Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Faith: Is There a Role to Play in Bringing Compromise?

Opinion

Faith: Is There a Role to Play in Bringing Compromise?
man holding his hands on open book
Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

Congress may open with prayer, but it is not a religious body. Yet religion is something that moves so very many, inescapably impacting Congress. Perhaps our attempts to increase civility and boost the best in our democracy should not neglect the role of faith in our lives. Perhaps we can even have faith play a role in uniting us.

Philia, in the sense of “brotherly love,” is one of the loves that is part of the great Christian tradition. Should not this mean Christians should love our political opponents – enough to create a functioning democracy? Then there is Paul’s letter to the Philippians: “Let your reasonableness be known to everyone.” And Paul’s letter to the Galatians: “For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another.” The flesh could be seen as a politics of ego, or holding grudges, or hating opponents, or lying, or even setting up straw men to knock down; serving one another in the context of a legislative body means working with each other to get to “yes” on how best to help others.


Getting to “yes” in today’s political environment in Congress has been difficult. Yet it has happened with bipartisan majorities passing legislation. Last session, with a slight margin for Democrats in the Senate and a slight majority for Republicans in the House, the numbers necessitating some coming together, an omnibus appropriations bill passed by a bipartisan majority kept the government open. A foreign aid bill passed by a bipartisan majority funded Ukraine in the war of naked aggression by Russia, Israel in its right to exist, Gaza's humanitarian aid, and Taiwan as it faces a China that believes it is part of China. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was extended by a bipartisan majority for two more years, making sure that the United States continues to have authority to monitor foreign terrorists, but also under continual oversight much greater than before FISA was enacted at all.

Is there a Christian position on any of this, yes or no? I would say a qualified “no.” I do not doubt the faith of anyone who comes to contrary positions that I believe in. Yet I do think there is room in today’s politics for more brotherly love, reasonableness as a virtue, and exercising our freedom such as to “serve one another.” Perhaps we can go beyond numbers as the only reason for bridging differences; perhaps a kind and still voice can play a role, too.

Throughout my career in public service, I have engaged with the Religious Right and the lesser-known Religious Left. Both are actually very strong in their own ways. What seems to be missing is a Religious Center. This center could be Center-Right or Center-Left. For me, what I want is a religious movement willing to try to get to “yes” on every issue – so long as the end position is reasonable. This does not mean capitulating to everything. Just that “no” is not the only position.

I think of the organization Bread for the World when I worked in the US House of Representatives during the George W. Bush administration. People of faith showed up in our office with a stack of letters and “asks” that both Republicans and Democrats could support. One was the funding of Millennium Challenge Accounts, a competitive program that awards funds to developing nations that govern justly, invest in people, and promote economic freedom. Another was the funding of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). President Bush had called for the creation of these programs, and Democrats agreed.

A religious coalition of the Center-Left and Center-Right on select issues could do tremendous good for our country. Imagine more respectful dialogue and good compromises. The religious coalition would not appeal solely to a party’s base. Only to love of all (Democrat or Republican), reasonableness for all (Republican or Democrat), or serving each other (Republican and Democrat). I can imagine what this looks like – and maybe you can too. I hope what we see is less a country torn apart and more a country of the best in leadership.

Scott Miller is a graduate of Widener School of Law, a former chief of staff in Congress, and the author of 'Christianity & Your Neighbor's Liberty.


Read More

Our Conservative and Liberal Union
An american flag flying high in the sky
Photo by chris robert on Unsplash

Our Conservative and Liberal Union

How are Americans supposed to make a more perfect union when we can’t agree on whether we need to turn our cultural clocks forward or backward?

This question is among the more difficult that people can pose to their fellow countrymen. Not just because it has no obvious or easily agreed upon answer, but because it’s more likely to be asked during contentious times, like the one we are in today.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Anthem and the Civic Thread That Still Holds America Together

Baseball players place their caps over their hearts during the playing of the national anthem. Tacoma, Washington, USA.

Getty Images

The Anthem and the Civic Thread That Still Holds America Together

Each year, from the first buds of spring to the turning of autumn leaves, America is captivated by baseball. From Major League parks to Little League fields, from minor league stadiums to collegiate summer diamonds, the game transcends geography, generation, and ideology. Fans gather to watch today's stars and tomorrow's prospects, united by America's pastime.

Change has been abundant in the century since America celebrated its 150th birthday. Yet, as Field of Dreams reminds us, "There has been one constant throughout the years… baseball." Accompanying that constant is a nearly century-old civic ritual, forged in moments of national challenge and renewed before nearly every first pitch: the singing of the National Anthem.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two unrecognizable persons holding each other's hands

Political polarization changes relationships in profound ways. Explore the psychology of contempt, fear, extremism, and how to reconnect with loved ones.

Yana Iskayeva/Getty Images

The Permission Slip

There is a particular grief in hearing someone you love speak with contempt, different from anger or disagreement because it turns people into categories and places them beneath regard.

I felt it recently when a friend blamed immigrants for the country’s supposed decline. The bluntness shocked me, but the familiarity disturbed me more.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people sitting next to each other as one person works with clay.

Global civic education helps students build trust, navigate ambiguity, and work across differences. Research shows it can strengthen civic leadership and reduce polarization.

Photo Courtesy of Tilting Futures

Why Fixing Polarization Requires Students to Cross Borders

I've been running global civic education programs for twelve years, and I keep seeing the same pattern: college-age students arrive believing they know how the world works and that their perspective is fact. Months later, after sustained global engagement, they return home fundamentally different, with their walls down and having gained a visceral understanding that their perspective is just that: a perspective, not the truth.

There's a reason this transformation matters so much at this age. This is the moment when mental models solidify into frameworks about how the world works, about who deserves trust, and about what's possible across difference. But without exposure to people and cultures that have alternative perspectives, those frameworks harden into us-versus-them certainties rather than nurture curiosity, further entrenching the polarization that is fracturing our country. Too often this polarization is framed as a knowledge problem rather than a moral perception problem.

Keep ReadingShow less