Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Primaries in Nevada and Georgia switching mostly to mail

Mail-in ballots

Nevada and Georgia are pushing their citizens to vote by mail in the state's upcoming primary elections in order to keep safe from the coronavirus.

George Frey/Getty Images

The coronavirus pandemic continues to drive deliberations in states nationwide about how to conduct elections for the rest of this year and beyond.

In both reliably blue Nevada and relatively red Georgia, election officials on Tuesday decided to make their primaries wide open to voting by mail. Delaware became the latest state to delay its primary, while Wisconsin pressed ahead despite warnings about a shortage of poll workers.


The details of these developments:

Nevada

GOP Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske said all registered voters in the state will receive an absentee ballot well ahead of the June 9 primary. Voters may return it by mail or drop it off at a designated location. Postage will be free.

Cegavske noted that most of the state's poll workers are elderly and thus at a higher risk if they contract the coronavirus. Still, each of the 17 counties in Nevada will have one in-person polling location.

Georgia

All the state's voters will be sent an application to get a no-excuse-required absentee ballot in time to return it by May 19, the new date for the presidential primary but the originally scheduled date for congressional, state legislative, judicial and some local contests.

GOP Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced the move Tuesday, saying it was an attempt to encourage as many people as possible to vote from home and steer clear of polling places. But early voting and Election Day precincts will remain open.

Officials said the mailing will cost about $13 million.

While Georgia allows no-excuse absentee voting, only 7 percent of ballots were cast that way in the 2018 gubernatorial election.

Delaware

Democratic Gov. John Carney signed an executive order Tuesday postponing the presidential primary from April 28 to June 2. Primaries for other offices are scheduled for September.

That brings to five the number of states that have delayed their Democratic nomination contests to the second Tuesday after Memorial Day — making June 2 something of a miniature Super Tuesday, assuming there's still a contest between former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders.

And the Pennsylvania's Legislature is expected to pass a bill in coming days proposing to likewise reschedule from April 28 to June 2. Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf is eager to sign the measure.

The other states to switch are Connecticut, Indiana, Maryland and Rhode Island. New Jersey, Montana, New Mexico, South Dakota and the District of Columbia are already set for that day.

Wisconsin

The next big-state primary remains on track for April 7, Democratic Gov. Tony Evers says, mainly because the ballot includes not only the presidential contest but also races for many local positions that would soon become vacant if the date is changed.

But on Tuesday the top election official in Madison, the second biggest city, said that about half the hired poll workers — 525 of them — have vowed not to show up that day, potentially leaving dozens of polling places unable to open. Clerks statewide are clamoring to hire replacements to make sure there are at least three officials in each place as the law requires. Some have proposed calling in the National Guard to man the voting sites.

Evers on Tuesday encouraged voters to request a ballot online and then vote absentee. Officials said requests were on pace to set a statewide record.


Read More

Diverse People At Voting Booth. Vote Here Elections Sign

A political scientist examines how automatic voter registration is quietly turning non-affiliation into America's largest voting bloc.

AndreyPopov/Getty Images

When Neither Party Is the Default: Rethinking Representation As America’s Electorate Changes

For most of my career as a political scientist, representation was the central theme of my teaching and research. Early on, I studied how legislators understood their responsibilities to constituents — whether they saw themselves as delegates carrying out constituent mandates, trustees exercising independent judgment, or politicos combining both. That work asked a question that still matters: What does it mean to represent the public in a changing democracy?

Today I find myself asking a related question: What happens when the electorate changes but the institutions built to represent it do not?

Keep ReadingShow less
A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

How 9/11’s Memory Continues to Shape American Citizenship

Twenty‑five years after September 11th, the burden of that day continues to affect us in ways that are difficult to express. It was a moment of profound loss, but also one that revealed both the vulnerability and resilience of our national fabric. The memories remain vivid for many of us: where we were, what we felt, and how the world appeared to change in an instant. Even now, a quarter century later, the impact of that morning continues to shape how we understand our country, our responsibilities, and our relationships with one another.

To help us all reflect on that day, I invited four contributors to the Fulcrum to share reflections not to revisit the tragedy, but to commemorate the ways it has persisted in our consciousness twenty-five years later.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

An immigrant's perspective on why America's election debate over security vs. access is a false choice — and how USPS mail ballot rules fit in.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

Ballot Security and Voter Access Are Not Opposites: What the USPS Ballot Rule Gets Right

I came to the United States from India in 1982. In Indian elections, I watched officials check voter identity and mark a voter’s finger with indelible ink. Party representatives observed the process. The system was imperfect, as every large democracy is, but it sent a simple message: casting one vote is a serious civic act, and the process should make that clear.

When I later became an American citizen and cast my first ballot, the experience felt very different. A poll worker found my name on a list and handed me a ballot. In my precinct, there was no photo identification check. I was surprised—not because I expected voting to be difficult, but because I expected a system as consequential as an election to have clear, visible safeguards.

Keep ReadingShow less
A group of people wait in line to get their ballots to vote in the election.

Uncontested elections are more common than you'd think. From open primaries to multi-member districts, here's what states like California and Alaska are doing to bring real competition back to the ballot — and what it'll take to change political culture, too.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

What America Can Do About Its Uncontested Elections

Politics nerds have many ideas about how to strengthen American democracy; however, few directly address silent elections. For example, ranked-choice voting does nothing to encourage more candidates to run if there are not enough. Term limits increase turnover, but even newcomers can frequently run uncontested in general elections if they have won competitive primaries.

Fortunately, the cause isn’t hopeless. For one, tightening campaign finance laws would put potential challengers on more even footing with corporate-backed politicians, encouraging more candidates to run. Independent redistricting would also help. The Cook Political Report, a poll aggregator, considers only 69 of America’s 435 House districts competitive. Fair redistricting means more competitive districts and therefore more contested elections.

Keep ReadingShow less