Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

When It Comes to Our Children’s Education, Trump Gets An ‘F’

Opinion

Happy teacher asking girl with hand raised sitting in classroom at elementary school

Trump's education policies are reshaping public schools. Learn how Department of Education cuts, school boards, and local elections could shape children's futures.

Maskot / Getty Images

When grading a government, there should be no metric more telling than how the kids are doing. It may come as no surprise that they are not doing well–but if the kids are failing, it is because Trump has failed them. The United States has the highest child poverty rate of any wealthy nation, yet the president continues to systematically abandon children: stripping away vital affordability protections, dismantling public education infrastructure, and cutting Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Plus, there’s the ongoing threat of gun violence in schools, the cruel realities facing migrant kids in detention centers, and now new threats to digital safety and youth mental health–an intersectional crisis that desperately requires federal attention while Trump is actively trying to prevent states from stepping up in the meantime. Each of these issues deserves its own op-ed, but today let’s talk about the silver bullet for addressing inequality and building a resilient, inclusive society: public education. Its days may be numbered, but you can help.

In a move characteristically devoid of compassion, President Trump signed an executive order to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education (DOE), mandated that federal funding would be conditional on cutting all diversity, equity, or inclusion programs, and urged Congress to abolish the DOE outright. Following suit, Congress proposed and enacted budget cuts to reduce essential funding for programs supporting low-income students, students with disabilities, and otherwise vulnerable populations. The Supreme Court decision to allow mass layoffs at the Department of Education only worsens this crisis, reducing the department’s ability to assist schools during these challenging times. These combined federal actions will have far-reaching consequences for children and communities across the country. School’s out for summer? School might be out forever.


The impact is evident. Nationwide, schools are facing funding shortages, program cancellations, and staffing crises, and things keep getting worse. While federal funding accounts for only about 14% of school budgets, it plays a crucial role in leveling the playing field—ensuring fairness, opportunity, and support for our most vulnerable students. Trump’s proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2027 calls for major cuts to education and safety-net programming, less than a year after his deep eligibility and benefit cuts under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, including new restrictions on SNAP and Medicaid, as well as major cuts to student financial aid that left millions scrambling. Clearly, at a national level, education is on the chopping block. Even if some Congress members manage to delay the damage, it is a precarious time to be a student or educator while so much is in flux.

Local school boards may be a line of defense. These elected leaders work to ensure that our children receive an equitable, high-quality education and that schools are safe places where students can thrive. School boards make critical decisions about budgets, resources, and policies, and work to ensure teachers have the tools, resources, and support they need to create effective, nurturing learning environments. Local school boards can provide in-touch leadership, and attempt to clean up the mess left by national policies that threaten our public schools. Unfortunately, many school districts suffer from low engagement and limited competition in school board races. Between 24% and 40% of these races go uncontested each year, with incumbents winning around 80% of the time. This lack of diversity and competition leaves community voices muted and allows special interests to influence education policies that may not truly reflect the community’s needs. On that note, this is prime time for you to consider running.

While there are dozens of deep, systemic failures plaguing America’s youth today, education is one of the few arenas where accessible, institutional mechanisms still exist for us to infiltrate and reclaim immediately. If you want to force federal attention back onto these critical priorities, you can step into the arena yourself by running for Congress to champion child safety and family safety nets. But you don’t have to go to Washington to make an impact. Running for your local school board is an accessible, impactful way to defend public education, support teachers, and help shape policies that prioritize students’ well-being and learning. There are over 80,000 school board seats nationwide, with about a quarter up for election each year. By stepping into these roles, everyday citizens can ensure that their communities’ schools remain safe, inclusive, and well-resourced.

You don’t need to be a parent or teacher to run. If you care about the well-being of young people or the integrity of local schools or even just the future economic vitality of your neighborhood, then you should think about it. We all have the power to help make our schools safe, equitable, and capable of preparing students for the challenges ahead. That being said, if you are a parent or a teacher, what are you waiting for? Run for a seat, or if you aren't ready to take that step, change how you engage with local elections: pay attention to the candidates on your ballot, and actively recruit or encourage a trusted, compassionate neighbor to run. Congress must do what it can to defend against the daunting onslaught our president is deploying against our youth, but we can all help ensure that children at least have access to the education they deserve.

This call to action isn't just for adults. If you are a young person with notes on your schooling, you should run. Most school board seats only require candidates to be 18 years old, and a growing number of states have even enacted laws permitting or sometimes requiring local school boards to feature designated student positions, with some of these younger representatives carrying full voting rights. Trump ended programs that surveyed the experiences of high schoolers, but voices from the classroom are vital. No one is too young to invest in how the next generation learns and grows. Raise your hand.


Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.


Read More

A person reaches for a book on a shelf in a library.

A daughter of Cultural Revolution survivors argues U.S. school book bans are about power, not protection, and how a freedom-to-read law offers a way forward.

LAW Ho Ming/Getty Images

My Parents Lived through a Book Ban. Americans Should Demand the Freedom to Read.

At the start of this school year, a Texas schoolteacher from my home school district went nationally viral. In a video, Darius Williams sobbed as he explained that after he “gave them the answers,” his high school seniors still could not complete an exercise comprising two sentences to read and one to write. Reading scores in the country currently languish at a twenty-year low. In the new year, a historic set of new state lawmakers around the country should prioritize reversing ineffective policies that have kept critical reading materials out of school libraries.

Since 2021, book bans have reached a level “never before seen in the life of any living American” (34,000 total in public schools across the country, according to PEN America). Some institutions are even preemptively removing materials to avoid controversy, a phenomenon termed “soft censorship.”

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth stands for anthems at the Pentagon on October 15, 2026 in Arlington, Virginia. The two defense officials discussed NATO financial commitments by European countries.

Hegseth’s order ending tenure at the service academies punishes scholars and leaves future officers less prepared for war. Here’s why Congress should step in.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Secretary Hegseth's Tenure Ban Fails Our Officers and the Academy

Yesterday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth fired another round of shots in his war on higher education, and once again he fought it in his own backyard. After pulling books off the shelves of the Naval Academy and cutting the Pentagon’s ties to graduate programs at Harvard and Princeton, he signed a memo ordering the service academies to stop granting tenure to civilian professors, effective immediately. Tenure, he wrote, breeds “academic stagnation, faculty complacency,” and belongs to a broader academic structure that serves to “dilute our focus on lethality.” This assault on the academy is a mistake, both wronging the scholars who teach at the academies, and leaving the cadets and midshipmen who learn from them less prepared for war.

In his depiction of the tenure system's shortcomings, Hegseth mischaracterizes it as a finish line, where receiving tenure marks the moment a professor stops running. Granted, there is a grain of truth here: a study of over 12,000 American faculty members published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that in non-lab-based fields like political science and sociology, publication rates do fall once tenure is secured. Lab-based fields, meanwhile, sustain high research output. More importantly, however, the same study found that after receiving tenure, scholars turn toward newer, riskier questions, also known as the kind that occasionally transforms a field.

Keep ReadingShow less
Students in a classroom.​

Civics is a practice, not a quiz. See how immigrant and Indigenous communities are teaching schools to build, not blend in, as America turns 250.

Getty Images, andresr

Schools Can’t Teach Democracy Without Valuing Students’ Lived Experiences

Recently, I gathered with a group of dads outside Philadelphia to clear out a neighborhood park through Dads for All, the organization I co-founded. Some of us grew up in that neighborhood, some had never set foot in it, and plenty of us had no idea what we were doing. Our kids, ages three to seventeen, hauled branches and swung tools nearly as long as they were tall — and they were delighted.

Here's what I watched them figure out: A park is where a kid gets to be free. It's where you run, where you pretend to be a superhero, where the ground belongs to you. And you assume it just shows up. That morning, our children learned that it doesn't. Somebody has to see what it could be. Somebody has to partner with the people who own it and the people who use it. And then somebody has to pick up the loppers. That was the most honest civics lesson my son has ever had, and unfortunately, that is where the problem is.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Window to Safely Managing the Education Freedom Tax Credit is Closing Fast
Empty wooden tables and chairs in a library with shelves of books
Photo by Tuyen Vo on Unsplash

The Window to Safely Managing the Education Freedom Tax Credit is Closing Fast

There is a major change in how students, schools, and educational programs can be funded, taking effect on January 1, 2027, with a small window of time to ensure the program is well managed. We have to move fast.

The Education Freedom Tax Credit (EFTC) creates a new federal tax credit for taxpayers who make qualified contributions to approved nonprofit Scholarship Granting Organizations (SGOs). SGOs, in turn, use that money to award scholarships for tutoring, tuition, or other qualified education expenses for students, regardless of whether they attend public, private, or charter schools. The money is contributed directly to SGOs by taxpayers, who can receive a dollar-for-dollar tax credit on their 2027 tax filing, up to $1,700 for individuals and $3,400 for married taxpayers filing jointly.

Keep ReadingShow less