Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Capital Shifts Toward Tangible Assets and Emerging Economies

Opinion

Paper currency from several countries.

As U.S. market dominance fades, capital is shifting toward emerging economies in Asia and Latin America.

Getty Images, Priscila Zambotto

The global economy is experiencing a fundamental reallocation of capital. For more than a decade, the story of world markets centered on American technology companies and the strength of the dollar. In 2026, that dominance is fading. Investors are directing funds toward Asia and Latin America, where growth prospects appear more robust and risks more contained.

Market data this year makes the pattern clear. The S&P 500 has posted small losses year to date, while the Nasdaq has struggled. By contrast, emerging-market indices have gained ground. Asian equities have outperformed, and Brazil’s B3 index has risen sharply. An FT report in January noted emerging-market stocks, bonds, and currencies enjoying a strong start precisely as the dollar weakened.


This divergence is not cyclical. It rests on three structural forces: faster growth in the developing world, a cooler assessment of artificial intelligence in the United States, and worries about fiscal sustainability in the West. The International Monetary Fund's latest outlook projects global growth at 3.3 percent in 2026. Advanced economies are expected to expand by roughly 1.5 to 2 percent; emerging and developing economies by just above 4 percent. That gap of more than double has persisted for years but is now shaping investment decisions. Growth in emerging markets is also more evenly spread across sectors - industrials, financial services, and consumer industries - rather than concentrated in a narrow group of technology firms.

The reassessment of artificial intelligence is equally important. In the United States, the early optimism about generative tools has yielded to concern over their impact on profit margins in law, insurance, and software, as well as on employment. February’s non-farm payrolls fell by 92,000, an unexpected decline that has sharpened fears of faster labor-market disruption than societies can absorb. Recent Goldman Sachs studies highlight the risk that AI could displace tasks accounting for a significant share of work hours within a decade.

Investors have therefore shifted attention from software applications to the physical inputs of the AI economy. Semiconductor production, power infrastructure, and related hardware are concentrated in Asia, where suppliers enjoy pricing leverage. The rotation is from the creators of algorithms to the providers of the tangible components that make them run.

The dollar’s retreat adds momentum. The currency has fallen to levels not seen in four years. Persistent U.S. budget deficits and repeated political deadlocks over long-term fiscal repair have eroded confidence. The Federal Reserve’s policy rate remains around 3.75 percent, leaving real yields in many emerging markets comparatively attractive and pulling capital into local-currency debt and equities. Parallel changes in financial infrastructure are reducing reliance on traditional dollar channels. Project mBridge, the platform linking central banks in Hong Kong, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia, has now settled more than $55 billion in cross-border transactions - a 2,500-fold increase since its early trials. This is not ideological de-dollarization; it is a practical search for efficiency. Central banks have responded by increasing gold holdings. The metal has traded above $5,000 an ounce this year, with purchases led by China and other emerging-market authorities.

Two broad scenarios suggest themselves. In a smoother transition, U.S. markets stabilize once AI delivers measurable productivity gains and emerging economies continue their catch-up. In a rougher version, unresolved fiscal pressures in the West generate volatility that accelerates the move of capital toward jurisdictions with clearer policy frameworks. To navigate this transition, three concrete policy shifts are required.

First, the international community must move beyond viewing platforms like mBridge as "alternative" systems and instead integrate them into a global regulatory framework. By establishing unified anti-money laundering protocols for multi-CBDC platforms, we can prevent a fragmented shadow finance market. A standardized digital code of conduct would allow these efficient systems to coexist with the SWIFT network, ensuring that speed does not come at the cost of transparency.

Second, emerging economies must resist the urge to use new capital inflows for short-term consumption. Instead, governments in Southeast Asia and Latin America should establish Sovereign Infrastructure Trusts. These funds would channel speculative private credit into the "tangible AI" sector - specifically, high-capacity power grids and specialized logistics hubs. By anchoring foreign capital in physical, revenue-generating assets, these nations can create a buffer against the eventual return of Western interest rate volatility.

Third, as AI displaces labor in the West, developed economies must implement Transition Credits for corporations that reinvest AI-driven profits into human-in-the-loop reskilling. Simultaneously, emerging markets - possessing younger demographics - should prioritize STEM-based digital service export zones. This would allow a global labor equilibrium, where Western AI efficiency is balanced by the cognitive labor surplus of the Global South.

