Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The state of voting: Dec. 5, 2022

voting legislation updates

This weekly update summarizing legislative activity affecting voting and elections is powered by the Voting Rights Lab. Sign up for VRL’s weekly newsletter here.

The Voting Rights Lab is tracking 2,213 bills so far this session, with 583 bills that tighten voter access or election administration and 1,061 bills that expand the rules. The rest are neutral, mixed or unclear in their impact.

Georgia is conducting its first runoff general election since a state law truncated the runoff timeline. Among stories lauding historic single-day turnout numbers are many detailing hours-long lines and the fact that thousands of mail ballots were sent too late for voters to return them by the required deadline.

Elsewhere, lawmakers in Missouri prefiled legislation to restore voting eligibility to people with past felony convictions immediately upon release from incarceration. Rhode Island’s incoming secretary of state named same-day registration legislation and the implementation of a new online mail ballot request system as his top priorities in 2023.

Looking ahead: After postponing consideration of the bill last week, an Ohio House committee may hear legislation this week that would restrict mail voting, limit secretary of state authority, and make the state’s voter ID law stricter.

Here are the details:


Georgia’s new truncated runoff period leads to long lines, delayed mail ballots. In the first runoff general election since last year’s S.B. 202 was enacted, voters across Georgia experienced hours-long lines at early voting locations, including multiple days of three-hour lines in Savannah. S.B. 202 cut the time between the November election and the runoff in half, reduced the number of required early voting days for runoff elections from 17 to five, and eliminated all required weekend days – though some counties did choose to offer the option. The new law also made it a felony to provide food and beverages to voters waiting in line.

In addition to long lines, the truncated timeline seems to have also resulted in problems with mail voting. In Cobb County, part of the Atlanta metro area, thousands of mail ballots were not sent out to voters until eight days before Election Day, which is the deadline for receipt of completed ballots by election officials. On Friday, a Cobb County Superior Court judge issued an injunction ordering the county to accept ballots received by Dec. 9, three days after runoff election day, so long as they were postmarked by the close of polls.

Ohio House committee may move a restrictive elections bill this week. Last week the Ohio House of Representatives’ Government Oversight Committee postponed consideration of a substitute to H.B. 294 that would restrict acceptable forms of voter ID, limit secretary of state authority, prohibit prepaid postage for mail ballots and remove provisions from the bill establishing automatic voter registration, among other changes. The committee is expected to hold additional hearings this week.

Prefiled legislation in Missouri would restore voting eligibility to people with past felony convictions. H.B. 248 would restore the ability to vote for people with past felony convictions upon release from incarceration. The Senate companion bill has not yet been assigned a bill number. Under current Missouri law, people with past felony convictions may not vote until they complete all relevant terms of parole and probation. If this legislation passes, Missouri will join the 23 other states where people with past felony convictions may vote immediately upon release from incarceration.

Incoming Rhode Island secretary of state cites same-day registration and online mail ballot requests as priorities. Secretary of State-elect Gregg Amore named legislation establishing same-day registration and the implementation of an online mail ballot request system, already authorized by this year’s S.B. 2007, as his top priorities.


Read More

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference at the Washington Convention Center March 6, 2018 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

After AIPAC failed to defeat El-Sayed in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary—after spending $32 million—it said that it remains committed to defeating El-Sayed and his "radical, anti-Israel" agenda in the general election. Which means it is poised to sink tens of millions of dollars in supporting Republican Mike Rogers. It also said that Haley Stevens, his opponent, had presented "an authentic Democratic agenda." Meaning that El-Sayed did not? And they think that Mike Rogers, a MAGA Trump supporter, does compared with El-Sayed?

How can AIPAC say that El-Sayed does not present an authentic Democratic agenda when his socialist stance is much more in line with the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence than most centrist Democrats'? And making it sound like AIPAC cares about an authentic Democratic agenda is deceitful, when in the same breath they make clear that they will support Mike Rogers, a Trump lackey, in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research
silhouette of person using microscope

Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research

Scientists and the federal government have been close partners since World War II. A landmark report by President Truman’s chief science advisor laid out a vision for government research that shaped eight decades of federally funded science. That vision is now at risk. In principle, the Trump administration has supported scientific research with its own vision for a new “golden age of science.” But in practice, the administration has upended the relationship between the government, researchers, and their institutions. The changes have alarmed working scientists and their allies, who have protested in record numbers.

In July, I moderated a webinar on “Rewriting the Rules: What’s happening to public science?” (read the transcript here). The webinar was co-sponsored by NAPA, CODE, and the Bridge Alliance, with Dr. Aaron Carroll of AcademyHealth, Dr. Chris Marcum of the Federation of American Scientists, Dr. Gretchen Goldman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Dr. Maryam Zaringhalam of the Center for Open Science. I also interviewed Cole Donovan of the Stand Up for Science Foundation by email.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democratic Party Suicide
a piece of paper cut out of the shape of a donkey
Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

Democratic Party Suicide

A recent New York Times article, "Moderate Democrats Prepare for 'War' Against an Ascendant Left," describes a disturbing perspective among mainstream, moderate, centrist Democrats. It is disturbing for many reasons.

First, there is the practical impact. If indeed mainstream Democrats attack socialist Democrats in a sustained, organized manner, there is only one possible result: the defeat of the Party in 2026 and the renewed vigor of Trump and his MAGA allies. Especially when combined with the all-out effort that AIPAC will mostly take to support Republican candidates running against Democratic candidates who are socialists. (See my article, "The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC.")

Keep ReadingShow less
An Iranian flag and the message "No King" graffitied on the ruins of the data center building of Sharif University of Technology after a U.S.-Israeli missile strike on April 7, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

How has the meaning of military victory changed? Explore Iran, deterrence, nuclear weapons, and why modern wars are fought with limited objectives.

Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images

The Last War We Understood

Every modern conflict seems to produce the same debate.

Supporters argue that military action achieved its objectives. Critics ask why the enemy still exists. Iran is only the latest example.

Keep ReadingShow less