Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

When It Comes to Our Children’s Education, Trump Gets An ‘F’

Opinion

Happy teacher asking girl with hand raised sitting in classroom at elementary school

Trump's education policies are reshaping public schools. Learn how Department of Education cuts, school boards, and local elections could shape children's futures.

Maskot / Getty Images

When grading a government, there should be no metric more telling than how the kids are doing. It may come as no surprise that they are not doing well–but if the kids are failing, it is because Trump has failed them. The United States has the highest child poverty rate of any wealthy nation, yet the president continues to systematically abandon children: stripping away vital affordability protections, dismantling public education infrastructure, and cutting Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Plus, there’s the ongoing threat of gun violence in schools, the cruel realities facing migrant kids in detention centers, and now new threats to digital safety and youth mental health–an intersectional crisis that desperately requires federal attention while Trump is actively trying to prevent states from stepping up in the meantime. Each of these issues deserves its own op-ed, but today let’s talk about the silver bullet for addressing inequality and building a resilient, inclusive society: public education. Its days may be numbered, but you can help.

In a move characteristically devoid of compassion, President Trump signed an executive order to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education (DOE), mandated that federal funding would be conditional on cutting all diversity, equity, or inclusion programs, and urged Congress to abolish the DOE outright. Following suit, Congress proposed and enacted budget cuts to reduce essential funding for programs supporting low-income students, students with disabilities, and otherwise vulnerable populations. The Supreme Court decision to allow mass layoffs at the Department of Education only worsens this crisis, reducing the department’s ability to assist schools during these challenging times. These combined federal actions will have far-reaching consequences for children and communities across the country. School’s out for summer? School might be out forever.


The impact is evident. Nationwide, schools are facing funding shortages, program cancellations, and staffing crises, and things keep getting worse. While federal funding accounts for only about 14% of school budgets, it plays a crucial role in leveling the playing field—ensuring fairness, opportunity, and support for our most vulnerable students. Trump’s proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2027 calls for major cuts to education and safety-net programming, less than a year after his deep eligibility and benefit cuts under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, including new restrictions on SNAP and Medicaid, as well as major cuts to student financial aid that left millions scrambling. Clearly, at a national level, education is on the chopping block. Even if some Congress members manage to delay the damage, it is a precarious time to be a student or educator while so much is in flux.

Local school boards may be a line of defense. These elected leaders work to ensure that our children receive an equitable, high-quality education and that schools are safe places where students can thrive. School boards make critical decisions about budgets, resources, and policies, and work to ensure teachers have the tools, resources, and support they need to create effective, nurturing learning environments. Local school boards can provide in-touch leadership, and attempt to clean up the mess left by national policies that threaten our public schools. Unfortunately, many school districts suffer from low engagement and limited competition in school board races. Between 24% and 40% of these races go uncontested each year, with incumbents winning around 80% of the time. This lack of diversity and competition leaves community voices muted and allows special interests to influence education policies that may not truly reflect the community’s needs. On that note, this is prime time for you to consider running.

While there are dozens of deep, systemic failures plaguing America’s youth today, education is one of the few arenas where accessible, institutional mechanisms still exist for us to infiltrate and reclaim immediately. If you want to force federal attention back onto these critical priorities, you can step into the arena yourself by running for Congress to champion child safety and family safety nets. But you don’t have to go to Washington to make an impact. Running for your local school board is an accessible, impactful way to defend public education, support teachers, and help shape policies that prioritize students’ well-being and learning. There are over 80,000 school board seats nationwide, with about a quarter up for election each year. By stepping into these roles, everyday citizens can ensure that their communities’ schools remain safe, inclusive, and well-resourced.

You don’t need to be a parent or teacher to run. If you care about the well-being of young people or the integrity of local schools or even just the future economic vitality of your neighborhood, then you should think about it. We all have the power to help make our schools safe, equitable, and capable of preparing students for the challenges ahead. That being said, if you are a parent or a teacher, what are you waiting for? Run for a seat, or if you aren't ready to take that step, change how you engage with local elections: pay attention to the candidates on your ballot, and actively recruit or encourage a trusted, compassionate neighbor to run. Congress must do what it can to defend against the daunting onslaught our president is deploying against our youth, but we can all help ensure that children at least have access to the education they deserve.

