Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Joe Manchin on Taxpayer-Funded Primaries: 'They're Locking Us Out!'

News

Joe Manchin on Taxpayer-Funded Primaries: 'They're Locking Us Out!'

Joe Manchin

Alex Wong/Getty Images

While appearing on CNN host Michael Smerconish’s show, former Democratic U.S. Senator Joe Manchin, now a registered independent, told Smerconish that “we have to have open primaries” in order to get candidates who prioritize representation to run and have a chance to win.

“We have to change the primary,” he added. “They are locking us out.”


- YouTube youtu.be

Manchin believes it is impossible to have a representative form of government when independent voters can’t even participate in elections in a meaningful way. The use of a closed or semi-closed system locks out about 24 million independents each election cycle.

Smerconish not only supports the adoption and use of open primaries, but he is also a lead plaintiff in a lawsuit in Pennsylvania challenging the Commonwealth’s use of closed partisan primaries. Plaintiffs say the system violates the state constitution's Free and Equal Elections Clause.

“As one of our lawyers, Shannon Spector, said: ‘Denying a citizen the right to vote is the harshest form of taxation without representation,’” Smerconish has previously said.

It has been over a year since Manchin left the Democratic Party to register independent, citing the broken state of U.S. politics and the unwillingness of both parties to work together to find compromise on important issues.

“To stay true to myself and remain committed to put country before party, I have decided to register as an independent with no party affiliation and continue to fight for America’s sensible majority,” he said.

The decision, however, means that in West Virginia – where he resides – his options in taxpayer-funded primary elections are limited. His state uses a semi-closed system that allows the parties to decide who can and cannot participate in “their” primaries.

- YouTube youtu.be

The Democratic Party of West Virginia currently allows independent votes to participate, but the state’s Republican Party voted in January 2024 to close its primaries to party members only.

This leaves the 25% of the voting population that is registered unaffiliated with limited options and no real meaningful say in who represents them as most elections in the state are effectively decided in the Republican primaries.

Republicans hold a super-majority in the state legislature with 91% of the seats in the House of Delegates and all but two state Senate seats. Both of the state’s congressional seats are held by Republicans in districts that have a party advantage of R+22 (WV-1) and R+20 (WV-2).

This means voters not registered with the Republican Party are denied a meaningful say in taxpayer-funded elections, including independent voters.

Joe Manchin on Taxpayer-Funded Primaries: 'They're Locking Us Out!' was first published on Independent Voter News and was republished with permission.

Shawn Griffiths is an election reform expert and National Editor of IVN.


Read More

An Iranian flag and the message "No King" graffitied on the ruins of the data center building of Sharif University of Technology after a U.S.-Israeli missile strike on April 7, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

How has the meaning of military victory changed? Explore Iran, deterrence, nuclear weapons, and why modern wars are fought with limited objectives.

Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images

The Last War We Understood

Every modern conflict seems to produce the same debate.

Supporters argue that military action achieved its objectives. Critics ask why the enemy still exists. Iran is only the latest example.

Keep ReadingShow less
United States Capitol building and blurred American flag against blue sky

America’s aging Congress has no maximum age limit. Could a constitutional amendment create age limits for lawmakers and better represent younger voters?

TGI /Tetra Images

Congress Has an Age Floor and No Ceiling. That's Backwards for Gen Z.

Senator Dianne Feinstein's visible decline in her final years in office. Senator Lindsey Graham's sudden death. Senator Mitch McConnell's own recent hospitalization, and his halting explanation of it afterward. Three senators, three separate incidents, no obvious connection between them, except that the saga of these three senators is really one story about the problem of not knowing when to step down. That framing asks the right question of individual leaders. But it assumes the problem is a matter of personal judgment, each senator, in his or her own time, finding the wisdom to recognize the moment has passed. I think that gets the American version of this problem backwards. Congress's age problem is not a string of individual judgment calls. It is a structural feature of the Constitution itself, and it is quietly reshaping who gets represented in American government.

The Constitution sets a floor for federal office and no ceiling. A representative must be at least twenty-five. A senator must be at least thirty. A president must be at least thirty-five. Nothing in the document says how old is too old. Combine that asymmetry with the enormous advantages of incumbency, better name recognition, fundraising networks, committee seniority, and the result is predictable: a Congress that can start young but can never age out. It can only age up. The 119th Congress is now the third oldest in American history, with an average member age of nearly fifty-nine and a Senate averaging in the mid-sixties. This is not a temporary blip. It is the natural output of a system with a gate on one end and no gate on the other.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first
a large white building with a flag on top of it

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the third and final installment of our series on “Article the first.” Previous parts examined the history of the single inverted word that turned an intended floor into a ceiling and its impact on the amendment’s failed ratification. This concluding part outlines the path forward for enlarging the House today.

Part 3 — The Path Forward

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

Painting from 1856 by Junius Brutus Stearns of George Washington at the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the second of a three-part series on the First Amendment proposed by Congress in 1789—often called “Article the first”—which was never ratified. Part 1 explained how a single inverted word in the text created a mathematical absurdity that has been misread for 237 years. This second part explores the untold history of how that defect affected the original ratification process in state legislatures.

Part 2 — The Untold History

Keep ReadingShow less