Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

As Detainments Increase, Seattle Dedicates $4M to Legal Defense of Immigrants

News

As Detainments Increase, Seattle Dedicates $4M to Legal Defense of Immigrants

The City of Seattle sits across Elliott Bay as activists march down Alki Beach with protest signs in support of immigrants on Feb. 2, 2025.

Photo: Alex Garland

A $4 million budget increase for the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs (OIRA) will go toward community grants and legal defense for detained immigrants, Mayor Katie Wilson's office announced.

Proposed in September 2025 amid a growing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) presence, nearly half the budget increase will help fund the City's Legal Defense Network (LDN), a program that provides legal representation to those who live, work, or go to school in Seattle during immigration proceedings.


The additional funds will double LDN's annual budget by $1.25 million.

"And yet we also know it's probably just a drop in the ocean bucket," District 2 Councilmember Eddie Lin said in an interview with the Emerald. "I'm just glad to see the money starting to get out the door, given the intense needs there."

In immigration court, defendants do not have the right to have an attorney appointed to them, leaving them to pay for their own or proceed without representation. In Washington State, over half of those appearing in court go unrepresented.

Vanessa Gutierrez at Northwest Immigrant Rights Project says this funding is "desperately needed" as detainments continue to rise.

"The stakes are so high in immigration court, and oftentimes it could be life or death," Gutierrez said. "Not having legal representation is limiting their ability to access due process and be able to get a fair hearing."

The increased funding comes weeks after the Seattle City Council passed an emergency one-year ban on the creation of new ICE detention centers. Most Seattle detainees are held at the Northwest ICE Processing Center in Tacoma, a facility with over 1,500 beds. As of March 10, the detention center was holding 1,016 detainees.

Last year, lawyers who represented LDN served 358 immigrants during removal proceedings, a press release said.

Gutierrez hopes LDN's expansion will "fill in the gaps" for those who have restricted access to legal information. A former federal program known as the Legal Orientation Program provided consultations and intakes to those being held in detention centers. The initiative was shut down in April 2025 by the Trump administration.

With the new funds, OIRA will also offer community grants to aid grassroots organizations responding to federal immigration actions. From neighborhood alert systems to community aid, individual grants will go up to $10,000.

"We have to be prioritizing these basic safety nets," Lin said. "Whether it's things like rental assistance, food banks … we have to make sure we are not cutting these essential services."

OIRA will allocate additional funds in the coming months to immigrant inclusion services cut by federal funding, to community response, and to language-access programs.

As federal policy changes, Gutierrez urges vulnerable communities to know their rights in the case they are approached by a federal agent, have a safety plan in the case of detainment, and have access to important documents.


As Detainments Increase, Seattle Dedicates $4M to Legal Defense of Immigrants was originally published by South Seattle Emerald and is republished with permission.


Read More

​Christa Pike

Christa Pike in an undated photo.

(Tennessee Department of Correction/ZUMA Press/TNS)

How death penalty opponents share the blame for botched executions

“Botched” is a perfectly fine word for golf, cooking, or home repair. It seems inadequate for the taking of a life, even the life of Christa Pike, a heinous murderer.

In 1996, a jury found Pike guilty of the torture and murder of her Jobs Corps classmate, Colleen Slemmer. Pike was sentenced to death. In the 30 years since, her case has gone through at least seven major rounds of appeal and judicial review, including four petitions to the Supreme Court. All were rejected. This doesn’t even include the many more attempts to reopen or reverse her sentence that went nowhere. She is guilty, lawfully and rightly convicted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

President Donald Trump speaks before signing the Secure America Act in the Oval Office of the White House on June 10, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Federal Court Blocks Trump’s ‘Loyalty Question’ on Civil Service Job Applications

A court’s decision to block the Trump administration from including a “loyalty question” on federal job applications was a win not only for the nonpartisan civil service, but also for the communities public employees serve, said one labor leader whose union was among the plaintiffs in the case against the Office of Personnel Management.

Patrick Moran, president of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) union, said Friday that the loyalty questions the OPM placed on job applications for public servants were a “blatantly illegal attempt to hire partisan cronies who would endanger our communities by putting politics before people, rather than dedicated, qualified public service workers.”

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. standard certificate of live birth application form next to flag of USA.

U.S. standard certificate of live birth application form next to flag of USA.

Getty Images

Birthright Citizenship Explained: History, SCOTUS Rulings & Executive Orders

Birthright citizenship has been part of American law for more than 150 years. As the American public continues to see challenges against its constitutionality, brought on by the Trump administration, it is important to remember why.

After the Civil War, Congress adopted the 14th Amendment in 1868 to overturn Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which had denied citizenship to Black Americans, dampening their federal protections. While the 13th amendment had abolished slavery a few years earlier, Free Black Americans were considered noncitizens by many, and thus had to work around a separate set of laws, meaning they could never be fully integrated as members of American society. In response to this issue, the 14th Amendment declares that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to its jurisdiction, are citizens of the United States.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scales of justice
a golden scale with an eagle on top of it

A Real Test for “Lawfare” Must Protect Allies and Enemies Alike

“Lawfare” is becoming a word that ends arguments instead of clarifying them. When Donald Trump or his allies are prosecuted, many on the right call the case political. When the Trump administration investigates critics, many on the left call it retaliation or “score-settling.” Sometimes those accusations are justified. Sometimes they are partisan reflexes. A label that changes with the identity of the defendant is not a rule of law.

The hard cases are not the ones with a public order to punish an enemy. They are cases with mixed facts: a real investigative predicate, a politically active target, disputed timing, later changes in treatment, and no contemporaneous record the public can inspect. Those cases require something better than “trust the prosecutors” or “trust the accused.” They require an auditable standard.

Keep ReadingShow less