Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Latinos Must Forge Stronger Political Solidarity with Black People to Remove It

Opinion

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”


Racism like this is a major liability for a multi-racial democracy like ours—and Latinos must push back against it by nurturing greater political solidarity with Black Americans. Doing so will ensure that our children and grandchildren enjoy more equity and opportunity than we do in a society where our voices are actively silenced and regularly ignored. It will also guarantee that democracy is practiced to its fullest capacity by the time our children and grandchildren become voting-age adults.

U.S. society often lures Latinos to think of themselves as ambitious and hard-working, usually to distinguish themselves from racist tropes about Black people. Do not take the bait! This is a short-sighted strategy devoid of historical understanding. All immigrant groups before us—Irish, Italians, Jews— actively chose to distance themselves from Black people, which means they were highly aware of the price of being Black in America.

The truth is that Latinos have always been substantially closer to the Black experience in America than the trajectory of Irish, Italian, Jewish, and other European immigrants—and we must start acting like it. As a Latino person, if you sense that democracy is falling apart because your voting rights are being rolled back, because law enforcement is abusing rather than protecting your communities, or because you feel that no matter how hard you work, things are less affordable, then the answer is to combine your voices with Black Americans, who share these and other opinions.

My lab’s data-driven research shows that when Latinos and Blacks view themselves as being on the same political “team,” they make real progress toward democratic goals. Indeed, when Latinos and Blacks are reminded about the similarities between their experiences with racial discrimination, Black adults become more supportive of policies that benefit Latinos (e.g., flexible immigration procedures) while Latinos express more generous attitudes toward Blacks (e.g., support for Black Lives Matter).

My message to my Latino co-ethnics is simple. Today, we can do what is right for our ethnic group and others who are positioned similarly, and join communities, activists, and other groups working to dismantle the structures that create racial disparities and promote Black-Latino conflict. Some of these efforts will involve new coalitions between grassroots organizations seeking to enhance the well-being of Black and Latino families during these trying times, as is now happening in Northern California. Other efforts will involve recharged alliances between Black and Latino elected officials and civic leaders, such as those led by Mayor Karen Bass in Los Angeles and Mayor Brandon Johnson in Chicago.

Before Trump’s arrival, we Latinos told ourselves that we were also “minorities”—but only temporarily. Sure, our parents and grandparents came here with little, often lived in squalor, and experienced exclusion from the mainstream. But this would eventually pass, we told ourselves, because our children and grandchildren would experience upward mobility.

But that strategy isn’t working out for us. Yes, we can take out mortgages for homes. We can finance cars. We can even send some of our kids to college. But these developments are deceptive. We are accumulating little intergenerational wealth, we have atrociously weak political representation, and we remain stuck in jobs where our skill sets far outstrip our pay. As a result, despite working hard, our future prospects are dimming amid all these trappings of progress.

The goal here is not to pretend that we are all the same; it’s to acknowledge that we are more similar than different. This simple shift in perception produces more camaraderie between Latinos and African Americans, especially among Democratic people of color. This political unity translates into larger and more energized blocs of Latino and Black voters that support political candidates and policy proposals that uplift the voices and concerns of our communities.

In our political system, victories still demand large numbers of votes. So, it is in our collective interest for Latino and Black people to unify and act in tandem when opportunities present themselves, just as they are at this very moment. Together we can achieve what we and others most fundamentally need – a truly multi-racial democracy that faithfully responds to our interests and preserves our rights.

Dr. Efrén Pérez is a professor of political science and psychology at UCLA, where he directs the Race, Ethnicity, Politics, & Society (REPS) Lab. He is the author of several award-winning books, including Diversity’s Child: People of Color and the Politics of Identity. His data-based research can be accessed at https://eoperez.com

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy was first published on Latino News Network and was republished with permission.


Read More

Voters standing at voting booths.

As midterm elections approach, betting markets favor Democrats—but voter distrust, anti-establishment sentiment, and demand for reform could reshape the party’s future.

Getty Images, adamkaz

Dems Favored To Win Midterms — Will They Run the Candidates Voters Want?

Donald Trump can dismiss his dismal approval ratings and the GOP’s sinking midterm odds as fake news – but he can’t ignore the betting markets. More accurate in predicting political elections than traditional opinion polls, Democrats are a heavy midterm favorite, with an 87% chance of taking the House, and winning the Senate, 52 seats to 48.

But for any Democratic victory to be more than a temporary restraining order on Trump and the GOP, the Democratic Party needs to start placing voters front and center, building a way forward focused on what millions of voters have made clear they need: a new type of candidate with character who will fight, not fold with a new agenda that puts them first – an agenda untethered to the political class(Democrat and Republican) who put the needs of special interests and billionaires over ordinary citizens. In short, they want candidates who are voter-centered, not donor-centered.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Hidden Infrastructure of Democracy: Professionalizing and Diversifying Election Staff

Dr. Shaniqua Williams, assistant professor of political science

The Hidden Infrastructure of Democracy: Professionalizing and Diversifying Election Staff

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems—spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Below is an interview with Dr. Shaniqua Williams, Assistant Professor at West Virginia University. Her research focuses on state politics, race and ethnicity, Black political behavior, Black women’s descriptive and substantive representation, and election administration. She is also a Research Fellow with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, where her work focuses on election administration, workforce development, infrastructure, and policy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Macbeth’s Warning: How Ambition and Power Threaten Our Democracy

Engraving of three witches around a bubbling cauldron in a cave summoning an apparition of a rising demon in the background recalling a scene from Shakespeare's Macbeth..Image found in an 1881 book: "Zig Zag Journeys in the Orient" Published by John Wilson & Son, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Getty Images, KenWiedemann

Macbeth’s Warning: How Ambition and Power Threaten Our Democracy

“Something wicked this way comes…” chant the three witches in Shakespeare’s Macbeth, hailing the former general, now the new king of Scotland.

And indeed, something wicked this way has come to us, in the threat that we are facing to our democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors standing in front of government military tanks.

People attend a pro-government rally on January 12, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. Tens of thousands of demonstrators gathered in Tehran's Enqelab Square on Monday, as Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, speaker of the Iranian parliament, made a speech denouncing western intervention in Iran, following ongoing anti-government protests.

Getty Images

Changing Iran: With Help from Political Geographers on the Ground

INTRODUCTION

This article suggests a different path out of the present excursionist war. This would be a diplomatic effort with ample incentives to MAGA-Israel and the Conservative Shia Theocratic Khamenei Regime (CSTKR) to stop the war. In exchange for the U.S. and Israel stopping the bombing in Iran, this effort would allow the CSTKR to survive and thrive. They could keep and promote their belief that the return of the Muhammad al-Mahdi, the 12th Imam, who disappeared in 874 CE, is key to bringing on the end times to establish peace and justice on earth. While most people would endorse the attainment of peace and justice on earth, they would strongly object to its connection to try to actualize it through violent struggle.

This effort would assist Iran to thrive via the removal of sanctions, substantial technical and economic assistance, help in developing its civilian nuclear program, and letting them keep and maintain a mine-cleared Strait of Hormuz and charge tolls, similar to what Egypt levies for the Suez Canal. Charging tolls provides a strong incentive to keep that waterway open, maintained, and safe. It becomes an additional opportunity cost to keep it closed. The CSTKR and its proxy militias, in turn, must stop their bombing and terror campaigns and, in addition, the CSTKR must let the Strait of Hormuz be quickly opened, give up materials that can be used to build nuclear weapons, and accept the political reconfiguration of Iran as outlined here.

Keep ReadingShow less