Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Is the U.S. Better Off Today Than a Year Ago?

A Look at Trump’s First Year Back in Office

News

Is the U.S. Better Off Today Than a Year Ago?

A street vendor sells Trump paraphernalia on January 19, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Eric Thayer/Getty Images)

As President Donald Trump begins his second year back in the White House, economists, policy analysts, and public‑opinion researchers describe a country experiencing mixed economic signals, rising household strain, and deepening political anxiety. While tax cuts and energy‑sector expansion have delivered short‑term boosts, broader indicators suggest a more fragile landscape than the one Trump inherited in early 2025.

Trump’s most significant legislative achievement of the year—the One, Big Beautiful Bill Act—has begun to shape the economic outlook for 2026. The tax‑cut package, signed on July 4, is expected to deliver between $30 billion and $100 billion in aggregate refunds in the first half of the year, according to Bloomberg, which noted that the influx of cash could provide a short‑term boost to consumer spending. Economists surveyed by the outlet projected 2% GDP growth for 2026, describing it as “a modest pace by past U.S. standards” and cautioning that the administration’s more optimistic 3.5% forecast is unlikely to materialize.


The labor market tells a similarly nuanced story. An analysis by AInvest News found that 687,000 private‑sector jobs have been added since Trump took office, a figure the administration has highlighted as evidence of a strengthening economy. But unemployment has also risen to 4.6%, a sign that the labor market is cooling after years of post‑pandemic expansion. The same analysis reported that Trump’s tariff‑driven manufacturing strategy has reduced employment by 2.7% in targeted sectors, with automation and retaliatory trade measures contributing to the decline. “Fiscal risks from deregulation and tax cuts… contrast with short‑term energy sector gains,” the report concluded.

For many Americans, the most immediate measure of economic well‑being is affordability, and here the picture is more challenging. It is estimated that households face $1,300 to $2,100 in additional annual costs due to the combined effects of tariffs, deregulation, and inflationary pressures. A USA Today report captured the frustration of consumers who say rising prices have overshadowed any benefits from tax relief. “Household budgets are definitely top of mind,” the outlet summarized, noting that many respondents felt the economy was “worse” than a year earlier.

Steven Hill, writing in The Fulcrum, described the national economic landscape as a “split‑screen reality of positives and negatives,” arguing that Trump’s promises to lower the costs of living and deliver sweeping tax cuts have produced uneven results. “He promised to bring down the cost of living… and enact big corporate and income tax cuts. So, how is he doing?” Hill wrote, before outlining indicators that show both progress and backsliding.

The political climate has also shaped perceptions of national well‑being. Protests have intensified in response to immigration enforcement actions and the executive branch's assertiveness, adding to a sense of volatility. Trump’s foreign‑policy posture has drawn global attention, particularly after the dramatic seizure of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, an operation that raised questions about legal precedent and executive authority. Coverage from TIME highlighted the tension between Trump’s anti‑elite political persona and his reappearance at the World Economic Forum in Davos, noting that he “gained popularity based on his ability to present himself as a foil to those who frequent Davos,” even as he re‑engages with global economic leaders.

Public sentiment reflects these crosscurrents. Polling throughout late 2025 and early 2026 shows a majority of Americans expressing pessimism about the country’s direction, with concerns centered on inflation, tariffs, and political division. While the administration points to tax refunds, energy‑sector growth, and job creation as signs of progress, many households say they feel squeezed rather than supported.

One year into Trump’s return to office, the United States is navigating a complex and contradictory moment. Tax cuts and sector‑specific gains offer reasons for optimism, but rising unemployment, higher household costs, and widespread public frustration point to deeper vulnerabilities. As Bloomberg put it, the U.S. economy is “on track” for modest growth, but the track is narrower and more fragile than the administration’s rhetoric suggests. Whether the country is better off than it was a year ago ultimately depends on which metrics—and whose experiences—are at the center.

Across the reporting reviewed, one theme is consistent: Americans are feeling the strain, even as headline indicators show pockets of strength.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of The Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network


Read More

Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

View of the Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

Getty Images, Philippe Debled

The City Where Traffic Fatalities Vanished

A U.S. city of 60,000 people would typically see around six to eight traffic fatalities every year. But Hoboken, New Jersey? They haven’t had a single fatal crash for nine years — since January 17, 2017, to be exact.

Campaigns for seatbelts, lower speed limits and sober driving have brought national death tolls from car crashes down from a peak in the first half of the 20th century. However, many still assume some traffic deaths as an unavoidable cost of car culture.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Has Forgotten Its Oath — and the Nation Is Paying the Price

US Capitol

Congress Has Forgotten Its Oath — and the Nation Is Paying the Price

What has happened to the U.S. Congress? Once the anchor of American democracy, it now delivers chaos and a record of inaction that leaves millions of Americans vulnerable. A branch designed to defend the Constitution has instead drifted into paralysis — and the nation is paying the price. It must break its silence and reassert its constitutional role.

The Constitution created three coequal branches — legislative, executive, and judicial — each designed to balance and restrain the others. The Framers placed Congress first in Article I (U.S. Constitution) because they believed the people’s representatives should hold the greatest responsibility: to write laws, control spending, conduct oversight, and ensure that no president or agency escapes accountability. Congress was meant to be the branch closest to the people — the one that listens, deliberates, and acts on behalf of the nation.

Keep ReadingShow less
WI professor: Dems face breaking point over DHS funding feud

Republicans will need some Democratic support to pass the multi-bill spending package in time to avoid a partial government shutdown.

(Adobe Stock)

WI professor: Dems face breaking point over DHS funding feud

A Wisconsin professor is calling another potential government shutdown the ultimate test for the Democratic Party.

Congress is currently in contentious negotiations over a House-approved bill containing additional funding for the Department of Homeland Security, including billions for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as national political uproar continues after immigration agents shot and killed Alex Pretti, 37, in Minneapolis during protests over the weekend.

Keep ReadingShow less
Family First: How One Program Is Rebuilding System-Impacted Families

Close up holding hands

Getty Images

Family First: How One Program Is Rebuilding System-Impacted Families

“Are you proud of your mother?” Colie Lavar Long, known as Shaka, asked 13-year-old Jade Muñez when he found her waiting at the Georgetown University Law Center. She had come straight from school and was waiting for her mother, Jessica Trejo—who, like Long, is formerly incarcerated—to finish her classes before they would head home together, part of their daily routine.

Muñez said yes, a heartwarming moment for both Long and Trejo, who are friends through their involvement in Georgetown University’s Prisons and Justice Initiative. Trejo recalled that day: “When I came out, [Long] told me, ‘I think it’s awesome that your daughter comes here after school. Any other kid would be like, I'm out of here.’” This mother-daughter bond inspired Long to encourage this kind of family relationship through an initiative he named the Family First program.

Keep ReadingShow less