Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Is the U.S. Better Off Today Than a Year Ago?

A Look at Trump’s First Year Back in Office

News

Is the U.S. Better Off Today Than a Year Ago?

A street vendor sells Trump paraphernalia on January 19, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Eric Thayer/Getty Images)

As President Donald Trump begins his second year back in the White House, economists, policy analysts, and public‑opinion researchers describe a country experiencing mixed economic signals, rising household strain, and deepening political anxiety. While tax cuts and energy‑sector expansion have delivered short‑term boosts, broader indicators suggest a more fragile landscape than the one Trump inherited in early 2025.

Trump’s most significant legislative achievement of the year—the One, Big Beautiful Bill Act—has begun to shape the economic outlook for 2026. The tax‑cut package, signed on July 4, is expected to deliver between $30 billion and $100 billion in aggregate refunds in the first half of the year, according to Bloomberg, which noted that the influx of cash could provide a short‑term boost to consumer spending. Economists surveyed by the outlet projected 2% GDP growth for 2026, describing it as “a modest pace by past U.S. standards” and cautioning that the administration’s more optimistic 3.5% forecast is unlikely to materialize.


The labor market tells a similarly nuanced story. An analysis by AInvest News found that 687,000 private‑sector jobs have been added since Trump took office, a figure the administration has highlighted as evidence of a strengthening economy. But unemployment has also risen to 4.6%, a sign that the labor market is cooling after years of post‑pandemic expansion. The same analysis reported that Trump’s tariff‑driven manufacturing strategy has reduced employment by 2.7% in targeted sectors, with automation and retaliatory trade measures contributing to the decline. “Fiscal risks from deregulation and tax cuts… contrast with short‑term energy sector gains,” the report concluded.

For many Americans, the most immediate measure of economic well‑being is affordability, and here the picture is more challenging. It is estimated that households face $1,300 to $2,100 in additional annual costs due to the combined effects of tariffs, deregulation, and inflationary pressures. A USA Today report captured the frustration of consumers who say rising prices have overshadowed any benefits from tax relief. “Household budgets are definitely top of mind,” the outlet summarized, noting that many respondents felt the economy was “worse” than a year earlier.

Steven Hill, writing in The Fulcrum, described the national economic landscape as a “split‑screen reality of positives and negatives,” arguing that Trump’s promises to lower the costs of living and deliver sweeping tax cuts have produced uneven results. “He promised to bring down the cost of living… and enact big corporate and income tax cuts. So, how is he doing?” Hill wrote, before outlining indicators that show both progress and backsliding.

The political climate has also shaped perceptions of national well‑being. Protests have intensified in response to immigration enforcement actions and the executive branch's assertiveness, adding to a sense of volatility. Trump’s foreign‑policy posture has drawn global attention, particularly after the dramatic seizure of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, an operation that raised questions about legal precedent and executive authority. Coverage from TIME highlighted the tension between Trump’s anti‑elite political persona and his reappearance at the World Economic Forum in Davos, noting that he “gained popularity based on his ability to present himself as a foil to those who frequent Davos,” even as he re‑engages with global economic leaders.

Public sentiment reflects these crosscurrents. Polling throughout late 2025 and early 2026 shows a majority of Americans expressing pessimism about the country’s direction, with concerns centered on inflation, tariffs, and political division. While the administration points to tax refunds, energy‑sector growth, and job creation as signs of progress, many households say they feel squeezed rather than supported.

One year into Trump’s return to office, the United States is navigating a complex and contradictory moment. Tax cuts and sector‑specific gains offer reasons for optimism, but rising unemployment, higher household costs, and widespread public frustration point to deeper vulnerabilities. As Bloomberg put it, the U.S. economy is “on track” for modest growth, but the track is narrower and more fragile than the administration’s rhetoric suggests. Whether the country is better off than it was a year ago ultimately depends on which metrics—and whose experiences—are at the center.

Across the reporting reviewed, one theme is consistent: Americans are feeling the strain, even as headline indicators show pockets of strength.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of The Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network


Read More

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep Reading Show less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep Reading Show less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep Reading Show less
New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.

Keep Reading Show less