This call to action isn't just for adults. If you are a young person with notes on your schooling, you should run. Most school board seats only require candidates to be 18 years old, and a growing number of states have even enacted laws permitting or sometimes requiring local school boards to feature designated student positions, with some of these younger representatives carrying full voting rights. Trump ended programs that surveyed the experiences of high schoolers, but voices from the classroom are vital. No one is too young to invest in how the next generation learns and grows. Raise your hand.


Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.


Read More

students walking, college campus
a group of people walking on a sidewalk

Safe Spaces vs. Free Speech: Rethinking Campus Safety

“I really want to be able to discuss polarizing topics,” she said. “But as long as it’s a safe space.”

This common sentiment reflects recent data on students’ attitudes toward speech on campus: a 2024 Knight Foundation study found that 91% of students value free speech as “very important” or "important," while 64% of students believe colleges should offer “safe spaces” on campus, with only 15% opposed.

Keep ReadingShow less
Children's books on a shelf.
A 17-year-old changemaker from Ohio, Sahana Srikanth founded the Young Learners Foundation to tackle the literacy gap, donating over 18,000 books and empowering youth through mentorship, education, and community-driven impact.
Pexels

Darius Williams Went Viral. Fixing the Literacy Crisis Won’t.

On his second day of teaching at Wheatley High School in Houston, former food influencer Darius Williams faced a problem that has plagued U.S. classrooms for decades: his students couldn’t read or write on grade level. But he didn’t call a colleague or email a district literacy specialist. Instead, he posted a video.

In the clip, Williams sat in front of the camera, crying over the futures his students would be denied. "We have got to do something,” he wrote in the caption. “Something is broken somewhere. It has to be. To see this level of engagement with students who simply don't have literacy skills is completely disheartening. Whew. Yall did not prepare me for this."

Keep ReadingShow less
Military education. Student in soldier uniform learning at wooden table indoors, selective focus

Millions join the military to afford college. This essay examines military education benefits, student debt, and why higher education shouldn't depend on military service.

Liudmila Chernetska/Getty Images

You Shouldn't Have to Go To War to Go To College

There are many reasons to join the military, but one of the most enticing is education. Indeed, a 2017 poll conducted by the Department of Defense found that 49% of Army recruits signed up to pay for their education. It makes sense. Military education packages are incredibly attractive, which is quite the recruitment carrot. For a huge number of recruits, joining the military means finding a way to pay for school they couldn’t otherwise afford. That may say less about the luster of military benefits and more about a problem in our public policy. As education scholar William Ayers wrote back in 2006, as recruitment fell short of quotas, “High schools have thus become battlefields for the hearts and minds of young people…recruiters dangle gifts and promises of future benefits before teenagers in an effort to fill the ranks of an all-volunteer military.” Is our country making it hard to get an education on purpose?

Some critics suggest military recruitment strategies have sought to weaponize poverty. By the 1980s, the term "poverty draft" had gained traction, articulating the idea that the enlisted ranks of the military were composed of young people with limited economic opportunities. There is speculation that the Pentagon even embraced programs like No Child Left Behind as part of a broader strategy to improve recruitment by targeting low-income youth. Though these may be cynical perspectives on a simple matter of correlation, it does appear that the military struggles to draw youth to join the ranks whenever more attractive alternative economic pathways emerge. After a long recruitment drought, last year’s numbers finally climbed, but Army officials link it to “a higher unemployment rate among people aged 16 to 24…” In other words, if the economy is depressed enough, as long as the military is one of the few employers still hiring, a recruitment drought won’t be so obvious.

Keep ReadingShow less
Children holding hands, walking down a school hallway with backpacks on.

Texas families increasingly rely on after-school programs, but funding cuts and workforce shortages are limiting access.

wera Rodsawang/Getty Images

After School, Before It’s Too Late for Texas Students

Every afternoon in Texas, the end of the school day creates a daily scramble for families. Five out of six parents say they want after-school care, but cannot access it.

The demand for after-school programs is not theoretical.

Keep ReadingShow less