Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America’s Two Economies - Soaring Stocks and Slashed Food Stamps

Opinion

America’s Two Economies - Soaring Stocks and Slashed Food Stamps

As 2026 begins, the U.S. economy is splitting in two—booming corporate profits and stock gains for the wealthy, deepening hardship for working families.

The close of the 2025 holiday season has revealed a stark divide in the U.S. economy. As 2026 begins, the United States appears to be operating in two financial realities: record corporate profits and soaring stock values for the wealthy, alongside deepening hardship for millions of ordinary households. For many Americans, Christmas was overshadowed not by celebration but by economic strain, compounded by the rollback of key federal assistance programs.

The year’s economic data offered mixed signals. Online sales surged to $11.8 billion on Black Friday, and overall holiday spending is projected to exceed $1 trillion for the first time. Yet nearly half of all national consumption now comes from high-income households, whose spending on luxury goods and premium travel masks the growing struggles of families at the lower end of the income scale.


While those with money are able to afford life's essentials, life is far more difficult for families at the bottom of the income scale. Last year, the cost of holiday gifts rose by more than general inflation. The cost of items that many people give as gifts rose by 26% in comparison to other prices. About 41% of consumers were forced to buy fewer presents, as many others reduced their holiday spending budgets by approximately 10%. One quarter of the population in New York lives in poverty, a figure which is roughly double that of the country as a whole.

The present economic system is presently becoming a "K-shaped" one, with a wealthy class whose wealth grows and a working class struggling. This pattern is being further intensified by specific policy decisions. The tax bill signed into law by the current administration, commonly referred to as the Big and Beautiful Act, grants large corporations and the affluent significant tax cuts. These budget reductions are balanced by government cuts in funding for social services, which millions of American citizens are dependent on.

The situation has been exacerbated by two significant factors which will be felt at the end of 2025. Millions of Americans are facing a loss of health insurance at the end of this month, due to the Affordable Care Act's tax credits expiring on December 31st. Low-income households are finding their winter food budgets slashed just as the winter season starts because of the cuts to the U.S. food stamps programme.

Current tariffs are also an indirect taxation. The average household now faces a hike of approximately $2,400 every year thanks to these new tariffs. For many lower-income households, these fees can be crushing. They are much easier for the wealthier classes to afford.

The concentration of corporate power has the effect of trapping the average American in a structural economic situation. The start of 2026 finds many sectors undergoing considerable industry consolidation. Businesses with large amounts of cash are, due to tax relief and high interest rates, taking over the companies that are experiencing difficulties. The consolidation of such big companies leads to a reduction in competition and gives them the power to set a lower wage, despite the profits being at an all-time high. In a community where one major firm controls the economic infrastructure, workers have limited leverage when negotiating salaries and benefits. People have no choice but to accept the low pay on offer as there are no other companies to work for in the area.

One reason the industry divide, known as the "K-shaped" split, is turning out to be so enduring is that it now has no major competitor to challenge its hold. A strong stock market generally indicated that the economy was doing well and that job prospects were favourable. Today, that link is broken. Because the economy is experiencing a boom, shares in the market are increasing. This economic boom is a direct result of companies cutting back on employee costs, introducing labour-saving machinery, and reducing employee benefits. The wealth now generated in the financial district does not make its way down to the workers in the warehouses and the cashiers.

Evidence of a divide in the job market is becoming increasingly apparent. During November and December 2025, the larger companies in the U.S. created jobs at a rate of ninety thousand, but smaller ones with less than fifty employees let go of 120,000 staff. The majority of the private sector workforce is employed in small businesses, thus a decline in these concerns is creating "job deserts" in many communities. The trend of consolidation results in large companies having too much power and ordinary people being left with reduced opportunities and lower pay.

In the United States, wealth is distributed in such a manner that it now jeopardizes the existence of a stable middle class. Those wealthy enough to own assets such as real estate and stocks are witnessing a sort of "snowball effect" with their wealth, whereas those forced to live on wages continue to see their purchasing power dwindle.

With the arrival of 2026, Americans are increasingly faced with a deepening economic rift. The growing wealth gap in the country has led to an increasing disparity between those with the financial means to afford life's essentials, including healthcare and food, and those who are unable to do so. A holiday season of twinkling lights serves to mask the reality that the economic system is benefiting fewer and fewer of the population.


Imran Khalid is a physician, geostrategic analyst, and freelance writer.


Read More

U.S. Capitol

A shrinking deficit doesn’t mean fiscal health. CBO projections show rising debt, Social Security insolvency, and trillions added under the 2025 tax law.

