Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Building a Stronger “We”: How to Talk About Immigrant Youth

News

Building a Stronger “We”: How to Talk About Immigrant Youth

Person standing next to a "We Are The Future" sign

Photo provided

The speed and severity with which the Trump administration has enacted anti-immigrant policies have surpassed many of our expectations. It’s created upheaval not just among immigrant communities but across our society. This upheaval is not incidental; it is part of a deliberate and consistent strategy to activate anti-immigrant sentiment and deeply entrenched, xenophobic Us vs. Them mindsets. With everything from rhetoric to policy decisions, the Trump administration has employed messaging aimed at marking immigrants as “dangerously other,” fueling division, harmful policies, and the deployment of ICE in our communities.

For those working to support immigrant adolescents and youth, the challenges are compounded by another pervasive mindset: the tendency to view adolescents as inherently “other.” FrameWorks Institute’s past research has shown that Americans often perceive adolescents as wild, out of control, or fundamentally different from adults. This lens of otherness, when combined with anti-immigrant sentiment, creates a double burden for immigrant youth, painting them as doubly removed from societal norms and belonging.


It is easy to feel overwhelmed and disheartened by these ongoing attacks. Communicating about immigrant youth has always been challenging, but the stakes today require more than routine messaging. They demand a shared framing strategy, one that pushes back against dangerous rhetoric and policies today while building support for immigrant youth over the long term. We have proven tools to change how the public understands immigrant youth, and those tools work best when we use them consistently and together, now and in the future.

Here’s the strategy:

  1. Appeal to our shared humanity.
    Lead with the idea that we all value human dignity and that supporting immigrant youth is an essential expression of that shared humanity. Start with this idea before discussing human rights.
  2. Link immigrant youth’s wellbeing to our collective wellbeing.
    Make clear connections between their wellbeing and the wellbeing of our communities and our society. Explain how we all benefit – now and in the future – when immigrant youth have what they need to thrive.
  3. Spotlight healthy adolescent development.
    Talk about adolescence as a critical period of opportunity and growth for immigrant youth. Draw on the well-framed elements of the Core Story of Adolescence to demonstrate what immigrant youth need to thrive and how we can support them.
  4. Pivot to humane, pragmatic solutions.
    When encountering opposition, shift toward practical, achievable, nonpunitive policies that benefit everyone. Describe solutions in concise, concrete, and collective ways.
  5. Move from crisis stories to policy stories.
    The current immigration situation is a crisis, but crisis framing can backfire. Rather than build sustained momentum, crisis messaging can lead to fatalism and fatigue. Instead, illustrate the urgency of this issue by contrasting humane and pragmatic immigration policies with the current punitive policies that negatively impact immigrant youths’ development. Counter fatalistic thinking by explaining how policies that provide pathways to legal status, protect families from separation, and allow access to health care, education, and social services support immigrant youth’s development and wellbeing.
  6. Center lived expertise.
    Build understanding and drive support for policy change through storytelling that highlights how young people’s experiences as immigrants have cultivated deep expertise and unique insights into the immigration system and the moment at hand.
  7. Explain how harmful policies affect all immigrant youth.
    Avoid the “worthiness trap” by clearly explaining the role of harmful policies for all immigrant youth, regardless of status or circumstances, then discuss effects for particular subsets of young people.
  8. Frame your data.
    Contextualize data with explanations and solutions. Instead of merely showing data, explain what it conveys, what solutions it calls for, and why we should care.

Building a Stronger “We”: How to Talk About Immigrant Youth was first published on FrameWorks and was republished with permission.


Read More

A Tonal Shift in American Clergy
people inside room
Photo by Pedro Lima on Unsplash

A Tonal Shift in American Clergy

I. From Statements to Bodies

When a New Hampshire bishop urged his clergy to "get their affairs in order" and prepare their bodies—not just their voices—for public witness, the language landed with unusual force. Martyrdom■adjacent rhetoric is rare in contemporary American clergy discourse, and its emergence signals a tonal shift with civic implications. The question is not only why this language surfaced now, but why it stands out so sharply against the responses of other religious traditions facing the same events.

Keep ReadingShow less
Faith: Is There a Role to Play in Bringing Compromise?
man holding his hands on open book
Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

Faith: Is There a Role to Play in Bringing Compromise?

Congress may open with prayer, but it is not a religious body. Yet religion is something that moves so very many, inescapably impacting Congress. Perhaps our attempts to increase civility and boost the best in our democracy should not neglect the role of faith in our lives. Perhaps we can even have faith play a role in uniting us.

Philia, in the sense of “brotherly love,” is one of the loves that is part of the great Christian tradition. Should not this mean Christians should love our political opponents – enough to create a functioning democracy? Then there is Paul’s letter to the Philippians: “Let your reasonableness be known to everyone.” And Paul’s letter to the Galatians: “For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another.” The flesh could be seen as a politics of ego, or holding grudges, or hating opponents, or lying, or even setting up straw men to knock down; serving one another in the context of a legislative body means working with each other to get to “yes” on how best to help others.

Keep ReadingShow less
People joined hand in hand.

A Star Trek allegory reveals how outrage culture, media incentives, and political polarization feed on our anger—and who benefits when we keep fighting.

Getty Images//Stock Photo

What Star Trek Understood About Division—and Why We Keep Falling for It

The more divided we become, the more absurd it all starts to look.

Not because the problems aren’t real—they are—but because the patterns are. The outrage cycles. The villains rotate. The language escalates. And yet the outcomes remain stubbornly the same: more anger, less trust, and very little that resembles progress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sheet music in front of an American flag

An exploration of American patriotic songs and how their ideals of liberty, dignity, and belonging clash with today’s ICE immigration policies.

merrymoonmary/Getty Images

Patriotic Songs Reveal the America ICE Is Betraying

For over two hundred years, Americans have used songs to express who we are and who we want to be. Before political parties became so divided and before social media made arguments public, our national identity grew from songs sung in schools, ballparks, churches, and public spaces.

Our patriotic songs are more than just music. They describe a country built on dignity, equality, and belonging. Today, as ICE enforces harsh and fearful policies, these songs remind us how far we have moved from the nation we say we are.

Keep ReadingShow less