Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Capital Shifts Toward Tangible Assets and Emerging Economies

Opinion

Paper currency from several countries.

As U.S. market dominance fades, capital is shifting toward emerging economies in Asia and Latin America.

Getty Images, Priscila Zambotto

The global economy is experiencing a fundamental reallocation of capital. For more than a decade, the story of world markets centered on American technology companies and the strength of the dollar. In 2026, that dominance is fading. Investors are directing funds toward Asia and Latin America, where growth prospects appear more robust and risks more contained.

Market data this year makes the pattern clear. The S&P 500 has posted small losses year to date, while the Nasdaq has struggled. By contrast, emerging-market indices have gained ground. Asian equities have outperformed, and Brazil’s B3 index has risen sharply. An FT report in January noted emerging-market stocks, bonds, and currencies enjoying a strong start precisely as the dollar weakened.


This divergence is not cyclical. It rests on three structural forces: faster growth in the developing world, a cooler assessment of artificial intelligence in the United States, and worries about fiscal sustainability in the West. The International Monetary Fund's latest outlook projects global growth at 3.3 percent in 2026. Advanced economies are expected to expand by roughly 1.5 to 2 percent; emerging and developing economies by just above 4 percent. That gap of more than double has persisted for years but is now shaping investment decisions. Growth in emerging markets is also more evenly spread across sectors - industrials, financial services, and consumer industries - rather than concentrated in a narrow group of technology firms.

The reassessment of artificial intelligence is equally important. In the United States, the early optimism about generative tools has yielded to concern over their impact on profit margins in law, insurance, and software, as well as on employment. February’s non-farm payrolls fell by 92,000, an unexpected decline that has sharpened fears of faster labor-market disruption than societies can absorb. Recent Goldman Sachs studies highlight the risk that AI could displace tasks accounting for a significant share of work hours within a decade.

Investors have therefore shifted attention from software applications to the physical inputs of the AI economy. Semiconductor production, power infrastructure, and related hardware are concentrated in Asia, where suppliers enjoy pricing leverage. The rotation is from the creators of algorithms to the providers of the tangible components that make them run.

The dollar’s retreat adds momentum. The currency has fallen to levels not seen in four years. Persistent U.S. budget deficits and repeated political deadlocks over long-term fiscal repair have eroded confidence. The Federal Reserve’s policy rate remains around 3.75 percent, leaving real yields in many emerging markets comparatively attractive and pulling capital into local-currency debt and equities. Parallel changes in financial infrastructure are reducing reliance on traditional dollar channels. Project mBridge, the platform linking central banks in Hong Kong, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia, has now settled more than $55 billion in cross-border transactions - a 2,500-fold increase since its early trials. This is not ideological de-dollarization; it is a practical search for efficiency. Central banks have responded by increasing gold holdings. The metal has traded above $5,000 an ounce this year, with purchases led by China and other emerging-market authorities.

Two broad scenarios suggest themselves. In a smoother transition, U.S. markets stabilize once AI delivers measurable productivity gains and emerging economies continue their catch-up. In a rougher version, unresolved fiscal pressures in the West generate volatility that accelerates the move of capital toward jurisdictions with clearer policy frameworks. To navigate this transition, three concrete policy shifts are required.

First, the international community must move beyond viewing platforms like mBridge as "alternative" systems and instead integrate them into a global regulatory framework. By establishing unified anti-money laundering protocols for multi-CBDC platforms, we can prevent a fragmented shadow finance market. A standardized digital code of conduct would allow these efficient systems to coexist with the SWIFT network, ensuring that speed does not come at the cost of transparency.

Second, emerging economies must resist the urge to use new capital inflows for short-term consumption. Instead, governments in Southeast Asia and Latin America should establish Sovereign Infrastructure Trusts. These funds would channel speculative private credit into the "tangible AI" sector - specifically, high-capacity power grids and specialized logistics hubs. By anchoring foreign capital in physical, revenue-generating assets, these nations can create a buffer against the eventual return of Western interest rate volatility.

Third, as AI displaces labor in the West, developed economies must implement Transition Credits for corporations that reinvest AI-driven profits into human-in-the-loop reskilling. Simultaneously, emerging markets - possessing younger demographics - should prioritize STEM-based digital service export zones. This would allow a global labor equilibrium, where Western AI efficiency is balanced by the cognitive labor surplus of the Global South.

Developed economies face an obvious priority: restoring fiscal order. Reducing long-term debt burdens and overcoming legislative gridlock would remove the political-risk premium now attached to Western assets. Without credible plans for sustainability, investor caution will persist. Emerging markets, for their part, must channel the new inflows into productive uses rather than speculative excess. Stronger regulatory oversight and greater transparency in private markets matter. Private credit to emerging economies reached a record $22.3 billion last year, nearly 40 percent above the previous peak, according to the Global Private Capital Association. India and Latin America accounted for much of the total. Maintaining standards in these markets will sustain confidence.

