Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Meet the reformer: Kat Calvin, who wants you to get the right voter ID

Kat Calvin

Kat Calvin founded Spread The Vote to help people get the IDs they need to participate in elections in their states.

Photo courtesy Kat Calvin

A 36-year-old attorney, Kat Calvin founded Spread the Vote after the 2016 election. She said the results that year convinced her that the Supreme Court's striking down of the preclearance requirements under the Voting Rights Act has led to a wave of voter suppression across the country. Her answers have been lightly edited for clarity and length.

What's the tweet-length description of your organization?

Spread The Vote helps people obtain the government-issued photo identification cards required for voting in many states.


Describe your very first civic engagement.

Oh wow, I don't know! I do remember getting out of school in probably the fifth grade to vote for Bill Clinton with my mom.

What was your biggest professional triumph?

Discovering that I had built a team of incredible people who believed in each other and our mission enough to stick together through the hard times.

And your most disappointing setback?

Learning that no matter how hard you work, when you run a nonprofit you just cannot control when the money does and does not come in.

How does your identity influence the way you go about your work?

I'm a black woman. Black women are a high percentage of people living without IDs in this country and we face much bigger barriers to both obtaining those IDs and rebuilding our lives after we get them. I try to be conscious of the fact that it looks very different when a white man gets an ID and wants to get a job and start over and when a black woman gets an ID and wants to get a job and start over. She will always face 20 more layers of challenges than he will, and we have to think about how that affects the kind of services and opportunities we can both provide and find for our clients.

It's also much, much more difficult to raise money as a black woman and I have to live with donors and potential donors who sometimes say very racist and sexist things to me. There's a lot of grinning and bearing it and remembering why I'm here, and going home to drink bourbon and go for very long runs to calm down.

What's the best advice you've ever been given?

My mother always reminded me of Marian Anderson and said that if they're not listening you find higher ground and shout until they have to hear you.

Create a new flavor for Ben & Jerry's.

Jurassic Bark: chocolate ice cream with Oreo crumbles and peanut brittle in the shape of dinosaurs.

West Wing or Veep?

West Wing

What's the last thing you do on your phone at night?

Make sure I haven't missed any bonkers news or the apocalypse or something.

What is your deepest, darkest secret?

I don't know how much of a secret this is but I am a sucker for anything about serial killers — books, podcasts, movies, socks. I don't care. I'm in.


Read More

People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less