Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

I Ran as a Democrat in a Red State. Here’s What I Learned

Opinion

election, people voting
A South Dakota Democrat reflects on running in a deep-red state and explains how Democrats can reconnect with rural, working-class voters.
Brett Deering/Getty Images

South Dakota is a state rich in natural beauty and resources. From the granite peaks of the Black Hills to windswept prairies that stretch for miles, there is nowhere quite like home for me.

Every fall, hunters arrive to pursue the Chinese Ring-Necked Pheasant, our state bird. In days past, a different kind of hunter also frequented our state: political strategists in pursuit of votes for storied South Dakota Democrats like George McGovern and Tom Daschle.


That era feels distant now. But it isn’t. As recently as 2010, Democrats held five of the Dakotas’ six Congressional seats. Today, we hold none.

It can be challenging to be a tiny blue dot in a ruby-red state that you love. I ran for state senate in 2024, the same year Donald Trump received a record vote share here. Though I connected with voters and outperformed the national ticket, I still lost. But my experience in a deep-red state gave me perspective on how Democrats can compete again in states like South Dakota.

Democrats’ recent electoral victories show that they can win by engaging voters on their own terms; the same is true in red states. Here are my thoughts on why many South Dakotans feel unrepresented by Democrats and what to do about it.

1. We Are Not Just “Flyover Country”

First, Democrats must address the “flyover country” problem: the perception among many South Dakotans that coastal elites see them as unimportant. It's frustrating to hear Democrats described as “elitist” or “out of touch” because most local Democrats are down-to-Earth and familiar with our state’s problems. Still, there’s no denying Democrats have an image problem.

Red-state Democrats must combat that perception by advertising their local roots. National news about D.C. infighting and political sermons by Hollywood celebrities rarely resonate here. Our cultural touchstones are more likely found in South Dakota Magazine or by walking down Main Street during the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally.

South Dakotans want to feel respected and heard. To meet—and exceed—that expectation, we need to show our connection to these cultural touchstones.

2. Red-State Voters Are Not a Monolith

Second, Democrats must stop treating red-state Americans as a monolith. This view ignores vast cultural diversity. In South Dakota, for example, our large Native American population creates a distinct political dynamic.

To win, Democrats must see this diversity as an opportunity. By speaking to Native issues, rural economic anxieties, and small-town cultural pride, Democrats will find that “red state” doesn’t mean “lost cause.”

3. Meet Red-State Americans Where They Are On Crime And Immigration

Third, we cannot dismiss concerns about crime and immigration as right-wing talking points: they are real issues for many voters. When Democrats ignore these fears, they cede the conversation to Republicans. Acknowledging these concerns is the first step to rebuilding trust. We must offer practical solutions for community safety and border security that uphold our values and the rule of law.

4. Focus on Working- And Middle-Class Economic Priorities

Finally, Democrats must reclaim their status as the party of the working and middle classes.

The Democrats’ decline in the Dakotas reflects a national trend, culminating in the recent loss of Montana's last statewide-elected Democrat. These defeats occurred despite growing national diversity, which, on paper, should favor Democrats.

The problem is that the Democrats, once the champions of the working class, are now widely viewed as the party of corporate elites. Many red-state Americans see them as consumed with cultural battles rather than kitchen-table economic concerns.

I fell victim to this myself. In my race, I doubled down on abortion after a pro-choice amendment made the ballot. It didn't work. I failed to understand that a message centered on affordability would have been more effective. For example, many voters I spoke with cared deeply about expanding free school lunch programs. One said he’d rather see money go to that than the “$5 million for [Kristi] Noem’s ads” (referring to ads by our former governor “promoting” South Dakota jobs).

My experience reflects a larger challenge. To build a national coalition, the Democrats must prove their policies can help all Americans. Voters are hungry for someone who understands their lives and will deliver real solutions. That’s the kind of opening Democrats should seize.

Conclusion

I didn’t win, but I came away convinced that Democrats can compete here again. A small investment in passionate candidates can have an outsized impact in overlooked states like South Dakota. Don’t just fly over us: stop here, talk to us, and see we are worth fighting for.

Clay Hoffman is a South Dakota native who is passionate about improving his community and making South Dakota affordable for everyone. He ran for state senate in 2024, has prior experience in public service and the nonprofit sector, and currently works as a Development Director for the Boys & Girls Club of the Sioux Empire.


Read More

People joined hand in hand.

A Star Trek allegory reveals how outrage culture, media incentives, and political polarization feed on our anger—and who benefits when we keep fighting.

Getty Images//Stock Photo

What Star Trek Understood About Division—and Why We Keep Falling for It

The more divided we become, the more absurd it all starts to look.

Not because the problems aren’t real—they are—but because the patterns are. The outrage cycles. The villains rotate. The language escalates. And yet the outcomes remain stubbornly the same: more anger, less trust, and very little that resembles progress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sheet music in front of an American flag

An exploration of American patriotic songs and how their ideals of liberty, dignity, and belonging clash with today’s ICE immigration policies.

merrymoonmary/Getty Images

Patriotic Songs Reveal the America ICE Is Betraying

For over two hundred years, Americans have used songs to express who we are and who we want to be. Before political parties became so divided and before social media made arguments public, our national identity grew from songs sung in schools, ballparks, churches, and public spaces.

Our patriotic songs are more than just music. They describe a country built on dignity, equality, and belonging. Today, as ICE enforces harsh and fearful policies, these songs remind us how far we have moved from the nation we say we are.

Keep ReadingShow less
Varying speech bubbles.​ Dialogue. Conversations.
Examining the 2025 episodes that challenged democratic institutions and highlighted the stakes for truth, accountability, and responsible public leadership.
Getty Images, DrAfter123

At Long Last...We Must Begin.

As much as I wish this were an article announcing the ninth episode we all deserve of Stranger Things, it’s not.

A week ago, this was a story about a twelve-minute Uber ride with a Trump-loving driver on a crisp Saturday morning in Nashville, TN. It was a good story. It made a neat point: if this conversation can happen here, it can happen anywhere.

Keep ReadingShow less
Building a Stronger “We”: How to Talk About Immigrant Youth

Person standing next to a "We Are The Future" sign

Photo provided

Building a Stronger “We”: How to Talk About Immigrant Youth

The speed and severity with which the Trump administration has enacted anti-immigrant policies have surpassed many of our expectations. It’s created upheaval not just among immigrant communities but across our society. This upheaval is not incidental; it is part of a deliberate and consistent strategy to activate anti-immigrant sentiment and deeply entrenched, xenophobic Us vs. Them mindsets. With everything from rhetoric to policy decisions, the Trump administration has employed messaging aimed at marking immigrants as “dangerously other,” fueling division, harmful policies, and the deployment of ICE in our communities.

For those working to support immigrant adolescents and youth, the challenges are compounded by another pervasive mindset: the tendency to view adolescents as inherently “other.” FrameWorks Institute’s past research has shown that Americans often perceive adolescents as wild, out of control, or fundamentally different from adults. This lens of otherness, when combined with anti-immigrant sentiment, creates a double burden for immigrant youth, painting them as doubly removed from societal norms and belonging.

Keep ReadingShow less