Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

As Detainments Increase, Seattle Dedicates $4M to Legal Defense of Immigrants

News

As Detainments Increase, Seattle Dedicates $4M to Legal Defense of Immigrants

The City of Seattle sits across Elliott Bay as activists march down Alki Beach with protest signs in support of immigrants on Feb. 2, 2025.

Photo: Alex Garland

A $4 million budget increase for the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs (OIRA) will go toward community grants and legal defense for detained immigrants, Mayor Katie Wilson's office announced.

Proposed in September 2025 amid a growing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) presence, nearly half the budget increase will help fund the City's Legal Defense Network (LDN), a program that provides legal representation to those who live, work, or go to school in Seattle during immigration proceedings.


The additional funds will double LDN's annual budget by $1.25 million.

"And yet we also know it's probably just a drop in the ocean bucket," District 2 Councilmember Eddie Lin said in an interview with the Emerald. "I'm just glad to see the money starting to get out the door, given the intense needs there."

In immigration court, defendants do not have the right to have an attorney appointed to them, leaving them to pay for their own or proceed without representation. In Washington State, over half of those appearing in court go unrepresented.

Vanessa Gutierrez at Northwest Immigrant Rights Project says this funding is "desperately needed" as detainments continue to rise.

"The stakes are so high in immigration court, and oftentimes it could be life or death," Gutierrez said. "Not having legal representation is limiting their ability to access due process and be able to get a fair hearing."

The increased funding comes weeks after the Seattle City Council passed an emergency one-year ban on the creation of new ICE detention centers. Most Seattle detainees are held at the Northwest ICE Processing Center in Tacoma, a facility with over 1,500 beds. As of March 10, the detention center was holding 1,016 detainees.

Last year, lawyers who represented LDN served 358 immigrants during removal proceedings, a press release said.

Gutierrez hopes LDN's expansion will "fill in the gaps" for those who have restricted access to legal information. A former federal program known as the Legal Orientation Program provided consultations and intakes to those being held in detention centers. The initiative was shut down in April 2025 by the Trump administration.

With the new funds, OIRA will also offer community grants to aid grassroots organizations responding to federal immigration actions. From neighborhood alert systems to community aid, individual grants will go up to $10,000.

"We have to be prioritizing these basic safety nets," Lin said. "Whether it's things like rental assistance, food banks … we have to make sure we are not cutting these essential services."

OIRA will allocate additional funds in the coming months to immigrant inclusion services cut by federal funding, to community response, and to language-access programs.

As federal policy changes, Gutierrez urges vulnerable communities to know their rights in the case they are approached by a federal agent, have a safety plan in the case of detainment, and have access to important documents.


As Detainments Increase, Seattle Dedicates $4M to Legal Defense of Immigrants was originally published by South Seattle Emerald and is republished with permission.


Read More

gavel on top of a US flag
a judge's gavel on top of a flag
Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash

60 Former DOJ Attorneys Oppose California Election Lawsuit

Sixty former Department of Justice attorneys from both Democratic and Republican administrations are urging a federal appeals court to reject the Justice Department's last-minute intervention in California's election. They argue that the intervention violates longstanding department policies designed to prevent election interference. The former officials cite guidelines such as Justice Manual Section 9-85.500, which advises against overt investigative or prosecutorial steps near an election, and the department's non-interference policy, which seeks to avoid actions that could affect election outcomes or integrity.

In an amicus brief filed by the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law and Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP, the former officials argue that DOJ is taking the unusual step of seeking election-related relief just days before the midterm election, contrary to department policies that discourage such actions near Election Day. They say these policies aim to prevent election interference, discourage voter participation, or disrupt election administration. The brief cites United States v. Cohen, 152 F.3d 321 (4th Cir. 1998), where courts recognized the importance of avoiding last-minute changes to election procedures. The amici also cite Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1 (2006), in which the Supreme Court cautioned against altering election rules close to an election, as such changes can cause confusion and undermine public confidence in the electoral process.

Keep ReadingShow less
Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection

DOJ lawsuits in Alaska and California preview post-Election Day fights over certification and seating winners. Here’s how officials and voters can prepare.

Aitor Diago / Getty Images

The Lawsuits Will Lose. The Delays Will Still Win.

Less than two weeks before Election Day, President Trump’s Justice Department asked a federal court to stop Alaska from certifying its U.S. Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses to Democrat Mary Peltola. The lawsuit claims that a second candidate on the ballot, Daniel J. Sullivan, will confuse voters. That argument went nowhere in June, when the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the state had no legal way to remove him from the ballot. Asked about the suit, the president took credit. “I’m the one that said do it,” he told reporters.

Alongside the Alaska suit, the Trump administration sued California to keep the state from counting mail ballots from 20,000 people it calls “likely” noncitizens. Over the summer, the Department of Homeland Security put that number at 190,000. Legal experts expect both suits to fail, as so many suits like them have. Still, Alaska and California give us an early look at what the weeks after November 3rd could bring: recount demands, calls to review or throw out ballots, and pressure to delay seating winners.

Keep ReadingShow less
Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection
The Rule of Law depends on action, not blind optimism. Explore how critical hope, civic engagement, and accountability can strengthen democracy.
Aitor Diago / Getty Images

The Law Was Supposed to Be a Shield. I Found the Bars.

I used to believe that learning the law meant learning the architecture of protection.

I believed statutes existed because someone, somewhere, had anticipated injustice and decided certain lines should never be crossed. I believed due process meant power could not simply declare itself correct. I believed whistleblower protections, grievance procedures, public-records laws, administrative review and courts formed a structure designed to restrain institutional misconduct.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Christa Pike

Christa Pike in an undated photo.

(Tennessee Department of Correction/ZUMA Press/TNS)

How death penalty opponents share the blame for botched executions

“Botched” is a perfectly fine word for golf, cooking, or home repair. It seems inadequate for the taking of a life, even the life of Christa Pike, a heinous murderer.

In 1996, a jury found Pike guilty of the torture and murder of her Jobs Corps classmate, Colleen Slemmer. Pike was sentenced to death. In the 30 years since, her case has gone through at least seven major rounds of appeal and judicial review, including four petitions to the Supreme Court. All were rejected. This doesn’t even include the many more attempts to reopen or reverse her sentence that went nowhere. She is guilty, lawfully and rightly convicted.

Keep ReadingShow less