Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Hardest Part of Postpartum Has Been Fascism

Opinion

The Hardest Part of Postpartum Has Been Fascism

woman in orange long sleeve shirt sitting on gray couch

Photo by Joice Kelly on Unsplash

The hardest part of postpartum hasn’t been the sleepless nights or the endless cycle of feeding, burping, and diaper changes. It’s been scrolling through the news while nap-trapped under a newborn and realizing that the world my son has just entered feels increasingly hostile and uncertain.

Nothing could have prepared me for navigating the throes of new motherhood while watching fascism unfold in real time.


Life with a newborn is already disorienting. Days blur into nights. Your body is recovering, your brain is foggy from sleep deprivation, and your life revolves around a tiny person who needs you for everything. Through it all, I’ve found myself putting on a smiling face for a baby who knows nothing of the outside world while inwardly grieving the state of that world.

In the span of my son’s first months of life, I’ve seen fascism in the suppression of dissent, where ICE murdered two American citizens, militarism escalating, and immigrants once again scapegoated for problems in the United States, from housing to healthcare and everything in between.

It’s been hard sitting on the sidelines while friends put themselves on the line for their undocumented neighbors and protesting ICE and its abuses of power.

For me, these fears aren’t abstract. Both of my parents left their homelands, their families, and their friends to start over in the United States, hoping to give me a better life. Their migration shaped my own sense of possibility.

Now, as a parent myself, I find myself wondering what I would do to give my son the same chance.

What if my family is targeted simply because we are Latino? At what point would I consider leaving the country to give my child a better future?

Even in the haze of postpartum life, I find myself contingency planning—applying for a passport for my infant son, just in case. At the same time, I’m coming to terms with a painful truth: I cannot shield him from the racism and xenophobia that exist in this world.

While postpartum life can be isolating, I’m reminded that I’m not alone. At a new parent group in the San Francisco Bay Area, several of us admitted that the news has been weighing heavily on us. We are a generation of parents with unprecedented access to information at all hours of the day and night—and very little control over the events shaping our children’s future.

Like many parents, I find myself asking: how do we raise children in times like these?

Those questions keep me up at night just as much as my crying son.

Recently, I came across a post offering guidance to parents on how to talk to young children about violence. It was a small but meaningful reminder that even in frightening times, there are people thinking carefully about how to help children grow up with empathy rather than fear.

My activism looks different these days. Instead of marching in the streets, I spend hours rocking a baby to sleep. Instead of organizing meetings, my nights are filled with lullabies and whispered “I love yous” to a child who has no idea what is happening beyond our home.

Some nights, I sit in the dim light of the nursery while my son drifts off against my chest. His tiny hand holds onto me, his breathing slow and steady in a way that makes the rest of the world feel far away. For a moment, the headlines fade and there is only us.

But even in those moments of peace, the questions remain.

Parenting right now looks like applying for a passport for a baby who can’t sit up yet—just in case. It looks like rocking him to sleep while headlines flash across my phone. It looks like kissing his soft cheeks and praying for a world that is kinder and more just than the one we are living in now.

I may not be able to control the forces shaping my son’s future. But I can raise him to meet that future with compassion instead of cruelty.

In dark times, raising compassionate children is an act of resistance.

Elisabet Avalos is a leader in housing justice, developing programs for survivors of violence experiencing homelessness, and a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project on Domestic Violence and Economic Security.


Read More

man in yellow and black crew neck shirt raising his right hand
man in yellow and black crew neck shirt raising his right hand

Building a Heat-Safe South Florida for Cancer Survivors and Patients

Temperatures in South Florida have been rising, leading to extreme heat and alarming heat advisories. On Aug. 13, 2026, the state experienced dangerous heat, with heat index values potentially climbing above 110 degrees.

Most Floridians take caution and stay inside if they can to escape the heat. For cancer patients and survivors, getting to that air-conditioned space can be another challenge.

Keep ReadingShow less
Senators Criticize Trump Administration’s Demands to Access Health Data as a Condition for Lifesaving Aid
Roberto “Bear” Guerra/ProPublica. Source image: Getty Images

Senators Criticize Trump Administration’s Demands to Access Health Data as a Condition for Lifesaving Aid

What Happened: Citing reporting by ProPublica, eight Democratic U.S. senators have criticized the Trump administration’s demands to access the health data of millions of people as a condition of giving lifesaving aid to other countries. In a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the senators, including minority leader Chuck Schumer, said the U.S. demands were “unprecedented and at odds with U.S. policy concerning the data of American citizens.”

The inquiry into the administration’s approach to foreign health data referred to a ProPublica story published in June about agreements the U.S. struck with African countries — and the risks they posed to people there. Experts told ProPublica that the deals are vague and lack language used in most data-sharing agreements to adequately limit what information is collected and how it can be used. As a result, they said, there is an increased risk that individuals’ personal data could be exposed, misused or commercialized without their consent.

Keep ReadingShow less
As Temperatures Rise and Federal Funding Falls, Drowning Risks Grow
a group of kids in a pool
Photo by Kevin Paes on Unsplash

As Temperatures Rise and Federal Funding Falls, Drowning Risks Grow

July 25 marked World Drowning Day. More than 4000 people die from unintentional drowning in the United States each year. This translates into an average of 11 drowning deaths per day. Children ages one to four are at greatest risk, making drowning the leading cause of death for that group and the second leading cause of death for children ages five to 14.

Two emerging trends could make those numbers worse: federal funding cuts that have weakened drowning prevention efforts and hotter summers that are driving more people to water to cool off. Together, these trends threaten to deepen long-standing disparities that already place Black, Indigenous, autistic, and low-income communities at greater risk.

Keep ReadingShow less
FDA Sign at its headquarters in Washington DC. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA) is a federal agency of the USA.

The FDA’s changing drug approval policies raise concerns about political influence, scientific standards, drug safety, and the future of U.S. pharmaceutical regulation.

JHVEPhoto/Getty Images

FDA Turmoil: Political Interference Threatens Drug Safety Standards

Over the past three decades, drug development in the United States accelerated dramatically. Industry spending increased tenfold between the 1980s and 2019; the number of manufacturers grew; clinical trials became more sophisticated; and new technologies and precision medicines emerged. The Food and Drug Administration kept pace, building processes, standards, and a scientific culture that supported this rapid innovation. It offered pharmaceutical companies a predictable regulatory environment and a level playing field, producing substantial benefits for consumers and researchers alike.

In little more than a year, however, the Trump administration has upended many of these FDA norms. It has tied certain drug approvals to political considerations through a new, opaque program; imposed labeling changes without new scientific evidence; forced out experienced career scientists; replaced respected experts on advisory panels; and promoted unproven therapies. While some of these moves have drawn limited media attention, most have escaped public notice—even though they threaten national health standards and consumer safety. And legal guardrails may be too weak to prevent or limit their effects.

Keep ReadingShow less