Developed economies face an obvious priority: restoring fiscal order. Reducing long-term debt burdens and overcoming legislative gridlock would remove the political-risk premium now attached to Western assets. Without credible plans for sustainability, investor caution will persist. Emerging markets, for their part, must channel the new inflows into productive uses rather than speculative excess. Stronger regulatory oversight and greater transparency in private markets matter. Private credit to emerging economies reached a record $22.3 billion last year, nearly 40 percent above the previous peak, according to the Global Private Capital Association. India and Latin America accounted for much of the total. Maintaining standards in these markets will sustain confidence.

The unipolar financial order that prevailed for decades is giving way to a more dispersed system. Growth is becoming more widely distributed, and capital is becoming more mobile. This is not a narrative of decline for the West but of rebalancing for the world. The opportunities worth pursuing now span more regions and more sectors than before. Investors and policymakers who recognize the shift early will be better placed to navigate the years ahead.


Imran Khalid is a physician, geostrategic analyst, and freelance writer.


Read More

 Dollar Bill Sticking Out of Piggy Bank on Yellow Background

A federal court sided with LAHSA, but LA nonprofits are still fronting millions to deliver government-funded homeless and DV services. Time to fix this.

Javier Zayas Photography/Getty Images

When Nonprofits Become the Bank for Government

It is a victory for Los Angeles in LAHSA v. Trump et al. that a federal court has temporarily halted the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's suspension of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority and ordered HUD to execute already-awarded 2025 grants. The court found that HUD's action was arbitrary and unlawful, restoring LAHSA's role as the regional Continuum of Care applicant and protecting critical federal homelessness resources.

That is good news for Los Angeles.

Keep ReadingShow less
Construction worker


Low angle view of male construction workers framing a new house

Getty Images

Latino Workers Are the Backbone of America — But Inequities Persist

WASHINGTON — As the nation pauses today to mark Labor Day 2026, a glaring spotlight is shining on the massive economic influence, historical legacy, and evolving challenges of the Latino labor force. Once relegated to the margins of the broader American labor narrative, Latino workers are stepping into the national conversation as the indisputable backbone of the modern United States economy.

According to recent findings from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the overall labor market has shown unexpected strength, with a stable baseline keeping the Hispanic and Latino unemployment rate hovering around 4.8%. While this reflects a significant drop from the 5.3% peak recorded a year ago, advocacy groups argue that the metrics mask deeper inequalities that holiday celebrations tend to overlook.

Keep ReadingShow less
US $1 dollar bill in mid air melting, red gradated background

From $215B to $7.14T: how outbound investment, falling labor share, and rising corporate profits reveal trickle-down economics' core flaw.

PM Images/Getty Images

Trickle-Down-Economics was Doomed from Day-One; yet Defended to Present-Day

By 1972, U.S. direct investments abroad amounted to $94.0 billion. This was two years prior to the development of the Laffer Curve in 1974 by American economist Arthur Laffer, famously sketched on a restaurant napkin during a dinner meeting in Washington, D.C. Therefore, the writing was on the wall regarding the vulnerability of Trickle-down economics, years prior to Reagan’s Economic Recovery Tax Act (ERTA) of 1981.

Trickle-down economics fails primarily because outbound foreign direct investment (FDI) allows corporations and wealthy individuals to invest tax-cut windfall profits globally rather than domestically. The theory of Trickle-down economics predicted that lowering taxes on businesses and high earners will stimulate local capital accumulation, leading to domestic business expansion, job creation, and wage growth for everyone. However, in a highly globalized economy, capital is hyper-mobile. Instead of filtering downward into the domestic economy, these untaxed or low-tax profits frequently exit the country entirely.

Keep ReadingShow less
An American & Canadian flag waving in the wind

An American & Canadian flag waving in the wind

Getty Images

Just the Facts: What’s Changed in U.S.–Canada Tariffs Since March 2025

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and a spirit of inquiry, presenting our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our newsgathering and the selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

In March of 2025, I wrote a column for The Fulcrum, Just the Facts: Canadian Tariffs, that set out to do something simple: strip away the rhetoric and explain, plainly, what tariffs between the United States and Canada actually were, what each country imposed, and why. That piece went on to become the most‑read article in Fulcrum history — more than 300,000 readers — because people were hungry for clarity in a debate that had become clouded by politics, slogans, and selective memory.

Keep ReadingShow less