The unipolar financial order that prevailed for decades is giving way to a more dispersed system. Growth is becoming more widely distributed, and capital is becoming more mobile. This is not a narrative of decline for the West but of rebalancing for the world. The opportunities worth pursuing now span more regions and more sectors than before. Investors and policymakers who recognize the shift early will be better placed to navigate the years ahead.


Imran Khalid is a physician, geostrategic analyst, and freelance writer.


Read More

​A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes.

A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes in the Houch neighborhood, after being displaced for weeks by war between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah militia that has displaced 1.2 million Lebanese, on April 28, 2026, in Tyre, Lebanon.

Scott Peterson / Getty Images

Please Don't Feed the Warmongers

I was recently catching up with an old friend from my Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps days who told me about some young sailors he knew in Bahrain tasked with intercepting hostile drones. Critically, as highly disciplined professionals, they have become extraordinarily good at it. My friend and I, with over twenty years of active duty service as military officers between us, discussed the extent to which their competence and vigilance are keeping them, and other Americans deployed in the area, alive, all while their leadership in Washington treats war with an increasingly terrifying callousness.

As brave servicemembers risk their lives on the front lines, Trump brags about how much money he’s making as president. It is true that for those invested in the types of industries that thrive during armed conflict, this war in Iran is a windfall. Trump himself invested between $9.7 million and $24.3 million in arms manufacturers and Pentagon contractors in 2025. Why would he end the war?

Keep ReadingShow less
A father voting, with his young son standing by him, watching him.

Citizens cast their vote during the 2026 presidential runoff in Colombia on June 21, 2026 in Barranquilla, Colombia. Ivan Cepeda, candidate for the Pacto Historico party and Abelardo de la Espriella, candidate for the Salvación Nacional, face in a tight runoff to rule Colombia from 2026 to 2030.

Leonardo Castañeda/Getty Images

Colombia’s Election Matters—Especially to Ecuador and the U.S.

In a closely fought election on June 21, conservative outsider Abelardo De La Espriella prevailed over Iván Cepeda, an ally of current leftist president, Gustavo Petro. Central to the electorate’s choice were distinct policy proposals to fight criminality and the drug cartels, who control large swaths of Colombian territory. The policies president-elect De La Espriella will bring to the fight against these issues matter greatly, not only to Colombia, but to neighboring Ecuador and the United States.

Earlier in March, Ecuadorian President Noboa, desperate to gain traction in his own drug war, announced a partnership with the U.S. to conduct joint operations against drug cartels. The partnership quickly went awry. A New York Times investigation of the first strike indicates that what the joint militaries considered a drug camp was in fact a dairy farm, with no drug connection. Then, on March 17, Colombia accused Ecuador of bombing within its territory with U.S. involvement. These incidents resulted in U.S. lawmakers calling for a suspension of joint operations on May 13. Very quickly, the U.S. partnership has reopened the scars of the Plan Colombia era of the early 2000s, where an overly militaristic approach to the drug war funded by the U.S. resulted in human rights abuses and false positives.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult grandson teaching his grandfather to use laptop, close-up.

Social Security faces a funding crisis by 2032 that could cut retirement benefits by 22%. Learn what's driving the shortfall and how it could be fixed.

Westend61 / Getty Images

Social Security Faces a 2032 Crisis with Deep Benefit Cuts Ahead

A financial tsunami of giant proportions is heading our way. And it is due to arrive in about six years. Policymakers have known about this tsunami for some time, but in June, we found out the Big Wave is taller than anyone knew.

That’s when the Social Security Trustees released their latest report on the financial health of the popular Social Security retirement program. According to the trustees’ report, the outlook is not good – Social Security’s solvency is in danger. By 2032, the Social Security fund will fall short by about $2.5 trillion of the money needed to pay the 52 million American retirees their full retirement benefits. Previously, it was thought that the tsunami would make landfall in 2034, but the finances are deteriorating faster than expected. If no presidential and congressional intervention is mounted, retirees will take about a 22 percent haircut, meaning any senior beneficiary who was receiving $3000 per month will see that chopped to about $2300 per month, a loss of about $8000 per year.

Keep ReadingShow less
 Lego Bricks in child hands

How imagination shapes our future and the American spirit.

Ekaterina79 / Getty Images

The Dreams That Built America—and Will Carry Us Forward

Ah love, let us be true

To one another! For the world, which seems

Keep ReadingShow less