group over others. Third, plan to vote. Having a plan to participate makes political action more likely. True, your own individual vote is not going to determine an election. But sitting out a context has major repercussions. Our politics offer only two major choices (Democrats versus Republicans) and is most responsive to large numbers of voters with similar preferences. The majority of Latinos are still Democrats and opposed to cruelty now targeting their group and others. Do not waste this majority by thinking others will carry the load for you – that, too, is how America’s racial hierarchy thrives.

How Anti-Black Racism is Fueling the Widespread Cruelty Against Kevin González and Other Latinos was first published by California Latino News and was republished with permission.


Dr. Efrén Pérez is professor of political science and psychology at UCLA, where he directs the Race, Ethnicity, Politics, & Society (REPS) Lab. He is the author of several award-winning books, including Diversity’s Child: People of Color and the Politics of Identity. His data-based research can be accessed at https://eoperez.com


Read More

ladder inside head silhouette illustration
ladder inside head silhouette illustration

Father-Daughter Bonding: The Art of Disagreeing Well

From the moment my youngest daughter was born, she carved out her own space in my world. I remember the pediatrician remarking on her long eyelashes, my brief panic when she didn't cry right away, and then the overwhelming relief and joy of holding her as she looked up and seemed to smile.

Growing up in the United States, most children called their fathers “Dad.” She chose something different. She called me Nanna—the Telugu word for father. It was a small, sweet choice that signaled the unique intellectual and emotional bond we would share. I have three daughters, and while my relationships with her older sisters are deep and powerful in their own ways, this is the daughter who shares this particular story with me.

Keep ReadingShow less
ball under basketball ring
ball under basketball ring
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

Fairness and Inclusion in Women’s Sports

Two former NBA players have said they want to play in the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA). Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White announced their intent to enter the WNBA draft, claiming—falsely—that they identify as women to force the WNBA to clarify its policy, which restricts participation to women without defining what it means to be a woman. The players’ announcement followed closely on the heels of WNBA player Sophie Cunningham’s public comments that it was “common sense” that only “biological women” be permitted to compete in the WNBA. Cunningham’s comments drew competing rallies to her games, either supporting or denouncing her stance. Her statement was preceded by the first Supreme Court ruling on eligibility for female sports competitions at the school and college level, a ruling that does not apply to professional sports. In West Virginia v. B. P. J., the Supreme Court affirmed that U.S. states may legally bar transgender girls and women from female school or collegiate sports teams, leaving states to decide.

Public discussion of this issue has been deeply polarized. Some on the political left have asserted that “trans women are women” and that anyone who opposes their participation in elite women’s sports is a bigot. Meanwhile, some on the political right have presented trans women athletes as male athletes stealing women’s trophies. This is a classic case of affective polarization—a phenomenon in which people feel their identities, values, or rights are at stake. They become less willing to consider alternative perspectives and demonize those with opposing views.

Keep ReadingShow less
Aerial view of a large Google Data Center

Aerial view of a large Google Data Center

Getty images

West Virginia NAACP wants statewide data center moratorium

Local chapters of the NAACP in West Virginia have joined together in unanimously opposing new construction of data centers, signing on to a resolution demanding a statewide moratorium.

Data center growth in the Mountain State is on the rise. It is estimated fewer than a dozen smaller centers are currently in operation and around 10 large-scale projects have been proposed.

Keep ReadingShow less
Walling In, Walling Out
A person holding a smart phone with social media on the screen
Photo by Berke Citak on Unsplash

Walling In, Walling Out

In the 1980s, comedian Steven Wright had a bit about Smokey the Bear. When we were kids, we must’ve seen the old PSA a thousand times. “Only you can prevent forest fires.” As Wright recalls Smokey’s warning, he points at himself with a questioning look as if to say, “Me?”

That bit came to mind the other day when I saw the post of a friend from high school that started out by saying, “If you weren’t sure, this is censorship. You know, what you like to accuse President DJT of…”

Keep ReadingShow less