Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Latinos Must Forge Stronger Political Solidarity with Black People to Remove It

Opinion

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”


Racism like this is a major liability for a multi-racial democracy like ours—and Latinos must push back against it by nurturing greater political solidarity with Black Americans. Doing so will ensure that our children and grandchildren enjoy more equity and opportunity than we do in a society where our voices are actively silenced and regularly ignored. It will also guarantee that democracy is practiced to its fullest capacity by the time our children and grandchildren become voting-age adults.

U.S. society often lures Latinos to think of themselves as ambitious and hard-working, usually to distinguish themselves from racist tropes about Black people. Do not take the bait! This is a short-sighted strategy devoid of historical understanding. All immigrant groups before us—Irish, Italians, Jews— actively chose to distance themselves from Black people, which means they were highly aware of the price of being Black in America.

The truth is that Latinos have always been substantially closer to the Black experience in America than the trajectory of Irish, Italian, Jewish, and other European immigrants—and we must start acting like it. As a Latino person, if you sense that democracy is falling apart because your voting rights are being rolled back, because law enforcement is abusing rather than protecting your communities, or because you feel that no matter how hard you work, things are less affordable, then the answer is to combine your voices with Black Americans, who share these and other opinions.

My lab’s data-driven research shows that when Latinos and Blacks view themselves as being on the same political “team,” they make real progress toward democratic goals. Indeed, when Latinos and Blacks are reminded about the similarities between their experiences with racial discrimination, Black adults become more supportive of policies that benefit Latinos (e.g., flexible immigration procedures) while Latinos express more generous attitudes toward Blacks (e.g., support for Black Lives Matter).

My message to my Latino co-ethnics is simple. Today, we can do what is right for our ethnic group and others who are positioned similarly, and join communities, activists, and other groups working to dismantle the structures that create racial disparities and promote Black-Latino conflict. Some of these efforts will involve new coalitions between grassroots organizations seeking to enhance the well-being of Black and Latino families during these trying times, as is now happening in Northern California. Other efforts will involve recharged alliances between Black and Latino elected officials and civic leaders, such as those led by Mayor Karen Bass in Los Angeles and Mayor Brandon Johnson in Chicago.

Before Trump’s arrival, we Latinos told ourselves that we were also “minorities”—but only temporarily. Sure, our parents and grandparents came here with little, often lived in squalor, and experienced exclusion from the mainstream. But this would eventually pass, we told ourselves, because our children and grandchildren would experience upward mobility.

But that strategy isn’t working out for us. Yes, we can take out mortgages for homes. We can finance cars. We can even send some of our kids to college. But these developments are deceptive. We are accumulating little intergenerational wealth, we have atrociously weak political representation, and we remain stuck in jobs where our skill sets far outstrip our pay. As a result, despite working hard, our future prospects are dimming amid all these trappings of progress.

The goal here is not to pretend that we are all the same; it’s to acknowledge that we are more similar than different. This simple shift in perception produces more camaraderie between Latinos and African Americans, especially among Democratic people of color. This political unity translates into larger and more energized blocs of Latino and Black voters that support political candidates and policy proposals that uplift the voices and concerns of our communities.

In our political system, victories still demand large numbers of votes. So, it is in our collective interest for Latino and Black people to unify and act in tandem when opportunities present themselves, just as they are at this very moment. Together we can achieve what we and others most fundamentally need – a truly multi-racial democracy that faithfully responds to our interests and preserves our rights.

Dr. Efrén Pérez is a professor of political science and psychology at UCLA, where he directs the Race, Ethnicity, Politics, & Society (REPS) Lab. He is the author of several award-winning books, including Diversity’s Child: People of Color and the Politics of Identity. His data-based research can be accessed at https://eoperez.com

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy was first published on Latino News Network and was republished with permission.


Read More

People waving US flags

People waving US flags

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Democracy Fellowship Spotlight: Joel Gurin on Trustworthy Data

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems: spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Recently, I interviewed Joel Gurin, who founded and now leads the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and wrote Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he chaired the White House Task Force on Smart Disclosure, which studied how open government data can improve consumer markets. He also led as Chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission and spent over a decade at Consumer Reports.

Keep Reading Show less
A balance.

A retired New York judge criticizes President Trump’s actions on tariffs, judicial defiance, alleged corruption, and executive overreach, warning of threats to constitutional order and the rule of law in the United States.

Getty Images

A Pay‑to‑Play Presidency Testing the Limits of Our Institutions

Another day, another outrage, and another attack on the Constitution that this President has twice taken a vow to uphold. Instead of accepting the Supreme Court decision striking down his imposition of tariffs, the President is now imposing them by executive order and excoriating the Justices who ruled against him. His disrespect for the Constitution and the judiciary is boundless.

To this retired New York State judge, all hell seems to have broken loose in our federal government. Congress lies dormant when it is not enabling the chief executive’s misuse and personal acquisition of federal funds, and, notwithstanding its recent tariffs ruling, a majority of the Supreme Court generally rubber-stamps the administration’s actions through opaque “shadow docket” rulings. In doing so, SCOTUS abdicates its role as an independent check.

Keep Reading Show less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep Reading Show less
Bomb First, Debate Later: The Hidden Cost of How America Makes War Now

A general view of Tehran with smoke visible in the distance after explosions were reported in the city, on March 02, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

Getty Images, Contributor

Bomb First, Debate Later: The Hidden Cost of How America Makes War Now

For those old enough to remember the first Gulf War, the scenes feel painfully familiar: smoke rising over Tehran. Babies carried out of a bombed-out hospital in incubators. Missiles striking cities across the Middle East. Oil markets in turmoil as Iran threatens to close the Strait of Hormuz. The war of choice that began with Israeli and American strikes on Iran is widening by the hour, pulling in multiple countries, including NATO allies, and producing casualties that mount by the day.

Much of the early discussion has focused on obvious questions. How far will the conflict spread? How many people will die? What will it cost the United States in money, lives, and global stability?

Keep Reading Show less