Getty Images, Dmitry Vinogradov

The Deficit Mirage

The False Comfort of a Good Headline

A mirage can look real from a distance. The closer you get, the less substance you find. That is increasingly how Washington talks about the federal deficit.

Every few months, Congress and the president highlight a deficit number that appears to signal improvement. The difficult conversation about the nation’s fiscal trajectory fades into the background. But a shrinking deficit is not necessarily a sign of fiscal health. It measures one year’s gap between revenue and spending. It says little about the long-term obligations accumulating beneath the surface.

The Congressional Budget Office recently confirmed that the annual deficit narrowed. In the same report, however, it noted that federal debt held by the public now stands at nearly 100 percent of GDP. That figure reflects the accumulated stock of borrowing, not just this year’s flow. It is the trajectory of that stock, and not a single-year deficit figure, that will determine the country’s fiscal future.

What the Deficit Doesn’t Show

The deficit is politically attractive because it is simple and headline-friendly. It appears manageable on paper. Both parties have invoked it selectively for decades, celebrating short-term improvements while downplaying long-term drift. But the deeper fiscal story lies elsewhere.

Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the debt now account for roughly half of federal outlays, and their share rises automatically each year. These commitments do not pause for election cycles. They grow with demographics, health costs, and compounding interest.

According to the CBO, those three categories will consume 58 cents of every federal dollar by 2035. Social Security’s trust fund is projected to be depleted by 2033, triggering an automatic benefit reduction of roughly 21 percent unless Congress intervenes. Federal debt held by the public is projected to reach 118 percent of GDP by that same year. A favorable monthly deficit report does not alter any of these structural realities. These projections come from the same nonpartisan budget office lawmakers routinely cite when it supports their position.

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

A take on permitting reform, deregulation, and DHS accountability—arguing for economic growth with guardrails that protect communities, health, and the environment.

Getty Images, Javier Ghersi

A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

For far too long, our national conversation has been framed around a false choice. On one side, Republicans frequently argue that the best way to strengthen the economy and improve the lives of everyday Americans is to give businesses maximum freedom by having fewer rules, fewer constraints and more incentives to grow. On the other side, Democrats have stressed the need for guardrails to protect our environment, our health, and our communities from the unintended effects of unchecked growth.

But this debate has always been too narrow. It assumes that we must choose between action and accountability, between getting things done and doing them responsibly.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close up of stock market chart on a glowing particle world map and trading board.

Democrats seek a post-Trump strategy, but reliance on neoliberal economic policies may deepen inequality and voter distrust.

Getty Images, Yuichiro Chino

After Trump, Democrats Confront a Deeper Economic Reckoning

For a decade, Democrats have defined themselves largely by their opposition to Donald Trump, a posture taken in response to institutional crises and a sustained effort to defend democratic norms from erosion. Whatever Trump may claim, he will not be on the 2028 presidential ballot. This moment offers Democrats an opportunity to do something they have postponed for years: move beyond resistance politics and articulate a serious, forward-looking strategy for governing. Notably, at least one emerging Democratic policy group has begun studying what governing might look like in a post-Trump era, signaling an early attempt to think beyond opposition alone.

While Democrats’ growing willingness to look past Trump is a welcome development, there is a real danger in relying too heavily on familiar policy approaches. Established frameworks offer comfort and coherence, but they also carry risks, especially when the conditions that once made them successful no longer hold.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why Global Investors Are Abandoning the Dollar
1 U.S.A dollar banknotes
Photo by Alexander Grey on Unsplash

Why Global Investors Are Abandoning the Dollar

In the middle of the twentieth century, the American architect of the postwar order, Dean Acheson, famously observed that Great Britain had lost an empire but had not yet found a role. The United States is not facing a comparable eclipse. It remains the world’s dominant military power and the central node of global finance. Yet a quieter, more incremental shift is underway - one that reflects not a sudden collapse, but a strategic recalibration. Global investors are not abandoning the dollar en masse; they are hedging against a growing perception that American stewardship of the international system has become fundamentally less predictable.

That unease has surfaced most visibly in the gold market. In the opening weeks of 2026, the yellow metal has performed less like a commodity and more like a verdict, surging past $5,500 an ounce. This month, we reached a milestone that would have been unthinkable a decade ago: for the first time in thirty years, global central bank gold reserves have overtaken combined holdings of U.S. Treasuries. According to World Gold Council data, central banks now hold nearly $4 trillion in gold, nudging past their $3.9 trillion stake in American debt.

Keep ReadingShow less